logo
A Single Server Holds All Navy Pay and Promotion Data. DOGE Canceled a Contract to Upload It to the Cloud.

A Single Server Holds All Navy Pay and Promotion Data. DOGE Canceled a Contract to Upload It to the Cloud.

Yahoo23-05-2025

The Navy has been in a yearslong struggle to modernize its critically important human resources computer systems that underpin a whole host of vital tasks like pay and promotions.
But a contract for what might have been one of the most promising efforts to upgrade the systems just fell victim to billionaire Elon Musk's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, according to sources interviewed by Military.com. As a result, a critical and aging server in Tennessee that holds most of the service's pay and promotion data is operating with no backup in the event of a natural disaster.
The contract was a relatively small $170 million award to a company called Pantheon to move all the data on that server into the cloud and out of danger. It was canceled in early May.
Read Next: From Star Wars to Golden Dome: Trump Pushes US Missile Shield Despite Funding and Technology Hurdles
The HR systems go unnoticed when they work as intended but, when they break, the consequences are drastic. In 2022, Military.com reported extensively about the effects on sailors when the Navy fell behind on issuing them a key discharge document, sometimes making them wait for months into their civilian lives.
"Everything in terms of what sailors access, in terms of [the Navy's online HR portal] would be impacted because they run on those mainframes," a senior Navy personnel official told Military.com in an interview last week, speaking about the server in Tennessee. "Reconstituting it would probably take anywhere between nine and 16 months, during which time we could not promote sailors effectively."
Another person familiar with the details of the contract added that the Navy "almost lost it [the servers] due to flooding a little less than two months ago."
Both were granted anonymity to talk freely about the situation without fear of retaliation.
Meanwhile, Navy Secretary John Phelan went on TV Thursday and bragged that "DOGE has been very good to work with" and that the service got rid of "300 different IT systems, none of which were talking with each other."
"We've cleared that out and have started basically brand-new," he said.
To begin to understand how the Navy got to this point, one must go back to 2019 when the service first embarked on its journey to consolidate and modernize more than 55 disparate systems -- some of which were going on being nearly half a century old at that point.
The effort became known as Navy Pay and Personnel System, or NP2.
It was clear by 2022 that the effort was not going well. Sailors were posting online about struggles to get pay issues fixed, and some came forward saying that they had had to wait more than a hundred days for their discharge paperwork.
Those delays meant that discharged sailors were left overpaying thousands of dollars for unnecessary rent, paying tens of thousands of dollars to self-fund moves that should have been paid for, experiencing delays in getting jobs, and were forced to contemplate the possibility of losing medical care.
The NP2 system eventually cost the Navy more than $1 billion while the service's personnel office told lawmakers the program "has not progressed as desired," according to documents submitted to the House Defense Appropriations Committee in early May.
Also, the Navy still had 55 "legacy" systems costing it $122 million a year and, according to its responses to Congress, the project is now seven years behind schedule.
"All the indications were the program was going to fail the sailor," the Navy official told Military.com. The decision was made to bring in another smaller team to at least address an urgent problem: aging servers with no backup.
"HR operations could essentially be paralyzed for a year if we didn't do something," the official said, explaining that there were no contingency plans to keep the servers running in the event of an emergency.
That's where the now-canceled contract came in. The Navy's personnel office hired a company called Pantheon in June 2024 and gave it $170 million to basically move that server data into cloud storage and out of danger.
But part of that effort included modernizing data going back as far as World War II, which was sometimes as basic as just pictures of paper files.
As a bonus, the Navy would gain better access to personnel data that could help leaders understand what was going on with sailors -- something that has been a hallmark for the service's current personnel boss.
"We can't connect the data right now from where the sailor is in the training pipeline and where they're going next and what shipping is going to do to that supply chain," the Navy official explained. "So, we wind up firing instructors, only to find out we got a big cohort of people who need them coming in four weeks later."
Unlike the NP2 effort, the Navy official even said that Pantheon was "making a lot of headway" on untangling the mess that was one of the last two physical data centers in the Navy.
But then came DOGE.
Shortly after President Donald Trump was elected, his political ally and billionaire businessman Elon Musk was tapped to lead a government cost-cutting and efficiency effort that has become known as DOGE. Musk, the world's richest man, and his team slashed federal agencies and workers without the consent of Congress -- often haphazardly -- triggering numerous lawsuits and public outcry throughout the first months of the Trump administration.
Top Pentagon officials in the Trump administration have touted DOGE cuts in recent weeks but typically without offering much in the way of details.
In early March, the Pentagon's top spokesman, Sean Parnell, posted a video message on social media claiming DOGE had made "initial findings" that "will probably save $80 million in wasteful spending" but provided examples that totaled only $13 million.
Phelan also joined in with similar videos that touted cuts to "IT contracts that are ineffective and over-budget" while offering no further details.
More broadly, DOGE has also developed a track record of inaccurate or inflated claims about the savings it is generating by slashing government spending.
Still, some officials, including the two who spoke with Military.com, were broadly supportive of the contract cutting efforts by DOGE.
"The department desperately needs to get more efficient," the Navy official said, adding that they thought "the DOGE effort is a reasonable effort -- it's a good effort."
According to the official, the cancellation of the Pantheon contract aimed at moving HR data to the cloud was the broader Navy bureaucracy simply protecting the large, existing NP2 contract and using DOGE as their hitman.
From their perspective inside the Navy's personnel infrastructure, DOGE got played by the IT and contracting bureaucracy within the service, and "they were handed a statement of work on a contract that they didn't even read."
The other person familiar with the Pantheon contract told Military.com that it was flagged to DOGE, and a DOGE representative told them "they never even looked at it -- he had never seen it or read it" before it was cancelled.
"He asked me for a copy," they added.
Military.com reached out to the Navy with a list of questions that included what role top service officials -- namely the chief information officer and a top program executive -- played in flagging the contract to DOGE, the relationships those officials had with the contractors behind NP2, and whether they felt the NP2 contract was a good value.
A Navy spokesman offered a brief statement to Military.com that didn't dispute that DOGE canceled the Pantheon contract aimed at fixing the shortcomings of the larger, unproductive NP2 contract but said that Musk's team recommended it, not the Navy.
"The decision is part of a broader effort to realign resources and optimize IT capabilities that enhance readiness, accelerate decision-making, and strengthen the lethality of our naval forces," the statement added.
Both the person familiar with the contract and the Navy personnel official were shocked when they found out the news.
"We said, 'Hey, no, you're right, there are things in this program that need to be cut -- you just shot the wrong target,'" the official said.
Other disputes over the value of contracts terminated by DOGE have also occurred.
Last week, Military.com also reported that DOGE canceled a contract for a program that helped troops better utilize their tuition assistance.
Under that contract, "20% of first-time TA users shifted from low market-value programs to STEM fields like cybersecurity and engineering, critical for the defense industrial base," according to a statement from the company that was performing the service. The term STEM refers to science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
Now, with the Navy's HR data backup efforts stalled, there are serious concerns about what happens if a storm knocks out the server -- as well as the fate of long-term efforts to bring service data and HR systems into the modern age.
Losing the server for months would mean hits to morale when promotion boards aren't able to meet and to retention when those sailors decide to leave the force, the Navy told Congress in the document reviewed by Military.com.
"Additionally, this could further threaten our ability to continue to meet our recruiting goals," according to the Navy.
The service spokesman stressed that "the Navy is focused on the well-being of the men and women who serve as we look to optimize resources essential to Navy personnel systems, pay management, and operational readiness."
Related: 2 Educational Programs for Troops Eliminated Amid Cost-Cutting Efforts at Pentagon

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Analysis-Global economy's 'sugar rush' defies trade drama
Analysis-Global economy's 'sugar rush' defies trade drama

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analysis-Global economy's 'sugar rush' defies trade drama

By Francesco Canepa FRANKFURT (Reuters) -For all the drama surrounding U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, the world economy is holding up better than many had expected. The latest data from the United States, China and, to a lesser extent, Europe are showing resilience and the global economy as a whole is still expected to grow modestly this year. This is in part due to U.S. buyers and foreign sellers bringing forward business while many of the import duties unveiled by U.S. President Donald Trump remain suspended. While that effect may prove short-lived, Trump's decision to pause tariffs and some glimpses of progress in trade talks, particularly between the United States and the European Union, have fuelled cautious optimism. "We are seeing a bit of a sugar rush in industry, with manufacturers bringing forward production and trade," said Holger Schmieding, an economist at investment bank Berenberg. "The other thing is that we have evidence that Trump pedalled back on tariffs. The bet in markets and to some extent in the economy is that he barks but doesn't bite." Investment banks and institutions generally expect the United States to avoid a recession this year and the global economy to keep growing. The International Monetary Fund downgraded its global GDP growth forecast by just 0.5 percentage points last month to 2.8%. This is roughly in line with the trend over the past decade and a far cry from the downturns experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2008 financial crisis or even the turmoil that followed the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001. No one is venturing a prediction on where the trade negotiations will eventually settle, particularly with a U.S. president who sees himself as unstoppable. This week alone, separate U.S. courts first blocked and then reinstated Trump's tariffs - creating a degree of legal uncertainty that will do little to facilitate trade deals between the United States and those threatened with the levies. While the EU celebrated "new impetus" in its trade talks with the United States, negotiations with China were "a bit stalled" according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Companies are counting the cost of the ongoing impasse. A Reuters analysis of corporate disclosures shows Trump's trade war had cost companies more than $34 billion in lost sales and higher costs, a toll that is expected to rise as ongoing uncertainty over tariffs paralyses decision making at some of the world's largest companies. Car-makers from Japan's Toyota to Germany's Porsche and Mercedes-Benz are bracing for lower, or lower-than-previously expected profits if they have not given up making predictions altogether, like Volvo Cars and Dutch-based Stellantis. This is likely to result in a hit especially for Japan. The United States is Japan's biggest export destination, accounting for 21 trillion yen ($146.16 billion) worth of goods, with automobiles representing roughly 28% of the total. "While the worst shocks may be over, there's still a lot up in the air," Xingchen Yu, a strategist at UBS's Chief Investment Office, said. "We don't really know what a new normal for tariffs would look like, unfortunately." PAYBACK But so far the global economy has held up pretty well. China's output and exports are resilient as its companies re-route trade to the United States via third countries. Even in Europe, manufacturing activity was at a 33-month high in May, rebounding from a slump induced by more expensive fuel following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Confidence was also buttressed by the prospect of greater fiscal spending in Germany, a missing ingredient for European growth for the past couple of decades. The robustness of the world economy has surprised even professional forecasters. A measure produced by U.S. bank Citi that tracks the degree to which global economic data has surprised to the upside is now at its highest in more than a year. Some of that strength circles back to the tariffs themselves and the attempts by U.S. households and businesses to front-load purchases to beat anticipated price increases later this year. U.S. imports were up around 30% in March from where they were in October. The risk to the upbeat outlook comes from the expected "payback" of those advance purchases, which are unlikely to be repeated and will mean slower activity - in the U.S. and elsewhere - later. Economists still fear a triple whammy in which the front-loaded boost to the goods sector is unwound while U.S. household purchasing power is squeezed by higher prices and companies put off investment and hiring. At the margin, however, this scenario is starting to appear a little less likely after Trump's pause on tariffs. "The balance has slightly shifted towards more optimism, albeit with uncertainty and volatility," ING's global head of macro Carsten Brzeski said. ($1 = 143.6800 yen) (Additional reporting by Dan Burns in Washington, Claire Fu in Singapore, Ellen Zhang in Beijing and Leika Kihara in Tokyo; Editing by Mark John and Jane Merriman) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Stocks futures drop as Trump claims China has ‘violated' trade agreement
Stocks futures drop as Trump claims China has ‘violated' trade agreement

CNN

time27 minutes ago

  • CNN

Stocks futures drop as Trump claims China has ‘violated' trade agreement

Stock futures fell Friday after President Donald Trump said China has 'totally violated' its trade agreement with the United States, sending another jolt to markets after a whiplash week of tariff developments. Dow futures were down 100 points, or 0.3%. S&P 500 futures and those tied to the Nasdaq 100 both slid 0.3%. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' the president posted on social media. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Wall Street has been cautious about the next steps in Trump's trade war. Stocks had received a boost this week after the Court of International Trade late Wednesday blocked most of Trump's tariffs on legal grounds, but that rally lost steam as traders bet the White House would aggressively appeal and pursue another legal strategy. A federal appeals court on Thursday paused the CIT's ruling to block Trump's tariffs, leaving the president's massive tariff agenda in limbo as the courts deliberate its legality. 'The stunning, head-spinning, mind-boggling trade fiasco will not be resolved quickly,' said Greg Valiere, chief US policy strategist at AGF Investments, in a note. 'It probably will land in the Supreme Court — and even that may not settle the issue.' Investors on Friday also digested fresh data that showed the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge cooled in April slightly more economists had expected, but also revealed a significant drop in consumer spending. Trump has reignited his trade war in the past week, which has stirred up uncertainty in markets after Wall Street had begun to turn the page on tariff concerns. The S&P 500 has been steadily climbing out of an early April slump instigated by the president's back-and-forth on his 'reciprocal' tariffs. Despite the recent fluctuations, investors who sold at the start of May missed out on a historically strong month for markets. The benchmark index is up more than 6% this month and is on track for its best month since 2023 and its best performance in May since 1990. 'Even though the stock market has staged a decisive rebound since the April lows, there is still plenty of uncertainty on tariffs, especially given the legal battle that is brewing over the 'Liberation Day' tariffs,' said Clark Bellin, president and chief investment officer at Bellwether Wealth. The dollar slightly gained on Friday. Yet the US dollar index, which measures the dollar's strength against six major foreign currencies, is on track to end the month in the red. It would be the dollar's fifth month of decline in a row. 'We expect bouts of market volatility ahead as investors continue to navigate a range of market, economic and geopolitical risks,' said Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, CIO of global equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, in a Thursday note. The benchmark S&P 500 is up about 0.5% this year. This is a developing story and will be updated.

US imposes new rules to curb semiconductor design software sales to China
US imposes new rules to curb semiconductor design software sales to China

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US imposes new rules to curb semiconductor design software sales to China

It appears the Trump administration has imposed new export controls on chip design software as it seeks to further undermine China's ability to make and use advanced AI chips. Siemens EDA, Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys all confirmed that they have received notices from the U.S. Commerce Department about new export controls on electronic automation design (EDA) software to China. EDA tools are primarily used to aid with the design and validation of semiconductor manufacturing, testing, and for monitoring performance and quality. They are used by chip foundries, chipmakers, networking hardware companies, the automotive industry, and many more. Siemens EDA, a division of German tech conglomerate Siemens, told TechCrunch that it has received a notice from the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) last week about new export controls on EDA software to China and Chinese military end users. "Siemens has supported customers in China for more than 150 years and will continue to work with our customers globally to mitigate the impact of these new restrictions while operating in compliance with applicable national export control regimes," the company said. U.S.-based Synopsys, which also makes EDA software, said on Thursday that it had also received a similar letter from the BIS. The company also suspended its forecast for the third quarter and full-year 2025. Cadence also received a notice from the BIS saying a license is now required for "the export, re-export or in-country transfer of electronic design automation software" to customers in China. The news was first reported by The Financial Times. The new export rules come as the U.S. ramps up its efforts to hinder Chinese companies as the battle for AI supremacy heats up. But these export controls are increasingly hurting the U.S. chip industry, which has long enjoyed significant market share in China. Nvidia alone has incurred billions in losses due to restrictions on sales of its H20 and Hopper AI chips to Chinese customers. The company, along with rival AMD, is even said to be working on selling lower-powered versions of its AI chips to Chinese customers. The U.S. Commerce Department did not immediately return a request for comment outside regular business hours. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store