Leading academics call on Labour to overturn Palestine Action ban
Expressing support for the group, banned in an unprecedented move by the Home Secretary earlier this year, can result in a prison sentence of up to 14 years.
Signatories to the letter, published in The Guardian, include Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, the writer Tariq Ali, novelist China Mieville. Two representatives of Scottish universities are also included: Rahul Rao, of St Andrews and Emilios Christodoulidis of Glasgow.
READ MORE: John Swinney to consider imposing state boycott on Israel
The letter said: 'As scholars dedicated to questions of justice and ethics we believe that Yvette Cooper's recent proscription of Palestine Action represents an attack both on the entire pro-Palestine movement and on fundamental freedoms of expression, association, assembly and protest.'
It added: 'As hundreds of people again risk arrest by joining street protests on August 9 and as students and teachers prepare for the start of another turbulent academic year, we express our full solidarity with those mobilising on their campuses or in their workplaces and communities to put an immediate stop to the escalating genocide and to end all UK complicity with Israel's crimes.'
More than 500 people have pledged to protest in support of Palestine Action outside the Houses of Parliament in Westminster this weekend. The Metropolitan Police said it was prepared to make mass arrests.
Palestine Action was banned after activists caused an estimated £7 million worth of damage to planes at the RAF Brize Norton military base.
READ MORE: Yvette Cooper under pressure to grant UK visas for 80 Palestinian students
Co-founder Huda Ammori is attempting to overturn the ban through the courts and this week accused Home Secretary Yvette Cooper of making 'false allegations' against the group.
It comes after 300 Jewish public figures, including director Mike Leigh and author Michael Rosen, wrote to the Prime Minister protesting the ban.
The letter, by the human rights lawyer Geoffrey Bindman KC and the playwright Gillian Slovo, accused the Government of 'hand-wringing over the level of slaughter and suffering in Gaza and the West Bank' and of offering 'tacit support' for Israel's actions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Two arrested after water pistol attack on Orthodox Jews
Two men have been arrested after a video of Jewish people being sprayed with water pistols in Greater Manchester went viral. The suspects, two men aged 26 and 36, were arrested on Thursday in Farnworth, Bolton, and are being questioned on suspicion of racially aggravated common assault. Greater Manchester Police said it was made aware of the video being shared online, showing two men in a car, laughing and joking as they sprayed liquid from water pistols at traditionally-dressed, Jewish pedestrians, including children. It was soundtracked with Hava Nagila, a folk song traditionally sung at Jewish celebrations. As part of the investigation, officers have seized a vehicle believed to be the one seen in the footage, along with a water pistol suspected to have been used during the incident. Chief Inspector Simon Ashcroft, of GMP's Salford district, said: 'We are treating this incident with the utmost seriousness and have acted swiftly to make arrests." "GMP has a zero-tolerance approach to hate crime in any form, and we are committed to ensuring our communities feel safe and supported." "We continue to work closely with our partners to provide reassurance and encourage anyone affected to come forward." "We are also aware from other footage that there may be further victims, and we urge anyone who believes they have been targeted to contact GMP or the Community Security Trust (CST).' The CST, a charity which looks after security for British Jews, said in a statement on X, formerly Twitter: 'Following on from the appalling antisemitic videos, which were widely shared yesterday, two males have been arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated common assault." 'CST would like to thank @GMPolice for their support and swift action in this case.'
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Victim shock after twisted Scots rapists' rights group targets brave survivors calling them attention seekers
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A VILE rapists' rights group has been slammed for targeting sexual assault victims. Members of Justice for Innocent Men Scotland made the twisted claim that female survivors of beasts' abuse use their ordeal to find 'fame' or 'make money'. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Ellie Wilson is disgusted by the actions of JIMS. Credit: BBC 4 The campaigner has been labelled an attention seeker. 4 Marzenka, a member of JIMS, has stood by sex beast partner John Sturgeon. 4 Pam Gosal was furious after learning of JIMS. Credit: Tom Farmer Among their conspiracies are that convicted sexual abusers are victims of miscarriages of justice while men are being locked up to break up families and 'decrease the birth rate'. Rape survivor Ellie Wilson, 27, told how she has been labelled an attention seeker by the activists on social media. She hit out: 'They are a rapist rights group. They claim they're fighting for innocent men but there are no criteria for which men they support. "They blanketly don't accept courts' rulings and will never accept a man's guilt if he's tried under the Scottish courts under our current laws. 'It's so harmful to people that have shown such bravery.' We told how her ex-partner Daniel McFarlane raped her twice in 2017 and 2018 while both were students at Glasgow University. The fiend, of Inverness, was caged for five years in 2022. Ellie bravely waived her right to anonymity to push for change in the justice system. One online post attacking her reads: 'It is troubling to see how, for some, being a victim has become a commodity. 'A way to gain fame or make money, rather than a painful experience that demands respect and a fair process.' I was raped by my 'best friend' – after his sinister messages I made bold plan to take him down Ellie hit back: 'They suggested I'm some sort of spy for counter-terrorism police that seduced my rapist and then got him convicted. Clearly they're not backing down.' The group have focused on parts of the Criminal Procedure Act that protect victims from intrusive questioning — claiming crucial evidence is being blocked leading to wrongful convictions. But Ellie said: 'Things like Section 274 and 275 were put in place to protect victims from being asked irrelevant questions. 'It shouldn't be about what victims were wearing or how many people they've had sex with.' Marzenka Pe is one of the most prominent members and her social media pages feature loved-up pics with her partner John Sturgeon, 42, who was sentenced to eight years in prison after being convicted by a jury at the High Court in Glasgow in June of raping two women. One group member said: 'I feel like we're going back to George Orwell 1984. They're pitting women against men. 'When you do that you break down the family unit. They're trying to control the population by decreasing the birth rate.' Tory MSP Pam Gosal, who has tabled laws to introduce a register of convicted domestic abusers, slammed the group. She said: 'Conviction rates for rape are extremely low and many abusers are never held to account.' Rape Crisis Scotland chief executive Sandy Brindley told how survivors face cases knowing the chances of justice are slim. She said: "Less than a quarter of rape trials with a single complainer ends with a conviction. "Rape is one of the most under-reported crimes and continues to have the lowest conviction rate of any crime type in Scotland.' JIMS told The Scottish Sun they are 'a grassroots campaign group' of partners, relatives and supporters of 'wrongfully convicted' men. And a spokesman insisted they 'do not condone harassment of any kind' adding: 'No one from JIMS has ever harassed anyone. 'But supporting victims should never come at the cost of silencing those wrongfully convicted.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
We're witnessing the slow extinction of the human race
'When the facts change', economist JM Keynes is supposed to have said to a critic, 'I change my mind. What do you do, sir?' In a vast swathe of countries, there are more deaths each year than births. Across the world, annual population growth has dropped from more than 2 per cent 60 years ago to less than 1 per cent and falling. Populations are ageing and shrinking with calamitous ramifications for economic dynamism and for the viability of welfare states. The facts have certainly changed, but contra Keynes, opinion – never mind action – is lagging well behind. Only slowly is humanity waking up to the possibility of a future in which history comes to an end, not in the kind of liberal utopia imagined by political theorist Francis Fukuyama, nor in the bang of the nuclear apocalypse feared during the Cold War, but in the whimper of the last person turning off the lights. Somewhere, some group or other with a pro-natal urge is likely to keep humanity going. But if the examples of the worst performing societies in East Asia are replicated – where a hundred parents make 33 children who make 11 grandchildren – the end of the human race altogether is not impossible. In the UK, where fertility rates have been below replacement level for more than half a century, feeble demography lies at the root of many if not most of the country's woes. Britain's increasingly upside-down population pyramid means society is less creative, productive and entrepreneurial, suffering from stultifying economic growth and placing ever greater burdens on the state. But ministers have been cautious even to comment on the matter. Keir Starmer was one of the first frontline politicians to have anything to say about the birth rate and the best he could muster amounted to little more than 'nothing to do with me'. Although many governments are uneager to dip their toes into controversial and turbulent demographic waters, it is nevertheless incumbent on those of us who understand the issue to think about what policies might be adopted so that when, one day, the authorities in countries like the UK wake up to the population emergency (as they already have in many other places, from China to France) they have an idea of what to do about it. Unlike hiking up interest rates to clamp down on inflation, this is not an easy matter. The mechanisms required to e ncourage people to have more children are not obvious and the remedies will not feed through into the workforce for the best part of 20 years. But the fact that it is difficult should not be a counsel of despair or inaction. The first reaction of many identifying a problem is to demand the government throw money at it. But as we know, many governments have precious little money to throw at anything. So, as my fellow author Philip Pilkington and I will argue in a forthcoming book on demography and economics, the whole way that government spends money, the whole of the welfare state, will need to be redesigned around the family, encouraging, incentivising and nurturing the formation of the unit within which children can be born and flourish. And the tax system should be redesigned around it, too. Those bearing the costs of producing a future cohort of workers are effectively bearing the costs of the existence of a future economy. Without children today, there will be no workers or taxpayers when today's cohort of the economically active age and retire. Reorienting the state, nation and economy towards families and childbearing – that is, towards the state, nation and economy having any kind of future – will take multiple forms. Childcare will need to be made more available and affordable. Planning restrictions which prevent the widespread creation of housing suitable for families will have to be smashed. Un-means-tested benefits for the elderly will need to be amended. The tax and benefits system penalising those who want to have children will require a complete overhaul. But however important it is for governments to start acknowledging the problem of too few births and doing something about it, economic incentives alone will not fix this problem. There is evidence that a suitable tax system stimulates family formation, that affordable childcare encourages working mothers to have more children, and that baby bonuses do indeed stimulate childbearing. But the effects are modest. In the UK, plenty of young people today say that they cannot afford to have children, and with housing out of the reach of many, nurseries wildly expensive by international comparisons, and the tax burden on young families indefensible, they deserve our sympathy and assistance. But in parts of the UK where housing is relatively cheap, the birth rate is not noticeably higher than where it is expensive. In countries where childcare is highly subsidised (Germany, the Baltic States), the problem has not improved. Recent data from the US shows that, while the better-off still have more children than middle-earners, the drop-off in arrivals on the maternity wards is affecting even the wealthiest. What is required, above and beyond any changes to tax and spend, is a cultural revolution which transforms coupling-up and having children from a distant aspiration to an urgent priority. Films and novels, internet influencers and education should orient around this goal. So many influences from the cultural sphere today are negative. Sex education focuses on prevention and disease rather than positively encouraging planned pregnancy. Instagram accounts are more focused on kittens than kids. Changing the culture is even harder than changing the material incentive structure, but it is the only way we stand a realistic chance of returning to a world in which the average couple having an average of two or three children is the norm. It is the only alternative to a terminal decline and a long farewell.
