logo
Will move SC with contempt plea against Karnataka on Mhadei issue: Goa CM

Will move SC with contempt plea against Karnataka on Mhadei issue: Goa CM

Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant on Tuesday informed the legislative assembly that the state government will file a contempt petition in the Supreme Court against Karnataka for carrying out activities that are aimed at diverting the Mhadei river water.
The CM also accused the neighbouring state of being involved in activities aimed at diverting the river water.
The two adjoining coastal states are embroiled in a dispute over sharing the Mhadei river water. The BJP-ruled Goa has accused the Congress-governed Karnataka of planning to divert the river water by constructing two dams.
The Mhadei river originates in the Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary in Karnataka, and flows through Goa, Karnataka and Maharashtra as it empties into the Arabian Sea at Panaji in Goa.
The Centre had set up a tribunal which decided on sharing the river water between the three riparian states -- Goa, Karnataka and Maharashtra. Goa and Karnataka along with Maharashtra have appealed against the tribunal's order on sharing water by the three states in the Supreme Court, and the matter is sub-judice. Opposition MLAs in the Goa assembly on Tuesday cornered the Pramod Sawant government in the House over its failure to stop Karnataka from conducting illegal activities. Raising the issue, independent MLA Aleixo Reginaldo Lourenco sought to know the progress of the case pending before the apex court against the verdict of the tribunal on the share of Mhadei river water. Speaking on the issue, Sawant said Karnataka has been actively involved in activities aimed at diverting the Mhadei river water. "We cannot stop their activities as they are happening in their jurisdiction. But the Goa government has taken every step to counter their attempts to divert the Mhadei water," he said. The chief minister added that he had personally met Union Environment, Forest and Climate Change Minister Bhupender Yadav over the issue.
"I have discussed the matter and the Union ministry (has assured that it) will not give any permission to Karnataka to conduct any such activities," he said. "The state will file a contempt petition against Karnataka before the Supreme Court in the matter," the CM added. State Water Resources Department Minister Subhash Shirodkar said the state government has been monitoring the activities of Karnataka. The opposition benches, including Leader of Opposition Yuri Alemao, Goa Forward Party (GFP) MLA Vijai Sardesai, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Venzy Viegas and others participated in the discussion.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kamra, Andhare deny charges in reply to breach of privilege notice
Kamra, Andhare deny charges in reply to breach of privilege notice

The Hindu

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Kamra, Andhare deny charges in reply to breach of privilege notice

Comedian Kunal Kamra and Shiv Sena UBT leader Sushma Andhare have denied the charges of breach of privilege against them in responses filed before the privileges committee of the Maharashtra Legislative Council. Both were issued notices after Mr. Kamra's parody song against then Chief Minister, and now Deputy Chief Minister, Eknath Shinde, allegedly referred to him as 'gaddar' or traitor. They sent their written replies last week. 'How is 'gaddar' unparliamentary,' Ms. Andhare asked in a 28-page document which consisted of a five-page reply and a 23-page attachment of the two lists of unparliamentary words as declared by the Maharashtra Legislature in 1984 and 1999. Mr. Kamra and Ms. Andhare have said that the action against them is mala fide in intent. 'Both of them have given their replies. As the chairperson of the committee, I feel they have filed similar responses, which are not in consonance with the format we expect. We have sent their replies to the legal department for their opinion. Further action will be taken thereafter,' Prasad Lad, chairperson of the privileges committee, told The Hindu. 'It is an established principle – constitutional and commonsensical – that the legislature's power to initiate privilege proceedings exists to protect the proper functioning of the democratic institution. Similar to a court's power to punish for criminal contempt (which I have some familiarity with), parliamentary privilege can only be exercised if the impugned actions demonstrably and substantially interfere in the functioning of the relevant organ of state. Indeed, your notice does not evidence any such interference. It merely alleges that by singing a song, and adopting a sarcastic manner, I have belittled and disrespected the Deputy Chief Minister of the state. It also alleges that by this song, I have insulted the House, its 288 members and have attempted to provoke its members,' Mr. Kamra's one-page reply said. While delving on the usage of the word 'gaddar', he said the word had been used against prominent politicians in the past as well. 'The only possible distinction is that they have used the term 'gaddar' in heated political speeches, while I sang it to the mellifluous tune of the hit Bollywood song 'Bholi Si Surat'... I would respectfully suggest that if a parody of a famous Bollywood song has disrupted or affected the functioning of the Maharashtra legislature, then the breach of privilege is by the members of the House who find themselves so easily provoked, and not by me,' he said. Ms. Andhare said that if she had not used any of the unparliamentary word against any member of the legislature, how could she be accused of using it. She said that the expression 'mirchya zombtat' (loosely translated as getting miffed) was used for those who had attacked 'Habitat' studio, where Mr. Kamra had performed, and not for the legislators. She further said that Mr. Shinde had himself never filed any defamation complaint or issued any notice to her. Saying that as per law, only the one who is offended can decide if he is defamed or not, she added there was no action on his part to show that she had offended him.

Shashi Tharoor declined Congress' offer to speak on Operation Sindoor: party sources
Shashi Tharoor declined Congress' offer to speak on Operation Sindoor: party sources

The Hindu

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Shashi Tharoor declined Congress' offer to speak on Operation Sindoor: party sources

The Congress asked party MP Shashi Tharoor if he was interested in speaking during the Operation Sindoor debate in Parliament but he declined and instead expressed a desire to speak on 'The Indian Ports Bill, 2025', party sources said on Monday (July 28, 2026). Also read: Parliament Monsoon session updates on July 28, 2025 There has been speculation on whether Mr. Tharoor, who led the delegation to the U.S. among other countries, will be picked as a speaker by the Congress, given that his enthusiastic endorsement of the government's action following the terror attack has soured his ties with the party. Asked whether Mr. Tharoor was asked to speak during the debate, a senior Congress leader said, 'It is a practice that senior leaders are asked whether they are interested in speaking on a major issue. Gaurav Gogoi and K. Suresh had reached out to him and asked if he was interested in speaking during the debate on Operation Sindoor, to which he said he is not interested and would like to speak on the Ports Bill.' There was no immediate response from Mr. Tharoor on the assertion by the party sources. 'Vow of silence' Asked whether he would speak in Parliament on Operation Sindoor, the seasoned Lok Sabha MP had earlier quipped to the media that he is on a maun vrat (vow of silence). Opposition parties have framed their public criticism of the government around alleged intelligence lapses behind the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which left 26 civilians killed, and U.S. President Donald Trump's claims of mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Rahul Gandhi has repeatedly attacked the government's foreign policy, claiming that India did not receive international support on Operation Sindoor and has cited Mr. Trump's frequent mediation claims to target the ruling alliance. The government has rejected Mr. Trump's claims.

Operation Sindoor was nothing but 'tamasha' of govt in media: Congress MP Praniti Shinde in Lok Sabha
Operation Sindoor was nothing but 'tamasha' of govt in media: Congress MP Praniti Shinde in Lok Sabha

Mint

time18 minutes ago

  • Mint

Operation Sindoor was nothing but 'tamasha' of govt in media: Congress MP Praniti Shinde in Lok Sabha

Congress MP Praniti Shinde on Monday called Operation Sindoor a "tamasha" by the government, and claimed it was more of a media show than a real success. Shinde questioned what was actually achieved, how many terrorists were caught, whether any fighter jets were lost, and demanded that the government take responsibility and give clear answers. During the discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha, Praniti Shinde said, '... Operation Sindoor was nothing but a 'tamasha' of the government in the media. No one is telling us what was achieved in this Operation. How many terrorists were caught? How many fighter jets did we lose? Who is responsible and whose mistake is this, should be answered by the government...' Meanwhile, earlier, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh targeted the opposition in the Lok Sabha, accusing them of prioritising the wrong questions during the opening debate on Operation Sindoor. Replying to the questions raised by the Opposition during the Parliament monsoon session about possible Indian aircraft losses, Singh said that their questions did not represent the national sentiments. "In every country, citizens hand over different duties to the opposition and the government. The government's role is to work for the citizens, and the Opposition's role is to ask questions of the government on important matters related to citizens. Few members of the Opposition have been asking how many of our aircraft were shot down? I feel their question does not adequately represent our national sentiments," Singh said. Singh further hailed Operation Sindoor, saying that the military operation that was launched on May 7 in response to the Phalgam terror attack was a "success." "If they must ask a question, it should be whether India destroyed terrorist bases, and the answer to that is, yes... If you have a question to ask, it should be whether Operation Sindoor was a success. The answer is yes. Were terror heads destroyed? Yes. If you have a question to ask, ask this: Were any of our brave soldiers harmed in this operation? The answer is, no, none of our soldiers were harmed...," he further said. Operation Sindoor was carried out in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed the lives of 26 people on April 22 this year. India targeted nine terror hubs across Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir and Pakistan and neutralised over 100 terrorists. After the May 7 operations, India and Pakistan reached a cessation of hostilities understanding on May 10.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store