
When Trump tariffs hit French barrels and corks, California's winemakers feel the squeeze
'The first email I received was from my cork provider,' Burke recalled. 'He said he'd take on 2% of the additional cost of importing corks from Europe, but I would have to absorb the other 13%. Then my barrel supplier got in touch, pushing me to put in my orders as fast as possible because every new French barrel coming across the Atlantic after the tariffs was going to come with a $100 or $150 fee.'
Every one of these messages was a gut punch for Burke's five-year-old family-run business, Dresser Winery, which sits on an idyllic hillside outside Paso Robles and specializes in big, bold reds. Burke sent a note out to his wine club members earlier this year telling them he did not plan on increasing prices for the fall shipment, but he realized he could no longer honor the commitment.
'If we do that,' he said flatly, 'we have to shut the business down.'
It turns out even US wine producers are heavily reliant on foreign components – everything from French oak barrels, which give the wine a buttery, vanilla finish in contrast to the much less appealing brown sugar taste of American oak, to glass bottles and corks and the wine-making equipment itself.
'Every single product we use, from our pumps to the de-stemmer, comes with instructions written in six languages,' Burke explained. 'Could we produce some of these things here? Sure, but it would take three years to get production up and running, and that's not the way the specialization has been.'
As another producer from Paso Robles, Paul Hoover of Still Waters Vineyards, put it: 'The only thing in my bottles made in America is the wine.'
Ostensibly, Trump's tariffs on imported goods are supposed to give a competitive boost to American entrepreneurs like Burke and Hoover. But the theory does not really apply to the wine business – not only because so many of the materials used to make California wine come from overseas, but also because people do not buy wine based on price alone.
'It is a fundamental misunderstanding of wine drinkers and the wine marketplace,' the National Association of Wine Retailers, an industry lobby group, said in a blistering statement in response to the 15% tariff announcement.
'Champagne is not sparkling wine. Bordeaux is not simply cabernet sauvignon or merlot … America's independent fine wine retailers understand better than most that when an American wine drinker asks for red Burgundy, they do not substitute Oregon pinot noir when the Burgundy is out of their price range or unavailable. They simply don't make a purchase.'
Burke echoed this sentiment, saying he had to control his reaction recently when a Trump supporter came to his winery and told him he must be excited about the business opportunities the tariffs will create. 'People aren't buying my bottles because of tariffs on French wines, that's for sure,' he said. 'If anything, I'm competing against other Californian and American wines. With European wines, it's not a real competition at all. They're very different regions, very different products.'
California wines are far from the cheapest because of the high cost of land and labour in the Golden state. For that reason, many producers live or die by the quality of what they make and the sort of subtle distinctions that come from varietals grown in a particular microclimate, or in a particular soil, or aged in a particular barrel.
Price still matters, because fine wines are a discretionary spending item, and if the economy or people's personal finances are struggling it is often one of the first things that consumers stop buying. The National Association of Wine Retailers, said it was worried about tariffs generally, not just on wine, because inflation and an uncertain business climate would hurt its members' bottom line just as much.
'The increased costs of living that will result from the recently enacted tariffs, along with the significant increase in prices for wines … will only push down consumption further, thereby harming the American wine industry to a degree from which many of its participants will not recover,' the group said.
In Paso Robles, which has seen an explosion in the number of wineries over the past two decades to about 250 and has become a major weekend tourist hub for wine lovers from San Francisco and Los Angeles, some of the harmful effects are being felt already.
Joel Peterson, executive director of the Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance, said international orders were drying up as the reverberations from Trump's trade war echo around the globe. 'We have wine sitting in a warehouse that is specially labeled for the Canadian market that producers can't sell,' he said. 'We've had no orders from the UK since Trump's so-called Liberation Day in April. People are scared to order those wines.'
Domestic retailers say they have not seen significant price increases kick in yet – for either domestic or European wines – but are already starting to struggle simply because of the uncertainty created by the White House's constantly shifting messages on where and at what rate it intends to impose tariffs.
'We're not in a recession but it's what I call a recess market,' said Jim Knight, co-owner of the Wine House in Los Angeles, which specializes in small-label boutique wines from the United States and around the world. 'People have money, they're just not spending it … If the president made a decision and stuck with it, we could plan for it. But we haven't been able to plan for it.'
Knight's business has a particular problem with high-end French wines it bought in advance years ago – right after the grapes were harvested – and presold to customers with an anticipated 10% mark-up. When tariffs on European wines were briefly at 10% earlier this year, Knight was looking at his entire profit being wiped out, since tariffs are imposed when goods arrive in the United States, not when they are purchased. Now, at 15%, he's looking at taking a loss that might force him to lay off workers or otherwise shrink his business.
For now, he is letting the wine sit in a temperature-controlled storage unit in France and hoping Trump might still bend to pressure from the industry to create a tariff exception for wines and spirits. An industry initiative called Toasts not Tariffs has been lobbying the White House hard to do exactly that.
More broadly, Knight said he was worried that small European producers would no longer offer their limited production to the US market, and that some of the specialist importers, the ones who love the same smaller label wines he does, will go out of business. 'Importers of wine from the European Union are American businesses too,' he remarked.
That helps explain why a US distributor of European wines and spirits, VOS Selections of New York, has been the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Trump's tariffs – a case that led to an initial ruling against the administration in the court of international trade at the end of May.
Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University who has spearheaded the suit, said the nature of the wine business was a vivid illustration of the harm that tariffs can do. 'Many of the wines our client imports simply cannot be produced in the United States because of differences in climate, soil and other factors,' he said. 'We're not benefiting American industry, we're damaging it and hurting consumers.'
Not every wine producer sees the economic outlook as uniformly gloomy. Hoover, of Still Waters Vineyards, said the cost of storing and transporting wine was a greater burden than the price of corks or bottles – particularly for California producers who have too much inventory on their hands following a post-Covid boom-and-bust cycle. He said he was relieved at a drop in fuel prices in recent months and saw opportunities if they fell further.
He was modestly hopeful, for example, that he could tap into sales opportunities on the east coast where he was previously priced out. 'Before the tariffs, a boat coming from Europe could deliver wine to the east coast more efficiently than I could getting it across the United States on a truck,' he said. 'Let's see how that looks going forward. Energy costs are the key to this. Let's hope the tariffs don't monkey that up.'
One of the main reasons that people in the wine business do not believe the tariffs will benefit domestic producers, as the White House is promising, is that they have seen this scenario play out before, during Trump's first term as president.
In 2019, the administration imposed a 25% tariff on most European wines, among other products, in retaliation for European subsidies on Airbus passenger jets. Trump said at the time that the relatively low price of French wines was unfair to California producers, but no evidence emerged that the tariff did anything to redress that perceived unfairness. 'It did not increase my domestic wine sales at all,' Knight said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
39 minutes ago
- Sky News
Starmer to meet European leaders for 'coalition of the willing' talks on Ukraine
European leaders who make up the 'coalition of the willing' are set to hold a conference call on Sunday - ahead of crunch talks between Donald Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy next week. The coalition - co-chaired by Sir Keir Starmer, France's President Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz - has the aim of bringing countries together to protect a peace deal in Ukraine. Top of the agenda at Sunday's meeting will be securing a concrete commitment from Mr Trump on a security guarantee that would act as a powerful backstop in any Russia-Ukraine peacekeeping arrangement. European leaders seemed buoyed by the US president's most recent hints on the subject, in the knowledge that US military might is likely to deter Vladimir Putin from advancing in the future. They will also discuss how to bring Mr Zelenskyy into talks after Mr Trump and Mr Putin's Alaska meeting saw him left out in the cold. In coordinated statements, European leaders said Mr Zelenskyy must play a greater role in future talks, and that peace cannot be achieved without him. The hard bit will be to persuade the unpredictable US administration to change its approach, something that has proved almost impossible in the past. 5:55 When Mr Trump re-entered the White House and made it clear the US would no longer provide a blank cheque to protect peace in Europe, others decided they had to step up, and the 'coalition of the willing' was thrown together in March. Since then, information about the allied peacekeeping effort has been patchy, but we know it includes over 30 countries, which have been asked to pledge whatever military support they can, including troops. 2:21 What has been forthcoming from the group though, has been consistent attempts to use their limited leverage to put pressure on the US. That will continue ahead of crunch talks between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy, which are set to take place in Washington on Monday.


The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A UK headline wealth tax? It may be simpler to put up existing taxes
Pressure to go further on wealth taxes – by creating new modes of clawing at hoards of hard-to-reach cash – is mounting. For starters, the fiscal picture is looking fairly bleak, with economists estimating that Rachel Reeves must raise £20bn – or even as much as £50bn – to meet her goal of balancing day-to-day spending against the revenue raised from taxation. On the government backbenches, meanwhile, MPs want the chancellor to squeeze the richest in society harder. They even put forward an early day motion last month calling for a 2% annual tax on individual assets over £10m. Yet introducing these kinds of taxes is often not straightforward, with the behaviour of the wealthy being hard to monitor and harder still to predict. The first significant problem is working out where the assets are and who holds them. That has always been difficult and has become even more challenging after one of the most important economic surveys, the household wealth data series, was suspended by the Office for National Statistics because of its low quality. The upshot is that HMRC simply does not know how many millionaires or billionaires there are in the UK. Without reliable figures, it is extremely hard to write policies, cost them and administer them. There is also a battle to be had with an 'old guard with set views' in Whitehall. Whitehall sources paint a picture of a Treasury led by figures influenced by economists whose thinking was prominent at Oxford University in the 1980s and 90s – such as James Mirrlees, Christophe Chamley and Tony Atkinson – leading to something of an orthodox view. In a nutshell, that position is that if you tax capital too much, it will stop investment and hamper growth. Or, in Chamley's words: 'Tax rate on capital income tends to zero in the long run.'. Since this era, the debate within economics has become more nuanced. A growing body of research suggests that some taxation on capital, even at relatively high rates, could lead to greater investment. As it becomes less attractive to hoard wealth because of taxation, risk appetites would then increase in pursuit of higher returns. You might be less tempted to keep your money in a vanilla savings account that can be taxed hard and easily if you can get a much better rate of return – even with a bit more risk – elsewhere. Treasury insiders argue that Reeves has followed the more modern logic, having already taken steps to widen the scope of inheritance and capital gains tax (IHT and CGT). They posit that her reluctance to pursue a headline wealth tax does not mean she has pulled her punches when it comes to taxing wealth. Hostile backbenchers, on the other hand, suggest she follows the old orthodoxy too closely. They often cite her decision to go for relatively small changes in the amounts of tax paid via CGT, rather than bring it more closely in line with income tax at the last budget, which also upset more senior political colleagues. What the debate about how to handle changes to IHT (which have been fiercely opposed by farmers) or CGT illustrates is that if the government really wants to tax wealth more effectively then it has all kinds of ways to do so before opting for a politically – and potentially economically – sensitive route with a headline wealth tax. Yet even changing existing mechanisms might not be easy, when the UK already has one of the highest rates of tax on property and wealth among developed economies, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Political pressure may make it harder to maintain a more gradualist approach, however. Figures on the left of the Labour parliamentary party are attracted to totemic wealth taxes of the kind introduced in Spain – its so-called solidarity tax – and Switzerland. They see it as part of showing a commitment to rebalancing the economy. Reeves is critical of international examples, saying that Switzerland does not have IHT, and that Spain's wealth tax is so riddled with exemptions that it raises too little money. Some developed economies that had comparable wealth taxes have dropped them, too. 'We have inheritance tax. We have capital gains. We've just got rid of the non-dom tax status that doesn't exist anymore in our tax system. So we do have taxes that tax the wealthy,' Reeves said in a recent interview with LBC. Other measures that go further are not yet proven to work, she claims, saying that those who 'come up with simple solutions' must do more to 'explain exactly how it would work, whether it's an ongoing tax, what it would do to tax avoidance, what it would do about people moving or changing the way that their wealth is stored'. Economists argue that the government should focus its energies on raising existing taxes, such as equalising CGT with income tax, for example, or changing gifting rules around IHT first, rather than introduce a novel wealth tax. The Treasury is already examining gifting rules among other possible IHT changes. Yet while Reeves might agree with some of these arguments, it's less clear whether her cabinet colleagues will tolerate a slow and steady approach, particularly if the fiscal picture sours.


The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
11 steps to be £1,000s better off even if you're on a low income – including the 50/30/20 rule
STARTING out on the journey to improve your finances can feel daunting - it's hard to know where to start. But small steps can have a huge impact, we spoke to top finance experts to pull together an 11 step guide to being financially better off within six months - and you could save THOUSANDS of pounds. 1 Here's how to get started: Set a budget To be better off, you need to live within your means. Understand your income and outgoings, and then create rules for how to spend your money. Graham Wells, from Gro Wiser financial coaching, says: 'Trying to fix multiple aspects of your finances in one go is unlikely to work, so you need to prioritise. "Be realistic and focus on small steps that will compound over time.' The 50/30/20 rule is one way to divide up your spending, where 50% of your money goes on essentials like the rent or mortgage and food shop each month, 30% on nice-to-haves like meals out and new clothes, and 20% into savings. You may need to tweak the percentages depending on your income and outgoings, or if you want to save more. Six month savvy: Someone earning £1,500 a month after tax could save £1,800 in six months by following this rule and putting 20% into savings monthly. Automate it Set up direct debits so that your money is automatically funnelled to where it needs to be. For example, you might set up one to pay off credit card debt and another to transfer cash into a savings account. Automating the process means you don't need to remember to do it manually and removes the temptation to spend on other things instead. "Set up the direct debits for payday - if you wait until the end of the month to see what's left, you can be almost certain there will be nothing," says Sarah Coles from the wealth manager Hargreaves Lansdown. Six month savvy: Use the round-ups tool on your banking app. This rounds your spending to the nearest pound and puts the difference into savings. For example, if you spent £1.87, it would be rounded to £2, with 13p going into savings. These small amounts really add up over time. Check your bank statement It's easy to lose track, so check for any subscriptions, membership or services that you might have forgotten about and no longer need. Do you use all of those TV streaming services? When was the last time you went to the gym? Check you are getting the best deal on bills like your mobile phone, broadband and car insurance. If you are out of the initial deal period, you are probably overpaying. Six month savvy: Research by Citizen's Advice found that a quarter of UK adults have accidentally taken out a subscription, often because they didn't realise a trial period had ended or that the deal had automatically renewed. According to Money Wellness, we each waste about £170 a year on unused subscriptions. Get free money Use cashback websites to earn money on those essentials that you do need to buy. Sites like QuidCo and Topcashback offer money back on purchases such as insurance, holidays and clothing: just set up an account, click through to the retailer from the cashback website, and then buy as usual. Cashback is never guaranteed so only use this for things you need to purchase anyway. Switching bank accounts is another way to bag free cash; banks often pay bonuses to new customers. Be sure to check the requirements to make sure you qualify. Six month savvy: Currently on QuidCo you could get 7.5% cashback at Expedia, while at Topcashback you could get 15% cashback at Currys. Topcashback says its users earn on average £345 a year. Banks including Santander, First Direct and Lloyds are currently offering switching bonuses of up to £180. Pay down debt Focus on clearing expensive debt before you worry about savings. The interest rates on credit cards and loans are higher than you can earn on savings, so will undo your efforts. Check if you are eligible for a 0% credit card, where you can clear your debt without racking up extra interest charges. Ideally you should have a direct debit to clear your credit card in full each month, but if you can't afford this try to pay off more than the minimum amount. Six month savvy: If you had £1,000 on a credit card charging 24% and paid £50 a month, it would take two years and two months to clear and you'd pay £252 in interest. If you paid £200 a month, you would clear it in six months and pay £58 in interest. 'My Lifetime Isa has changed my finances - I could get £15k free cash' When Antony Jones first heard about the Lifetime Isa, he thought it sounded too good to be true. But since opening an account, he has pocketed £4,000 in free cash. Lifetime Isas can be opened by those aged 18-40, and you can save up to £4,000 a year in them until you are 50, which you can put into cash or invest. The best thing is that you get a 25% bonus from the government - so if you save £4,000 in a year, you get £1,000 on top. If you saved the maximum every year from age 18 to 50, you'd get £32,000 free cash in total. And because the bonus gets paid a month after you put money into the account, you can start to feel better off very quickly. 'I only regret missing out on those years when I could have been saving into a Lifetime Isa but didn't know about them,' says Antony, 39, who lives in Cardiff and opened his account in 2021. He could get £15,000 in total from the bonus if he keeps saving until he is 50. The one catch is that the money can only be used either to buy your first home or after age 60. Antony, who works as a software developer, already has a mortgage so wants the money to boost his retirement savings. He has set up a direct debit to invest £330 a month through the investment platform AJ Bell, and splits the money between two funds: Vanguard LifeStrategy 80% Equity and Vanguard Global All Cap Index. 'I opened a Lifetime Isa because I wanted the bonus, but it's completely changed my finances. It has helped me learn about investing and do more of it,' says Antony. Set up a savings account Experts recommend having three to six months' of outgoings in an easy-access savings account in case of an emergency. Make sure you are getting a good rate - money in your current account won't earn interest. Top easy-access accounts are currently from Chase Bank and Trading 212, paying almost 5%. You can then put some money in a fixed savings account, where you may get a higher rate but can't access the money for a set period. Alice Haine, from the investment firm Bestinvest, says: "A small amount set aside each month will kickstart your journey towards financial security, with each top-up helping to ease the stress when a sudden cost lands in your lap." Six month savvy: For those just starting a regular saver account can be a good option - these pay a higher rate but limit how much you can save. For example, you can save up to £300 a month with First Direct and earn 7%. If you maxed out the account, after a year you would have saved £3,600 and earned £135 in interest. Pay into a pension Retirement might be decades away, but it's still important to save for. If you are 22 or over and earning at least £10,000, you should be automatically put into your company pension scheme. Usually you contribute 5% of your salary into a pension and your company pays in 3%. Ask if your employer will pay in more if you increase your contribution too. Six month savvy: Pensions are for the long-term so you won't see results in six months, but if you contribute £50 a month from age 22 and your company £30 a month, and it grew at 5% a year, you would have more than £108,000 by age 60. Start investing Investing is the best way to grow your money over the long-term, but it comes with risks because the stock market can go down as well as up. You should only invest money that you are able to tie up for a minimum of three years. The simplest way to start is with a robo-investing app, where you answer some questions about your finances and how much risk you want to take, and are then guided to a ready-made investment fund. You can often start with as little as £1. Six month savvy: If you invested £25 a month into a fund that grew at 6% a year, after a year you would have £309, and after 10 years you would have £4,096. If you were able to save £50 a month, you'd have £617 after one year and £8,194 after ten years. Set some boundaries Identify your money weaknesses and set some rules to help you tackle them. If you are an impulse buyer, for example, delete shopping apps from your phone. Consider the 24-hour rule, where you leave an item in your basket for a day to give you time to think about whether you really want it. Six month savvy: Use a spreadsheet or budgeting app to record your spending and break it into categories, says Wells: 'This can be transformational. "It helps people understand more about their spending behaviours and what changes they would like to introduce.' Be kind to yourself There is often a feeling of guilt associated with money and a sense that we should know more, says Wells, but it's not something many people are taught. No one is perfect and there will be months that you get off track. Coles adds: 'Don't lose sleep about the imperfections in your finances. Focus on what you have achieved, rather than what is left to do.' Six month savvy: Write a list of the things that are worrying you, says Haine: 'Sometimes the things causing the most anxiety can be easy to fix. "Doing everything at once will feel overwhelming, so focus on each money woe one at a time.' Get help Improving your finances can be overwhelming, but there is support available if you need it. Charities like Citizens Advice and Step Change are an important resource if you are struggling with debt. The Money Helper website offers guidance on everyday money as well as savings and pensions. For investing help, be sure to use regulated websites for tips such as Hargreaves Lansdown and AJ Bell. I'm a psychologist - here are three tips to change your money mindset Simonne Gnessen, founder of Wise Money Financial Coaching: Reframe it What messages do you tell yourself about money? Saying 'I'm bad with money' or 'I always overspend' can unconsciously encourage you to behave in that way. Try to notice how you think and feel about money, and reframe it. Say 'I'm making progress' and 'I am trying' instead, and focus on the wins. Be curious Don't judge yourself if you get off track or overspend. Instead try to explore what caused you to do that and consider what you could have done differently. Coming from a place of curiosity rather than judgment means you will be more open to change. Journaling can help you explore your feelings and spot behaviour patterns. Set a money date Make it something you enjoy rather than a chore. Schedule regular time for money matters, whether it is five minutes to top-up your savings or an hour to comb your bank statement - this stops tasks building up and becoming overwhelming. Set a time to check-in with your partner; do it over coffee and cake rather than at home surrounded by paperwork, to make it feel like a treat. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@