US-SA Feud: Israel, lobby power and BRICS are the real reasons
Following his recent visit to Washington, President Cyril Ramaphosa has committed the country to an ambitious infrastructure plan to turn the country's economy around.
Image: AFP
IN my view, the meeting between President Cyril Ramaphosa and President Donald Trump was 'more than meets the eye'. To the ordinary observer, it appeared straightforward, but closer scrutiny reveals intricacies and complexities better left unspoken, lest we risk opening Pandora's box.
There are unrevealed details, a different perspective that even seasoned political commentators avoid addressing. Some philosophers play an intellectual version of Russian roulette. So I am prepared to risk shooting myself in the head by exploring the Israeli factor and the pro-Israel lobby's role in the deterioration of US-South Africa relations. My aim is not consensus but controversy.
Like Ian Mitroff and his colleagues argue in *Assumptional Analysis: A Methodology for Strategic Problem Solving*, our culture unconsciously trains us for compromise — even the avoidance of conflict. This risks reaching consensus 'too soon and for the wrong reasons', such as an inability to tolerate disagreement. Their 'assumptional analysis' technique is a tool for strategic problem-solving, one that embraces conflict rather than sidestepping it. It begins by identifying stakeholders, dissecting their assumptions, and negotiating solutions without shying from controversy.
Sociologist Zygmunt Bauman, citing philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis, warns: 'The problem with our civilisation is that it has stopped questioning itself. No society which forgets the art of asking questions can count on finding answers to the problems that beset it—certainly not before it is too late.' We must ask these difficult questions, for emotions often blind us to the bigger picture.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The much-anticipated discussions between Trump and Ramaphosa, including their media briefing, revolved around several key points: Meeting Context: Trump's questions seemed tailored to favour pro-Israel lobby perspectives, revealing a clear bias.
Trump's questions seemed tailored to favour pro-Israel lobby perspectives, revealing a clear bias. South Africa-Israel Tensions: South Africa's decision to take Israel to the ICJ over Gaza genocide allegations triggered a fierce reaction from Trump.
South Africa's decision to take Israel to the ICJ over Gaza genocide allegations triggered a fierce reaction from Trump. Trump's Comments: He weaponised the term 'genocide' to describe white farmer killings in South Africa — a deliberate, exaggerated provocation.
He weaponised the term 'genocide' to describe white farmer killings in South Africa — a deliberate, exaggerated provocation. Israeli Sensitivity: The word 'genocide' carries immense weight for Jews, given the Holocaust's trauma. Israel's outrage was predictable.
The word 'genocide' carries immense weight for Jews, given the Holocaust's trauma. Israel's outrage was predictable. Criticism of Trump: Many saw his rhetoric as a political stunt, deflecting from South Africa's legitimate grievances against Israel.
It is my view that Trump's questions — both publicly and behind closed doors — were influenced by the pro-Israel lobby within his administration. They were framed with vengeance in mind, designed to humiliate South Africa for its ICJ case. Notably, Trump fixated on 'genocide' when criticising South Africa's handling of farm murders.
For Jews, this term is psychologically debilitating, evoking the 6 million lives lost in the Holocaust. Yet, if 'genocide' applies to historical Jewish suffering, how can Israel deny its relevance to Gaza, where over 70 000 Palestinians have been killed since October 2025?
Trump sought to exaggerate farmer killings into a systemic 'genocide'. The reality is starkly different. Yes, there are killings on farms — but to call this a genocide is a blatant distortion. His rhetoric was a retaliatory move by Israel, using Trump as its mouthpiece.
Without delving into conspiracy, the pro-Israel faction has long been accused of shielding Israel from accountability. It has influenced US policy for decades, ensuring the US's reluctance to criticise Israel's violence against Palestinians, its human rights abuses, or its threats against Iran. Media outlets are increasingly exposing the lobby's corrupt practices.
For years, this issue was ignored in political discourse. But no longer. The collapse of the Oslo Accords and the Second Intifada brought it to the forefront. Figures like Jimmy Carter (*Peace Not Apartheid*) and scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt (*The Israel Lobby*) have challenged the lobby's dominance. Their works sparked global debate, praised by some as a wake-up call, dismissed by others as misleading.
What went unmentioned in the Trump-Ramaphosa press conference was the elephant in the room: Israel. South Africa is the only nation to openly condemn Israel's actions in Gaza and pursue legal action. This principled stance has cost it dearly — US aid was cut, and diplomatic relations soured. Israel's fury stems from South Africa's use of the word 'genocide', a term that opens old wounds for Jews. The irony is palpable: a state born from genocide now inflicts similar horrors.
Another thorn in America's side is South Africa's BRICS membership. China and Russia, particularly China, are vying for global influence, challenging US hegemony. South Africa is caught in a Catch-22: Russia and China supported the anti-apartheid struggle, but the US remains its largest trade partner. This delicate balancing act fuels Washington's frustration.
Critics underestimate Ramaphosa's handling of Trump. As Goethe said: 'Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least.' Ramaphosa prioritised mending ties over pointless confrontation. With 8 million unemployed, South Africa cannot afford empty gestures. Henry Ford's words ring true: 'Obstacles are what you see when you take your eyes off the goal.' Ramaphosa kept his focus — stabilising relations with a critical trade partner.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
41 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
US asks Australia to increase defense spending to 3.5% of GDP
The defense chiefs also discussed security issues including accelerating U.S. defense capabilities in Australia, advancing defense industrial base cooperation and creating supply chain resilience, the Defense Department said in a statement. 'On defense spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defense spending to 3.5 percent of its GDP as soon as possible,' the statement said. The ministers' meeting on Friday on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier security forum, is only the second between the security allies since U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January. Marles said after the meeting they did not discuss a specific percentage of GDP to raise Australian defense spending.
Daily Maverick
41 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
To attack Russian air bases, Ukrainian spies hid drones in wooden sheds
Ukraine's SBU domestic intelligence says it carried out 'operation Spider's Web' Drones in sheds were placed on trucks and driven near Russian bases SBU says 34% of cruise missile carriers put out of action Video shows Russian strategic bombers on fire By Tom Balmforth and Max Hunder Ukraine's domestic security agency, the SBU, acknowledged that it carried out the attacks and said they caused considerable damage. The sheds were loaded onto trucks that were driven to the perimeter of the air bases. The roof panels of the sheds were lifted off by a remotely-activated mechanism, allowing the drones to fly out and begin their attack, the official said. The security official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said strikes were conducted on Sunday on four air bases, and that 41 Russian warplanes were hit. An SBU statement posted on the Telegram messaging app estimated the damage caused by the assaults at $7 billion. 'Thirty-four percent of strategic cruise missile carriers at the main airfields of the Russian Federation were hit,' the SBU said on Telegram. Unverified video and pictures posted on Russian social media showed Russian strategic bombers on fire at the Belaya air base in the Irkutsk region of Siberia. Igor Kobzev, the regional governor, said there had been a drone attack on a military unit near the village of Sredny, which is near the Belaya base, though he did not specify what the target was. He said the drones had been launched from a truck. The Irkutsk region attack was the first time a drone assault had been mounted by Ukraine so far from the front lines, which are more than 4,300 km (2,670 miles) away. That is beyond the range of the long-range strike drones or ballistic missiles Ukraine has in its arsenal, so required a special scheme to get the drones close enough to their target. Photographs shared with Reuters by the Ukrainian security official showed dozens of short-range quadrocopter drones piled up in an industrial facility. The official said these were the same devices used in the attack. Other images shared by the official showed the wooden sheds with their metal roofing panels removed, and the drones sitting in the cavities between roof beams. Separate video posted on Russian Telegram channels, which has not been verified by Reuters, appeared to show matching sheds on the back of a truck. The roof panels can be seen lying on the ground next to the truck, and the video footage shows at least two drones rising out of the top of the sheds and flying off. The Russian online media outlet that posted the video, Baza, said in a caption that it was filmed in the district near the Belaya air base. The Irkutsk region air base hosts Tupolev Tu-22M supersonic long-range strategic bombers, a type of aircraft that has been used to launch missiles against targets in Ukraine. The operation was code-named 'Spider's Web', according to the Ukrainian security official, and was personally overseen by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and Vasyl Maliuk, head of the SBU domestic intelligence agency. If confirmed, the strikes would be the most damaging Ukrainian drone attack of the war, and would be a significant setback for Moscow. The source shared video footage shot from a drone, saying it showed one of the strikes. The images showed several large aircraft, some of which appeared to be Tu-95 strategic bombers, on fire.
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
ANC succession battle — the pros and cons of the top candidates vying for Ramaphosa's job
While it is unclear who will take over from President Cyril Ramaphosa as leader of the ANC, their ability to win votes will be extremely important. It may be constructive to examine what five of the most likely candidates would bring to the electorate. As our politics becomes more competitive than ever before, the identity of the leader of each party has become more important. One of President Cyril Ramaphosa's great strengths when he became leader of the ANC was that he was more popular than the party. The ANC itself said that he played a major role in helping it win the 2019 election (this was hugely contested at the time, and the then secretary-general, Ace Magashule, was forced to publicly disavow his comment that Ramaphosa had not played an important role). Ramaphosa's deteriorating popularity among voters, partly due to his inaction against corruption, and the Phala Phala scandal, might well have played a role in the ANC's dramatic decline last year. This shows how important the vote-winning ability of a new ANC leader will be. While it is not clear who will contest the position at the ANC's electoral conference in 2027, there is plenty of well-informed speculation that candidates could include Deputy President Paul Mashatile, International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa and the ANC secretary-general, Fikile Mbalula. Paul Mashatile There is little evidence that Mashatile has broad support among the electorate. His apparent inability to communicate a distinct message during his time as Deputy President suggests he is finding it difficult to create space in which to move. This could be a function of the position he holds. Deputy presidents are often subject to intense scrutiny, and people look for evidence of their ambition for the top job, which could be why he has not, so far, articulated a particular vision. Mashatile's public speeches in English are often stilted. His answers to parliamentary questions are, frankly, boring. He does not say anything new, and his delivery comes across as wooden. As a result of having no apparent message, the narrative around him is dominated by claims that he has benefited from fishy financial deals. He has failed to properly and publicly condemn the violence used by his security officers when they assaulted the occupants of a vehicle on the N1 highway. It is difficult to imagine him crafting a coherent message as the leader of the ANC. On the election trail he probably won't provide much help to the party. His position as Deputy President means he doesn't have responsibility for any particular portfolio. However, for the contenders Lamola, Ramokgopa and Mchunu, what happens on their watch reflects on their public images. Ronald Lamola The minister of international relations and cooperation is a high-profile position — but it is overshadowed by the President. In some instances, for example, SA's genocide case against Israel, Lamola has been able to take the lead. However, in the hardest and most high-profile issue, dealing with the Trump administration, Ramaphosa has taken over. What Lamola does have, almost uniquely in the ANC, is the ability to connect with younger voters. His age (41) makes him one of the youngest leaders in the party. He is relatively unscathed by the scandals that have surrounded so many people in the party. That said, if he were to undergo more scrutiny, he would have to answer questions about how his law firm failed to notice the massive corruption at the National Lotteries Commission, when it was tasked with investigating it. Kgosientsho Ramokgopa The public perception of Ramokgopa is entirely linked to load shedding. He is an excellent communicator and has ensured that he, the government and Eskom have controlled the narrative whenever load shedding is instituted. He is associated with the successes in dealing with load shedding — and also the failures. He will also appeal to voters who want a technocratic face for the ANC. He can give the impression to black professionals that he is one of them, that he speaks their language and can get things done. Sipho Mchunu Mchunu appeals to a slightly different constituency. Crucially for him and the ANC, he could win back voters in KwaZulu-Natal. This province voted for the ANC when former president Jacob Zuma was its leader, then appeared to move in the direction of the ANC and the IFP when Ramaphosa took over, only for large numbers to vote for Zuma's uMkhonto Wesizwe party in the last elections. Mchunu may well be able to develop a crucial constituency in this province for the ANC, where he was once its provincial secretary. Nationally, it would be a huge card in his favour if he were seen to be leading a successful effort to reduce violent crime. However, the problem of SA's crime is so large and is so intertwined with aspects of our politics that Mchunu is unlikely to be able to make much difference. Fikile Mbalula Mbalula, of course, is not in government. It is his position as secretary-general of the party that might give him the edge in any internal ANC race. In the past, the position of secretary-general has been shaped by the personality occupying it. Gwede Mantashe imbued the office with huge authority, while Kgalema Motlanthe had more of a quiet legitimacy. Lately, Mbalula has appeared to be trying to portray more of a sober appearance than in previous years. However, it is unlikely that voters have forgotten what happened when he was transport minister and how he was responsible for so many missteps. As previously pointed out, Mbalula has a history of running his mouth off. People are unlikely to have forgotten how he tweeted that he had 'Just landed in Ukraine', or that he had taken Prasa into administration with no legal authority to do so, or that he used such vulgar language when talking to taxi drivers that the SA Council of Churches was moved to to make a public comment. Or that he was found by a Public Protector to have received a paid holiday from a sporting goods chain while minister of sport. These are the consequences of his long history in the public eye. It is unlikely that he can change the way the public views him. While it would be entirely rational to assume that ANC delegates would have the 2029 elections in mind when they vote for the position of ANC leader, history shows that sometimes internal dynamics are more important. And the ANC appears to have done virtually nothing to win back votes since the polls last year. This suggests that the electability of candidates will not be the most important factor in the ANC's leadership election. DM
