Chinese vessels collide while chasing Philippine boat near disputed Scarborough Shoal
Two Chinese vessels collided in the South China Sea on Monday while pursuing a Philippine patrol boat near the contested Scarborough Shoal, officials in Manila said, releasing video footage of the incident.
The video shows a Chinese coast guard vessel shooting a water cannon and tracking close behind a Philippine coast guard boat until it collided with a much larger People's Liberation Army craft, leaving visible damage on both Chinese vessels.
Crew members aboard the smaller Chinese vessel had been visible just before the collision, Philippine coast guard spokesman Commodore Jay Tarriela said at a press briefing. He said the Chinese crew didn't respond to an offer of assistance from the Philippine crew.
'We're not sure whether they were able to rescue those personnel who were in front prior to the collision. But we are hoping that these personnel are in good condition,' he said.
China's military confirmed the confrontation, but did not confirm or deny the collision. 'The China Coast Guard took necessary measures in accordance with the law, including monitoring, pressing from the outside, blocking and controlling the Philippine vessels to drive them away,' Gan Yu, a Chinese coast guard spokesperson, said in a statement.
The incident comes days after the Philippine and Indian navies conducted joint exercises in the South China Sea, held to counter China's far-reaching maritime claims.
The Scarborough Shoal is a triangular chain of reefs located 125 nautical miles from the main Philippine island of Luzon. Over the past year, China has sought to strengthen its claim to the shoal, mounted large-scale military drills and deployed the world's largest coast guard ship, known as 'The Monster,' in the area.
Includes reporting from Agence France-Presse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
7 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
China Is Taking AI Safety Seriously. So Must the U.S.
'China doesn't care about AI safety—so why should we?' This flawed logic pervades U.S. policy and tech circles, offering cover for a reckless race to the bottom as Washington rushes to outpace Beijing in AI development. According to this rationale, regulating AI would risk falling behind in the so-called 'AI arms race.' And since China supposedly doesn't prioritize safety, racing ahead—even recklessly—is the safer long-term bet. This narrative is not just wrong; it's dangerous. Ironically, Chinese leaders may have a lesson for the U.S.'s AI boosters: true speed requires control. As China's top tech official, Ding Xuexiang, put it bluntly at Davos in January 2025: 'If the braking system isn't under control, you can't step on the accelerator with confidence.' For Chinese leaders, safety isn't a constraint; it's a prerequisite. AI safety has become a political priority in China. In April, President Xi Jinping chaired a rare Politburo study session on AI warning of 'unprecedented' risks. China's National Emergency Response Plan now lists AI safety alongside pandemics and cyberattacks. Regulators require pre-deployment safety assessments for generative AI and recently removed over 3,500 non-compliant AI products from the market. In just the first half of this year, China has issued more national AI standards than in the previous three years combined. Meanwhile, the volume of technical papers focused on frontier AI safety has more than doubled over the past year in China. But the last time U.S. and Chinese leaders met to discuss AI's risks was in May 2024. In September, officials from both nations hinted at a second round of conversations 'at an appropriate time.' But no meeting took place under the Biden Administration, and there is even greater uncertainty over whether the Trump Administration will pick up the baton. This is a missed opportunity. Read More: The Politics, and Geopolitics, of Artificial Intelligence China is open to collaboration. In May 2025, it launched a bilateral AI dialogue with the United Kingdom. Esteemed Chinese scientists have contributed to major international efforts, such as the International AI Safety Report backed by 33 countries and intergovernmental organisations (including the U.S. and China) and The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities. A necessary first step is to revive the dormant U.S.–China dialogue on AI risks. Without a functioning government-to-government channel, prospects for coordination remain slim. China indicated it was open to continuing the conversation at the end of the Biden Administration. It already yielded a modest but symbolically important agreement: both sides affirmed that human decision-making must remain in control of nuclear weapons. This channel has potential for further progress. Going forward, discussions should focus on shared, high-stakes threats. Consider OpenAI's recent classification of its latest ChatGPT Agent as having crossed the 'High Capability' threshold in the biological domain under the company's own Preparedness Framework. This means the agent could, at least in principle, provide users with meaningful guidance that might facilitate the creation of dangerous biological threats. Both Washington and Beijing have a vital interest in preventing non-state actors from weaponizing such tools. An AI-assisted biological attack would not respect national borders. In addition, leading experts and Turing Award winners from the West and China share concerns that advanced general-purpose AI systems may come to operate outside of human control, posing catastrophic and existential risks. Both governments have already acknowledged some of these risks. President Trump's AI Action Plan warns that AI may 'pose novel national security risks in the near future,' specifically in cybersecurity and in chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) domains. Similarly, in September last year, China's primary AI security standards body highlighted the need for AI safety standards addressing cybersecurity, CBRN, and loss of control risks. From there, the two sides could take practical steps to build technical trust between leading standards organizations—such as China's National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee (TC260) and the America's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Plus, industry authorities, such as the AI Industry Alliance of China (AIIA) and the Frontier Model Forum in the US, could share best practices on risk management frameworks. AIIA has formulated 'Safety Commitments' which most leading Chinese developers have signed. A new Chinese risk management framework, focused fully on frontier risks including cyber misuse, biological misuse, large-scale persuasion and manipulation, and loss of control scenarios, was published during the World AI Conference (WAIC) and can help both countries align. Read More: The U.S. Can't Afford to Lose the Biotech Race with China As trust deepens, governments and leading labs could begin sharing safety evaluation methods and results for the most advanced models. The Global AI Governance Action Plan, unveiled at WAIC, explicitly calls for the creation of 'mutually recognized safety evaluation platforms.' As an Anthropic co-founder said, a recent Chinese AI safety evaluation report has similar findings with the West: frontier AI systems pose some non-trivial CBRN risks, and are beginning to show early warning signs of autonomous self-replication and deception. A shared understanding of model vulnerabilities—and of how those vulnerabilities are being tested—would lay the groundwork for broader safety cooperation. Finally, the two sides could establish incident-reporting channels and emergency response protocols. In the event of an AI-related accident or misuse, rapid and transparent communication will be essential. A modern equivalent to 'hotlines' between top AI officials in both countries could ensure real-time alerts when models breach safety thresholds or behave unexpectedly. In April, President Xi Jinping explicitly stressed the need for 'monitoring, early risk warning and emergency response' in AI. After any dangerous incident, there should be a pre-agreed upon plan for how to react. Engagement won't be easy—political and technical hurdles are inevitable. But AI risks are global—and so must be the governance response. Rather than using China as a justification for domestic inaction on AI regulation, American policymakers and industry leaders should engage directly. AI risks won't wait.
Newsweek
37 minutes ago
- Newsweek
US Navy Ship 'Expelled' From Disputed Waters, China's Military Says
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China's military says it drove U.S. Navy destroyer the USS Higgins from waters near Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea on Wednesday morning. Two days ago, a collision occurred between Chinese ships seeking to disrupt a Philippine Goast Guard mission at the disputed feature. Newsweek reached out to the U.S. Seventh Fleet and the Chinese Foreign Ministry via emailed requests for comment. Why It Matters China claims sovereignty over most of the South China Sea, home to overlapping claims by the Philippines and several other states. Scarborough Shoal, one of the most hotly contested features in China's territorial dispute with the Philippines, sits within the U.S. treaty ally's exclusive economic zone. While China effectively seized control of waters around the atoll in 2012, the Philippines has since 2024 increased its patrols there to assert its claim and deliver supplies to local fishermen. Clashes at Scarborough and other South China Sea flashpoints have raised questions over whether a miscalculation could trigger Manila's Mutual Defense Treaty with Washington—and potentially a conflict between the two superpowers. What To Know In a statement posted to Chinese social media, the People's Liberation Army Southern Theater Command said the guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins had "illegally intruded" into the territorial sea around Scarborough Shoal, calling it a serious violation of China's sovereignty and security. The command "deployed forces and monitored and expelled it in accordance with law and regulations," the statement added. Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins (DDG 76) pulls away from Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) after conducting a fueling-at-sea while underway in the Pacific Ocean on November 7, 2024. Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins (DDG 76) pulls away from Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) after conducting a fueling-at-sea while underway in the Pacific Ocean on November 7, 2024. Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Lucas J. Hastings/U.S. Navy A territorial sea extends 12 nautical miles (about 13.8 miles) from coastlines and high-tide features such as Scarborough Shoal. In 2016, an international arbitral tribunal rejected China's expansive South China Sea claims. The tribunal did not rule on sovereignty over the shoal; it recognized traditional fishing rights for Filipino and Chinese fishermen at Scarborough. The U.S. Navy had not released any information on the alleged patrol near Scarborough Shoal as of time of writing. The Navy frequently deploys sea and air assets in international waters to challenge claims that Washington believes infringe on the freedom of navigation. China maintains patrols by the U.S. and other Western militaries in the region threaten peace and stability. During Monday's confrontation, a China Coast Guard ship slammed into a Chinese Type 052 destroyer while pursuing a smaller Philippine Coast Guard patrol boat that was part of a government mission to deliver food and fuel to fishermen. Footage shows the collision severely damaging the coast guard cutter's bow. Ship-tracking data shared by the maritime analysis group SeaLight showed Chinese vessels on Tuesday sailing in a grid-like pattern consistent with search-and-rescue operations—suggesting personnel may have been thrown overboard by the impact. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said the Philippines had "seriously harmed peace and stability at sea." What People Are Saying The Philippines Department of Foreign Affairs wrote in a statement: "The Department is seriously concerned by the dangerous maneuvers of two vessels of the People's Liberation Army Navy and the Chinese Coast Guard and their unlawful interference with a routine humanitarian operation for Filipino fisherfolk in and around the territorial sea of Bajo de Masinloc, which is a longstanding and integral part of Philippine territory." Bajo de Masinloc is the Philippines' name for Scarborough Shoal. In China, it's known as Huangyan Island. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) ranking member of the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party, wrote in a statement this week: "China's campaign to dominate the South China Sea by force threatens stability, peace, and prosperity across the Indo-Pacific, as the Philippines and other nations defend their legitimate interests. Beijing must comply with international law and immediately end its coercive maritime actions." What's Next The Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs said it would lodge a diplomatic protest against China over its actions at Scarborough Shoal.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
What investors see in the sale of AI chips to China
Nvidia and AMD can sell their AI chips to China for the low price of 15% of their revenue, paid out to the U.S. government. Investors are unfazed. Why it matters: Shareholders are focusing on the revenue opportunities that come with more access to Beijing, not on the unprecedented involvement of the Trump administration in Nvidia's business dealings. What they're saying: "There's way more upside," Daniel Newman, principal analyst and CEO of The Futurum Group, tells Axios. Catch up quick: The Trump administration previously backed export controls on Nvidia's H20 chips, which are "orders of magnitude" less powerful than Nvidia's Blackwell chips, Newman says. A month ago, the administration signaled that it was shifting course on these controls, but did not issue the licenses required for sales to be possible. That appeared to change after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with President Trump. Nvidia walked away with promises of licenses so long as the chip giant cut the U.S. government a check for 15% of its China revenue. Zoom in: Nvidia stock is up nearly 0.5% since the news broke Monday, with investors and analysts bullish on the deal. The lifting of the export controls could lead to a $15 billion revenue windfall for Nvidia. Both Nvidia and AMD have pricing power, given the strength of demand for AI chips in China, according to a note from Bank of America. That means the 15% expense could be passed on to Chinese customers. Between the lines: While the deal could lead to billions of dollars in additional revenue for the U.S. government, it's not just about the money. It's also about access to rare earth magnets, Newman says. The U.S. has powerful AI chips that China wants. China has rare earth metals the U.S. wants. When the administration first changed course on export controls in July, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC that selling the "fourth best" AI chip to China wasn't material. Lutnick also said the export control rollback was tied to a rare earths deal, though those details have not fully materialized. Yes. but: Export controls are typically put in place for a reason: in this case, national security concerns. The 15% revenue split, first reported by the Financial Times, includes an anonymous source quote that points to the security concerns: "What's next — letting Lockheed Martin sell F-35s to China for a 15% commission?" Situational awareness: Beijing is urging local companies to avoid buying chips from American companies because of its own security concerns. Newman says that may be political theater – an effort for China to keep the upper hand in ongoing negotiations. Chinese companies will likely still want access to the best possible chips. Be smart: In just January of this year, investors feared China outpacing the U.S. in the AI arms race given the reported success of DeepSeek.
