State capture allegations come back to haunt RAF acting CIO
It is not certain that the RAF board realises that the primary purpose of the fund is to 'compensate victims timeously'. Picture: Shutterstock
The Road Accident Fund (RAF) board placed its acting chief investment officer (CIO) Sefotle Modiba on precautionary suspension following allegations that parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) was given misinformation about Modiba's departure from the City of Johannesburg (CoJ).
It has also emerged that RAF CEO Collins Letsoalo has lodged an urgent high court application to review and set aside last week's decision by the fund's board to suspend him with immediate effect for insubordination for defying a board instruction for him to attend a Scopa meeting on 28 May.
Letsoalo is alleging the decision is unlawful, irrational, and unreasonable and is requesting the court to order his immediate reinstatement as RAF CEO.
The application is scheduled to be heard next week.
RAF board deputy chair Dr Nomonde Mabuya-Moloele confirmed to parliament's Portfolio Committee on Transport last week that the RAF board had recommended at a special meeting tonight to rescind a decision to place Letsoalo on special leave and to then place him on suspension.
Mabuya-Moloele further confirmed that Modiba had been placed on precautionary suspension with full pay and benefits with immediate effect. This is due to concerns regarding Modiba's previous employment at the CoJ and other matters that are currently under investigation.
ALSO READ: RAF CEO placed on special leave with full pay, as MPs grill fund
Charges 'were dropped' say Modiba's attorneys
Scopa member Patrick Atkinson of the DA said during last month's Scopa meeting that a letter was sent to the committee by Vuyo Manisi Inc Attorneys on behalf of Modiba stating that:
The CoJ decided to withdraw all charges of misconduct against Modiba;
There was a mutual separation agreement between the CoJ and Modiba; and
All of what is stated in the letter is well documented and backed up by concrete evidence that their client, Modiba, did not leave the CoJ with any charges hanging over his head.
Atkinson said the letter further stated that Modiba feels aggrieved because of comments made by Scopa chair Songezo Zibi on a matter that had already been finalised and is inaccurate.
He said the letter urged Scopa to refrain from 'using false information' and committee members not 'to entertain wrong information concerning their client's [Modiba] departure from the CoJ'.
ALSO READ: R25.5 billion deficit over five years — Can RAF afford to pay out claims?
Charges against Modiba 'were not dropped' – CoJ
Atkinson said the reality is that Scopa sought information from the CoJ and he would like to state the facts of the response it received from the CoJ.
He said with regard to the claim that the charges against Modiba were dropped because the CoJ no longer believed he had a case to answer, the CoJ said:
'According to our records, the charges against Mr Modiba were not dropped. He resigned during the disciplinary process.'
Atkinson said the second question from Scopa to the CoJ was whether there was a mutual separation agreement as part of the settlement when Modiba resigned and had the charges dropped.
Atkinson replied that the CoJ said: 'No, there was no mutual separation between Mr Modiba and the CoJ.
'There was a proposal for mutual separation from his [legal] representative, which proposal was rejected by the CoJ representatives. Subsequently, the employer resigned and left of his own volition.'
ALSO READ: Expert accuses RAF of misrepresenting itself and its purpose
'We have been lied to again' – Scopa
Atkinson said the CoJ was further asked if Modiba resigned of his own accord before the disciplinary inquiry could proceed – and since he was no longer an employee there was no longer a reason to pursue the matter any further?
He replied that the CoJ said: 'Mr Modiba resigned during the disciplinary process when the parties could not reach any consensus on mutual separation.'
Atkinson said the issue Scopa has, which is extremely serious, is that 'we have been lied to again'.
'Mr Modiba instructed a lawyer to send us a letter with falsehoods and lies,' he added.
'Now, I think the situation here is that certainly the [RAF] board needs to speak to Mr Modiba and see whether you want to continue to employ him on the basis of a lawyer's letter sent to Scopa which does not attest to the information we received from the CoJ,' he said.
Atkinson also requested Scopa to report Modiba's attorney to the Legal Practice Council.
'In essence, a lie has been sent to this committee under a lawyer's letter under the full knowledge of Mr Modiba and his attorney,' he said.
'So we would ask that that attorney be reported to the Legal Professional [Practice] Council and that [the] letter be subject to an investigation.'
ALSO READ: RAF management muzzled employees during investigations, SIU says
The R2.6bn that left CoJ's coffers
During the Scopa meeting with the RAF in March, Scopa chair Zibi referred to the fact that Modiba had reportedly left the CoJ after facing disciplinary charges related to the withdrawal of R2.6 billion.
He said these funds were later linked to Regiments Capital, a firm cited during the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture.
Zibi pointed out in last month's Scopa meeting that he had asked the RAF for information about Modiba in October 2024 – and with a simple email that took four minutes the committee to draft, it received the response from the CoJ that Atkinson had mentioned.
'The [RAF] board is failing,' said Zibi.
'Vacancies in critical positions, litigation without a head of legal, people in positions who are still trying to find their feet, lawyers who rock up in court to try and overturn a matter and they don't argue it, inability to send a simple email to a previous employer to ask about the appropriateness of an employee, who then proceeds to send a lawyer's letter that is suspect at best.
'This situation cannot continue any longer. It's making a mockery of parliament and its oversight.'
ALSO READ: WATCH: Letsoalo denies misleading Scopa on RAF's state of affairs
Transport department to report on action being taken
Zibi asked Deputy Minister of Transport Mkhuleko Hlengwa, when he next reports to parliament about the RAF, to report on what is being done to remedy this situation.
Hlengwa told the Portfolio Committee on Transport last week that he would be having a meeting with the RAF board this week (the week starting 9 June) on a number of issues.
The Department of Transport stated on Friday that this meeting 'will evaluate the prospects of the current board to restore good governance and effective administration at the entity so that it fulfills its primary purpose of compensating road accident victims timeously'.
'The department will consider appropriate interventions post this meeting to ensure the stability of the entity, good governance, and the fulfilment of its mandate.'
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
2 days ago
- TimesLIVE
Limpopo man sentenced to life in prison more than decade after raping 12-year-old girl
A Limpopo man has been sentenced to life in prison more than a decade after raping a 12-year-old girl in the Bolobedu area near Tzaneen. Nelson Letsoalo, 46, was convicted in the Tzaneen regional court on Thursday after an investigation by the family violence, child protection and sexual offences (FCS) unit. According to provincial police spokesperson Col Malesela Ledwaba the incident happened in 2013 when the minor was visiting her grandmother in Khapamadi Section under Bolobedu policing area. 'The victim went to a shop that was next to the tavern and Letsoalo, who was known by the victim as a cleaner, called her to come inside the tavern,' said Ledwaba. 'The accused forced the victim to lay on the floor and she was raped. Afterwards, Letsoalo threatened the victim with death if she told anyone about it.' The child later disclosed the traumatic incident to her mother in January 2020, which led to an immediate report to local police. Letsoalo was arrested the next day on January 5 2020 at his home in Kgapane and the matter was immediately transferred to Tzaneen FCS. 'The accused made numerous court appearances until he was granted R1,000 bail,' Ledwaba said. Despite the time that had passed, Letsoalo was found guilty of rape of a minor and sentenced to life in prison. Provincial police commissioner Lt-Gen Thembi Hadebe welcomed the court outcome.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Court declares Joburg's non-sectional title refuse charge tariff unlawful
A high court judgment ruled that CoJ's reclassification of non-sectional title properties was inconsistent with legislation and by-laws. The High Court in Johannesburg has found that the City of Johannesburg (CoJ) acted unlawfully in imposing a non-sectional title refuse charge tariff on certain residential accommodation buildings that were already paying a refuse charge tariff. A judgment handed down by Judge Mandlenkosi Motha on 21 July 2025, declared the classification of 'non-sectional title properties,' in CoJ's Tariff of Charges for Solid Waste Services for the years 2018 to 2022, unlawful and inconsistent with existing regulation. There were 42 applicants in total, 41 of which were companies owning a collective 7 333 multi-unit residential accommodation units within the city. These included Indluplace Properties, the Johannesburg Housing Company and Sirius Property Investments. The remaining applicant was the Johannesburg Property Owners and Managers Association, a non-profit organisation established to represent the interests of property owners and managers in the city. Judge Motha said this matter originated in CoJ's reclassification 'of multi-unit residential rental accommodation, from the refuse charge tariff to the non-sectional title refuse tariff'. Essentially, he said the matter concerns the lawfulness of CoJ imposing a non-sectional title tariff on buildings that were paying a refuse charge tariff. ALSO READ: Pikitup fleet woes cause waste collection delays in Johannesburg Applicant's argument The applicants sought an order declaring the classification of non-sectional title properties – as contained in the CoJ's Tariff of Charges for Solid Waste Services for the years 2018 to 2022 – unlawful and inconsistent with the Local Government Municipal Systems Act (MSA) of 2000, read with CoJ's Tariff Determination By-laws of 2008, and set it aside. The applicants argued that, as stipulated in the MSA, it is the municipality's policies and by-laws that dictate how its tariff-setting powers must be exercised. They further stated that, in terms of this Act, a municipality must adopt and implement a tariff policy on the levying of fees for municipal services – whether provided directly by the municipality or through service delivery agreements – and that this policy must comply with the provisions of the MSA, the Municipal Finance Management Act, and any other applicable legislation. ALSO READ: Tshwane cleaning tariff may be challenged in court The city's counter-argument The CoJ argued that the reclassification was not unlawful, as the tariff determination scheme arises from relevant enabling legislation. It maintained that non-sectional title units should be subject to municipal levies in the same manner as sectional title units. The city further claimed that regarding the policy or by-laws, the reference to non-sectional titles would not be 'a fundamentally wrong way of interpreting the MSA'. It added that 'the remit of the empowering provision of Section 75(2) of the Act is wide enough to permit 'the COJ to impose or extend the non-sectional title tariff to flats in buildings owned by the applicants'.' Judge Motha said the court referred the CoJ's counsel to the detailed differentiations and distinctions in the Tariff Determination By-laws, particularly that the council may allow for the following categorisation of users: 'residential or domestic; commercial; industrial; farming; government; and state-owned enterprises.' In response to CoJ's counsel arguing that it wasn't necessary for the by-laws to explicitly mention the term 'non-sectional title,' Judge Motha posed a rhetorical question: what is the function of by-laws if not to delineate users? Judge Motha referred to two previous judgments, which ruled that local government may only act within the powers lawfully conferred upon it. Further, it's fundamental to South Africa's constitutional order that the legislature and executive in every sphere is bound by the principle that they may exercise no power and perform no function beyond that granted to them by law. ALSO READ: These Gauteng municipalities are lagging behind with their refuse collection bills He said two issues stand out 'like a sore thumb' in this case when properly examining the Tariff Determination Policy, which is created under the MSA. Firstly, 'there is no differentiation called 'sectional title' and 'non-sectional title' properties,' and secondly, to enforce and implement the tariff policy, by-laws 'must' be adopted. 'The creation of a distinction between sectional and non-sectional title properties introduces a category that finds no basis in the empowering provision. 'It, therefore, ineluctably follows that the respondents (CoJ) acted ultra vires in purporting to create a non-sectional title distinction,' he said. Judge Motha added that Chapter 5 of the Tariff Determination Policy defines various types of tariffs for waste and refuse removal. It provides for a 'domestic tariff' that applies to private dwellings per erf, blocks of flats and elderly people's homes, as well as a 'non-domestic tariff' and a 'business refuse' tariff. However, Judge Motha stressed, 'it makes no distinction between sectional title and non-sectional title properties'. ALSO READ: Gauteng's waste collection woes: R1 billion needed for landfills, R60 million for fleets Judge Motha said that to merely contend, as the CoJ does, that Section 75(2) of the MSA is sufficiently broad to permit a distinction between sectional and non-sectional title properties 'is to overlook the pivotal role of a tariff policy and by-laws'. 'Without a tariff policy and by-laws, the imposition of tariffs is left without a rational legal framework and becomes susceptible to challenges on the grounds of unfair discrimination and irrationality. 'For example, sectional title owners whose flats are less than R350 000 do not pay any refuse levies. What is the rationale for charging non-title property owners for units that could be worth less than R350 000?' he asked. Costs were awarded against CoJ. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Eyewitness News
5 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa committed to full implementation of state capture recommendations - Presidency's Magwenya
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa has rejected claims that the recommendations of the state capture commission have been swept under the carpet. The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has come under scrutiny lately, with questions raised about its handling of state capture-related cases. While the president admits there are challenges within the institution, he maintains that action is being taken against individuals implicated in the looting of state funds. ALSO READ: • Dearth of investigating skills among reasons for delays in prosecuting big corruption cases, SCOPA hears • ActionSA slams NPA for failing to successfully prosecute those implicated in state capture Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said there had been consistent progress. "Government has recovered nearly R11 billion in stolen public funds, strengthened our law enforcement capacity and implemented comprehensive reform across government." Last week, former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo stressed the need for adequate resourcing to hold the corrupt accountable. But Magwenya insisted that this was already underway. "President Cyril Ramaphosa remains committed to the full implementation of the state capture recommendations and to rebuilding public trust in our institutions."
