South Africa lauds progress in talks on VAT hikes
THE African National Congress (ANC) says it remains committed to fostering 'inclusive and principled dialogue' as part of efforts to ensure effective governance and safeguard South Africa's democratic gains.
This follows a meeting between the ANC negotiating team, led by secretary-general Fikile Mbalula, and a delegation from the Freedom Front Plus (FF+), headed by Corné Mulder. According to the ANC, the engagement was constructive.
It was previously reported that the FF Plus and the Democratic Alliance (DA) were among the parties that voted against the passing of the national budget in Parliament.
Their opposition was largely due to concerns over the 0.5% Value-Added Tax (VAT) increase, which is expected to come into effect in May. The DA has also filed papers in the Western Cape High Court challenging the legality of the 2025/26 national budget process.
The ANC described the meeting with FF+ as 'cordial' and 'forward-looking' , with both parties recognising the urgent need to address South Africa's fiscal and governance challenges.
'There was broad alignment on the importance of the recently adopted Fiscal Framework, particularly as a foundation to stabilise public finances, maintain essential public services, and promote sustainable economic growth,' said ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri.
The discussions also underscored the need for strong parliamentary oversight, efficient public spending, and decisive action against financial mismanagement.
Over the weekend, the ANC also held high-level talks with the DA in Johannesburg. DA Federal chairperson Helen Zille confirmed that 'a negotiating team appointed by the Federal Executive of the DA met a delegation from the African National Congress (ANC)' .
Bhengu-Motsiri noted that GNU partners must 'be guided by mutual respect, common purpose, and disciplined cooperation in the national interest.'
She added that these engagements are part of the ANC's broader effort to deepen multiparty consensus and democratic accountability within the GNU.
The ANC reaffirmed its commitment to 'inclusive leadership, stability, and the advancement of the country's developmental agenda' as it continues discussions with various political stakeholders.
First published by IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
28-05-2025
- Russia Today
Trump vs. South Africa: Who is winning the clash over ‘white genocide'?
On May 21, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa visited Washington. The visit is significant for several reasons. It was the first time an African leader went to Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in February. Also, leading up to the meeting, there were months of 'preparatory work' during which Washington publicly pressured South Africa at the highest levels over accusations of 'white genocide.' South Africa was among the first countries to face direct pressure from the US. Even before tariffs were introduced or disputes with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky occurred in the Oval Office, Trump suspended economic aid to South Africa, citing violations of the rights of the white minority and policies contrary to US interests. Secretary of State Marco Rubio subsequently declined to attend the G20 summit in Johannesburg, pointing to South Africa's alleged anti-American stance. In response, South Africa adopted a strategy of patient endurance. Its key economic and political role in the region prevented the US from severing ties over concerns about white farmers. Ultimately, the only tangible loss for South Africa was the reduction of American financial aid ($200-$300 million annually), a large portion of which funded various NGOs and universities – traditional opponents of the African National Congress (ANC), the largest party in the Government of National Unity (GNU). The rest – Rubio's comments about the G20 or Elon Musk's 'white noise' – had no real, lasting impact. The expropriation law remains in place, and the lawsuit against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has not been withdrawn. Trump and Musk's gradual (at least public) distancing has also been an important factor in stabilizing relations. Nevertheless, the influence of billionaires and close associates is still a key factor. Accompanying Ramaphosa on his trip to Washington were golf stars Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, as well as Johann Rupert – Trump's golf partner and one of South Africa's wealthiest individuals – the owner of the luxury goods holding company Richemont. Els, Goosen, and Rupert are not only golf enthusiasts like Trump but also represent white South Africans, who are well-respected in South Africa and have thriving businesses there. South Africa had surely done its homework. The meeting did not end in a public spat and most commentators commend Ramaphosa for demonstrating restraint, while criticizing Trump and his team for being poorly prepared for the talks. Trump, for instance, showed images of dead bodies from the ongoing violence in eastern Congo, claiming they were white farmers killed in South Africa. However, insiders report that substantial negotiations took place behind closed doors. It seems that Trump is satisfied with this arrangement. After failing to achieve a 'quick victory', he shifted to his preferred transactional approach, which Ramaphosa played into by offering potential deals. Reports indicate that the two sides discussed collaboration on supplying critical minerals and prospects for exporting LNG from the US to South Africa. These may be some of the concessions that South Africa is willing to make in the negotiations regarding tariff revisions. For instance, exporting 2 million tons of LNG per year could amount to about $1 billion annually, significantly contributing to balancing trade between the US and South Africa. Moreover, South Africa hopes to extend in some form the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which is set to expire this year. No breakthroughs or formal agreements were announced following the talks, and it would have been premature to expect any. Both Trump and Ramaphosa managed to take something positive away from the meeting – Trump criticized Ramaphosa for 'genocide against whites,' likely appeasing some radicals in his circle and among his supporters, while Ramaphosa maintained his stance on key political issues and shifted the dialogue toward bilateral trade and economic cooperation. Ramaphosa's success did not go unnoticed in Africa – South Africa emphasized its role as an important global player. Gradually, the world – including Africa – is learning how to engage with Trump, who, in turn, seems to be recognizing the complexities and nuances of international affairs. It appears that during Trump's second term, Africa will receive more attention than it did during his first term. During his previous term, he did not visit Africa, becoming the first US president since Ronald Reagan to not visit any African country; he also made several critical public remarks about Africa and its leaders. However, the US is now actively involved in mediating efforts concerning the situation in eastern Congo, continues to support the Lobito Corridor project (involving Angola, DRC, and Zambia), and is exploring the possibility of organizing a third US-Africa summit. At the same time, the interim results of Trump's attempts to exert pressure on Africa demonstrate that Washington has fewer levers, and perhaps less inclination to apply pressure even on developing countries. Emerging alternative centers of power – not just political, but also financial and technological – allow these nations to survive without the US. The decline of American influence in Africa is a long-term trend that largely does not depend on the administration in Washington – particularly since US policies, especially with regard to Africa, have more continuity than one might assume.
Russia Today
20-05-2025
- Russia Today
Afrikaners not responsible for misinforming Trump
The Afrikaner Leadership Network says Afrikaners in South Africa cannot be blamed for misinforming United States President Donald Trump about the situation prevailing in Africa's economic powerhouse. On Monday, President Cyril Ramaphosa arrived in United States for a high-stakes encounter with Trump, with Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen joining the delegation to help negotiate for the continuation of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). The meeting aims to reset strained relations between the two countries and secure a favorable trade deal. Ramaphosa and Steenhuisen, who is also the DA leader, are joined by Minister of Trade and Industry Parks Tau, Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni and International Relations and Minister Ronald Lamola. New special envoy to the US, Mcebisi Jonas is also part of the team. In an interview with broadcaster Newzroom Afrika, the Afrikaner Leadership Network's Theuns Eloff said it is wrong for anyone to blame Afrikaners for misinforming Trump. Eloff added that the misinformation narrative is overstated, adding that he believes Trump knows what is happening in South Africa. 'Let me speak about the American administration and separate them from Mr Trump himself. Mr Trump may believe things that he has been told by we don't know who, not by any Afrikaners' organisations of this country. As the Afrikaner Leadership Network, when we met with the ANC, we said we had never said there is white genocide and we had never said there is large scale expropriation of white or Afrikaner farms. So he got it somewhere,' said Eloff. 'This thing of misinformation is bandied about. If I were in the American administration and I had to advise the president, I would ask the embassy in South Africa and probably the CIA who can read everything that is being said on South African media and South African social media. 'So I do not think we must overemphasise this thing of misinformation. There is no way the Americans depend of X,Y or Z to know what is happening. They know what is happening so it is a question of emphasis. I think for me that is the nuance we want here,' he said. Last week, IOL reported that Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni told Parliament that AfriForum and the Solidarity Movement are under investigation for alleged acts of treason. The Afrikaner groups are accused of providing false information to the United States government about the alleged persecution of white South Africans. 'The law enforcement agencies are investigating the treasonous act of misinformation… But we continue to make sure that the treasonous acts cannot be left unpunished,' Ntshavheni said during an oral question session in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP). Her remarks came as she outlined government reforms to South Africa's intelligence architecture, which she said would remove political influence and ensure independence. These reforms include the dissolution of the State Security Agency (SSA) and the establishment of two separate intelligence departments. First published by IOL
Russia Today
14-05-2025
- Russia Today
African National Congress demands probe into ‘shameful' Israel trip
The ANC has demanded an urgent parliamentary probe into what it calls a 'shameful' visit to Israel by MPs from the DA, PA, and ACDP — slamming the trip as a disgraceful and a constitutionally reckless act that defies South Africa's official stance on the conflict. Speaking in the National Assembly on Tuesday, ANC MP Fasiha Hassan delivered a scathing rebuke of the delegation, describing the trip as 'irresponsible' and 'a betrayal of South Africa's constitutional values and its historic solidarity with the Palestinian people.' In a moment of fierce condemnation, Hassan declared, 'shame on you,' to the MPs involved. The visit occurred amid the ongoing war on Gaza, which has resulted in over 60,000 Palestinian deaths and the displacement of millions. 'What 'facts' were these MPs looking for?' Hassan questioned, 'when the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza is well-documented and undeniable.' Hassan likened the delegation's actions to the apartheid-era propaganda tactics, recalling how the National Party once orchestrated similar international visits to sanitise racial oppression and white minority rule. 'This trip echoes the shameful tactics of the apartheid past,' she said. The incident has provoked additional outrage given its timing: South Africa is currently leading a genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which has ruled that a plausible case of genocide exists. Hassan alleged that the visiting MPs were attempting to justify crimes against humanity. She stated this was not a mission for truth — it was an endorsement of brutality under the guise of diplomacy. At least ten MPs were part of the visit, facilitated by the South African Friends of Israel. The itinerary included a high-profile meeting with Israeli President Isaac Herzog. The DA sent several senior figures, including its spokesperson on international relations, Emma Powell; justice spokesperson, Glynnis Breytenbach; and chairperson of the Social Development Committee, Bridget Masango. The PA was represented by Ashley Sauls and Milicent Mathopa, while the ACDP's delegation included Chief Whip Steve Swart and former MP Marie Sukers. The ANC and other critics have emphasised that the trip was not authorised by Parliament or the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO). Meanwhile, DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp had told IOL previously that 'the trip was arranged and attended by individuals in their private capacity and not through the party'. The PA defended their MPs, stating that their policies and political positions were known when they entered the GNU. The party added that the trip was not a published by IOL
