
'The Ugly Stepsister': Director Emilie Blichfeldt on reframing Cinderella as body horror
Ever read or watched the classic fairy tale Cinderella and thought that the stepsisters were getting a raw deal?
If so, Norwegian director Emilie Blichfeldt has just the film for you.
Her debut feature, Den stygge stesøsteren (The Ugly Stepsister), was a hit at both this year's Sundance and Berlin Film Festival – making it onto our Top 10 Films of this year's Berlinale.
It deconstructs the Cinderella story and the pursuit of the beauty myth by telling the fairy tale from the perspective of ugly stepsister Elvira, played to perfection by Lea Myren. She'll go to any lengths to feel accepted and to compete with her beautiful stepsister for the affections of the prince.
Brace yourselves. We mean ANY lengths.
Blichfeldt's period film takes inspiration from the Brothers Grimm - from feet mutilation to looming crows – and the visceral body horror of David Cronenberg, to better comment on societal expectations regarding beauty standards that persist to this day. In this respect, it's not dissimilar to another recent horror fairy tale – Coralie Fargeat's Oscar-winning The Substance. Except Elvira's transformation doesn't require neon green Ozempic injections sent from a shady organization – she'll go old school with low-tech surgeries and a tapeworm.
Rare are debut films so ambitious, bold and confidently executed, heralding a new and fully-formed cinematic voice we can't wait to hear more from.
Euronews Culture sat down with Blichtfeldt to speak about turning Cinderella into a body horror tale, the importance of using practical effects and humour, as well as what it's like to make a film that made one person throw up.
Most of us end up like the stepsisters: cutting off our toes to try to fit the shoe! In real life, most of us are them - doing insane stuff to try to change ourselves to be Cinderella. But we have no sympathy for those characters, and I think that's very interesting.
Emilie Blichfeldt
Euronews Culture: The Ugly Stepsister has already taken you to Sundance and the Berlin Film Festival. How has it felt to get such huge platforms for the launch of your debut feature?
Emilie Blichfeldt: It's insane! How am I supposed to do this again, you know? But I've loved it, especially experiencing the film meeting its audience. That has been exhilarating.
The film sees you reframe the beloved fairy tale Cinderella. What is your personal relationship to fairy tales and specifically this story?
In Norway, we have a very specific relationship to Cinderella, because there's a very strong Christmas tradition to watch a 70s Czech film called Three Hazelnuts for Cinderella (or Three Wishes for Cinderella). We have a strong relationship to that version. And I grew up on the Brothers Grimm version. I had a small pixie book. Do you know those?
Those small books published in the 50s?
Yes, those. And all the gory details made it – there was the cutting of the toes, but there were no illustrations of that. However, there was an illustration of the stepsister on the horse with the prince and three big drops of blood coming out of her shoe. That image stuck with me.
I've always been fascinated by women who have trouble with their body image, who are struggling to fit within femininity.
Emilie Blichfeldt
There seems to be a trend at the moment of reassessing and reframing past figures and giving a voice to 'evil' or misunderstood characters. I'm thinking about Maleficent and Cruella for example. Why do you think that is?
I think fairy tales have been used as these very moral lessons, very moralistic stories in which you praise one type of person and demonize another to scare the young ones so they understand 'this is the way to go and not this.' But the thing is that for most of us, marrying a prince is not so attainable...
Well there goes that dream!
(Laughs) But to answer your question, I never thought I would do that – anchor myself in this trend, because it feels like a big American studio thing. And a fairy tale movie is such a big undertaking. I didn't think I would do that, but it wasn't me that chose the stepsister. The stepsister chose me! When I rediscovered this fairy tale, I immediately identified with the moment when she is discovered, when she's cut off her toes to better fit the shoe and is rejected by the prince. It was shocking to me that I could relate so strongly to this, because I've felt that shame, that sorrow, that distress when I've tried to fit in with imposed beauty ideals and failed. And it was shocking to me to identify with the character that I had previously despised and mocked and ridiculed. There's a form of internalized self-hatred in this. Because everyone wants to be Cinderella, right?
Yes, most people associate with the lead character, who happens to be beautiful and gets what she wants. Even in the Disney version of Cinderella, the stepsisters are portrayed with huge teeth, comically large arses, and it almost forces children to be repelled by them.
Exactly, and most of us end up like the stepsisters: cutting off our toes to try to fit the shoe! In real life, most of us are them - doing insane stuff to try to change ourselves to be Cinderella. But we have no sympathy for those characters, and I think that's very interesting. I've always been fascinated by women who have trouble with their body image, who are struggling to fit within femininity. I thought to myself that I had to do this story addressing why we've never sympathised for the character we're most like in real life, and to challenge the idea of what beauty is.
You mention the 'insane stuff' people to do be more like the Cinderella character, and your film directly addresses the tyranny of beauty standards. After seeing the film, it reminded me of those horrific US shows like The Swan, which turned 'ugly ducklings' into cookie-cutter pageant belles through plastic surgery. Or even The Bachelorette, where you have these women who line up in front of their modern prince to be chosen... It struck me that The Ugly Stepsister sticks to the 1812 Grimm Brothers tale, but that things haven't evolved that much...
That's exactly it. The Brothers Grimm version of Cinderella is also body horror. And today, we have that but packaged differently. It's like the Kardashians, which is a makeover show. And these makeover scenes you see in countless movies... I grew up with movies like The Princess Diaries, Miss Congeniality, She's All That... And I thought, what is it with this makeover idea? We love the hope of maybe being able to transform in the same way. It's also sold as something fun, with plenty of upbeat music.
I really wanted to turn that on its head – to not make Cinderella evil and Elvira the evil one, but to have the stepsister as a three-dimensional character and not an archetype. And to address how makeovers and transformation are sold in society. That's why during the first surgery scene in the film, I hope the audience is a little unsure of whether it's going to be played for laughs or if it's going to be horrible.
I didn't want there to be gore for the sake of it. The practical effects needed to hold ideas and metaphors, and not just be there for shock value.
Emilie Blichfeldt
I wanted to talk to you about that scene, because even for a horror fan, that scene was intense. The little taps on the nose start off as funny, but the eye surgery made me squirm.
(Laughs) Excellent. I like to see people squirm!
Job well done then. The effects look very real and incredibly visceral.
They are all practical, and I'm glad you said visceral, because that's the point. I knew I wanted practical effects because of my love for body horror and genre movies. It's often the older ones that have the practical effects, and a lot of people say, 'Oh, that's retro', but I thought I'd challenge myself on that. I had to negotiate with my producers, because it costs a lot of money to get practical effects, but I needed it to be visceral.
There's also this uncanniness when it's practical. Things don't move smoothly or perfectly like with CGI. There are always small mistakes. There's even an awareness in the audience that this is fake. If you use VFX, it's too perfect. And with practical effects, you can also see that's it's not really real, but because it's beautifully made, the audience makes this contract with the movie. 'Ok, I know it's not real, but I want it to be real. I'll invest in this.' And this distance still makes you safe as an audience. I also didn't want there to be gore for the sake of it. The practical effects needed to hold ideas and metaphors, and not just be there for shock value.
Considering the timing of The Ugly Stepsister 's release, there's a rather obvious parallel to be drawn with The Substance, which also deals with the shackling toxicity of beauty standards. I had the pleasure of talking to Coralie Fargeat last year and she mentioned how horror films and genre films are the best vehicles in order to address society's ills. Do you share that opinion?
I think so. I think David Cronenberg is a great example of this. Who is better at describing modern human difficulties in relation to bodies and to this world? What's really interesting with that is that it's a paradox because body horror is a very intimate thing with the characters. It's all about their minds and their bodies and how they interact. So, it's a very intimate thing with the character, but at the same time it's all about our common existence in this world. Cronenberg is so great when it comes to showing society in one body.
People love to label, especially when it comes to marketing films and recommending them. Are you comfortable with The Ugly Stepsister being described as new wave feminist horror?
Sure! I think if The Substance hadn't happened, I think the body horror label would be much harder to sell or to lure people in with. But now, it's like The Substance has trailblazed. It's like audiences got the taste for it, and they just want more! And I'm gonna give it to them!
It was the perfect metaphor for what happens when you are the victim of a society that tells you're ugly and you're living under the burden of feeling ugly. (...) Everyone says that real beauty is on the inside, but people still give real value based on outer appearance.
Emilie Blichfeldt
Speaking of taste, one thing I loved about your film is the role of food and the act of eating - whether it's cake, spaghetti or a tapeworm egg. It's something you see a lot of in fairy tales – the apple in Snow White or the ingestion of a drink in Alice in Wonderland... Can you tell me more about this aspect?
Eating in fairy tales is often a very fatal choice. If you eat something, something will happen. I knew my film was going to be a body horror and I knew she was going to cut off her toes at the end. When I was writing the script, my mission was to try to get the audience to understand why she would do such a thing and sympathize with her in that moment and not just think of her as a mad woman. I wanted to infuse it with more body horror and in re-reading the Grimm fairy tale and researching these things, I found the tapeworm diet. Beyond gore and splatter, body horror always carries meaning. I couldn't just let her eat the tapeworm egg and then just get skinny. It was more interesting for me to get her to eat this thing, as it was the perfect metaphor for what happens when you are the victim of a society that tells you're ugly and you're living under the burden of feeling ugly. Many people result to internalizing that gaze and starting to self-objectify and become complicit.
There's a moment that struck me regarding this and the stranglehold beauty standards have: when Elvira is told that it's what's inside that matters, but that she's brave because she's changing her outside to match what she knows is on the inside. It's warped.
Yes, and like those US shows you mentioned, it's common. That language capitalizes on insecurities. Everyone says that real beauty is on the inside, but people still give real value based on outer appearance. When Elvira eats the egg, she is actually doing something to herself by her own 'free will'- that's when she internalizes the objectifying gaze, and it starts growing in her belly and eating her up from the inside, both literally and metaphorically. And what goes in has to come out...
It's another tough scene to watch...
Good! It should be. That's one of my favourite scenes because it's also a very emotional moment when Elvira is rid of this worm and all that it represents.
It's also quite a funny moment in many ways. When the tapeworm is yanked out, the mother figure in the same room is about to give a blow job. Simultaneously, one phallic thing comes out while another literally goes in...
(Laughs) I'm so glad you found that funny, because every time I see that scene, I wonder: 'Who wrote that? Was it me?' (Laughs)
It's a tricky balancing act, but throughout the film, there are so many humorous moments like this one. I'm thinking of the line 'What kind of virgin fucks a stable boy?', or even the salmon baron at the ball called Frederick von Bluckfish...
You get my humour! Long live people with dark senses of humour!
Amen. But people often forget that alongside horror, humour is also an incredibly powerful tool to reflect how society is still riddled with hypocrisies and ills.
That's it, and it's also a way to endure, right? Humour is a wonderful way of dealing with shit. For me, the best way of dealing with myself is to use humour, because it allows you to see yourself with a distance and see how ridiculous things are. In humour, there can be a lot of warmth and self-except acceptance. There's hope in humour. And considering it's quite a grim – pun intended – story I'm telling, I want people to be able to look at it, to relate to it, and to go out after seeing it and not feel beaten down by it. Humour is so important in this respect and hopefully contributes to people asking themselves why we value our appearances so much.
It's really touching to see those who feel represented by the movie and who reflect on what beauty and ugliness is and where those standards come from. That's a dream come true.
Emilie Blichfeldt
You mentioned at the start of this interview that watching the film meet its audience was a source of joy. Have there been any reactions that have shocked you, or that you weren't expecting when talking to members of the public?
I find it delightful that people are seeing stuff that I haven't seen or thought of. I was also very surprised that it's become a quite a discussion point whether Cinderella is still a virgin after having sex – in the sense of which hole she takes it in.
Really? I didn't even think about that!
No, a lot of people don't! I don't have an answer for which hole it is! And what's funny about it is that it says a lot about the people watching the film and how it relates to the themes. (Laughs) I love that! I think that no matter what hole she takes it in, she doesn't care because it's sex and she's natural and not ashamed. I love that for her. Otherwise, when it comes to reactions, I didn't think I would make someone throw up!
Did you?
At the premiere in Sundance. It was insane! But between you and me, and whoever reads this interview, I don't think it was the movie. I think it was a bad lunch! Still, it's great PR!(Laughs) And it's really touching to see those who feel represented by the movie and who reflect on what beauty and ugliness is and where those standards come from. That's a dream come true.
Even on Letterboxd and the comments left on there, people are talking about how other cinemagoers reacted. Like 'the guy next to me gagged twice!' I think that's just so beautiful when you can experience something like that with strangers and it creates a collective experience. Something you wouldn't get when you watch it alone at home on your screen... I hope that genre movies are the ones that are going to keep the cinemas alive because of that, you know? That would also be a dream come true.
The Ugly Stepsister is out in cinemas on 7 March in Norway. It's heading to German theatres on 5 June and Spanish cinemas on 10 October. More European release dates to follow. Shudder have secured the rights, so it will also be heading to the streaming platform soon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Director Akinola Davies Jr. on breaking new ground for Nigerian cinema
My Father's Shadow made history the moment it hit this year's Cannes lineup. Akinola Davies Jr.'s hauntingly beautiful debut became the first Nigerian film to receive an official selection at the festival, a milestone moment not just for the filmmaker but for African cinema as a whole. 'Representing Nigeria to me is a real badge of honour,' Davies Jr. told Euronews Culture. 'I am extremely proud to be Nigerian, proud to be African in general, and I think our stories are incredibly universal.' Set in 1993 Lagos during the tense lead-up to Nigeria's first democratic election since a military coup installed General Ibrahim Babangida, the semi-autobiographical film takes place over the course of a single, fraught day. Through the eyes of two young brothers reuniting with their absent father, My Father's Shadow quietly grapples with themes of masculinity, generational trauma, and the fragility of national identity in times of political unrest. Gangs of London star Ṣọpẹ́ Dìrísù delivers a simmering performance as Folarin, the burdened patriarch trying to reconnect with his sons, played by breakout talents Chibuike Marvellous Egbo and Godwin Egbo. Davies co-wrote the script with his brother Wale, with both also serving as executive producers on the project. Ahead of its Cannes premiere, global streamer MUBI acquired the film, with plans for a theatrical release in North America and the UK. We sat down with Akinola Davies Jr. following the film's premiere to discuss his Cannes experience, the making of My Father's Shadow, and the responsibility - and joy - of representing Nigeria on cinema's biggest stage. Euronews Culture: First of all, congratulations. It's fair to say My Father's Shadow has been a huge success story. It's received critical acclaim and, obviously, it was the first Nigerian film to be officially selected into Cannes. Could you tell us a little bit about the experience of going to Cannes and what it meant to you personally to represent Nigeria on such a massive global stage? Akinola Davies Jr.: Sure. I mean, you never really set out to be the first in anything, and we certainly weren't aware that it would be the first Nigerian film in selection. I think there have been Nigerian films at Cannes before, but obviously not in selection. So, the experience was pretty overwhelming, but in the best way. I think it's incredible to show work in a place full of cinephiles, people who love the craft, and a place with such massive prestige. It's everything you imagine the environment for your projects and work to live in. In that aspect, it was really fantastic to be there. I think Nigerians, with it being the first Nigerian film at Cannes, have really caught on to that. Many of the crew and cast turned up publicly, and it was synonymous with Nigeria having a pavilion in Cannes for the first year, which was just serendipitous and equally felt like perfect timing. The film doing as well as it has and being received as it has is like a cherry on top of a cherry on top of a cherry. So, yeah, I'm really pleased. Representing Nigeria to me is a real badge of honour. I am extremely proud to be Nigerian, proud to be African in general, and I think our stories are incredibly universal. I hope that continues because filmmakers like Mati Diop with her film Atlantiques and the Esiri brothers did it with Eyimofe (Eyimofe: This Is My Desire). But I think there's probably becoming an icnreasing market for nuanced versions of our stories to travel across the world. Nigerian cinema boasts an incredibly rich and deep history, from the pioneering work of Hubert Ogunde to the more recent contributions of Kunle Afolayan. Why do you think it has taken so long for a Nigerian film to be officially selected at Cannes? I find this question a bit tricky. On one hand, it's about curiosity because media, finance, and many industries are structured to privilege the global North. So naturally, everyone looks to Europe and America for what's relevant. However, there is now more introspection, allowing the global North to turn its attention toward the global South for stories and ideas. Both have been closely linked through growth and resource sharing. Specifically for Nigerian films traveling abroad, it's important to remember that Nigeria is made up of over 300 tribes, each with different languages and dialects. We are community-based people, so Nollywood's primary focus is serving Nigerian audiences. Beyond that, Nollywood serves the African continent and the diaspora. If Europe shows interest, it is incredibly welcoming - but language and dialect barriers need to be bridged. Europe hasn't always been great at doing that, especially since the focus has mostly been on European markets. So, there's definitely some complexity here. That being said, Nigerian films have been present at Cannes before - including another film this year. Perhaps storytelling style also plays a role: my film is part of Nollywood but leans more toward arthouse, which aligns well with Cannes, whereas many Nigerian films tend to be more commercial. I think both sides could do a better job bridging that gap. How do you see your work in relationship with Nollywood? I think my film is unapologetically a Nollywood film. My cast and crew are about 90% people who work in Nollywood. To say the work isn't Nollywood feels disingenuous. Nollywood is incredibly rich, with a beautiful tapestry of storytelling, creativity, and technical prowess. I wear that as a badge of honour. It's a young, fledgling industry. Nigerian cinema predates Nollywood, but Nollywood itself is probably 30–34 years old, roughly my age. Hollywood, by comparison, is about 100 years in development. Maybe now Nollywood has a commercial neccisity, but hopefully films like mine branch out to create space for arthouse narratives, more nuanced dramas. Nollywood has done well in horror, sci-fi, and supernatural, but the drama of the common man's daily life may be neglected. Hopefully films like mine, films like Eyimofe, films like All the Colours of the World Are Between Black and White, films like Mami Wata, create that palette, and audiences are interested. Going back to Cannes, were there any particularly surreal moments? Yeah, a couple of moments. The red carpets are always a little surreal. I tried to wink at Cate Blanchett. I don't know if she saw it, but I definitely tried. I also sat down and had lunch with Juliette Binoche, which was really surreal. But the moments that spun me out the most were simple. I follow this guy, Thomas Flight, on YouTube who does video essays and reviews. Meeting him in person was probably more exciting than seeing a celebrity because I love his work. What did you do to celebrate after the premiere of your film? Any parties? Yes, we had a party. Element produced my film and also produced Harry Lighton's incredible debut Pillion, which won an award for best screenplay. So we shared a party. I have a background in throwing parties and music, so I got some incredible DJs to come play. By all accounts, it was pretty good. For anyone unfamiliar, could you give us a brief synopsis of My Father's Shadow? Sure. My Father's Shadow is a film about fatherhood, nationhood, and brotherhood. It's about two brothers spending the day with their father, who they don't see regularly. He takes them around Lagos to show the struggles he goes through to provide for the family. They question his absence and hold him to account. On that day, there's a big election result announced, and he has to get them home. Why did you feel it was important to set it against such a pivotal political event in Nigerian history? Exactly for that reason. It was a pivotal moment. I was in Nigeria during that period, as was my brother, and we knew something was going on from the reactions of family. We were probably too young to fully understand the politics at the time, but in our research, we realised it was an important moment in the country's history, something not well documented until now. It's like a family heirloom in terms of Nigeria. It's a very important story to tell because Nigeria has a big part to play in Africa's growth and development, and even the world's. It hasn't fully fulfilled that potential yet, though there have been shimmering moments. To really shift things forward, we need to tell our own stories in a nuanced way, not from an outside perspective. I think My Father's Shadow holds a lot in terms of contemporary Nigerian history. It's important to know what happened and who was around in that period for sure. You co-wrote the film with your brother Wale, and I understand you each had different memories of your childhood and your father. How did those contrasting perspectives shape or enrich the film? My brother is an incredibly accomplished writer. He's also a musician and in music management. He's older than me and probably the most well-read person I know. He's also one of my closest and probably my best friends. Working with a sibling forces you into a space of honesty because you know everything about each other. That helps the work because we try to write from an honest place. If it's not honest, it doesn't feel right. Both of us being men, him being a father, and me not yet, also helps. Being close in age to when we lost our father really helped the genesis of the film - trying to figure out what we actually remember, what's made up, what's been told to us, what we fabricated versus what's real. That was the guiding force for writing the script. Equally, my brother became a father during the writing process, so a lot of emotions and the idea of sacrifice and providing for your family were taken into account. There's a narrative of absent fathers, which can be quite negative and derivative, but I don't think ours fits that. Our absent father was out of duty and providing for the family, which I believe is common in an African context - it's traditional and conservative. Ultimately, there's still this idea of duty in Africa, maybe antiquated in Europe, but still very present - providing for your family sometimes means you don't spend as much time with them. That's where our story comes from, and I think there are still challenges we're dealing with. Nigeria in the '90s - like much of the world - was very male dominated. Do you think it's changed much nowadays? I think on the surface, it's very male dominated, but I definitely wouldn't say women are in hierarchical control - although in politics, they've been gaining more ground. Actually, I think Nigerian women probably crystallise the brilliance of Nigeria in many ways. Our producer is a Nigerian woman; we have two producers, one from the UK and one from Nigeria. My mother - who's obviously a Nigerian woman - in my father's absence or after his passing, she took the mantle and raised four children. My aunt is the matriarch of the family. I was always surrounded by my mother's friends - they all ran their own businesses and were completely self-sufficient. If you go to any market in Nigeria, it's pretty much all women running things. So yeah, on the surface - and maybe politically or presidentially in some cases - it feels male dominated, and it's probably easy to say that from the outside looking in. But even though my mother isn't really in the film, she's still an overarching presence. Feminine energy is also a strong, though not front-facing, presence in the film - more subconscious, effectively. And I think that's what it means. To your question, I think Africa in general, and Nigeria in particular, has to present as masculine because of our history - colonial history, independence history. The leaders who've been targeted and killed the most were men and statesmen, including in my film, even though Abiola is still very much alive within it. So when that absence happens, it's the women who have to take care of the family, who have to rise to the occasion - especially Abiola's wives, who are central characters in my film. While my film is set over one day, after Abiola's passing years later, his wives were the ones leading the charge. So yeah, on the surface it might feel that way, but for me, having grown up there, I'd probably counter that Nigeria is highly organised and run by women. Obviously, patriarchy still has a place in society because of the colonial experience. But hopefully, through telling stories in film, art, and media, we can reference our histories. You shot the film on location, on 16mm film. How was that logistically and why did you feel it was important to shoot in this medium? You'd have to ask my producers for logistics, but it was challenging - there are no labs on the continent. We had to shuttle film back and forth, so we didn't see rushes for almost a week, meaning we couldn't strike sets during that time. I love shooting on film. It slows the pace, embraces imperfections, and allows more rehearsal time with cast and crew. Two of my three leads had never acted before - I didn't want to nitpick performances on set. Originally, I planned to fix things in the edit. Working with my Mexican editor Omidy Guzman, who's an unsung hero, we extracted what we needed and got the performances we wanted. Thematically, shooting a period film on film really helped. Politically, I wanted to see the Lagos I grew up in captured on what I consider the most beautiful medium. I wasn't exposed to much of that growing up. So whenever I shoot in Nigeria, I want to shoot on film because Lagos is incredibly cinematic and deserves celluloid - not that I'm against digital; I love digital too and shoot it often. But I think when it comes to capturing the essence of a place, I think film is a really good shorthand. What impact do you hope My Father's Shadow will have on the wider film industry? Ooooh big question! It's a bit early to say, but from responses, I hope My Father's Shadow is like breaking ground for a next generation of filmmakers to see that it's possible to do it. Obviously, like, I come with a certain level of privilege. I was born in the UK. My film's financed in the UK predominantly, but obviously co-produced by a Nigerian production company, Nigerian talent, Nigerian crew. So there's a lot of collaboration in there. But, obviously, I have to also say that it comes with a certain level of privilege having MUBI, Element, Match Factory, Fremantle, BBC, BFI all involved. That might not be the case for every filmmaker, but I want to acknowledge that and say that there is a way to sort of get to this point, but, obviously, it takes a lot of collaboration, a lot of forward thinking, and a lot of groundwork, but it's possible. My Father's Shadow had its world premiere at the Un Certain Regard section of the 2025 Cannes Film Festival, where it won the Special Mention for the Caméra d'Or. Mubi acquired distribution rights for North America, the UK, Ireland, and Turkey.


Euronews
6 days ago
- Euronews
Why has Auschwitz Museum created a digital replica of the death camp?
Due to conservation protection, shooting films at the Auschwitz site is not possible. In order to meet the needs of filmmakers, the Auschwitz Museum has made a digital replica, which was created "out of the growing interest of directors in the history of the German camp," explains Bartosz Bartyzel, a spokesman for the museum, in an interview with Euronews Culture. Euronews Culture: Where did the idea to create a digital replica of Auschwitz come from? Bartosz Bartyzel: The Auschwitz Museum has been working with filmmakers for many years - both documentary filmmakers and feature film directors. However, due to the conservation protection of the authentic Memorial Site, it is not possible to shoot feature films at the site. The idea to create a digital replica was born out of the need to respond to the growing interest in the history of the Auschwitz German camp in cinema and the daily experience of dealing with the film industry. This tool offers an opportunity to develop this cooperation in a new, responsible and ethical formula. Why is a replica necessary? B.B.: The regulations in force at the Memorial preclude the possibility of shooting feature films on the authentic and protected site of the former camp. However, filmmakers - especially those who want to reach for more narrative forms - need a space that allows them to tell the story faithfully. With a digital replica, they can do this without compromising the integrity of the historic site. Were filmmakers consulted with before the implementation? B.B.: In fact, it was the day-to-day collaboration with filmmakers and the production needs and challenges they reported that inspired the project. The idea was not detached from reality - on the contrary, it was born out of specific conversations, experiences and questions that had been coming from the creative community for years. Who was involved in the creative process? How long did it last? B.B.: The Picture from Auschwitz project is a joint initiative of the Auschwitz Museum, the Auschwitz-Birkenau Foundation and a team of technology specialists led by Maciej Żemojcin. The very concept crystallised over several months in the course of joint work and discussions. The technical team used the most advanced spatial scanning technologies to create a digital replica of the Auschwitz I camp. At the moment, the Foundation is making efforts to raise the funds needed to continue the project - to create a digital replica of the grounds of Auschwitz II-Birkenau, as well as the interiors of some of the buildings. What reactions did you receive after the announcement of the creation of the replica? B.B.: The reactions were definitely positive - both from the film community, which sees this as a viable and professional working tool, and from the general public, for whom this is an opportunity to learn about history in a deeper and more authentic way through the medium of film. The project has also been recognised in international debate, including at the Marché du Film in Cannes. Are there already willing filmmakers who will benefit from the replica? B.B.: We have already started discussions with the first filmmakers who have expressed an interest in collaborating using the digital replica. The details of these projects remain at the agreement stage for the time being, but we hope to be able to provide more information on the first productions soon. How has this project been funded and what will it take to sustain it? B.B.: The creation of the replica is financed by the Auschwitz-Birkenau Foundation from earmarked donations made by private donors. The Foundation is seeking funds to continue the project. Its assumption is that ultimately the maintenance and development of the programme will be financed through licence fees paid by film producers who will use the materials within the Virtual Film Location. This way, the project will become a self-financing tool, simultaneously supporting the educational and commemorative mission of the Memorials. What difficulties have arisen in implementing the project? B.B.: Such large and innovative projects always face difficulties. One of the biggest was, of course, obtaining adequate funding to start and develop the project. A key challenge was also the need to reconcile high-tech solutions with the very special status of the space we were mapping. Although we are working in a digital environment, we must not forget that every step we take concerns an authentic Memorial, which is subject to unique protection. This must be a priority thought in every action.


Euronews
04-06-2025
- Euronews
Falling in Love 'is possible only in Berlin' says Jean Paul Gaultier
"I went to the Garden of Love, And saw what I never had seen." Thus begins William Blake's 230 year-old poem 'The Garden of Love'. And what a bloom has it inspired in the shape of musical sensation Falling in Love, at the Friedrichstadt-Palast in Berlin. "I just remember how it was the first time I read the first two lines," writer and director Oliver Hoppmann explains. "I went to the Garden of Love and saw what I never had seen. And that was just, wow, that struck me, because there's pretty much everything in there for a show. There's a reference to nature, to love, I mean, what else do you need?" Well, it turns out what else you need are a supporting team of 60 performers, 50 musicians and countless backstage and office staff. Oh, and an audience, which now collectively amounts to half a million spectators. Some of whom, much to my initial dismay, clapped along rather a lot. The show centres on a young, creative but rather lost character called 'You', a deaf poet whose inability to conform leaves them dejected until an immersion into the lost Garden of Love opens a realm of possibilities. A magical place where they may finally find words, and a voice that is heard. That it is a spectacle is doubtless. From the get-go, Falling in Love showers you with light, with colour and with a wow factor that doesn't ever really go away. Your eyes dart left, right, up, through, beyond, and at every shift there is a new colour, a new depth, another stonking guitar-riff. And while you're blown away by the sheer magnitude of this visual carnival, the remaining part of your senses will not be surprised to discover that the entire thing has been curated by the French fashion stylist Jean Paul Gaultier. "Jean Paul and I, we've known each other for quite some has become a friend of our house because he loves the shows at Frederickstraße Palast," continues Hoppmann. "He travels here privately to see shows. So we have been in regular contact. And when we came to that idea of that new show, that poem, that garden of love, we said, okay, who could be that person who brings that spark in a couture way to that?" There is of course only one answer. Enter Jean Paul Gaultier. "I have had the pleasure and the privilege to design again many costumes for Falling in Love, but I also worked with other designers: Matières Fécales and Sasha Frolova. The challenge was to choose great collaborators who would share my and Oliver's vision for the show. And after our initial meetings and exchange of ideas and first sketches I was happy to give them almost a carte blanche for their sections of the show," Gaultier explains to Euronews Culture. The layered production design and the scale of that design gives you a tangible 360 degree sensation. The costumes are truly spectacular with echoes of Gaultier's iconic outfits in The Fifth Element but also The Hunger Games which, although designed by Judianna Makovsky, betrayed a Gaultier influence in places. "I have some codes that are part of my style and my fashion vocabulary," he says. "The corset and the cone bra is one of them. I always want to create something new but at the same time I use my fashion codes as my vocabulary." Theatrically it shares some elements with the We Will Rock You musical that ran for 12 years in London, and not just the wall of guitars. The flagrant pantomime nature that pervades much of the interaction is a common by-product of writing it large. And this is as large as indoor theatre gets. From the kick-off number Diamond City, it's clear the show is going to be a kaleidoscope. And you need such a thing when the whole audience is not bilingual and therefore the jokes sometimes fall flat. The audiences have comprised many nationalities but the top five are France, Switzerland, the US, Austria, and Denmark. There is cheeky titillation (the lower cheeks to be precise) and super-hench pecs on show in a celebration of athletic prowess and beauty. Choreography and technical elements come together to form something genuinely beautiful; a dancer abseiling down a waterfall enchants the mind while a wonderfully-engineered fountain dance is candy-popping fun. And all the camp, kitsch, multicoloured vibrancy sometimes finds its way into the audience. There's no fourth wall here. We're allowed into the pop video, the dream, the trip. The guitar-toting character of Leon is part game show host, part Worf from Star Trek. I wonder if all this colour has left characterisation as a second thought. The colours don't really inhabit the character types they represent in any physical or vocal way which leaves us having to try to recall them. Gaultier himself admits his greatest challenge on this production "was the soloists and how best to express their nature and their feelings through the costumes." There is something tribal about the colours here. We have three camps: red, green and blue, all in their various ways offering modes of expression to the poet to colour their world. The theme of deafness and isolation is encapsulated by the character of 'You', which brings a profound level of meaning to the carnival. "I try to focus on vision, on touch, on vibrations," says Justyna Woloch, who plays the deaf character of 'You'. "There is, built into the stage, a vibration plate in the middle of the hexagon that was purposefully made for people with hearing problems to be able to feel when to really be on the music and not be off the beat." Woloch is not deaf but took over from deaf performer Hearns Sebuado when she took the role of 'You'. "The plate helps me as well because, of course, I hear music and I immediately start moving but I really consciously have to try to stop hearing it, which is really hard. And so many times during the show I'm touching the vibration plate and trying to really block out all the sound." To illustrate the genesis of this element of the show, Hoppmann tells me about a deaf poetry slam that he attended 10 years ago where he suddenly understood the frustration of those with hearing impairment. "I'm a hearing director in a room of non-hearing people with performers on stage who are only using sign language, German sign language, to recite their poems. And I didn't have a clue what they were saying. There were, like, verbalisations and an audio description." "There was a verbal translation for people who were hearing and couldn't understand sign language," he recounts. "But, you know, a director always wants to be ahead of time, right? You want to know what comes next, what happens next. And I couldn't because I had always to wait until I got the translation. I really felt it. I'm the last person in the room that understood." It is without a doubt impressive that the themes of deafness and isolation are part of something so vast, loud (in both colour and sound) and inclusive, and the Palast itself plays a fundamental part in the proceedings. With an unrivalled stage area of 2,854 square metres, and near-perfect sight lines for the whole audience, as well as a trailblazing air-conditioning system via the actual seats, unusually visual treats can be clearly observed in comfort. Also playing a role is the wider geographical context. The inimitable city of Berlin. "I love Berlin," admits Gaultier. "I have been coming regularly for years. There was still the wall dividing the city the first time I visited. And this show is possible only in Berlin with its unique history and unique feeling." Disco ball shoulder pads, bike helmets, glitter g-strings with regency wigs run amok on the enormous stage. Every number is a brilliant pop video leaving little room for sentiment but plenty of fuel for entertainment. Gaultier is resolute on what's important. "It is a show, a Grand Show and I think it is most important that the audience enjoys themselves, that they enjoy the story, the music, the dancing, the special effects, the costumes. Whether that enjoyment is through form or the substance is not crucial for me," he says. Another thing that will not have escaped the audiences are the extraordinary number of crystals in the design. This is thanks to a partnership deal with Swarovski who provided a staggering 100 million crystals in all cuts and colours, which I am assured is a new world record in live entertainment. I'm not convinced there was an old world record to beat but it certainly fits the 'sky's the limit' remit. Profundity may be hard to detect among a sea of crystals but there are important themes at work amongst the glitz. There's an anthropological callback to Levi Strauss in the play's symbolic handing-over of the written word from the character of 'Me' and then to the character of 'You'. Walls created by isolation are broken, which takes on its own emotional evocation after the confinement of the global pandemic. The astonishing acrobatic performers (audiences genuinely screaming with disbelief at the physical feats) fall out of windows onto trampettes and ping back up again only to throw themselves out again is a nice metaphor for human romantic behaviour. The silly shapes we bend ourselves into for love and visibility. And on the philosophical note, when quizzed about upcoming fashion trends, Gaultier responds with something that probably should be on a poster. "I don't look at fashion as much as I used to. And trends are just trends but the style is something that stays. If you are too fashionable then very quickly you become unfashionable. As the French say La Mode se démode." Falling in Love is booking until 5 July 2025.