Bill to undo convictions for consensual gay sex introduced 32 years after decriminalisation of homosexuality
Hundreds of men were convicted since the State's foundation, and the legislation will 'right a wrong, something that should have been delivered many, many years ago', Sinn Féin TD
Aengus Ó Snodaigh
said as he introduced the Disregard of Historic Offences for Consensual Sexual Activity between Men Bill on Tuesday.
The legislation, developed with a number of campaign groups, was cosigned by Opposition parties and Independents. Mr Ó Snodaigh said it was one of 95 recommendations of the report of a working group established in 2021.
The State decriminalised gay sex in Ireland 32 years ago but 'it failed to address the legacy of that' to 'ensure that those men who have criminal convictions can disregard that conviction so that it is no longer a weight on their shoulders and a weight on our society'.
READ MORE
Speaking later outside the Dáil, Mr Ó Snodaigh said the exact number of those convicted under the legislation is not known, but one piece of research showed that in Tullow, Co Carlow in 1970, 12 criminal prosecutions were taken in one month.
Labour
's Conor Sheehan said: 'many men live with the trauma inflicted upon them by a society who told them they shouldn't exist'.
Despite an apology in 2018, no action was taken to disregard these convictions and many men are living with 'shame and stigma' and a trauma that 'drove many people to their graves. Gay men were driven underground', by the legislation, he said.
Urging the Government to support the Bill, Mr Sheehan said he was conscious that he was fortunate enough to be able to live openly as a gay man.
Social Democrats TD Pádraig Rice said 'the prosecution and convictions of hundreds of gay men for consensual sex was a gross violation of their human rights and did immeasurable damage.
'These arrests and convictions destroyed lives. The laws also had a negative impact on those who weren't convicted because the threat of prosecution was used to harass people in the community.'
[
10 milestones in Irish gay rights
Opens in new window
]
He said the arcane laws also had a 'huge impact on the provision of public services, including HIV/Aids prevention'. Mr Rice warned that 'we are running out of time for these men', many of whom were elderly, and they needed immediate action from Government.
Green Party leader
Roderic O'Gorman
said the legislation stated 'whoever shall be convicted of the abominable crime of buggery, committed either with mankind or with any animal, shall be liable to be kept in penal servitude for life'.
He said framing homosexuality in legislation from the 1860s showed the 'absolute moral condemnation' for being gay.
The same approach is being adopted currently, he said. 'It was adopted in Poland up to the recent change in the general election there. It's adopted in Hungary today.
'We see that same language online and I think that's why it is so important that we are moving to disregard these convictions.'
People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy said 'this is not just a matter of righting a historic wrong. It's about sending a message at a time when LGBQ rights are under attack in this country and globally, that love is love and homosexuality is never a crime'.
Independent TD Catherine Connolly said some of the legislation went back to the 17th century and had nothing to do with justice or fairness. 'It was homophobia at its worst.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
42 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Depicting the Metro as primarily an airport service is an example of Michael O'Leary's myopic thinking
To understand why Michael O'Leary 's arguments against the Dublin MetroLink are so flawed, you need to go back 25 years, when the project was first proposed in the Platform for Change transport plan for Dublin . That plan was based on the most detailed modelling of how our city should grow. It showed that a meshed network of public transport, safe cycling and walking routes was the only way of building a city that would work into the future. O'Leary's argument that we should give up on rail-based solutions and rely on the car and bus instead makes no sense. We will need a huge expansion in our bus service, but on its own it will not be able to carry the numbers needed to avoid inevitable gridlock. It is not a sustainable solution – even if every vehicle is guided by artificial intelligence and powered by clean electricity. The Metro will help us manage one specific capacity problem that we already knew about all those years ago, around the approach roads to Dublin Airport . Because these roads link so closely to the M1 and M50, which are the busiest roads in the country, they risk creating tailbacks that would clog up the entire road system. O'Leary wants the Government to just ignore the issue and undermine the independence of our planning system by scrapping the conditions that were put in place to manage this real capacity problem. He argues that the Metro will not be used by many airport passengers, but every vehicle diverted from that approach road matters. His proposal to ditch the Metro and abandon the rule of law by subverting the planning authority would do incredible damage to our country and do nothing to improve Dublin Airport. READ MORE Depicting the Metro as primarily an airport service is in any case an example of O'Leary's myopic thinking. It will first and foremost be a facility for the people of Swords and Ballymun, for students in Dublin City University and patients attending the Mater hospital . It can deliver the meshed network promised in the Platform for Change plan, by connecting to the mainline rail network at Glasnevin and Tara Street and to the Luas at Charlemont, St Stephens Green and O'Connell Street. [ Dublin's MetroLink: How much will it really cost? Opens in new window ] In the intervening years, we have also modelled where the second phase of the Metro will go. It is not designed to stop at Charlemont, but will continue from there to Terenure, Rathfarnham, Knocklyon, Firhouse and Tallaght, which are poorly served by public transport. The project was split because it was too big as a single line, but once we have delivered the first phase it should be a lot easier and cheaper to complete the second phase. What we will have then is a rail artery connecting the north and south sides of the city, joining up with all the other lines and making the city work in a cleaner, more efficient and social way. The final argument from O'Leary is that the Metro is now too expensive, citing the €23 billion price tag that has been put out there by some as the likely cost. Again, you need to know the history of the project to understand where that incredibly inflated price tag is coming from. Michael O'Leary's proposal 'to ditch the MetroLink and abandon the rule of law by subverting the planning authority would do incredible damage to our country and do nothing to improve Dublin Airport'. Photograph: Sam Boal/Collins Photos The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform has always opposed the Metro, for what seemed to me to be ideological rather than rational reasons. It succeeded in killing off the project in 2011 despite it having planning permission, being included in the national recovery plan and having funding support from the European Development Bank. The line also ran alongside large housing land banks the State then controlled through Nama , which were ready to be built upon once the Metro got the go-ahead. It was one of the worst investment decisions ever made in the history of the State not to go ahead at that time. Unfortunately, the department does not seem to have learned the right lessons from that experience. It is now more traumatised by the cost overruns from the building of the new National Children's Hospital and as a result is applying a new standard on the estimates for the Metro, which requires a 95 per cent certainty that no such cost overruns could ever occur. [ MetroLink delivery should be prioritised, US multinationals tell Government Opens in new window ] International experts confirmed to me it would be far more appropriate at this stage to apply a 50 per cent probability cost indicator, which brings the construction cost estimate down to less than €12 billion. It is hard to believe the department seems willing to talk up the odds of an expensive auction process, just to save face should there be future cost overruns. O'Leary does not help with his demeaning comments about the inability of the Irish State to deliver anything. In fact, we built out the motorways and Luas lines on budget and on time, just as we did with complex projects such as the National Broadband Plan and electricity interconnectors. Our biggest problem is a lack of confidence and conviction to deliver at speed. That is not helped by hurlers on the ditch such as O'Leary. Sowing doubt, derision and misinformation only delays projects and adds to the cost to the Irish public in the end.
Irish Times
42 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Taoiseach cracks down on last-minute, ‘under the arm' Cabinet memos from Ministers
Government Ministers have been warned to bring issues to Cabinet at the last minute only in exceptional and urgent cases, as Taoiseach Micheál Martin cracks down on memos going 'under the arm' to meetings. At a Cabinet meeting on June 10th, it is understood Mr Martin told colleagues the practice was happening far too often and needed to stop. The assistant secretary general to the Government has twice reminded senior officials across departments of the requirement for consultation under the constitutional principle of collective Cabinet responsibility. 'Under the arm' refers to a minister bringing a memo to a Cabinet meeting at the last minute, without the details being shared with other departments and ministers in advance. READ MORE Sometimes an urgent issue will need to be raised without notice, but ministers may also choose not to share details of a memo in advance if they do not want it leaked to the media. Officials at the Department of Public Expenditure (DPER) have complained about the practice, arguing they are not given enough time to consider issues that carry a significant cost to the exchequer. Notable examples in the lifetime of this Government include Minister for Housing James Browne's landmark reforms of Rent Pressure Zones and Minister for Culture Patrick O'Donovan 's bombshell memo on the Arts Council's failed IT project. According to documents released under Freedom of Information, Dermot Woods, assistant secretary general to the Government, wrote to senior officials across every department in April to stress that memos had to be submitted the week before a Cabinet meeting. He said that after specific deadlines, they would 'not be accepted' and would have to go to a later meeting. Mr Woods said 'prior consultation' was required when the Government had to make a decision on a memo. 'This formal consultation should, therefore, only be abridged where there is a genuine urgency ... and, even then, only to the minimum necessary to achieve the objective.' Mr Woods said an explanation for why there had not been prior consultation should be included in memos in such cases. In another Government-wide email issued in May, Mr Woods was forced to warn officials again. 'The Taoiseach has reiterated that the late submission of Memorandums to the Government is to be avoided and that deadlines for submission are to be observed,' he said. This was followed by an email from the private secretary to Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers stressing that the Taoiseach would consider adding late memos to the agenda only in 'exceptional cases where matters are urgent.' On Thursday, May 1st officials in DPER became aware that Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris was planning to bring a memo to Cabinet the following Tuesday, possibly 'under the arm.' Mr Harris was expected to update colleagues on the latest developments in trade between the US and Ireland, possible counter measures being considered by the European Union, and a 'new list' of goods and services with some 'sensitive areas' for Ireland. An official in DPER said that the department had previously told the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFA) that 'we wished for sight on these kinds of memos in good time ahead of the Government meetings, even informally if the memo wasn't ready for e‐cabinet.' At a meeting between DPER and DFA the next day, Mr Harris's department was again reminded that DPER needed to see memos in advance and 'and specifically that this memo needs to be provided ASAP.'
Irish Times
42 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Sinn Féin may reject commemorating the Normans, but there are some suspiciously Saxon names in its ranks
As the bearer of a 100 per cent Gaelic name, I am all in favour of Sinn Féin 's opposition to the State's participation in the European Year of the Normans in 2027. As the party's spokesman on the arts Aengus Ó Snodaigh put it in May, 'We Irish know well enough the legacy of William's successors invading and subjugating Ireland in the name of his English crown, with Strongbow ushering in the 900 years of occupation, with the North still under the descendants of William the Conqueror's Crown.' It is long since time that 'we Irish', children of the Gael, purged our history and our culture of the legacy of the Normans and the Anglo-Saxons who followed in their wake. This would certainly get rid of a lot of troublemakers. We could start of course with the father of Irish republicanism, Theobold Wolfe Tone . Tone derives from the Norman lordship of De Tosny. The family's presence in this archipelago dates from Raoul de Tosny's services as standard bearer to William the Conqueror at the Battle of Hastings in 1066 A.D. [ The Irish Times view on Sinn Féin vs the Normans: a cartoonish version of history Opens in new window ] Other prominent United Irishmen executed by the British included Edward Fitzgerald – the Fitz is the most obvious Norman giveaway. The Shears brothers, Henry and John were hanged shortly before the rising – Shears comes from the Norman name Essira. Oliver Bond shares his good Anglo-Saxon patronymic with James Bond. Thomas Russell's family name derives from Hugh de Rosel, who also accompanied William the Conqueror at Hastings. READ MORE 'We Irish' would also be better off without Charles Stewart Parnell. Parnell comes from La Pernelle, a village in, of all places, Normandy. The family established itself in Devon and Cornwall after the Conquest and a branch later took root in Ireland. Sinn Féin might even want to look within its own ranks. Gerry Adams hardly bears a name redolent of Gaeldom Returning to the executed, we might note that the British again did a decent enough job of ridding us Irish of agitators of Norman blood. There were of course the Pearse brothers Patrick and Willie – Pearse comes from the personal name Piers, a diminutive form of Pierre. Joseph Mary Plunkett owed his shameful appellation to Pleugueneuc in Brittany. The first big Anglo-Norman lord of this family in Ireland, John Plukenet, called his estate in Co Meath, Beaulieu, not even bothering to hide his French origins Another four of the 14 men executed in 1916 belonged to the Anglo-Saxon tribes who came in after the Norman conquest. Thomas Clarke was the chief architect of the rising – Clarke has stout Hampshire origins, though it could also be from the Norman form de Clerc. Con Colbert's surname is rooted on the Anglo-Scottish borders. The two Kents Edward (Éamonn Ceannt) and Thomas (executed in Cork) speak for themselves. So half of the 1916 martyrs flowed from the polluted springs of the Norman conquest. [ Fianna Fáil accused of 'offensive' plan to celebrate William the Conqueror Opens in new window ] Sinn Féin likes to place the 1981 hunger strikers in this direct line of succession from Tone and Pearse – and indeed some of them did bear the same genetic guilt. Bobby Sands probably goes back to William de Sandes or Walter de la Sonde, who established themselves as landowners in Surrey in Anglo-Norman times. Francis Hughes owed his name to the Old French Hue or Hughe. Kevin Lynch owed his to the Norman surname de Lench. Martin Hurson's patronymic is originally from Dorset, though it too may have Norman roots. And while we're clearing our history of these invasive species, 'we Irish' can also clean up our culture. Out go Edmund Burke (de Burca), Douglas Hyde (pure Anglo-Saxon), James Joyce (properly speaking Josse in old French), Lady Gregory (maiden name Persse), William Butler Yeats (de Jette), Samuel Beckett, Maeve Binchy (de Binga, from Normandy via Kent), Sebastian and Kevin Barry (de Barry), John Banville, Phil Lynott (big Welsh-Norman landgrabbers in Connacht), Louis le Brocquy, Colm Toíbín (Tobin is from St Aubyn), Neil Jordan (after Jordan De Courcy, who came in with Strongbow), Jessie Buckley (de Buckelay), and many more of their terrible ilk. Sinn Féin might even want to look within its own ranks. Gerry Adams hardly bears a name redolent of Gaeldom. Of its current TDs, Anne Graves and Thomas Gould sound suspiciously Saxon to me, Cathy Bennett shares her name not just with Jane Austen characters but with early Norman settlers, Denise Mitchell and Dessie Ellis ultimately echo French personal names, Pat Buckley is stamped with the same nominal culpability as Jessie. Oh and Ó Snodaigh is a Gaelicised version of Snoddy which comes from the town of Snodgrass in Ayrshire. Most advanced Irish nationalists in the 19th and early 20th centuries recognised and embraced the reality that Ireland, like pretty much every other corner of the globe, has been formed by a mixture of cultures All of this is, of course, utterly ludicrous. But it's not harmless. We are living at a time when the ludicrous is mainstream. Daft notions about nationality are moving again from the fringes to the centre. A self-pitying notion of 'We Irish' is not an innocent notion – it is being mobilised for violence right now on our own streets. It's a phrase in which the first little word can subvert the second. 'We' can be used to constrict the 'Irish', to confine it within one category of belonging – the descendants of the Gaels who were invaded by the Normans in 1169 and are still being occupied and subjugated by their descendants in Northern Ireland today. This isn't 19th-century nationalism. It's worse. Most advanced Irish nationalists in the 19th and early 20th centuries recognised and embraced the reality that Ireland, like pretty much every other corner of the globe, has been formed by a mixture of cultures. Religion – the sectarian divide between Catholic and Protestant – was a much more important marker of difference than ethnic origin. About a fifth of those living in Ireland now have no ancestral connection to the pre-Norman Gaelic world at all – if they sing the national anthem's line about 'seantír ár sinsear'/ 'our ancient sireland', they may be thinking of somewhere very far away. And the other four-fifths are, like every other nationality, a product of multiple invasions and migrations, colonisations and resistances, settlement and unsettlement. 'We Irish' should not be a prelude to a single sob story, an epic saga of endless oppression. It contains multitudes.
