logo
Reliance-led consortium moves Supreme Court over $1.7 billion KG Basin arbitration setback

Reliance-led consortium moves Supreme Court over $1.7 billion KG Basin arbitration setback

Mint20-05-2025

New Delhi: A consortium led by Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) has approached the Supreme Court challenging a Delhi high court order that overturned a $1.7 billion arbitral award in its favour in the long-running Krishna-Godavari (KG) Basin gas migration dispute with state-run Oil and Natural Gas Corp. (ONGC).
The consortium, which includes British Petroleum Exploration (Alpha) Ltd and Niko (NECO), filed petitions on 14 May. Both BP and Niko have also filed separate appeals contesting the Delhi high court's ruling.
'Yes, we filed the plea against the high court ruling last week. It remains to be seen when the matter will be listed for hearing,' a person familiar with the matter told Mint, requesting anonymity.
An email sent to Reliance on Tuesday afternoon remained unanswered.
The Delhi high court's order, issued on 14 February by Justices Rekha Palli and Saurabh Banerjee, set aside a May 2023 single-judge order that had upheld the arbitral award. The division bench declared the award unenforceable, citing multiple legal infirmities.
Specifically, the court pointed to four reasons: RIL's failure to disclose a crucial 2003 report (constituting patent illegality); the arbitration not qualifying as international; violation of the public trust doctrine in the context of natural resources; and unjust enrichment, as the consortium profited from gas belonging to ONGC or the government.
The verdict was seen as a major win for the central government in one of India's most high-profile energy sector disputes. It also cleared the path for the Centre to recover over ₹ 12,800 crore (approximately $1.7 billion) from the consortium.
In a stock exchange filing in March, RIL disclosed that the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas had raised a separate demand of $2.81 billion from RIL, BP, and Niko, based on the gas migration findings.
The case dates back to April 2000, when RIL and its partners signed a production-sharing contract (PSC) with the government for the KG-D6 block, off the Andhra Pradesh coast. RIL holds a 60% stake in the block, BP owns 30%, and Niko the remaining 10%.
In 2013, ONGC raised concerns that gas reservoirs in its blocks might be connected to those in the KG-D6 field. A joint study commissioned by both parties, and conducted by US-based consultant DeGolyer and MacNaughton, confirmed in 2015 that significant quantities of gas had migrated from ONGC's blocks into RIL's.
The report estimated the migrated gas to be worth over ₹ 11,000 crore. In response, a panel led by former Delhi high court chief justice A.P. Shah recommended compensation for what it termed 'unjust enrichment.' The government subsequently sought $1.5 billion in compensation, plus $174 million in interest.
The consortium contested the claim and initiated arbitration in 2016. In 2018, a three-member tribunal chaired by Singapore-based arbitrator Lawrence Boo ruled 2:1 in favour of RIL and its partners, concluding that the PSC permitted the extraction of naturally migrated gas as long as it occurred within the contract area.
The tribunal also directed the government to pay $8.3 million in arbitration costs.
The government then challenged the award in the Delhi high court, alleging that RIL had extracted gas without proper authorization and had withheld critical information about reservoir connectivity since 2003.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sun Pharma gets eight observations from USFDA for Halol plant
Sun Pharma gets eight observations from USFDA for Halol plant

Time of India

time14 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Sun Pharma gets eight observations from USFDA for Halol plant

Drug major Sun Pharma on Saturday said the US health regulator has issued a Form 483 with 8 observations after inspecting its Halol (Gujarat) manufacturing plant. The US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) conducted a good manufacturing practices (GMP) inspection at the Halol facility from June 2-13 2025, the Mumbai-based drug maker said in a regulatory filing. At the conclusion of the inspection, the USFDA issued a Form-483 with 8 observations, it added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 혈압 안정화를 돕는 블러디션 배합 성분 메디셜 더 읽기 Undo As per the USFDA, Form 483 is issued to a firm's management at the conclusion of an inspection when the investigator has observed any conditions that may constitute violations of the Food Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act and related Acts.

Sun Pharma's Halol plant gets 8 USFDA observations post inspection
Sun Pharma's Halol plant gets 8 USFDA observations post inspection

Business Standard

time16 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Sun Pharma's Halol plant gets 8 USFDA observations post inspection

The US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) conducted a good manufacturing practices (GMP) inspection at the Halol facility from June 2-13 2025, the Mumbai-based drug maker said Press Trust of India New Delhi Drug major Sun Pharma on Saturday said the US health regulator has issued a Form 483 with 8 observations after inspecting its Halol (Gujarat) manufacturing plant. The US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) conducted a good manufacturing practices (GMP) inspection at the Halol facility from June 2-13 2025, the Mumbai-based drug maker said in a regulatory filing. At the conclusion of the inspection, the USFDA issued a Form-483 with 8 observations, it added. As per the USFDA, Form 483 is issued to a firm's management at the conclusion of an inspection when the investigator has observed any conditions that may constitute violations of the Food Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act and related Acts.

Man claims IndiGo shut boarding gate in front of him despite arriving on time
Man claims IndiGo shut boarding gate in front of him despite arriving on time

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Man claims IndiGo shut boarding gate in front of him despite arriving on time

A Gurugram-based man called out IndiGo after he allegedly missed his flight by mere seconds, while still standing at the boarding Mishra, a passenger travelling from Delhi to Bagdogra, claimed he wasn't allowed to board his IndiGo flight on June 5 despite reaching the gate while boarding was still underway. In a detailed post on LinkedIn, he recounted how this 60-second delay ended up costing him his business trip, as well as a lot more 'IndiGo Airlines – where's the accountability? I never thought missing a flight by 60 seconds — while the gate was still open — would end up canceling an entire business trip and cost me double for my next leg of travel,' Mishra said. He said he checked in his baggage by 6:25 AM for his 7:30 AM flight and made it to the boarding gate at 7:04 AM, 26 minutes before the scheduled departure. Despite this, he alleged, the staff turned him away.'The gate was open, and passengers were ahead and behind me. But after three minutes of my requesting entry, the staff called DGCA personnel and shut the gate right in front of me,' he further added that the flight had been rescheduled to 7:20 AM, but there was no update via SMS, app, or email. Even with the revised time, he had still reached the gate 16 minutes cost me my Bagdogra–Hyderabad connection, my Gangtok meeting, and I had to rebook my Delhi–Hyderabad leg at double the cost,' he said, demanding a refund and accused IndiGo of poor customer handling, saying, 'There was no attempt to help. No empathy. The process took priority over people.'Take a look at the post here: In the comments, he pointed out yet another issue with his next flight. Mishra said that when he boarded his Delhi to Hyderabad flight later, it too was preponed, from 6:45 AM to 6:35 AM, and despite the revised time, boarding didn't start until 6:07 AM.'Now tell me, how do the rules work? If we're late by minutes, we're offloaded. But when delays are from your side, there's no explanation or accountability,' he airline replied, saying, 'Sir, we tried reaching out to you on your registered contact number; however, we were unable to establish a connection. Please share an alternate number along with a convenient time via DM so that we can connect with you. \~Team IndiGo.'While IndiGo has reached out to resolve the issue, Amit Mishra's post has sparked fresh debate on airline accountability and rigid boarding Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store