logo
Trump's distraction machine is working

Trump's distraction machine is working

Yahoo27-05-2025
There was a menacing cloud hanging over Chicago as I walked down Michigan Avenue the other day. It slowly descended. At first, I thought the cloud was fog, but the air was not damp. I continued walking. I noticed people were covering their mouths and noses with their shirts or jackets. Some of them were coughing. I chose to breathe deeply. My throat was not itching. My eyes were not burning. I breathed deeply again. I wondered, is the air full of incinerated medical waste? Asbestos or some other poison that will give me cancer? Smoke from a forest fire miles away? Was HARP or some other weather control device that the conspiracy theorists have long been obsessed with malfunctioning? I laughed out loud.
I then asked myself: Given how bad things are in America right now, what is the worst that can possibly happen to me from this bad air? I quickly realized the answer: a lot. So I covered my mouth and nose like everyone else.
Eventually, my phone buzzed with a weather alert. Chicago was experiencing a historic dust storm. In the Middle East, such a storm is called a 'haboob.' I walked several more blocks and looked up at Trump Tower. The dust cloud was now hovering below the huge 'Trump Tower' sign. I smiled at the absurdity and power of the metaphor that is the Age of Trump and its oppressive toxicity that has confused and disoriented so many Americans.
Donald Trump is a master propagandist and agent of chaos and distraction with power and influence over a vast propaganda and disinformation machine. Trump's ability to dominate the 24/7 media and this age of spectacle is likely unprecedented in modern (if not all of) American history. He is a defining personality and character of this era.
In a 2023 conversation, Lee McIntyre, author of the book 'On Disinformation: How to Fight for Truth and Protect Democracy,' explained to me: "I doubt that Trump has ever taken a course in psyops or that he reads disinformation training manuals in his spare time, but he is nonetheless a master, near-genius-level propagandist. He uses the exact same techniques of disinformation on an American audience that Putin uses on his citizens."
When Donald Trump, his MAGA Republicans and the larger antidemocracy movement encounter difficulties with their "shock and awe" campaign and blitzkrieg against American democracy and society, they amplify the power and reach of their disinformation and propaganda experience machine. The mainstream news media, the Democrats and other members of the responsible political class (and many among the general public) have been conditioned to respond almost like Pavlov's dogs. They chase the newest outrage or spectacle and react like it is a surprise instead of focusing on the bigger picture and goals that these controversies and 'shocking' events are advancing and/or hiding.
In a recent New York Times opinion essay, Ezra Klein explained how disorientation and a lack of focus are the intended outcome of Donald Trump and his agents' 'flooding the zone' strategy and tactic:
Focus is the fundamental substance of democracy. It is particularly the substance of opposition. People largely learn of what the government is doing through the media — be it mainstream media or social media. If you overwhelm the media — if you give it too many places it needs to look, all at once, if you keep it moving from one thing to the next — no coherent opposition can emerge. It is hard to even think coherently….
The flood is the point. The overwhelm is the point. The message wasn't in any one executive order or announcement. It was in the cumulative effect of all of them. The sense that this is Trump's country now. This is his government now. It follows his will. It does what he wants. If Trump tells the state to stop spending money, the money stops. If he says that birthright citizenship is over, it's over.
Or so he wants you to think. In Trump's first term, we were told: Don't normalize him. In his second, the task is different: Don't believe him.
Trump knows the power of marketing. If you make people believe something is true, you make it likelier that it becomes true…
It is a strategy that forces you into overreach. To keep the zone flooded, you have to keep acting, keep moving, keep creating new cycles of outrage or fear. You overwhelm yourself. And there's only so much you can do through executive orders. Soon enough, you have to go beyond what you can actually do. And when you do that, you either trigger a constitutional crisis or you reveal your own weakness.
Trump's 'big beautiful bill' is set to take trillions of dollars away from the American people and give it to the richest people and corporations. If enacted, it will be one of the largest — if not the largest — transfers of wealth in American history and further gut the social safety net. Trump's "big beautiful bill" is unpopular with the American people and would likely trigger a huge backlash — given any sustained attention.
While the GOP-controlled House passed Trump's bill, the media's attention was mostly focused on Trump's 'gifted' 400-million-dollar jetliner, a literal flying palace and king's court, from the government of Qatar. This is part of a much larger pattern of conflict of interests and corrupt power in apparent violation of the Constitution's Emoluments Clause and other ethics laws in which Donald Trump, his family and inner circle have leveraged the office of the presidency for personal enrichment.
Meanwhile, the United States Supreme Court has ordered a pause on Trump's mass deportation program under the Alien Enemies Act. There have been a series of lower court rulings that have also ordered a pause or outright stop to key parts of the Trump administration's actions and policies. A series of public opinion polls recently showed that Trump's support at this point in his presidency among the American people has collapsed at a rate not seen in 80 years. However, new public opinion polls show that Trump's support may have stabilized and is crawling back to his ceiling of approximately 45% to 47%. In total, Donald Trump's policies and behavior remain widely unpopular.
Donald Trump's historic global tariff regime has not created a new 'golden age' for the United States and the American people. Leading economists and other business leaders continue to warn that the shocks from Trump's tariffs will cause disruptions to the economy if not a recession (or worse). Last Friday, Moody's downgraded the credit-rating of the United States from AAA (the highest level).
Donald Trump and his administration's foreign policy –– and his brand as a 'dealmaker' — continues to falter. Most notably, the war in Ukraine continues and the United States' role as the world's leading democracy and an indispensable nation has been greatly diminished in just the first four months of Trump's return to power.
Trump and his agents responded by turning their firehose of distraction, falsehoods and spectacle on full blast. The water is rising very quickly.
In a recent Truth Social post, Donald Trump continued his attacks against singer Taylor Swift ("Has anyone noticed that, since I said 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT,' she's no longer 'HOT?'"). He also turned his rage against Bruce Springsteen, Beyonce, Bono and Oprah Winfrey by accusing them of being part of a vast anti-Trump conspiracy. On Wednesday, Trump shared a video on his Truth Social platform of him hitting Bruce Springsteen with a golf ball that then causes the singer to stumble on stage.
MSNBC's Steven Benen sorts through Trump's conspiracy theories and warns:
To the extent that reality still has any meaning in situations like this, let's just briefly note that there's literally no evidence of Harris or her campaign paying anyone for endorsements; there was nothing 'unlawful' or 'corrupt' about the support the then-Democratic nominee received from celebrities during the 2024 campaign; Beyoncé did not face 'loud booing' after she endorsed Harris; and there's nothing 'illegal' about public figures publicly backing a presidential candidate.
It's also probably worth mentioning in passing that Trump's hysterical online communications don't do any favors to his 'very stable genius' description of himself.
But of particular interest was the president's interest in 'a major investigation into this matter.'
All things considered, there's no reason to get too worked up about every Trump tantrum, his rage toward celebrities who've dared to criticize him, his weird approach to pop culture, or his use of the word 'illegal' as a synonym for 'stuff I don't like.' What I do care about, however, is the president's willingness to use the power of the state to pursue critics in authoritarian-style fashion.
This is especially true now with the Justice Department led by an attorney general who apparently sees herself as an extension of the White House and its political agenda — which raises the prospect of a federal investigator actually initiating a probe into celebrities that Trump doesn't like.
Trump also shared an AI-generated video of himself as a member of the rock band Journey playing their iconic song 'Don't Stop Believing' before a huge crowd of his MAGA people. In keeping with his drive for unlimited power, Trump also recently shared a series of AI-generated images of himself as the new Pope and a Sith Lord or other supremely powerful evil Jedi from George Lucas' 'Star Wars' universe.
Relatedly, former FBI director James Comey posted an image on the social media platform Instagram of the numbers '86 47' formed from seashells on a beach. Trump responded that Comey was making a coded threat against his life ('Eighty-six' is slang for 'replace' or 'get rid of'; Donald Trump is the 47th president of the United States). The MAGA chorus dutifully amplified Trump's paranoid conclusions. The Secret Service is now investigating Comey's alleged threat against Donald Trump. Comey has responded that this is all so much nonsense, and he was just sharing an image of seashells on the beach.
In her newsletter, historian Heather Cox Richardson offered this context for Donald Trump and his forces' coordinated distraction campaign and attempts to dominate the information space:
[R]etired entrepreneur Bill Southworth tallied the times Trump has grabbed headlines to distract people from larger stories, starting the tally with how Trump's posts about Peanut the Squirrel the day before the election swept like a brushfire across the right-wing media ecosystem and then into the mainstream. In early 2025, Southworth notes, as the media began to dig into the dramatic restructuring of the federal government, Trump posted outrageously about Gaza, and that story took over. When cuts to PEPFAR (the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) and the U.S. Agency for International Development threatened lives across Africa, Trump turned the conversation to white South Africans he lied were fleeing 'anti-white genocide.'
Southworth calls this 'narrative warfare,' and while it is true that Republican leaders have seeded a particular false narrative for decades now, this technique is also known as 'political technology' or 'virtual politics.' This system, pioneered in Russia under Russian president Vladimir Putin, is designed to get people to vote an authoritarian into office by creating a fake world of outrage. For those who do not buy the lies, there is another tool: flooding the zone so that people stop being able to figure out what is real and tune out.
The administration has clearly adopted this plan. As Drew Harwell and Sarah Ellison of the Washington Post noted in early March, the administration set out to portray Trump as a king in order 'to sell the country on [Trump's] expansionist approach to presidential power.'
Richardson adds:
Dominating means controlling the narrative. That starts with perceptions of the president himself. Trump's appearances have been deeply concerning as he cannot follow a coherent thread, frequently falls asleep, repeatedly veers into nonsense, and says he doesn't know about the operations of his government.
Donald Trump and his forces' ability to 'flood the zone' as part of their larger propaganda and disinformation campaign is not some 'unknown unknown,' a mystery, an impenetrable black box, a form of magic or a supernatural power. Information about how to effectively counter such strategies and tactics is readily available to almost anyone who wants to seek it out.For example, a free 2016 report from the Rand organization offers this advice:
We are not optimistic about the effectiveness of traditional counterpropaganda efforts. Certainly, some effort must be made to point out falsehoods and inconsistencies, but the same psychological evidence that shows how falsehood and inconsistency gain traction also tells us that retractions and refutations are seldom effective. Especially after a significant amount of time has passed, people will have trouble recalling which information they have received is the disinformation and which is the truth. Put simply, our first suggestion is don't expect to counter the firehose of falsehood with the squirt gun of truth.
The Rand report continues:
Our second suggestion is to find ways to help put raincoats on those at whom the firehose of falsehood is being directed.
Don't expect to counter Russia's firehose of falsehood with the squirt gun of truth. Instead, put raincoats on those at whom the firehose is aimed. [My emphasis added]
Another possibility is to focus on countering the effects of Russian propaganda, rather than the propaganda itself. The propagandists are working to accomplish something. The goal may be a change in attitudes, behaviors, or both. Identify those desired effects and then work to counter the effects that run contrary to your goals…
That metaphor and mindset leads us to our fourth suggestion for responding to Russian propaganda: Compete! If Russian propaganda aims to achieve certain effects, it can be countered by preventing or diminishing those effects.
In our 2023 conversation, Lee McIntyre offered this additional advice about how to resist and win an information war:
[D]isinformation has three goals. First is to try to get you to believe a falsehood. Second is to polarize you around a factual issue so that you begin to distrust, and even hate, the people who do not also believe this same falsehood. But finally comes the third and in some ways the most insidious goal of all they want you to give up. I think one message people get from disinformation is that everyone is biased, and that all speech is political. Or that things are so confusing — and there are so many voices out there who disagree — that it's just impossible to know the truth. People become confused and then cynical. They begin to feel helpless. And that is precisely the type of person that an authoritarian wants you to be.
They want you to give up. The easiest way to control a population is to control their information source. But you are not powerless. There is something you can do to fight back against disinformation. That's why I wrote the book.
But even before you read the book, I want you to know this: the most important step in winning an information war is first to admit that you are in one. [My emphasis added]
In the end, howling and complaining that 'the other side is not playing fair' instead of adapting and overcoming is no real defense and a path to defeat.
Unfortunately for the American people and the future of their democracy and freedom, throughout the long Age of Trump, the Democratic Party, the so-called Resistance, the mainstream news media and other supposed defenders of democracy and "the institutions" have not learned and internalized that lesson.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Trump calls his Alaska summit with Putin a 'chess game' that could fail
President Trump calls his Alaska summit with Putin a 'chess game' that could fail

USA Today

time11 minutes ago

  • USA Today

President Trump calls his Alaska summit with Putin a 'chess game' that could fail

WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump likened his upcoming high-stakes Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin to a "chess game" while predicting there's a "25% chance" the meeting could fail to advance peace talks between Russia and Ukraine. Trump, in an Aug. 14 interview with conservative talk show host Brian Kilmeade on Fox News Radio, said he hopes his one-on-one meeting with Putin will lead to a second meeting between himself, Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, where the two sides can hammer out details for a peace deal. "It's like a chess game," Trump said. "This meeting sets up the second meeting, but there is a 25% chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting." Trump suggested that Russia and Ukraine could "divvy things up" ‒ including land and boundaries ‒ during a second meeting, which has yet to be scheduled or agreed upon. Zelenskyy and Ukraine's European allies have stood firmly against Ukraine ceding significant territory seized by Russia in its three-year war on Ukraine. "The second meeting is going to be very, very important because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal," Trump said. "And – I don't want to use the word 'divvy' things up – but, you know, to a certain extent it's not a bad term, OK? But there will be a give-and-take as to boundaries, land, etcetera, etcetera." Trump's meeting with Putin to include 'bilateral lunch,' possible joint news conference White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, appearing Aug. 14 on Fox News' Fox and Friends, said Trump's meeting with Putin will be followed by a "bilateral lunch" between the two leaders and their respective delegations followed by a news conference. Trump suggested the two leaders could hold a joint press conference if the meeting is productive, but he said it will be a solo press conference if not. "I think it might be nice to have a joint and then separates, so something like that will happen," Trump said to Kilmeade. "Or if the meeting doesn't end well, I'll just have a press conference and head out. I'll head back to Washington." Trump is scheduled to leave Washington DC early in the morning on Aug. 15, flying across the continental United States on Air Force One, before landing in Anchorage. The meeting is set for Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. The base, established in the lead-up to World War II, is spread over 13,000 square acres. Trump, speaking to reporters on Aug.13 at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., warned there would be 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to end the Ukraine war when they meet. He has previously threatened to hit Russia with sanctions and tariffs if Putin does not end the fighting. Ahead of his meeting with Putin, Trump met on Aug. 13 virtually with Zelenskyy and leaders of European countries who have urged Trump not to capitulate to Putin's demands during his solo meeting. Leavitt said Trump wants to "sit down and look the president in the eye" during his meeting with Putin "and see what progress can be made to move the ball forward to end this brutal war and to restore peace." Contributing: Francesca Chambers and Bart Jansen of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

Will the 2026 tax season start late? IRS commissioner sparks speculation
Will the 2026 tax season start late? IRS commissioner sparks speculation

USA Today

time11 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Will the 2026 tax season start late? IRS commissioner sparks speculation

Sure, we're in back-to-school season, but tax pros already are speculating about the potential for a delayed start for the 2026 tax season. The buzz began building after Billy Long, the new IRS commissioner, was quoted in a July 29 article in The Tax Adviser, a monthly publication of the American Institute of CPAs, as well as the Journal of Accountancy. Long said that the 2026 filing season should start around Presidents Day, which is on Monday, Feb. 16 next year. Gulp, are we talking about a potential three-week delay here? Which could mean many early filers would have to wait even longer for their tax refunds? Not so fast, says the IRS in a statement issued after Long made his comments during a Q&A session at the 2025 Tax Summit of the National Association of Enrolled Agents in Salt Lake City. We're being told that things might not be that dire after all. This year, Internal Revenue Service began accepting and processing individual federal income tax returns on Jan. 27. Kicking off the tax season on Feb. 16 would mean we're talking about a roughly three-week delay. According to the article in the Tax Adviser, Long said he pushed for an earlier date but said that IRS staff wanted more preparation time. Long claimed that he was told staff would "need every day in there. But they have this thing down." Not surprisingly, the IRS seemed to back off that claim, according to an IRS statement in an article that Politico posted online Aug. 4. Tax Notes, a publication for tax professionals, posted the same IRS statement in its story online Aug. 5 with the headline "IRS walks back commissioner's filing season prediction." What IRS says now about next year's tax season The IRS statement on the tax filing date, which I later received by email as well, didn't deny Long's comments but offered some hope if you read between the lines. 2025 tax rules: Trump's new tax deduction on auto loans has major limitations: What car buyers should know The statement, first issued July 30 according to the IRS, concluded: "The IRS looks forward to another successful tax filing season next year, and we will announce the timing of its opening in the regular course." According to the July 30 statement, "IRS Commissioner Billy Long is in his second week of a 'boots on the ground' tour of IRS facilities with visits last week in Georgia and this week in Utah." The IRS said: "Billy cares about two groups of people: his employee-partners and taxpayers. He is gathering information on what enhancements can be made to provide an exceptional taxpayer experience for the American people." No kickoff date is set in stone yet. Last year, the IRS issued a news release on Jan. 10 to state that the 2025 tax season would start on Monday, Jan. 27, 2025. When will the IRS begin accepting tax returns? It's a popular question that readers search for online as the calendar year comes closer to an end. But remember, we likely have five months to go from now before the IRS announces when the agency will begin accepting and processing more than 140 million individual income returns for the 2025 tax year. My guess? The speculation has only just begun. Fingers crossed, and it will all work out. Don't bet too heavily against the possibility for at least a few glitches along the way. Some tax professionals remain cautiously optimistic Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting in Riverwoods, Illinois, told me that the good news for the IRS is that the "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" passed in early July instead of the end of December. "This would normally give the IRS time to prepare for the filing season," Luscombe said. Yet, there are potential glitches, he said. First, the IRS is dealing with significant staff reductions. Luscombe said it's hard to know whether staff reductions affected some key positions at the IRS. But he suggested that if IRS staff at one point told the IRS commissioner that the start of the filing season would probably need to be delayed well into February, then "that is an indication that the staff is concerned about being ready in time for the start of the tax season." On top of that, Luscombe said, Congress is talking about the possibility of another tax bill this year, which could potentially hit late in the year and also affect the start of tax filing season. "If the IRS staff says they need until Presidents Day in 2026, I would take them at their word, which would also mean delayed refunds compared to other more recent years," Luscombe said. No doubt, the IRS will do all it can within its power to avoid the uproar that would take place with any Presidents Day launch. "My interpretation of last week's comments is that the IRS is concerned but still trying to avoid a long delay," said Janet Holtzblatt, senior fellow for the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center in Washington, D.C. If the launch of the filing season is delayed, she said, it will more likely be due to the 25% reduction in IRS staff than to the tax law changes and new deductions in the one big bill. "The legislation was signed on July 4, which typically would give the IRS sufficient time to implement the new legislative provisions," she said. Typically, when the IRS has had to delay the kickoff date for the tax season, she said, it has been after Congress enacts tax legislation very late in the year. Often, some delays are limited to very specific complicated provisions associated with the new tax laws. For example, she said, the American Taxpayer Relief Act was enacted on Jan. 2, 2013, and had some retroactive provisions for 2012 returns. In that case, the filing season officially began on Jan. 30, 2013, but the IRS began accepting 2012 returns in various phases as it worked quickly to update forms and instructions to reflect the new law. The tax season essentially was delayed for some filers claiming particular tax breaks on 2012 returns. In 2013, for example, the IRS began accepting tax returns on Feb. 10 from people claiming depreciation deductions. Taxpayers claiming education credits had to wait until Feb. 14. "It wasn't until March 4 that everyone could file," Holtzblatt said. The IRS had to reprogram and test its systems for tax year 2012, including all updates required by the American Taxpayer Relief Act enacted by Congress in January 2013. In recent years, Holtzblatt said, the latest opening day for tax season occurred during the pandemic. The 2021 filing season did not begin until Feb. 12. "If the filing season is delayed, refunds will also be delayed," she said. "Perhaps, the IRS can still manage to avoid long delays, but the task will be challenging with a 25% reduction in staff and a remaining workforce that may well be demoralized." We're talking about more than one big change in tax rules that will impact 2025 tax returns — a new tax deduction of up to $6,000 for those age 65 and older who qualify; a tax deduction on overtime pay; a tax deduction on the interest paid on new car loans, and more. "The fact that there are changes in the law that impact this tax year means the IRS and Treasury must work diligently to both send out appropriate guidance to taxpayers and prepare for changes to filing to accommodate those changes next spring," said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. Once again, we don't actually know when the 2026 tax season will start. The IRS typically isn't announcing the start of filing season in the summer just days before school starts. But this summer, we all started talking about one big bill and tax breaks around the Fourth of July. So, I guess it's natural that some soon will be asking once again: When does the IRS begin accepting tax returns? Sort of like seeing artificial Christmas trees sprout up for sale in October. Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@ Follow her on X @tompor.

Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah's tense meeting with boss
Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah's tense meeting with boss

New York Post

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah's tense meeting with boss

Karen Attiah's future at The Washington Post is in doubt after a fraught one-on-one meeting with Adam O'Neal, the paper's newly installed opinion editor, according to a report. Sources told the Status newsletter that last month's discussion between Attiah and O'Neal, a former Economist correspondent who has been meeting columnists to say their work does not fit his vision and suggest they consider buyouts, was uncomfortable and did not go well. Attiah, a staunch anti-Trump commentator, had publicly noted prior to the meeting that she remained at the paper amid the latest exodus in which colleagues were taking voluntary packages. 4 Karen Attiah's future at The Washington Post is in doubt after a fraught one-on-one with her boss. Getty Images She wrote on X: 'So… officially, I'm the last Black staff columnist left in the Washington Post's opinion section.' Keith Richburg and Theodore Johnson, both of whom are black, continue as contributing writers. At that time, Attiah was weighing whether to take the newspaper's voluntary departure package or continue working at the publication owned by Jeff Bezos, the Status newsletter reported. During a tense sit-down following her post on X, Attiah chose not to take the buyout. O'Neal had been conducting individual sessions with various columnists, where many heard similar messages suggesting their writing didn't match his plans for the section and that they might want to accept the buyout offer. While O'Neal may have expected Attiah to follow other colleagues who left after receiving similar messages, and Attiah might have hoped for reassurance about her place at the paper, neither outcome occurred, according to the report. Despite rising tensions, Attiah recently published an article for the outlet about gaining muscle through bodybuilding, describing it as a 'deeply feminine act of self-consciousness.' 4 Adam O'Neal, a former correspondent for The Economist, is the newly installed opinion editor at the Washington Post. X / @WashPostComms Inside the opinion shop, O'Neal's standing is unsettled, according to the report. Much of the previous leadership and several marquee voices are gone, and some of those who remain view him skeptically. The New York Post has sought comment from Attiah, O'Neal and the Washington Post. 4 Attiah last month declined to accept a buyout offer, according to a report in the Status newsletter. Instagram/@karenattiah Signs of that editorial turn emerged this week after O'Neal ran an opinion piece by Jay Bhattacharya, an official in the Trump administration, arguing that the Health and Human Services decision to 'wind down its mRNA vaccine development activities' was a 'necessary' step, a stance that drew reader criticism. He also published an op-ed from Jeanine Pirro, the former Fox News host who is now a district attorney, promoting 'the fight to make DC safe and beautiful.' That piece arrived amid President Donald Trump's takeover of Washington, DC's police force. 4 Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos (seen with wife Lauren Sánchez) has overhauled the paper's editorial bent. Getty Images for amfAR A former Washington Post opinion editor told Status that management at the newspaper was 'turning The Post into a mouthpiece for the Trump administration,' and said such pieces would not have cleared under earlier section leaders. Under Bezos, the newsroom that has been repeatedly reshaped over the last two years. In October, the Washington Post broke with tradition by halting presidential endorsements and later announced a significant shift in its opinion strategy emphasizing personal liberties and free markets. The move preceded the exit of opinion editor David Shipley and drew backlash from alumni and readers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store