Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down following Trump budget cuts
The announcement came a day after U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, said the Senate Appropriations Committee hadn't included funding for the corporation in its fiscal 2026 spending bill.
'It is a shameful reality, and now communities across the country will suffer the consequences as over 1,500 stations lose critical funding," Murray said, according to The Hill.
The corporation has said more than 70% of its federal funding, which it disperses to NPR and PBS, goes to local public media stations. PBS advocates previously told USA TODAY the budget cuts would disproportionately affect rural areas.
President Donald Trump called for the outlets' federal funding to be pulled in May, saying 'neither entity presents a fair, accurate or unbiased portrayal of current events to taxpaying citizens.'
Corporation for Public Broadcasting employees were told on Aug. 1 that most staff positions would be slashed as the fiscal year ends on Sept. 30. Some staff would remain through January 2026 to 'ensure a responsible and orderly closeout of operations,' according to the corporation's news release.
'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life, providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country,' Corporation for Public Broadcasting President and CEO Patricia Harrison said. 'We are deeply grateful to our partners across the system for their resilience, leadership, and unwavering dedication to serving the American people.'
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting was established by Congress in 1967.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@usatoday.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a minute ago
- Boston Globe
‘It's outrageous': Mass. governor forays into national debate over Texas redistricting vote
'It's outrageous, and it impacts all of us across this country,' Healey said at a news conference after meeting with the Democrats. 'This is what everybody hates about politics, and we're not standing for it.' Tuesday's visit was more than just a 'welcome to Boston,' Healey said, but instead an opportunity to sound the alarm on what she views as a nationwide threat. Advertisement If passed, the Texas maps would add five new Republican districts. The maps would also mean that for a primary election six months away, voters wouldn't know which district they'll vote in or who they can vote for. 'Not only is it stealing a voice from Texas voters, it's stealing the voice and the vote from voters around this country, from all Americans,' Healey said. 'All Americans are going to be impacted by what the next Congress looks like.' Advertisement By leaving the state, the Texas Democrats effectively blocked voting on the new maps by breaking a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers required for the legislature to conduct official business. If Democrats were still in Texas, they could be forcibly returned by Department of Public Safety state troopers, but the department doesn't have jurisdiction outside the state. A Texas senator on Tuesday asked the attorney general, Ken Paxton, also said Tuesday that if the Democrats did not return by Friday, he Democratic Texas state Representative Ron Reynolds spoke alongside other Texas Democrats during a news conference at the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union hall on Monday in Warrenville, Ill. Scott Olson/Getty 'The price to pay pales in comparison to the rights of everyday people, everyday constituents that we represent proudly,' said Houston Representative Armando Walle, who traveled alongside his colleagues to Boston for the National Conference of State Legislators' annual summit, which is being held this week at the Thomas Michael Menino Convention & Exhibition Center. 'We're not scared, not scared at all.' Typically, state legislatures redraw congressional district lines once every 10 years to reflect the latest US Census. But Texas Republicans began their recent redistricting effort after pressure from the Trump administration, which demanded state leaders seven-member majority in the US House. Not all states allow for mid-decade redistricting. Texas, which has the second-largest congressional delegation in the country, does. In a CNBC interview on Tuesday morning, Trump blamed blue states like Massachusetts for initiating the current redistricting push. Advertisement 'They did it to us, the blue states you were talking about,' Trump said. 'In Massachusetts, I got, I think, 41 percent of the vote, a very blue state, and yet [Democrats] got 100 percent of Congress. One hundred percent. I got 40, 41 percent or something, and yet 100 percent of Congress in Massachusetts? No, it shouldn't be that way.' Trump received 36 percent of the vote in Massachusetts in 2024. Texas Democrats said the maps being proposed during this special legislative session are not only partisan but would also suppress the votes of people of color by breaking up voting blocs in districts with large minority populations. The US Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds, but the Voting Rights Act maintains that the map cannot suppress the voting rights of people of color. The current Texas map, passed in 2021, is being challenged in court on allegations that it violates the act. Secretary of State Bill Galvin, the state's top elections official who also met with the Democrats Tuesday, said the new maps would be 'splintering communities of color.' 'This is a very deliberate destruction of minority communities with the objective of trying to get more seats,' he said. Beyond Texas, Republicans have looked at redistricting in states where the party has control of the government, such as Missouri and Indiana, as a means to preserve a Republican majority in Congress after the 2026 midterm elections, which have historically gone against the party in the White House during a president's first term. Ohio is redrawing its map due to a court order, which could lead to Republican gains. Advertisement Democrats in California, Illinois, and New York hit back, When asked Tuesday if there is potential for Massachusetts to draw new maps before the next census, Galvin said it's not likely. 'We have no Republicans to give.' Matt Stout of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump threatens 250pc tariffs on drug imports
Donald Trump has threatened to impose tariffs of up to 250pc on pharmaceutical imports in a major threat to one of Britain's key sectors. The US president, who has already warned global drugmakers to lower their domestic prices in the US, said he would be announcing tariffs for the industry 'within the next week or so'. Such a move could be damaging for the UK, which counts pharma giants AstraZeneca and GSK as two of its largest companies and employs 73,000 people in the sector overall. Britain has signed a trade agreement with the US but the pharmaceutical tariffs are expected to be outside the scope of the agreement, increasing the risk. 'We'll be putting an initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals but in one year, one and a half years maximum it's going to go to 150pc and then it's going to go to 250pc,' Mr Trump said in a US television interview on Tuesday. The president added that he would impose tariffs on pharmaceutical imports to the US 'because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country'. It marks a fresh threat to the industry, which is awaiting the outcome of an investigation by the US commerce department into the impact of imports on American national security. The US president said the tariffs on pharmaceutical imports would be 'a separate class' to a string of tariff deals announced in recent weeks, adding: 'These are excluded class, as I call them ... like steel, aluminium, etc.' Mr Trump has repeatedly made threats to impose various levels of tariffs on the industry before changing course. His latest comments on trade levies come just days before his latest tariff deadline on goods entering the US comes into effect on Aug 7. The president was also critical of India after the country's foreign ministry accused the US and the EU of double standards on buying Russian oil. The US is due to impose 25pc tariffs on imports from India but Trump threatened to lift this further in his latest escalation. 'We settled on 25pc but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours because they are buying Russian oil, they are fuelling the war machine, and if they're going do that I'm not going to be happy,' he said, adding that India had 'not been a good trading partner'. 'The sticking point with India is that tariffs are too high ... They will give us zero tariffs and they're going to let us go in but that's not good enough because of what they are doing with oil.' Mr Trump also renewed his attacks on Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, and repeated his calls for the central bank to cut interest rates. 'Jay Powell is highly political and I call him ... Too Late Jerome, Too Late Powell,' he said. Mr Trump added that Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, 'does not want' to be chairman of the Federal Reserve but said that there were four others in the running for the position. Mr Powell's term as chairman of the Federal Reserve ends in May 2026. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump plans drug tariffs of up to 250%
President Donald Trump threatened to levy tariffs of up to 250% on pharmaceuticals imported into the United States. The president told CNBC on Aug. 5 that he plans to announce new tariffs "within the next week or so" on imports of pharmaceutical and semiconductor imports. He said he plans to launch a smaller tariff on drug imports before increasing the duties over 12 to 18 months to a maximum amount. Trump would start with an "initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals," he said. "But in one year, one-and-a-half years maximum, it's going to go to 150%, and then it's going to go to 250%, because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country." He said other nations "make a fortune" on pharmaceuticals, citing drugs imported from China and Ireland. Trump has said several times in recent months that there could be trade actions for the pharmaceutical industry, which has globalized since the 1990s with a drug supply chain that stretches from Europe to China and India. In July, Trump said his administration planned pharmaceutical-specific tariffs of up to 200%, though drug companies would have time to establish U.S.-based drug manufacturing. In April, Trump said he planned to impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals made overseas, a move he said would prompt drug companies to move their operations to the U.S. On July 31, Trump sent letters to 17 drug companies urging them to lower U.S. drug prices by Sept. 29 to "most favored nation" amounts paid by other nations. In the letters, Trump urged drug companies to adopt such pricing on drug for Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance program for low-income residents. He also requested drug companies lower U.S. prices to the same levels charged in Europe and elsewhere for newly-launched drugs for people on Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance plans. Trump also urged drug companies to lower pharmaceutical prices for U.S. consumers and businesses that directly purchase from drug companies. "Make no mistake: a collaborative effort towards achieving global pricing parity would be the most effective path for companies, the government and American patients," Trump said in the letters. "But if you refuse to step up, we will deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump plans pharmaceutical tariffs of up to 250% Sign in to access your portfolio
