Ukraine backing away from key peace deal pledge – what we know so far
Ukraine has 'unexpectedly postponed' a prisoner exchange with Russia that was among the key outcomes of negotiations held on Monday in Istanbul, Moscow's top negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, has said. He also stated that Kiev had refused to accept hundreds of bodies of its fallen troops.During the talks in Türkiye earlier this week, the two delegations agreed to exchange at least 1,000 prisoners, prioritizing those heavily wounded and those under 25.
On top of that, Russia unilaterally offered to repatriate the remains of over 6,000 slain Ukrainian military personnel as a humanitarian gesture.On Saturday, Medinsky said that Moscow had provided Kiev with a list of 640 heavily wounded and younger prisoners. However, 'the Ukrainian side unexpectedly postponed… the exchange of prisoners of war for an indefinite period,' the official stated, adding that the Ukrainian team 'did not even arrive at the exchange site.' According to Medinsky, Ukraine gave 'various and rather strange' pretexts for this.
The official called on 'Kiev to strictly adhere to the schedule and all agreements that had been reached and to immediately begin the exchange,' stressing that the Russian team is on site and 'fully ready to work.'Russia's top negotiator revealed that Ukraine also refused to accept the bodies of its fallen troops, even though the 'first batch of frozen remains of 1,212 Ukrainian soldiers has already arrived in refrigerated trucks at the exchange area.'
Lt. Gen. Aleksandr Zorin of the Russian Defense Ministry stated that the bodies of Ukrainian servicemen could be transferred to Ukraine as early as next week. He noted that, in accordance with the Istanbul agreements, Moscow delivered 1,212 bodies of Ukrainian personnel to the designated exchange area.
'This is the first batch, the first part,' the general emphasized.
Zorin previously said that Moscow had four other convoys, each carrying 1,200 sets of remains, ready for transfer as well.
Ukrainian officials have confirmed that the exchange of prisoners and the repatriation of fallen soldiers has been postponed until next week.In a statement on Saturday, Kiev's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War said that 'instead of a constructive dialogue, we are once again faced with manipulation and attempts to use sensitive humanitarian topics for informational purposes.'
Ukrainian authorities further insisted that Russian allegations 'do not correspond to reality or to previous agreements – neither regarding the prisoner exchange nor the repatriation of bodies.' The headquarters claimed that Ukraine had submitted its lists of prisoners to be exchanged, but Russia presented 'alternative lists,' which were not previously agreed upon. It also suggested that while an agreement on the repatriation had indeed been reached, no date had been set, with Moscow undertaking 'unilateral steps.'On Wednesday, Medinsky announced that Russia was ready to begin the swap on June 7, 8, and 9, and that this 'would again become the largest prisoner exchange.'
Following the first round of direct talks in Istanbul last month, Moscow and Kiev conducted a massive prisoner swap.
Earlier this week, the Russian official also expressed readiness to accept any remains of fallen Russian troops that Ukraine may be holding.
Additionally, Moscow offered during the talks to establish temporary humanitarian pauses in specific areas of the battlefield, lasting two to three days, so that both sides could gather the remains of their soldiers. Medinsky said Kiev's negotiators initially supported the idea, only for Vladimir Zelensky to publicly reject the proposal shortly thereafter.
According to the Russian presidential aide, the two belligerents had agreed to establish special medical commissions to help create exchange lists for severely injured soldiers 'without the need to wait for big political decisions.' The swaps would be held regularly 'in a routine manner,' Medinsky announced at the time.Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told RIA Novosti that Ukraine's refusal to accept the bodies of its own dead shows that the 'Kiev regime does not care about its own citizens, either alive or dead.'
Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said that Kiev is too 'scared' to admit the figure of 6,000 fallen Ukrainian soldiers, and that it 'doesn't want to pay the widows.'
Speaking to RT, Russian MP Dmitry Belik described Kiev's actions as 'beyond the pale… barbarity [and] absolutely inhumane behavior, whatever flimsy reasons Kiev is giving.' The lawmaker suggested that Ukrainian authorities could be refusing to accept the return of fallen troops to avoid paying compensation to their relatives.
State Duma Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Leonid Slutsky echoed this sentiment, saying that 'such behavior is [an example] of rare cynicism,' showing total disregard for the memory of Ukraine's own fallen soldiers.The two rounds of talks between Russia and Ukraine, held on May 16 and June 2, respectively, were the first since the spring of 2022, when Kiev unilaterally pulled out.
David Arakhamia, the head of the Ukrainian delegation at the time, later stated that the decision was made following a visit to Kiev by then-UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who he said had advised the Ukrainian government not to sign anything and 'just fight.' Johnson has rejected that account.
During the latest round of talks earlier this month, Russia and Ukraine exchanged draft memorandums outlining a roadmap toward an eventual peace deal and indicated a willingness to continue direct contacts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine can't stop it, maps can't hide it: Russia's summer blitz redraws the war
As the spring sun gave way to the heat of early summer, a new phase of the military campaign began to unfold across the front lines – and this time, the initiative clearly belongs to Russia. After months of grinding attritional warfare, Russian forces have launched a sweeping spring-summer offensive that is already delivering tangible results. From the borderlands of Sumy to the contested hills near Chasov Yar and the approaches to Dnepropetrovsk, the tempo has shifted decisively. Ukraine, battered and overextended, is now struggling to contain simultaneous breakthroughs across multiple sectors. The silence of Western media around these developments only underscores the magnitude of what is unfolding on the ground. A coordinated advance is in motion – methodical, strategic, and, by all appearances, effective. Following the liberation of Sudzha in early March 2025, the fighting quickly spilled across the border into Ukraine's Sumy Region. Moscow officially described its objective as the creation of a buffer zone – meant to safeguard the resumption of peaceful civilian life in Russia's neighboring Kursk Region. Motivated by political considerations, the Ukrainian Army has been trying to cling to a narrow foothold just across the border, in the village of Tyotkino in Kursk Region. In fact, Kiev has deployed some of its most experienced and ideologically committed units to this stretch of the front. But rather than showcasing Ukrainian resolve, the situation in Tyotkino has underscored the growing imbalance in offensive capabilities between Ukrainian and Russian forces in 2025. From the Russian side, Tyotkino is essentially a logistical cul-de-sac. But for Ukraine, the village connects to a critical rear supply hub in Belopolye. Even so, Ukrainian efforts to expand their presence in the area have ended in near catastrophe. In mid-May, the commander of Ukraine's 47th Brigade came close to staging a mutiny, accusing his superiors of issuing reckless orders that led to needless casualties. Elsewhere along the Sumy front, Ukrainian forces – many of them retreating from Sumy and the surrounding areas – have taken heavy losses. This remains a strategically vital axis for Ukraine. The authorities have announced mandatory evacuations in another 11 settlements, bringing the total number of evacuated towns and villages in the region to 213. Notably, this marks the first time Russian forces have entered Sumy Region since spring 2022. As of now, Russian advances appear to be accelerating. The front line has moved to within roughly 20km of the city of Sumy itself. Liman (also known as Krasny Liman) is a strategic city in the Donetsk People's Republic, with a pre-war population of around 20,000. Situated along the Kharkov-Donetsk railway, it serves as a key transportation hub in eastern Ukraine. After brief fighting, the city fell under Russian control in late May 2022 – but was later lost during Ukraine's Kharkov offensive in October of the same year. Today, Russian forces appear intent on retaking Liman by cutting off a single critical road that leads northwest toward Izium. The current offensive seems focused precisely on this objective. On May 15, Russian troops secured the village of Torskoye, followed by the capture of Redkodub May 29-30. Both settlements are considered vital defensive outposts for the Ukrainian Army along the route to Liman. From the south, the Liman front is effectively sealed off by the Seversky Donets River. During the brutal fighting in 2022, neither side managed to establish a crossing. With the evolution of drone warfare, any river assault today would be even more difficult to carry out. Russian forces are now within 10km of Liman and just 7km from the Izium road. The offensive is ongoing. As of early June, the stretch of the front from Dzerzhinsk (also known as Toretsk) to Mirnograd has become one of the most active battle zones. Russian forces have advanced up to 10km along a 30-kilometer-wide front, capturing 12 settlements and securing more than 15km of a key bypass highway linking Pokrovsk to Konstantinovka. These gains suggest that a southern encirclement of Konstantinovka – a city with a pre-war population of 67,000 – may now be underway. Simultaneously, fighting has intensified on the northern flank around Chasov Yar. The terrain in this area poses serious tactical challenges: Chasov Yar sits on elevated ground beyond the Seversky Donets–Donbass Canal, complicating efforts to establish supply lines or mount a full-scale offensive from that direction. Notably, this sector – among the three fronts currently in focus – has received the least media attention. That may soon change. Given its strategic positioning, it could emerge as a central axis of Russia's summer campaign. In the past week, Russian forces dismantled a significant Ukrainian stronghold north of the village of Zarya. The terrain here is rugged and uneven, but if fully secured, it would open a path for Russian troops to push toward the southern outskirts of Konstantinovka. Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk), a city of 65,000 before the war, has been under siege since autumn 2024. After Russia's swift capture of nearby Novogrodovka and Selidovo, it initially appeared that Pokrovsk would fall just as quickly. But in a surprising pivot, Russian command redirected its main effort toward the Kurakhovo axis. Since the winter, Ukrainian forces have attempted to push Russian troops back from the city's outskirts, but those efforts have largely failed to yield results. Further south, across the Volchya River, the offensives launched last year around Kurakhovo and Velikaya Novoselka are still ongoing. Russian troops have taken control of the town of Bogatyr and several surrounding settlements. The front line now lies just 3-15km from the Dnepropetrovsk regional border, depending on the sector. An interesting development in this sector: Russia's Central, Eastern, and Southern military groups are coordinating their offensive operations here – a rare show of multi-group integration. On June 8, the Russian Defense Ministry announced that units from the 90th Tank Division, part of the Center Group of Forces, had reached the western boundary of the Donetsk People's Republic and were advancing into neighboring Dnepropetrovsk Region.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia warns citizens against visiting Iran and Israel
Russia's Foreign Ministry has advised against traveling to Israel and Iran following the Israeli airstrikes carried out on Friday. Russian citizens currently in Israel have also been advised to leave. The Israeli military conducted a series of airstrikes on numerous targets – both military and nuclear sites – across Iran early on Friday. The Iranian authorities have confirmed that the attacks killed Major General Hossein Salami, the commander of Iran's elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and Major General Mohammad Bagheri, the chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces. Several media outlets have claimed that several other high-ranking Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists were also killed In an advisory published later in the day, the Foreign Ministry urged 'Russian citizens to refrain from visiting Israel and Iran – until the situation stabilizes.' The diplomats also called on compatriots to 'immediately leave dangerous areas, if possible.' Earlier in the day, the Russian embassy in Tel Aviv issued a similar advisory, urging Russian nationals 'who have the opportunity, to leave Israel.' Russia's civil aviation authority ordered the country's airlines to halt all flights to and from Israel and Iran, as well as to avoid both countries' respective airspaces until further notice, which is tentatively expected on June 26. Following the Israeli airstrikes against Iran, a number of global airlines, including Air France KLM, Ryanair, Wizz, Air India, Emirates and Lufthansa, have similarly begun avoiding the region and diverting flights to skirt the airspaces of Israel, Jordan, Iraq and Iran, as attested by FlightRadar data. According to the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol), some 650 flights have been canceled due to the escalation.
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Western war hawks lack real plan to defeat Russia
Western officials who talk about Ukraine winning the ongoing conflict don't have a real strategy for defeating Russia, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said. Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, the Pentagon chief declined to directly say whether he views Russia as a 'true adversary' or whether Washington would allow a 'complete surrender of Ukraine' in order to secure peace in the region. Instead, he insisted that the Trump administration was seeking a settlement to the Ukraine conflict that will last, not Kiev's surrender or Russia's defeat. 'The situation is unfortunate, unleashed by the previous administration,' he said, referring to former President Joe Biden, whom Trump's team blames for entangling the US in the Ukraine conflict. Biden's government repeatedly vowed to back Kiev for as long as it took to defeat Russia militarily. 'But everyone that talks about winning and prevailing is yet to present to me a plan that's going to push the Russian army out of those territories,' Hegseth added. The Pentagon chief also repeated his earlier call for Europe to take greater responsibility for its own security. While he pledged Washington would continue to mediate peace efforts, he avoided confirming whether military aid to Kiev would continue. 'We support peace in Ukraine… Peace is in our best interests, but Ukraine is not in the US and not in NATO,' he stated. Hegseth acknowledged that peace efforts 'are moving slowly.' When pressed on whether he would advise Trump to respond if Russia 'invades NATO,' he confirmed that the US would be obligated to act under the bloc's Article 5, which treats an attack on one member as an attack on all. However, he emphasized that 'Russia has not invaded NATO allies,' dismissing claims that Moscow poses an immediate threat to the bloc. Many Western officials have asserted that Russia plans to attack NATO's European members once the conflict in Ukraine ends. Moscow has repeatedly rejected these claims as nonsense, dismissing them as scare tactics used to justify increased Western military spending. Russia has also maintained that it remains open to peace talks if the root causes of the Ukraine conflict are addressed, including NATO expansion toward its borders and Western support for Kiev's NATO membership.
