Man found guilty of attempted murder of author Salman Rushdie in brutal stabbing
Feb. 21 (UPI) -- A jury on Friday convicted a New Jersey man of second-degree attempted murder and assault in the brutal stabbing of author Salman Rushdie on an upstate New York lecture stage in 2022.
Hadi Matar, 27, was found guilty within two hours of deliberations after the two-week trial in Chautauqua County Court. Matar also was found guilty of assault for injuring Henry Reese, who was moderating the event.
County Judge David Foley set sentencing for April 23. Matar could receive up to 25 years in prison.
Matar faces separate federal terrorism-linked charges in Buffalo for allegedly providing assistance to the Iran-backed Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah. The charges allege that Matar may have been motivated by an endorsement of a fatwa by Hezbollah.
Matar, who rejected a plea deal in the state case, did not testify and the defense called no witnesses.
Rushdie, now 77, was the prosecution's key witness during seven days of testimony. He described in graphic detail what happened on Aug. 12, 2022, and his painful recovery. He lost one eye in the attack.
Rushdie, who sat about 20 feet away from Matar, said that he feared he was dying.
"I saw a large quantity of blood pouring onto my clothes," said Rushdie, who initially thought he was being struck by the man's fist. "He was hitting me repeatedly. Hitting and slashing."
Rushdie was stabbed and slashed more than a dozen times in the head, throat, torso, thigh and hand. He spent 17 days at a Pennsylvania hospital and more than three weeks at a New York City rehabilitation center.
His 2024 memoir, Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder, described his ordeal.
During his closing arguments, District Attorney Jason Schmidt played a slow-motion video of the attack
"I want you to look at the unprovoked nature of this attack," Schmidt said. "I want you to look at the targeted nature of the attack. There were a lot of people around that day but there was only one person who was targeted."
Schmidt reminded jurors a trauma surgeon testified Rushdie's injuries would have been fatal without quick treatment.
Assistant public defender Andrew Brautigan said that prosecutors hadn't proved that Matar intended to kill Rushdie.
"You will agree something bad happened to Mr. Rushdie, but you don't know what Mr. Matar's conscious objective was," Brautigan said. "The testimony you have heard doesn't establish anything more than a chaotic noisy outburst that occurred that injured Mr. Rushdie."
Another public defender, Nathaniel Barone, told reporters Matar likely would have faced a lesser charge of assault were it not for Rushdie's celebrity.
"We think that it became an attempted murder because of the notoriety of the alleged victim in the case," Barone said after testimony concluded Thursday. "That's been it from the very beginning. It's been nothing more, nothing less. And it's for publicity purposes. It's for self-interest purposes."
Rushdie, a dual American-Lebonese citizen, spent years in hiding after Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, calling for his death in 1989 after the publication of his novel The Satanic Verse, which some Muslims consider blasphemous.
But after Khomeini announced that it would not enforce the decree, Rushdie traveled freely for the past 25 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Madeleine McCann prime suspect gloats he will never be charged without a body in chilling letter
Madeleine McCann prime suspect Christian Brueckner has gloated he will never be charged without a body. In a chilling letter, the 48-year-old convicted paedophile said 'the dropping of the investigation will hit the world like a bomb'. He bragged that police lacked the evidence needed to support their accusations against him in the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance. The letter, seen by The Sun, read: 'It is the important questions, the decisive questions that can never be answered.' He questions whether his vehicle was clearly seen near the crime scene on the night of the crime, whether there is DNA evidence, or a body, to which he says: 'All no, no no.' Brueckner adds: 'You don't have to be a realist like me to predict that the accusations made against me will not hold up and that the investigation will be dropped.' It comes as police officers returned to Germany following a fresh three-day search conducted between Praia da Luz—where three-year-old Madeleine vanished on May 3, 2007—and a house near the resort where Brueckner once lived. He also revealed in his letters a knowledge of how the German legal system works in his favour, The Sun reported. He wrote: 'You know, of course, that in Germany you don't have to prove your innocence as a suspect, but that the public prosecutor's office has to prove that you are clearly guilty. 'Even the slightest doubt leads to an acquittal, if there is a court hearing at all.' German authorities maintain that Brueckner is the main suspect in Madeleine's disappearance and are pushing for charges before his scheduled release in September. Brueckner, who is currently serving a seven-year prison sentence in Germany for raping an elderly American tourist in Praia da Luz in 2005, has always denied having any role in Madeleine's abduction. He has also denied committing the 2005 rape for which he was convicted in 2019 and is still serving his sentence. Brueckner is due to be released later this year and police face a race against time if they are to charge Brueckner in the McCann case. Investigators looking in to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann concluded their latest searches after three days without success. The British toddler vanished after she was left sleeping while her parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, went for dinner in a nearby restaurant. Personnel have spent two days focusing on one particular derelict building, using a ground-penetrating radar on the cobbled ground after clearing the area of debris and vegetation using a digger and chainsaws.
San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Elon Musk deletes anti-Trump posts as president warns of ‘serious consequences'
Elon Musk has quietly removed several high-profile posts on his social media platform, X, that directly criticized President Donald Trump, signaling a possible deescalation in a feud that exploded into public view this week. Among the deleted posts were Musk's accusations linking Trump to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as well as a now-vanished endorsement of a user's call for Trump's impeachment and replacement with Vice President JD Vance. The deletions were discovered Saturday morning, though it remains unclear why Musk removed the posts. On Thursday, Musk claimed that without him, Trump would not have secured the presidency, setting off threats from Trump to cut off government contracts with Musk's companies, including Starlink and Space X. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk replied. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The X page that once hosted Musk's post now displays a generic error message: ' page doesn't exist. Try searching for something else.' Musk had also replied 'yes' to a user's post calling for Trump's impeachment. By Saturday morning, that post had also been removed. The posts had marked a sharp escalation in the rift between Musk and Trump, who were once closely aligned. Trump purchased a red Tesla Model S in March and, just last week, appeared at a White House event alongside Musk, where he presented him with a ceremonial golden key to the nation. The alliance began to crack after Musk publicly criticized a sweeping GOP-backed budget measure, the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which he said did not include the reforms he had championed while leading the Department of Government Efficiency under Trump. On Thursday, Musk called on Trump to 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' Trump, in turn, dismissed Musk's opposition and suggested cutting off federal subsidies and contracts with Musk's companies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' the president wrote on Truth Social. In an interview with NBC News on Saturday, Trump warned of 'very serious consequences' if Musk were to fund Democratic candidates in retaliation. 'He'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump said, though he declined to elaborate. Trump added that Musk was being 'disrespectful to the office of the President.' He added, 'I think it's a very bad thing.' Asked whether he intended to mend the relationship, Trump responded simply: 'No.'
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Thank You ‘Fewer Toys' Trump, You're a Bigger Grinch than Me
Trump made headlines this week for going all Marie Kondo on the American economy—and I am here for it. During an interview with Meet the Press's Kristen Welker, Trump answered a question about rising prices due to his tariffs on China by declaring his aversion to the excesses of American-style capitalism: 'I don't think that a beautiful baby girl—that's 11 years old—needs to have 30 dolls,' said the President, before continuing later in the interview, 'They can have three.' In that same interview, he also stated that the nation's rates of pencil ownership have gotten out of control: 'They don't need to have 250 pencils,' he decreed of the sick stationery addicts among us. 'They can have five.' Exactly right! Families across the nation going broke trying to keep up with the latest pencil innovations. Our strategic graphite reserves at an all-time low. Finally, an American president has the courage to stand up to those b----rds at Dixon-Ticonderoga. Is it surprising that the President of the United States is now dictating how many dolls, crayons, vaccines or eggs children need? Sure, a little bit. But why should it be? Many of the world's great leaders have advocated for a centrally planned command economy—Josef Stalin and Mao Tse-Tung come to mind. And funnily enough, I've been making the argument that we waste too much money on cheap plastic cr-p from China to my wife for years, especially at Christmas when the kids were young. 'A Grinch,' she used to call me, a charge I have never denied. So I'm delighted to discover that the First Family hates Christmas as much as I do, although maybe I should have guessed as much during the first Trump administration when Melania apparently took her seasonal decorating theme from The Shining. Speaking of which, I was also heartened to see Trump's intention to impose 100% tariffs on foreign films. Why do we need to shoot films abroad when we've already got the entire world built to scale in Las Vegas? And why stop there either? I'd also like to see a 100% tariff on subtitles and on elevator music that sounds a little too 'ethnic.' Economists are warning that the significant impacts of Trump's economic policies should hit our shores this week, as the first Chinese ships to leave port following the imposition of the tariffs begin arriving in the U.S. Speaking with CNN, Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, said that 'cargo coming into Los Angeles will be down 35% compared for a year ago.' Fewer shipping containers means less work for dockworkers, fewer hauls for truckers, fewer products for sale. Will shortages follow? Some economists think so, with consumers likely to experience scarcity and/or price hikes in toys, footwear, glassware, cutlery, furniture, bedding and clothing—as are U.S. companies that rely on China for plastic, iron, steel and electronic components. One has to wonder whether Trump's message of austerity will fly among his own base. Republican orthodoxy has always been 'buy, buy, buy!' Following 9/11, for example, George W. Bush's message to the nation was, in effect, 'Go shopping.' After any one of our nation's frequent mass shootings, Republicans respond to calls for gun control by saying it isn't a matter of needing to own more guns, but of having the right to own as many as we, the people choose. How many guns do Americans get, Mr. President? Is it more or less than the number of pencils? We are told that any pain caused by these tariffs is likely to be short-lived. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reassured investors at the Milken Institute this week, claiming that, 'the result of the president's economic plan will be more. More jobs, more homes, more growth, more factories, more critical manufacturing plants, more semiconductors, more energy, more opportunity, more defense, more economic security, more innovation.' That may end up being the case, although it's hard to see where all the new jobs are coming from, or the wood to build all those new homes. It's difficult to envision factories springing up across the heartland paying American wages to American workers. It's difficult to see how cutting ourselves from the world will lead to more opportunity. But while it's tough to see how destroying our trade relationships creates more economic security (or national security) rather than less, I do agree with the Treasury Secretary that we are likely to see more innovation. After all, nothing inspires creativity like empty shelves.
