NE TN House delegation splits 4-4 as vouchers pass
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WJHL) — Four Northeast Tennessee House members voted against the school voucher bill Thursday and four voted for it as the bill passed fairly narrowly, 53-45. The bill is now being debated in the Senate.
LIVE: Tennessee Senate considers school vouchers after House passes bill
Tim Hicks (R-Gray), who has consistently expressed strong support of a statewide voucher bill, was joined in the 'aye' column by Timothy Hill (R-Blountville), John Crawford (R-Kingsport) and Bud Hulsey (R-Kingsport). Crawford and Hulsey had told News Channel 11 they were undecided on the bill at the end of last week, while Hill has not responded to requests for comment.
A total of 21 Republicans joined the House's 24 Democrats on the losing side, including local representatives Rebecca Alexander (Jonesborough), David Hawk (Greeneville), Gary Hicks (Rogersville) and Renea Jones (Erwin).
News Channel 11 has reached out to the members for comment and will update this story as we hear back from any of them.
'I voted in opposition to the proposed voucher plan, in accordance with the wishes of a majority of Greene County,' Hawk said in a text message minutes after the vote.
From Rebecca Alexander:
It was my greatest honor to stand up for what I felt what District 7 would want me to do. The letters and phone calls I received were around 10-1 against the voucher bill. I am in Nashville because you trusted me to represent you and I'm honored to do that and will continue to do so. We have the best public schools in our area and I am confident they will continue to be excellent and I promise to support them in Nashville.
From Bud Hulsey:
I voted 'yes' because 72% of my District appear to believe that it is good for parents to have a direct say in the type of education provided to their children, but with the full assurance that our local schools are fully protected and will lose nothing.
From Renea Jones:
The people of the Fourth House District elected me to be their voice in Nashville. Over the course of two months, I have met with parents, teachers, administrators, and citizens-at-large to ascertain how the Education Freedom Act ('vouchers') would impact Carter and Unicoi counties. After receiving over six hundred calls and emails through our office, and looking at the facts, I chose to vote against the Education Freedom Act. I feel that the legislation falls short of addressing the concerns our public education system faces. However, that was not the consensus of a majority of the legislature.
From Tim Hicks:
Education has a brighter future starting today. We will continue to support public education as the highest priority. There's nothing more important than giving our parents a choice for the education that best fits their child's needs.
(This is developing story)
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
41 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Pivots to Tax Cuts to Combat Voters' Economic Anxiety
President Donald Trump is pivoting his attention to passing the cornerstone of his legislative agenda, pressuring Congress to quickly approve a massive tax bill that Republicans believe will seal their political fortunes in the midterm elections. Trump has spent recent days focused on foreign affairs — the Iranian conflict, the Group of 7 in Canada and his most recent trip to a NATO summit in the Netherlands. Now, he's shifting to a domestic matter: strong-arming fractious Republican lawmakers to cut a deal on a multi-trillion dollar tax bill by an ambitious July 4 deadline.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Ten Years After Landmark Supreme Court Ruling, Is Same-Sex Marriage at Risk?
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A decade after same-sex marriage was legalized nationwide via a landmark Supreme Court ruling, many LGBTQ+ individuals fear the right may no longer be secure, with some signs that long-growing Republican acceptance of it could be waning. Obergefell v. Hodges was decided on June 26, 2015, in a 5 to 4 ruling. Justices John Roberts, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who still sit on the nation's top court, wrote dissenting opinions along with their former colleague, the late Justice Antonin Scalia. While Gallup polling in 2015 showed that just 37 percent of Republicans thought same-sex marriages should be valid, that number rose to a record high of 55 percent in 2022 and 2023, but has since dropped to 41 percent as of May—a double-digit decline. Over the past few months, conservative lawmakers in at least nine states have introduced legislation aimed at undermining same-sex marriage. Some of these bills specifically take aim at the Supreme Court, urging the justices to overturn the Obergefell precedent. "As an interracial gay couple with an adopted daughter, these developments are deeply unsettling—especially living in a swing state that leans conservative," Nikhil Patil, who resides in Georgia and married his husband in 2020, told Newsweek. "My husband and I have had difficult conversations about contingency plans." Jeremy Hanson-McIntyre, left, told Newsweek that the legality of his marriage to husband Joe, right, feels "very unstable, precarious and unsafe." Jeremy Hanson-McIntyre, left, told Newsweek that the legality of his marriage to husband Joe, right, feels "very unstable, precarious and unsafe." Courtney Klok/Courtesy of Jeremy Hanson-McIntyre Jeremy Hanson-McIntyre, who resides in Michigan and married his husband Joe in 2024, shared similar sentiments with Newsweek, saying that the legality of his marriage feels "very unstable, precarious and unsafe." He particularly blamed President Donald Trump and the Christian nationalist movement he's aligned with. "The current sitting president has built his campaign, image and reputation around the hatred and anger from the viewpoint of the Christian nationalists who utilize their hate-filled Bible thumping as a means to silence freedoms and prevent mere humans from simply living their own lives," he said. Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment. Is Same-Sex Marriage Under Threat? On June 10, the Southern Baptist Convention—the nation's largest Protestant denomination—called at its national meet for the "overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family." Justice Clarence Thomas took aim at Obergefell in a 2022 concurring opinion when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade precedent, which had allowed abortion nationwide for nearly 50 years. In his opinion, Thomas said the court should also "correct the error" set by the precedent of Obergefell, as well as Lawrence v. Texas, which established that criminal penalties for sodomy or private sexual acts between consenting adults are unconstitutional. The opinion raised alarm bells for many LGBTQ+ individuals, especially as Thomas' opinion came with the Supreme Court's overturning of a long-established right to abortion. In response, Congress passed the bipartisan Respect for Marriage Act later that year, which shored up protections for same-sex marriage. While Obergefell could still technically be overturned, and conservative states could then outlaw issuing same-sex marriage licenses, the bipartisan legislation requires states to recognize all marriages performed in other domestic or foreign jurisdictions. In the House, 39 Republicans voted "Yea," as did 12 GOP senators—meaning a significant majority of the GOP lawmakers voted against the bill in both chambers. Jim Obergefell, lead plaintiff in the Obergefell v. Hodges case, speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court on April 28, 2015, in Washington, D.C. Jim Obergefell, lead plaintiff in the Obergefell v. Hodges case, speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court on April 28, 2015, in Washington, D.C. Olivier Douliery/Getty Jim Obergefell, lead plaintiff in the 2015 case, recently shared his concerns. "Yes, I'm worried about marriage equality," he told USA Today. "If Obergefell is overturned, we go back to a time or a place where a queer couple in Ohio, where I live, might want to get married, but Ohio could refuse to issue a marriage license because Ohio still has a state level Defense of Marriage Act on the books." He added: "Our biggest challenge is making sure we don't lose the progress we have made." At the local level, conservative lawmakers in Idaho, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas have introduced measures aimed at undermining same-sex marriage in recent months. While none of these have been successfully passed through a state legislature, the effort is notable, particularly as many directly urge the Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell. "It is an important state sovereignty issue and one that should be debated at the state level, not at the U.S. Supreme Court level. The decision has already infringed on citizens' religious freedoms," Idaho state Representative Heather Scott, a Republican who introduced a measure urging the Supreme Court to overturn the precedent, told Newsweek. Daniel Innis, chairman of the LGBT group Log Cabin Republicans and a GOP state senator in New Hampshire, dismissed the effort playing out in some state legislatures. "That's not how stuff works, particularly the Supreme Court. I find the whole thing quite amusing, honestly," he told Newsweek. Innis said "there are people who occasionally play to the sort of fringe," adding the problem exists on the "left and the right." "Over the last decade, the presence of gay and lesbian folks in the Republican Party has become much more visible. It's totally like coming out of the closet a second time, when you're gay and come out as a Republican," he said. MassResistance, an anti-LGBTQ+ group that promotes socially conservative positions, has been the key driver behind many of the efforts in state legislatures to target same-sex marriage. The organization declined an interview request for this article. "We are certainly flattered that Newsweek would want to interview us. However, given your personal situation regarding this issue, we can't believe there's any way you could be objective or fair. So we'll pass on this," the organization said. The rejection appeared to refer to the fact that this writer identifies as queer. Sarah Kate Ellis, president and CEO of the LGBTQ+ advocacy group GLAAD, said that "threats to marriage equality are coming from a small fringe of extremists." She said that these individuals "refuse to accept the reality that they have lost this battle for acceptance and our country is better off for it." Trump and Same-Sex Marriage During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump briefly waved a rainbow flag with the words "LGBTs for Trump" during a Colorado rally. Groups like "Gays for Trump" and Log Cabin Republicans rallied behind him in that campaign, and in June 2016, Trump posted to Twitter, now X: "Thank you to the LGBT community! I will fight for you...." After taking office, he appointed Richard Grenell, who is openly gay and in a same-sex relationship, as his ambassador to Germany. In 2020 Grenell was named by Trump as acting director of national intelligence, making him the first openly gay person to serve in a Cabinet-level position, although he was never confirmed by the Senate. Ahead of the 2024 Republican National Convention, Trump quietly, and successfully, pushed the RNC to remove its definition of marriage as "between one man and one woman." The updated platform instead promises that the GOP will "promote a Culture that values the Sanctity of Marriage, the blessings of childhood, the foundational role of families, and supports working parents." In his second term, Trump appointed Scott Bessent, who is in a same-sex marriage, as treasury secretary. Bessent's appointment made him only the second-ever openly gay individual to be Senate-confirmed to a Cabinet role, the first being former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg under former President Joe Biden. It also made him the highest-ranking LGBTQ+ person in U.S. history, as he is currently 5th in line to the president. Demonstrators stand with a rainbow flag outside the Supreme Court on April 28, 2015, as it hears historic arguments in cases that could make same-sex marriage the law of the land. Demonstrators stand with a rainbow flag outside the Supreme Court on April 28, 2015, as it hears historic arguments in cases that could make same-sex marriage the law of the land. Jose Luis/AP "Trump has done this quietly," Innis said, criticizing the previous Democratic administration for focusing on "identity politics." He said Bessent is a "perfect example." "This is a competent professional who knows his business, and he's not walking around carrying the gay flag," the Log Cabin chair said. Despite Trump's actions, post-2024 election polling by the LGBTQ+ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign (HRC) showed 84 percent of the community backed former Vice President Kamala Harris, while just 14 percent supported Trump. Preelection polling by GLAAD showed that only 15 percent of LGBTQ+ respondents preferred Trump over the Democratic ticket. Trump and the Transgender Community Some of the LGBTQ+ opposition to Trump may derive partly from his administration's stance on transgender issues. Solidarity is important to many LGBTQ+ individuals, and some see strong parallels between the anti-trans movement and the efforts to prevent same-sex couples from marrying prior to Obergefell. During his 2024 campaign, the president routinely railed against transgender athletes and raised concerns about "gender ideology" in schools. He even floated the claim that gender transition surgeries were being conducted during the school day. "No transgender, no operations. You know, they take your are some places, your boy leaves for school, comes back a girl. OK? Without parental consent," he said last October. The claim lacks evidence, and professional medical organizations recommend that any gender-affirming surgery is performed after an individual turns 18. On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order targeting the transgender community. The order said the U.S. would "recognize two sexes, male and female," stating that "these sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality." His administration has gone on to target transgender athletes, and transgender individuals applying for new passports have received documents that list their sex assigned at birth, disregarding how they identify today. Innis said he doesn't see the Trump administration's effort as being "anti-trans." He said it is "a sentiment of protecting girls in sports and, you know, all sorts of other issues." "I think we've got to be reasonable and say, you have every right to exist. You have every right to pursue what you perceive to be the best solution for you, but that doesn't mean you could trample on the rights of others. And I think that's what the president is trying to get at," he said. Last December, Charlie Baker, president of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), told a Senate panel that there were fewer than 10 transgender athletes—out of more than 500,000 total athletes—competing in the association. It's unclear how many there are nationwide in local high schools and middle schools, but most researchers believe the number to be vanishingly small. The Future of Same-Sex Marriage While Gallup's polling has shown a dip in GOP support for same-sex marriage over the past couple of years, Americans overall approve by a large margin. As of May, the polling organization's data showed 68 percent of Americans believe same-sex marriages should be valid, while less than half that number, 29 percent, said they should not be. "When people see our families and recognize that we share the same values and challenges as any other family, support for our basic rights rises," GLAAD's Ellis said. Additionally, a growing number of young Americans identify as LGBTQ+. More than one in five, 22 percent, of those aged 18 to 29 say they are part of the community, according to survey results from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI). That's more than double the 10 percent of the 30- to 49-year-olds who identify the same way. But even as demographics change and gay Republicans become more visible, the conservative pushback to the LGBTQ+ community raises concern for many. Nikhil Patil has had "difficult conversations about contingency plans" with his husband. Nikhil Patil has had "difficult conversations about contingency plans" with his husband. Courtesy of Nikhil Patil "It's a strange dichotomy—we have more gay representation in media and pop culture than ever before, yet we're seeing a surge in anti-LGBTQIA+ sentiment at the political level," Patil said. Hanson-McIntyre said that the Trump administration has "made active moves against the LGBTQ+ community" and "has fostered an environment and emboldens those with prejudices, biases and uneducated fears against the LGBTQ+ community." At the same time, Hanson-McIntyre said he's seen how some within the Republican Party have changed their perspectives. "Those who have become more accepting are out there and do exist. The problem is, it's the irrational far-right agenda which screams the loudest and the ugliest," he said.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
‘Big brother in the business': The political odd couple whose partnership could reshape Boston politics
Wu, 40, calls 47-year-old Michlewitz her 'big brother in the business,' though he jokes that it's hard to see the powerful mayor of Boston as a 'little sister.' For more than a decade, they have been close friends and strong political allies, and when she speaks, he watches with the pride attendant to the familial role. Michlewitz is poised, if the parlor game is to be believed, to ascend to the House's most influential post when Speaker Ron Mariano ultimately retires. That potential promotion — the first time in nearly a generation that Boston would have one of its own in that role — could make a friendship that started 15 years ago in Boston's South End into the most important political partnership in New England. And it could mark a momentous shift for a city unusually beholden to the whims of Beacon Hill. Advertisement Wu and Michlewitz make up something of an odd couple. She is a locally elected progressive constrained by the more centrist tendencies of state powerbrokers; he is one of those powerbrokers. She is fighting Beacon Hill to give Boston rent control; he is on Beacon Hill opposing rent control. Her expansive agenda for the city depends on support from his colleagues at the state, and he does not always deliver it. Advertisement Aaron Michlewitz endorsed then-Councilor Michelle Wu for mayor in 2021. Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff And yet the two are undeniably close, sharing a genuine friendship that is not rooted in political expediency, according to conversations with more than a dozen people who know them. Michlewitz is one of the people the independent-minded mayor listens to above others, say people who know them well. And Wu's outside perspective has influenced Michlewitz, too, he says. Even when they are not at some event together — cutting ribbons, delivering canned remarks, cheesing at a It's hard to overstate how much Boston relies on Beacon Hill: for its funding, for its public transit system, for permission to do everything from grant a new liquor license to levy a new tax. Having Michlewitz at the helm could reverse the fortunes of a city known for Related : Of course, Michlewitz isn't speaker yet, and he declined to speculate on his political future. (Mariano, 78, has not said when he will retire, though speculation runs rampant; a spokesperson said Advertisement To be sure, even the best-placed ally can not guarantee that Boston will get what it wants from the Legislature. Michlewitz and other House leaders sometimes simply disagree with Wu, or believe the broader membership will disagree. In other moments, when they do line up, Michlewitz has muscled Wu's agenda through the House only to watch it die in the Senate, where she has fewer allies in leadership. Even so, Boston politicians say the close link between City Hall and the State House has already benefited both — to a point. 'Boston is the big winner in the situation,' said state Representative Adrian Madaro, an East Boston Democrat. Still, 'that doesn't mean that every mayor is going to get whatever he or she wants. Boston is not the be-all, end-all at the State House.' The Boston delegation is a limited faction of the 200-member state Legislature, Madaro added. 'It takes a lot of convincing to get anything done in this building.' Opposite paths to power Now arguably Boston's two most influential politicians, Wu and Michlewitz took opposite paths to power. Michlewitz is a self-described 'city kid.' A lifelong resident of the North End, he worked in college for former Boston mayor Tom Menino, then for Sal DiMasi, the last Bostonian to serve as speaker of the Massachusetts House. After DiMasi resigned in scandal, Michlewitz won his House seat in a 2009 special election — the innermost of inside tracks. Michlewitz has steadily climbed the ranks since; he is now House budget chair, one of the most powerful posts in the state. Advertisement Wu came from the outside. She arrived at Harvard from the Chicago area 20 years ago as a homesick college kid. The daughter of Taiwanese immigrants, she was a management consultant, a small business owner, and a law student before she found her way to politics, earning a summer fellowship under Menino in City Hall and working for Elizabeth Warren's first Senate campaign in 2012 before running for City Council herself. Wu and Michlewitz met about 15 years ago, when she was his constituent, and grew closer through her work leading the Ward 4 Democratic Committee and then through shared efforts on the Warren campaign. Michlewitz said he knew immediately that Wu would go far. They had not overlapped at City Hall, but they were both part of the broader 'Menino family,' a group bonded by devotion to the long-serving mayor. And both had a mentor in Near the end of 2012, Michlewitz recalled, Wu asked him to lunch at Zen in Beacon Hill and told him she was running for city councilor at-large. At that time, it looked like there would be four incumbents seeking reelection in the race, which meant, to win, Wu would need to knock one of them off. Standing with her could mean rocking the boat. Michlewitz agreed to back her before she could even get the words out to ask, he recalled. He was her first endorsement. Once Wu was elected to the City Council, they became close collaborators on local issues, discussing sewers, alleyways, restrictions on Uber and AirBnB. In August 2014, Michlewitz posted a video in a white undershirt Advertisement 'It's so rare and it's so meaningful in a space like politics to also find room for friendships,' Wu said in an interview. 'In some ways, it's felt like we've grown up together in Boston politics.' The two politicians agree often, but not always. In 2016, when developers proposed a hulking, 700-foot-plus Winthrop Square tower, critics fretted about the shadow it would cast on Boston Common. Wu Michlewitz confessed to being 'frustrated' by some of the city's new bike lanes, which Wu campaigned on expanding. But their friendship endures despite those disagreements. 'We both have jobs to do. We have mutual respect for each other, which I think is important. And sometimes those jobs don't necessarily align,' he said. There are times when rigid State House traditions seem to take precedence. In 2021, Michlewitz endorsed his House colleague Jon Santiago for mayor of Boston, backing him — as many state lawmakers did — over Wu. The message was clear: Beacon Hill stands by its own. Related : There seem to have been no lasting hard feelings. When Santiago dropped out of the race months later, Michlewitz endorsed Wu and campaigned with her. On the day before the November election, with polls heavily favoring Wu, she and Michlewitz had lunch with Uncle Frank. Michlewitz recalled how optimistic he and Chin felt about the outcome. Wu remembered it as an anchoring moment of calm before the storm. Advertisement Michlewitz wore a Michelle Wu for mayor button as he campaigned for her in 2021. Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff When Wu won the next night, Michlewitz introduced her at her victory party. He hugged her, then stepped out of her spotlight so she could greet the triumphant crowd. 'The best ally' Their relationship has only grown more central to the region's politics since that night. In the beginning of her term, they spoke every day, Michlewitz said. ''What do you think about this … How quickly should we do this?'' he recalled. 'Sometimes she'll listen to me, sometimes she doesn't.' How often are they in touch now? 'A lot,' Wu said, with a laugh. Every Boston mayor has relied on allies at the State House, in part because Rent control, fare-free public transit, major elements of her plans for a greener city — all rest in the hands of her counterparts in the state Legislature. And history shows Boston mayors don't have a strong record there, even those, like Marty Walsh, who were once state legislators themselves. Related : With Michlewitz in her corner, as well as other key allies such as Majority Leader Michael Moran of Brighton, Wu has notched some major wins. The city has been granted a seat on the Having allies in leadership makes those victories possible. 'Everything that the city needs at the House level is something [Michlewitz] is very helpful on,' said Phil Frattaroli, a North End restaurateur who has been involved in city politics. 'He's the best ally. … He's the best card to have in your hand.' Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and Massachusetts House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Aaron Michlewitz embraced at the podium during a Massachusetts Democratic Party fund-raiser at Empire Garden restaurant in Chinatown in May. Erin Clark But sometimes — as in the case of rent control — Michlewitz does not agree with Wu, leaving a policy proposal nowhere at the State House. Cynical political observers note Michlewitz is unlikely to risk his own standing — or his path to the speaker's office — to benefit the mayor. Wu acknowledged that the two don't always agree; 'at the city level versus the state level, there are different considerations,' she said. 'It's a different pace up there,' which can be frustrating, she continued. 'There's always something to be moving forward and collaborating on, and maybe, from his perspective, there's probably always something that I'm impatient on at any given moment. But that's my job.' When Michlewitz does line up with Wu, sometimes even his influence can take her agenda only so far. The ugliest battle Wu has faced to date on Beacon Hill was her effort last year to shift Boston's tax burden. She needed the state's permission to temporarily raise rates on businesses in order to blunt the increases to residents' bills. It was a tall order on Beacon Hill, where business leaders who feel scorned by Wu tend to find more favorable treatment. The powerful real estate industry staunchly opposed Wu's proposal. Michlewitz knew it would be 'challenging' to pass it, but thought Wu should have the flexibility to maneuver through a difficult economic cycle. Cue the negotiations. After Wu and Michlewitz agreed to a slightly narrower, 'He worked in the House to assure everyone that this was the right thing to do, because it wasn't an easy thing to get through,' said Jason Aluia, a lobbyist and leader of Boston's Ward 3 Democratic Committee who grew up with Michlewitz in the North End. Wu and Michlewitz are able to talk frankly even about difficult political realities, Aluia said. 'He has a very keen political sense,' Aluia said. 'He's going to say, 'I could help you do this, but that's not happening right now,' and she accepts that because she knows the State House is his place, and the city is her domain.' Trouble stirred again, though, when Wu's proposal headed to the Senate side, where a carefully Related : It wasn't the first time, nor is it likely to be the last, that Wu's agenda cleared Michlewitz's wing of the building only to die on the side where he wields far less influence. For some, there is a simple structural explanation: Beacon Hill runs on hierarchy, and Boston's stock is higher on the House side. Of course, Wu is not the only one who benefits from the relationship. Michlewitz can turn to her on constituent issues or local city matters, such as street design (though, as they both readily acknowledged, they don't always agree). In recent years, as they navigated a Wu and Michlewitz appeared in the North End amid a bitter debate over outdoor dining in the neighborhood. David L. Ryan/Globe Staff A second-term mayor with a strong mandate from voters, plus a freshly crowned House speaker from her city, would make for a powerful political force. But it remains to be seen whether each will take that next step, and whether they will row in the same direction if they do. 'Having leadership that's connected to Boston, of course, is going to shed a light on the needs in our city,' Wu said. 'There's always a lot to talk about on work issues and politics, but I'm grateful for a friendship that goes far beyond that.' For his part, Michlewitz said of Wu, 'Sometimes she can convince me, sometimes I have to try to convince her.' 'The thing that I appreciate about the mayor the most is that she is an honest broker,' he said. 'That to me is more important than policy sometimes.' Emma Platoff can be reached at
