logo
‘Big brother in the business': The political odd couple whose partnership could reshape Boston politics

‘Big brother in the business': The political odd couple whose partnership could reshape Boston politics

Boston Globe4 hours ago

Wu, 40, calls 47-year-old Michlewitz her 'big brother in the business,' though
he jokes that it's hard to see the powerful mayor of Boston as a 'little sister.' For more than a decade, they have been close friends and strong political allies, and when she speaks, he watches with the pride attendant to the familial role.
Michlewitz is poised, if the parlor game is to be believed, to ascend to the
House's
most influential post when Speaker Ron Mariano ultimately retires.
That potential promotion —
the first time in nearly a generation that Boston would have one of its own in that role — could make a friendship that started 15 years ago in Boston's South End into the most important political partnership in New England. And it could mark a momentous shift for a city unusually beholden to the whims of Beacon Hill.
Advertisement
Wu and Michlewitz make up something of an odd couple. She is a locally elected progressive constrained by the more centrist tendencies of state powerbrokers; he is one of those powerbrokers. She is fighting Beacon Hill to give Boston rent control; he is on Beacon Hill opposing rent control. Her expansive agenda for the city depends on support from his colleagues at the state, and he does not always deliver it.
Advertisement
Aaron Michlewitz endorsed then-Councilor Michelle Wu for mayor in 2021.
Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff
And yet the two are undeniably close, sharing a genuine friendship that is not rooted in
political expediency, according to conversations with more than a dozen people who know them. Michlewitz is one of the people the independent-minded mayor listens to above others, say people who know them well. And Wu's outside perspective has influenced Michlewitz, too, he says. Even when they are not at some event together — cutting ribbons, delivering canned remarks, cheesing at a
It's hard to overstate how much Boston relies on Beacon Hill: for its funding, for its public transit system, for permission to do everything from grant a new liquor license to levy a new tax. Having Michlewitz at the helm could reverse the fortunes of a city known for
Related
:
Of course,
Michlewitz isn't speaker yet, and he declined to speculate on his political future. (Mariano, 78, has not said when he will retire, though speculation runs rampant; a spokesperson said
Advertisement
To be sure, even the best-placed ally can not guarantee that Boston will get what it wants from the Legislature. Michlewitz and other House leaders sometimes
simply disagree with Wu, or believe the broader membership will disagree. In other moments, when they do line up, Michlewitz has muscled Wu's agenda through the House only to watch it die in the Senate, where she has fewer allies in leadership.
Even so, Boston politicians say the close link between City Hall and the State House has already benefited both — to a point.
'Boston is the big winner in the situation,' said state Representative Adrian Madaro, an East Boston Democrat. Still, 'that doesn't mean that every mayor is going to get whatever he or she wants. Boston is not the be-all, end-all at the State House.'
The Boston delegation is a limited faction of the 200-member state Legislature, Madaro added. 'It takes a lot of convincing to get anything done in this building.'
Opposite paths to power
Now arguably Boston's two most influential politicians, Wu and Michlewitz took opposite paths to power.
Michlewitz is a self-described 'city kid.' A lifelong resident of the North End, he worked in college for former Boston mayor Tom Menino, then for Sal DiMasi, the last Bostonian to serve as speaker of the Massachusetts House. After DiMasi resigned in scandal, Michlewitz won his House seat in a 2009 special election — the innermost of inside tracks. Michlewitz has steadily climbed the ranks since; he is now House budget chair, one of the most powerful posts in the state.
Advertisement
Wu came from the outside. She arrived at Harvard from the Chicago area 20 years ago as a homesick college kid. The daughter of Taiwanese immigrants, she was a management consultant, a small business owner, and a law student before she found her way to politics, earning a summer fellowship under Menino in City Hall and working for Elizabeth Warren's first
Senate campaign in 2012 before running for City Council herself.
Wu and Michlewitz met about 15 years ago, when she was his constituent, and grew closer through her work leading the Ward 4 Democratic Committee and then through shared efforts on the Warren campaign.
Michlewitz said he knew immediately that Wu would go far. They had not overlapped at City Hall, but
they were both part of the broader 'Menino family,' a group bonded by devotion to the long-serving mayor. And both had a mentor in
Near the end of 2012, Michlewitz recalled, Wu asked him to lunch at Zen in Beacon Hill and
told him she was running for city councilor at-large. At that time, it looked like there would be four incumbents seeking reelection in the race, which meant, to win, Wu would need to knock one of them off. Standing with her could mean rocking the boat. Michlewitz agreed to back her before she could even get the words out to ask, he recalled. He was her first endorsement.
Once
Wu was elected to the City Council, they became close collaborators on local issues, discussing sewers, alleyways, restrictions on Uber and AirBnB. In August 2014, Michlewitz posted a video in a white undershirt
Advertisement
'It's so rare and it's so meaningful in a space like politics to
also find room for friendships,' Wu said in an interview. 'In some ways, it's felt like we've grown up together in Boston politics.'
The two politicians agree often, but not always. In 2016, when developers proposed a hulking, 700-foot-plus Winthrop Square tower, critics fretted about the shadow it would cast on Boston Common. Wu
Michlewitz confessed to being 'frustrated' by some of the city's new bike lanes, which Wu campaigned on expanding.
But their friendship endures despite those disagreements.
'We both have jobs to do. We have mutual respect for each other, which I think is important. And sometimes those jobs don't necessarily align,' he said.
There are times when rigid State House traditions seem to take precedence.
In 2021, Michlewitz endorsed his House colleague Jon Santiago for mayor of Boston, backing him
— as many state lawmakers did — over Wu. The message was clear: Beacon Hill stands by its own.
Related
:
There seem to have been no lasting hard feelings. When Santiago dropped out of the race months later, Michlewitz endorsed Wu and campaigned with her. On the day before the November election, with polls heavily favoring Wu, she and Michlewitz had lunch with Uncle Frank. Michlewitz recalled how optimistic he and Chin felt about the outcome. Wu remembered it as an anchoring moment of calm before the storm.
Advertisement
Michlewitz wore a Michelle Wu for mayor button as he campaigned for her in 2021.
Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff
When Wu won the next night, Michlewitz introduced her at her victory party. He hugged her, then stepped out of her spotlight so she could greet the triumphant crowd.
'The best ally'
Their relationship has only grown more central to the region's politics since that night. In the beginning of her term, they spoke every day, Michlewitz said.
''What do you think about this … How quickly should we do this?'' he recalled. 'Sometimes she'll listen to me, sometimes she doesn't.'
How often are they in touch now? 'A lot,' Wu said, with a laugh.
Every Boston mayor has relied on allies at the State House, in part because
Rent control, fare-free public transit, major elements of her plans for a greener city — all rest in the hands of her counterparts in the state Legislature. And history shows Boston mayors don't have a strong record there, even those, like Marty Walsh, who were once state legislators themselves.
Related
:
With Michlewitz in her corner, as well as other key allies such as Majority Leader Michael Moran of Brighton, Wu has notched
some major wins. The city has been granted a seat on the
Having allies in leadership makes those victories possible.
'Everything that the city needs at the House level is something [Michlewitz] is very helpful on,' said Phil Frattaroli, a North End restaurateur who has been involved in city politics. 'He's the best ally. … He's the best card to have in your hand.'
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and Massachusetts House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Aaron Michlewitz embraced at the podium during a Massachusetts Democratic Party fund-raiser at Empire Garden restaurant in Chinatown in May.
Erin Clark
But sometimes — as in the case of rent control — Michlewitz does not agree with Wu, leaving a policy proposal nowhere at the State House. Cynical political observers note Michlewitz is unlikely to risk his own standing — or his path to the speaker's office — to benefit the mayor.
Wu acknowledged that the two don't always agree; 'at the city level versus the state level, there are different considerations,' she said.
'It's a different pace up there,' which can be frustrating, she continued. 'There's always something to be moving forward and collaborating on, and maybe, from his perspective, there's probably always something that I'm impatient on at any given moment. But that's my job.'
When Michlewitz does line up with Wu, sometimes even his influence can take her agenda only so far.
The ugliest battle Wu has faced to date on Beacon Hill was her effort last year to shift Boston's tax burden. She needed the state's permission to temporarily raise rates on businesses in order to blunt the increases to residents' bills.
It was a tall order on Beacon Hill, where business leaders who feel scorned by Wu tend to find more favorable treatment. The powerful real estate industry staunchly opposed Wu's proposal. Michlewitz knew it would be 'challenging' to pass it, but thought Wu should have the flexibility to maneuver through a difficult economic cycle.
Cue the negotiations. After Wu and Michlewitz agreed to a slightly narrower,
'He worked in the House to assure everyone that this was the right thing to do, because it wasn't an easy thing to get through,' said Jason Aluia, a lobbyist and leader of Boston's Ward 3 Democratic Committee who grew up with Michlewitz in the North End.
Wu and Michlewitz are able to talk frankly even about difficult political realities, Aluia said.
'He has a very keen political sense,' Aluia said. 'He's going to say, 'I could help you do this, but that's not happening right now,' and she accepts that because she knows the State House is his place, and the city is her domain.'
Trouble stirred again, though, when Wu's proposal headed to the Senate side, where a carefully
Related
:
It wasn't the first time, nor is it likely to be the last, that Wu's agenda cleared Michlewitz's wing of the building only to die on the side
where he wields far less influence. For some, there is a simple structural explanation: Beacon Hill runs on hierarchy, and Boston's stock is higher on the House side.
Of course, Wu is not the only one who benefits from the relationship. Michlewitz can turn to her on constituent issues or local city matters, such as street design (though, as they both readily acknowledged, they don't always agree). In recent years, as they navigated a
Wu and Michlewitz appeared in the North End amid a bitter debate over outdoor dining in the neighborhood.
David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
A second-term mayor with a strong mandate from voters, plus a freshly crowned House speaker from her city, would make for a powerful political force. But it remains to be seen whether each will take that next step, and whether they will row in the same direction if they do.
'Having leadership that's connected to Boston, of course, is going to shed a light on the needs in our city,' Wu said. 'There's always a lot to talk about on work issues and politics, but I'm grateful for a friendship that goes far beyond that.'
For his part, Michlewitz said of Wu, 'Sometimes she can convince me, sometimes I have to try to convince her.'
'The thing that I appreciate about the mayor the most is that she is an honest broker,' he said. 'That to me is more important than policy sometimes.'
Emma Platoff can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Outspoken Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett slammed for ‘evil' comments about Melania Trump's modeling career, US citizenship
Outspoken Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett slammed for ‘evil' comments about Melania Trump's modeling career, US citizenship

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Outspoken Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett slammed for ‘evil' comments about Melania Trump's modeling career, US citizenship

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) has been slammed as 'evil' and a 'disgrace' for insulting Melania Trump's modeling career and marriage during a heated House hearing — even suggesting there was no way the first lady could have earned a so-called 'Einstein visa.' The outspoken lefty pol took a swipe at President Trump's wife and ridiculed her US citizenship as lawmakers argued over restoring the visa process during Wednesday's House Judiciary Committee hearing. After attacking the Trump administration's immigration tactics, Crockett quickly made things personal. 3 Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett took aim at Melania Trump during a heated House hearing. 'Since we're talking about integrity, I'm confused as to why my Republican colleagues aren't talking about the lack of integrity when it comes to the president's family's visas,' she griped. 'Melania, the first lady — a model, and when I say model, I'm not talking Tyra Banks, Cindy Crawford or Naomi Campbell-level — applied for and was given an EB-1 visa,' she said cruelly. Melania moved to the US on an EB-1 visa — dubbed the 'Einstein visa' — as a model in the 1990s before eventually becoming a US citizen in 2006 after marrying Trump. Crockett, who is notorious for going viral during committee hearings with her incendiary rhetoric, added insult to injury by explaining the Einstein visa process. 3 Melania moved to the US on an EB-1 visa — dubbed the 'Einstein visa' — as a model in the 1990s. Getty Images 'You're supposed to have some sort of significant achievement, like being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize or a Pulitzer, being an Olympic medalist, or having other sustained extraordinary abilities and success in sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics,' she said. 'Last time I checked the first lady had none of those accolades under her belt.' 'It doesn't take an Einstein to see that the math ain't mathin' here,' she added. 3 Crockett has been called 'evil' and a 'disgrace' for her comments about the first lady. Getty Images The backlash against her was swift with many on social media blasting the Texas lawmaker as being 'jealous.' 'Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) disgracefully attacked Melania Trump on Wednesday for her modeling career and visa. Crockett said Melania wasn't on the same level as other models and didn't have the accolades to warrant an Einstein visa. Crockett is jealous,' one user wrote on X. 'Can Jasmine Crockett speak 5 Languages like Melania? NO! so she can just close her mouth,' another raged. One person chimed in, saying: 'How dare her compare Melania to those models? Melania has a lot more class in her little finger than Jasmine Crockett has in her whole body!'

Trump Megabill Reshapes Tax Breaks for Charity Contributions
Trump Megabill Reshapes Tax Breaks for Charity Contributions

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Megabill Reshapes Tax Breaks for Charity Contributions

Congress wants people to give more money to charity. The House and the Senate have different ideas on how to do it. The two chambers will have to hash it out as part of the megabill they hope to pass by July 4. But they agree they need to rework the 2017 law, which led to a drop in donations among small donors. Trump Considers Naming Next Fed Chair Early in Bid to Undermine Powell Shell in Early Talks to Acquire Rival BP OpenAI, Microsoft Rift Hinges on How Smart AI Can Get Meta Poaches Three OpenAI Researchers Mediator Proposes $20 Million Settlement in Trump's CBS Suit They are aiming to revive the charitable-donation deduction for people who take the standard deduction. At the same time, they would impose new limits for people who itemize. 'There are things that push in both directions in both versions of the bill,' said Elena Patel, a nonresident senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Depending on what the final version looks like, donors might want to give more this year or hold off on giving until next year to get the biggest tax break, said Damien Martin, a partner at EY Private Tax. The Senate bill proposes a permanent charitable-contribution deduction for nonitemizers of up to $1,000 for individuals and up to $2,000 for married couples filing jointly. That means potential tax savings, effective 2026 and after. For an individual in the 22% tax bracket, a $1,000 donation would mean $220 in tax savings. The House-passed bill sets those levels at $150 for individuals and $300 for joint filers. It would be temporary, for 2025 through 2028. Taxpayers might remember this looks a lot like the pandemic-era deduction for contributions. While the Senate proposal is more generous, it comes with a twist. It limits charitable-donation deductions for people who itemize. Itemizers, who are typically higher earners, could only claim such donations above a floor that is generally 0.5% of their adjusted gross income. For example, someone with $200,000 in adjusted gross income would only get a tax break on the contributions they give beyond $1,000. The more generous Senate version of the nonitemizer deduction would cost $74 billion over 10 years. It would be mostly offset by the 0.5% floor, which would raise $65 billion from people who would be losing part of their deductions, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. A proposed 1% floor on corporate giving would raise $17 billion over 10 years. Sen. James Lankford (R., Okla.), who has championed even larger deductions for nonitemizers, said both provisions are meant to encourage charitable gifts. As to the proposed floor, he said, 'Your first dollars aren't the ones that count. We're trying to incentivize additional giving, which would be helpful for the nonprofits.' Charities have been pushing for a charitable-donation deduction for nonitemizers since the 2017 tax law. The law doubled the standard deduction, which led to far fewer people getting a deduction for donations to charity. About one in 10 people itemize deductions and can benefit from the charitable deduction. The number of taxpayers itemizing charitable donations dropped to about 12 million in 2022 from about 37 million in 2017, according to the most recent data from the Internal Revenue Service. 'Those people that we lost, we're hopefully going to get some of them back,' said Wendy McGrady, chair of the Giving USA Foundation. The higher state and local tax deduction cap that is expected would push more people into being able to itemize. That would kick in this year under the House bill. Both the House and Senate versions of the tax bill have another provision that would limit the value of all itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers, including those for charitable contributions. The provision caps the value of each dollar of otherwise allowable itemized deductions at 35 cents in most cases. For a taxpayer in the top 37% income-tax bracket, the tax savings on a $10,000 charitable donation (beyond the proposed 0.5% floor) could fall from $3,700 to $3,500. If the new floor and the overall deductions limits end up in the final bill, high-income taxpayers might consider accelerating donations into 2025 to lock in a higher tax benefit, Martin said. 'It might spur big gifts,' he said. Write to Ashlea Ebeling at Nvidia Ruffles Tech Giants With Move Into Cloud Computing Can Brad Pitt's 'F1' Movie Finally Deliver Apple a Big-Screen Hit? Bumble Cuts 30% of Staff as Online Dating Hits 'Inflection Point' U.S. Regulators Move to Ease Financial Crisis-Era Bank Capital Rules Micron Technology Profit Soars as AI Boom Boosts Sales

Capitol agenda: Thune's megabill teeters on the brink
Capitol agenda: Thune's megabill teeters on the brink

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Capitol agenda: Thune's megabill teeters on the brink

Senate Majority Leader John Thune is scrambling to quell the Medicaid-fueled mutiny that's threatening to derail the megabill on both sides of the Capitol. In the Senate, 'Medicaid moderates' are rejecting Finance's opening offer of $15 billion for a stabilization fund for rural hospitals to help offset paring back the provider tax in expansion states from 6 percent to 3.5 percent. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) called it 'inadequate' and warned that even if leadership goes up to the $100 billion she's seeking, 'that doesn't solve' her issues with the bill. Thune closed the door to $100 billion soon after. Multiple senators are threatening they won't vote to open floor debate on the megabill without more clarity on Medicaid changes. That includes Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who warned colleagues behind closed doors Wednesday that 'you won't have a member from North Carolina sitting at this table after next year' unless the Senate changes course, Jordain scooped. (Reminder, fellow North Carolina Sen. Ted Budd isn't up for reelection until 2028.) Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) later posted on X that he spoke with Donald Trump and the president wants the Senate to 'stay with the House' on Medicaid. Look for whether Trump issues further instructions Thursday: Several GOP senators are expected to head to the White House for a 4 p.m. event to tout the 'big, beautiful bill.' Over in the House, wary moderates are also rejecting the rural hospital fund; one told POLITICO it's 'bullshit.' Speaker Mike Johnson is trying to calm nervous members by telling them he expects the Senate Medicaid language will move closer to the House's. House GOP leaders and moderates believe the provider tax will end up between 4 percent and 5 percent, according to four people granted anonymity to describe private conversations. Some House Republicans are prepared to swallow that. Others are protesting. Those numbers aren't currently under serious consideration in the Senate, two people granted anonymity told POLITICO, where there's general skepticism that rank-and-file Republicans across the Capitol have a good read on the negotiations. (Johnson and Thune are in close contact, though; the Senate leader stepped out of Wednesday's lunch on the phone with his House counterpart.) But a Senate shift could end up happening if Thune's members force his hand. Asked Wednesday about softening the provider-tax language, Thune didn't completely close the door. 'This all comes down to what the traffic will bear,' he told POLITICO. Other outstanding megabill issues: — Feeling less salty?: Blue-state House Republicans expected to receive two options in writing for a potential deal on the state-and-local tax deduction. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) said the SALT Republicans' Wednesday meeting with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) involved a 'productive conversation.' — Public-lands push and pull: POLITICO obtained Sen. Mike Lee's (R-Utah) scaled-back plan to sell off millions of acres in public lands, which he's shipped off to the parliamentarian for review. It could still face GOP pushback. — Inside RonJohn's White House talks: Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) told POLITICO the White House is working with him to establish a budget review panel through reconciliation. He's not a 'yes' on the megabill yet, though. What else we're watching: — Iran briefing: Senators will huddle at 2 p.m. for their rescheduled briefing on the Iran conflict. As of late Wednesday night, the potential speaker list included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Joint Chiefs Chair Dan Caine, but Senate aides cautioned the list could change. — Leg Branch markup: House appropriators will mark up the Legislative Branch funding bill Thursday — and there is a lot they want to see changed on Capitol Hill, according to their committee report released Wednesday. The panel had thoughts on member security, designated parking spaces, food service that accommodates more allergies and celiac disease, elevator outages and dome tours ahead of Thursday's markup. James Bikales, Josh Siegel and Katherine Tully McManus contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store