Gwadar still has no water and power
Listen to article
Ten years after launching the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and holding 78 progress review meetings, it again emerged on Tuesday that the jewel of the multibillion-dollar initiative, Gwadar, could not shine because it neither has sufficient clean water nor indigenous electricity.
The 78th CPEC progress review meeting was not different from dozens of such meetings held in the past where aggressiveness was shown over the lack of progress and new deadlines were set to fulfil obligations under President Xi Jinping's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
Federal Minister for Planning Ahsan Iqbal chaired the review meeting on CPEC. He expressed dissatisfaction over delay in ensuring national grid connectivity for Gwadar and directed the Quetta Electric Supply Company (Qesco) and the Power Division to submit an updated progress report within five working days, according to a statement issued by the Ministry of Planning after the meeting.
In the last review meeting held about two months ago in January, Ahsan Iqbal had sought a compliance report within one week to connect Gwadar and its free zone with the national electricity grid.
The city, having strategic importance in the CPEC framework, is energised by importing electricity from Iran.
Pakistan has surplus electricity and pays over Rs2.1 trillion in idle capacity charges to power producers by collecting Rs18 per unit from consumers. But it does not have the right set of policies for electricity supply through laying transmission lines.
In the last meeting, Iqbal had also instructed Qesco and the Power Division to coordinate with the Gwadar Port Authority and Pakistan Navy for immediate provision of electricity and the energisation of Gwadar Port and South Free Zone. The minister directed in January that the outstanding issues should be addressed and resolved subsequently. He also sought an updated progress report within five working days on the status of power supply to Gwadar from the national grid, according to the ministry.
The Power Division apprised the meeting that the Cabinet Committee on Energy, in its recent huddle, had approved a new policy for the provision of bulk electricity to the Special Economic Zones (SEZs) at a single point through an operation and maintenance contract between the respective developer of SEZs and power distribution companies (DISCOs).
The planning minister emphasised that the new policy should incorporate all zones including the SEZs, Export Processing Zones (EPZs) and Gwadar Free Zones. But his instructions were ignored.
The planning ministry stated on Tuesday that Ahsan Iqbal voiced deep concern over the non-operationalisation of a desalination plant in Gwadar and emphasised the urgent need for supply of clean drinking water.
He directed that immediate action should be taken within the week to resolve the issue, said the ministry.
China had provided equipment and demonstration stations from May to December last year for the provision of electricity and clean drinking water. The meeting was told that 10,000 solar panels were delivered in May 2024, followed by another 5,000 in September, under a grant-in-aid programme.
Furthermore, drinking water supply equipment, including 150 water filtration plants and 10 tube well solarisation units, arrived in August 2024. However, their distribution and installation were yet to be carried out, the meeting was told.
Expressing serious concern, Ahsan Iqbal directed the Ministry of Food to formulate a comprehensive plan within three days for efficient distribution of the equipment provided by China. He told the ministry to convene a meeting with all provinces and submit a formal plan within two days on how those machines would be used.
Pakistan had earlier proposed the utilisation of Gwadar Port as a transshipment facility but it was not able to provide basic facilities.
CPEC progressed smoothly till the seventh Joint Cooperation Committee (JCC) meeting and after that six more meetings have been held since 2017 but no breakthrough could be made.
The planning ministry stated on Tuesday that the meeting reviewed preparations for the upcoming 14th JCC meeting, with China confirming its support for holding the session in July 2025. All working group meetings have been scheduled for March and April to ensure comprehensive preparations.
Ahsan Iqbal directed that meetings of all working groups, particularly the working groups on safety & security and science & technology, should be scheduled at least one month prior to the JCC meeting. Furthermore, he stressed that the Pakistani mission in Beijing should actively follow up with the Chinese side to ensure that the meetings were arranged in accordance with the agreed calendar.
The minister told Pakistan's diplomatic mission in Beijing and the Economic Affairs Division to engage with the Chinese authorities to finalise a date for the visit of technical and financial experts to Pakistan.
A representative of the Ministry of Railways said that the Joint Technical and Financial Working Group meeting was held on January 16, 2025, during which both sides discussed the technical and financial aspects of the Karachi-Hyderabad section of Main Line-1 (ML-I) project.
Moreover, the Chinese side conveyed that they were in the process of finalising the composition of the Technical and Financial Working Group, which would visit Pakistan soon to resolve all pending issues related to the Karachi-Hyderabad section.
Iqbal directed the mission in Beijing and the Economic Affairs Division to follow up with the Chinese side to ensure the early visit of the working group on the second phase of CPEC, which focuses on green corridor developments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
China's angry rebuttal to Trump's tariff Tsunami
My reading of China has always been of a country that is sagacious, forgiving and accommodating—an entity flowing naturally through history, shaped by the burden and blessing of over 5,000 years of civilizational legacy. China has long carried the unique distinction of never being an occupying force in the historical sense, never driven by the imperial ambition to rule the world. Despite holding immense power at different junctures in history, China refrained from conquest. Its Great Wall was built not as a launchpad for outward domination, but as a safeguard for inward integration. This tradition of strategic restraint and internal focus has morphed into the philosophical foundation of President Xi Jinping's economic and diplomatic agenda in the 21st century. China's foreign policy, even amid rising global tensions, has maintained its emphasis on win-win cooperation, mutual growth, and infrastructural diplomacy. It does not promote regime change, nor does it meddle in the internal politics of other nations. China's strength lies in its ability to uplift weaker economies through massive infrastructure projects, energy support, port development, and institutional capacity-building. These efforts are not intended to dominate but to elevate. That is the spirit of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), offering struggling nations an alternative model of growth without conditionalities that mirror neo-colonialism. In contrast, the Trump administration's aggressive 'America First' policy has been marked by an unrelenting tariff war, often in violation of international norms, bilateral treaties, and the principles of the World Trade Organization (WTO). These tariffs were not just protectionist; they were unilateral assaults on the interconnected architecture of the global economy. By weaponizing tariffs, Trump sought to coerce trading partners and reconfigure supply chains through brute economic power. However, in doing so, the administration not only antagonized allies and adversaries alike but also disrupted global trade balances, supply chains, and investor confidence. The global economy is an ecosystem. If one part of it is harmed, the ripple effects are felt across continents. In this context, the Trump tariffs didn't just target China—they undermined the very structure of global trade and collaboration. The United States, which once championed free trade, suddenly became its greatest disruptor. This led to global uncertainty, inflation in various sectors, and rising consumer prices within the United States itself. In response to this unprecedented tariff regime, China issued its strongest economic and diplomatic rebuttal to date. Breaking from its traditional quiet diplomacy, Beijing made it unequivocally clear that it would not succumb to unilateral economic bullying. For the first time, Chinese officials accused the United States of distorting international trade norms and harming global economic recovery. China argued that the United States had, in fact, been the largest beneficiary of globalization. With a massive 25% share in world trade, the US economic dominance was built on the very trade practices it was now dismantling. China emphasized that it did not initiate the trade war but would not hesitate to defend its interests. It pledged to open up its economy further, reduce tariffs, and increase imports—not out of compulsion, but to demonstrate its commitment to global cooperation. This stands in sharp contrast to the inward-looking, protectionist tendencies of the Trump administration. China's response was calm but resolute. It promised to uphold the principles of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits. It reaffirmed its belief in genuine multilateralism, rejecting all forms of unilateralism and economic coercion. China stood firmly in support of the international system with the United Nations at its core and the multilateral trading system with the WTO at its foundation. China's declaration also emphasized that the vast majority of nations still believed in fairness, justice, and the rule of international law. These countries, it argued, would eventually stand on the right side of history—not because of allegiance to any one superpower, but because equity must triumph over hegemony. Trump, meanwhile, sought to justify the economic fallout from his tariff blitzkrieg by promising future investments totaling $7 trillion. However, even he admitted that the US stock market had lost nearly $6 trillion in value within days. While the theoretical future investment may or may not materialize over four to five years, the immediate damage was undeniable. The American consumer bore the brunt of the tariffs, with increased prices on everything from electronics to household goods. What Trump failed to recognize—or perhaps chose to ignore—is that tariffs on imports function as a hidden tax on American citizens. When tariffs are levied on goods from China or any other country, US importers pass those costs onto retailers, who in turn pass them onto consumers. So, while the US Treasury may gain in the short term from tariff revenues, it is ultimately the American people who pay the price. This disconnect between political rhetoric and economic reality triggered public backlash. Demonstrations erupted across the United States, not just from ideological opponents of Trump but from ordinary citizens suffering from inflation and job insecurity. The symbols associated with Trump's protectionist agenda—banners, flags, and campaign props—became the targets of public outrage, a visible expression of disillusionment with failed promises and mounting hardship. The damage was not just economic; it was reputational. America's standing as a leader of the free world, a promoter of open markets and democratic values, was called into question. The aggressive imposition of tariffs on allies and adversaries alike sent a message that America was retreating from the world stage, abandoning its commitments, and undermining its credibility. What is the via media in this escalating trade conflict? The answer lies in dialogue, cooperation, and mutual respect. Instead of unilaterally imposing tariffs, the United States must return to the table and engage its partners through negotiation, evidence-based studies, and inclusive policy-making. Any trade policy that causes disproportionate harm to a segment of the global population—be it American or foreign—is inherently flawed. Tariffs should be the last resort, not the first weapon of choice. They must be evaluated based on who truly benefits and who bears the cost. If the people of both nations stand to gain, then policy adjustments may be justified. But if tariffs disproportionately hurt consumers, strain diplomatic ties, and fracture global supply chains, then they are not only counterproductive but dangerous. The world today demands cooperation over confrontation. It requires strategic empathy rather than economic nationalism. China's model of infrastructure-led diplomacy and economic integration may not be perfect, but it offers an alternative vision to brute-force protectionism. A world driven by consultation and shared prosperity is far more stable than one governed by unilateral decrees and economic coercion. The battle between tariff wars and trade cooperation is not just a contest of policies—it is a contest of visions. The world must choose between retreating into silos or building bridges across continents. In this defining moment, China's calm and strategic response to Trump's aggressive tariffs may well mark a turning point in the global order. It is a call for equity—not hegemony. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Asian currencies inch lower
BENGALURU: Asian stocks climbed on Tuesday, while regional currencies edged lower against a firmer dollar as investors tracked the second day of high-stakes trade talks between Washington and Beijing. Representatives from China and the US met in London on Monday, just days after US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping held their first post-inauguration call to address an escalating trade dispute. Trump said he had received 'good reports' from officials engaged the talks, which are expected to extend into Tuesday. 'The sentiment across Asian stock markets seems to be lifted by optimism around the US-China trade talks, which is seemingly going smoothly,' said Poon Panichpibool, markets strategist at Krung Thai Bank. 'Developments so far suggest that tensions may ease slightly and that there will be no further escalation into a tariff standoff from either side, which is good.' MSCI's broadest index of Asia Pacific shares outside Japan rose as much as 0.8% to its highest level since January 21, 2022. South Korean equities rose 0.6%, and Indonesian shares gained 1.5%. DBS analysts said the second day of trade talks might see the US relaxing restrictions on tech exports in exchange for China resuming rare-earths mineral shipments. The tech-heavy Taiwanese index closed up 2.1% to over a two-month high, with chip giant TSMC jumping 4%. Malaysian stocks added 0.2%. Analysts at United Overseas Bank noted that the country's foreign portfolio inflows in May hit their highest level since March 2016 as signs of tariff de-escalation improved risk appetite. Regional currencies were largely unchanged. The absence of concrete outcomes from Monday's discussions between the world's two largest economies kept currency markets subdued, with traders hesitant to take big positions. 'FX markets are largely in consolidation mood, with upticks in USD seen,' said Christopher Wong, currency strategist at OCBC. The Malaysian ringgit, Singapore dollar each inched 0.1% lower, while the Taiwanese dollar and Thai baht edged 0.1% higher. The South Korean won fell 0.9%. The US dollar index was up 0.4% as investors awaited US inflation data, which is due on Wednesday. The inflation report is among the final key data points ahead of the US Federal Reserve's June 17-18 meeting, where it is widely expected to keep rates unchanged.
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Subsidies trimmed by Rs180b to Rs1.18tr
The Power Division has urged Nepra to align KE's tariff structure with national standards to ensure fairness, transparency and affordability. photo: file Listen to article The government has slashed the allocation for subsidies to Rs1.18 trillion for the upcoming fiscal year 2025-26, of which Rs1.036 trillion will go to the power sector. The government had earlier allocated Rs1.36 trillion in subsidies for the power sector and other commodities, which went up to Rs1.378 trillion for the ongoing financial year, according to revised estimates. With the subsidy allocation for FY26, the government expects to provide some relief for consumers of electricity, petroleum, food, urea, wheat subsidy, and mark-up for low-cost housing. However, it remains uncertain whether the government will be able to stay within the subsidy ceiling or exceed the target, as happened in the outgoing year. According to the Budget Book released on Tuesday, the subsidy bill has been estimated at Rs1.186 trillion for the next fiscal year, a reduction compared to the current financial year's allocation. Out of the total subsidies, a major chunk worth Rs1.03 trillion will go to the power sector compared to Rs1.19 trillion for the ongoing financial year. For the next fiscal year, the government has earmarked Rs249 billion — down from Rs276 billion — for payments for Inter-Disco tariff differential. An amount of Rs40 billion has been set aside for the merged districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P including Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) subsidy), compared to Rs65 billion allocated during the outgoing fiscal year for FATA subsidy arrears. The government has also set aside Rs74 billion for the next financial year — down from Rs108 billion — for the tariff differential for Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK). An amount of Rs48 billion has been earmarked for the Pakistan Energy Revolving Fund (PERA), the same as the ongoing financial year. The subsidy allocation to cover K-Electric's (KE) tariff differential has been slashed to Rs125 billion for the next fiscal year, compared to Rs171 billion allocated during the outgoing financial year. However, the government has increased the allocation to Rs1 billion for agriculture tubewells in Balochistan for KE consumers, up from Rs500 million during the outgoing year. Of the total, the government has allocated Rs95 billion for payments to Independent Power Producers (IPPs) for the next fiscal year. No allocation was originally made for IPPs in the outgoing year, but later Rs115 billion was provided in the revised budget estimates. The government has also allocated a Rs1.2 billion subsidy for petroleum for the next fiscal year, down from Rs18.4 billion. An amount of Rs1.2 billion has been earmarked to meet the shortfall in guaranteed throughput of Pakistan Electric Power Company (PEPCO), down from Rs2.4 billion this year. An allocation of Rs6 billion was also made during the outgoing fiscal year to cover the shortfall of Asia Petroleum; however, no such allocation has been made for the next year. For the ongoing fiscal year, the government had allocated Rs10 billion for domestic consumers through Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL), but no allocation has been made for this purpose in FY26. The subsidy cushion for the Pakistan Agricultural Storage and Services Corporation (PASSCO) has been increased to Rs20 billion from Rs12 billion for the current year. Of this, Rs14 billion will go for wheat reserve stocks and Rs6 billion for the cost differential in the sale of wheat. The government has slashed the subsidy allocation to Rs24 billion for the next fiscal year from Rs68 billion for industries and production. Of this, Rs9 billion will go as incentives for electric vehicles (EVs), and Rs15 billion to clear Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan (USCP) sugar subsidy arrears. No allocation has been made for the Ramazan Package or USCP PM Package. However, the government has increased the allocation to Rs104 billion for 'other subsidies' against Rs75 billion allocated earlier, which rose to Rs90 billion in revised estimates this year. Of this, Rs20 billion will go for wheat subsidies in Gilgit-Baltistan (G-B), and Rs15 billion for imported urea fertiliser. The Naya Pakistan Housing Authority will get Rs1 billion, with an additional Rs7 billion for the mark-up subsidy and risk-sharing scheme for, farm mechanisation, under the Kissan Package. The government will release Rs1 billion for the refinance and credit guarantee scheme (SME Asaan Finance), while Rs5.4 billion has been allocated for SME sector financing enhancement. An allocation of Rs30 billion — up from Rs13 billion — has been made for the mark-up subsidy supporting the phase-out of SBP refinancing facilities. Further allocations include Rs3 billion for 5km radius gas schemes, Rs5 billion for the EFS Enhanced Plan-Exim and Related Scheme, Rs5 billion for housing sector subsidies, and Rs7.3 billion for the Metro Bus subsidy.
