
‘Don't Touch My Pan!' France Bans Toxic PFAS, Except in Cookware
A year ago, France embarked on an ambitious goal: To craft the world's widest ranging ban on the use of harmful 'forever chemicals' in everyday products.
On Friday, that effort culminated in a national ban on PFAS that environmental and health experts hailed as a big step forward, with one notable exception.
After campaigning by the home appliances manufacturer, Tefal — including a rowdy rally by employees wielding pots and pans — nonstick pans and other PFAS-containing cookware were excluded from the ban.
'Victory against PFAS in the National Assembly! France confirms that it can lead the way in protecting public health,' Nicolas Thierry, a politician of France's Green Party who proposed the ban last year, wrote on Bluesky. Yet the exemption granted to cookware was his 'biggest regret,' Mr. Thierry later told Le Monde, the French daily.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of chemicals used in items like nonstick cookware, water-repellent clothing, cosmetics and firefighting foam. Known commonly as 'forever chemicals' because they don't easily break down in the environment, PFAS can damage the liver and immune system and have also been linked to birth defects, developmental delays and an increased risk of certain cancers.
France's new law, which goes into effect next year, bans the manufacture, trade and marketing of PFAS-containing cosmetics, footwear, certain textiles and ski wax. From 2030, the ban will cover all textiles containing the chemicals, except for protective clothing worn by firefighters and other professionals.
The law exempts pans and other cookware that use PFAS nonstick coatings, however, after the French manufacturer of Tefal nonstick cookware launched a public campaign to limit the law's scope. Tefal and its supporters say a ban on use in cookware would threaten jobs, limit choice for consumers and hurt France's industrial competitiveness.
'Our nonstick coatings are recognized as being safe,' a public poster campaign declared. In April, the company organized a rally near the French parliament, where employees banged on pots, held up signs that read 'Don't touch my pan!' and chanted 'Ecology yes, our jobs no.'
'We are fighting because we are within our rights,' Thierry de La Tour d'Artaise, chairman of Groupe SEB, which owns the Tefal brand, said at the rally. The proposed ban, he said, 'is bad for the consumer.'
Martin Scheringer, a professor of environmental chemistry at ETH Zurich, a public research university in Switzerland, said it was true that health risks from nonstick cookware itself were not the biggest concern. However, he said, manufacturing of nonstick materials can cause 'substantial emissions of PFAS to the environment.', with harmful effects on health.
Environmental groups also say that safer alternatives exist. And the discovery of PFAS hot-spots near chemical factories and military bases across Europe pointed to the need to rein in the chemicals at the source, said Hélène Duguy, an attorney at the environmental law firm ClientEarth. 'We're going to have to pay so much to clean it up in the future,' she said.
Despite its narrowed scope, the new law makes France the world's second country after Denmark to ban PFAS in a range of consumer products. Denmark has taken a more piecemeal approach, starting with PFAS in food packaging.
The European Union is considering a wider ban on PFAS chemicals that would cover both industrial and consumer uses, including cookware, a ban that would essentially override the French law. That process is in early stages.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US threatens allies: we will retaliate if you attend UN Palestine summit
Donald Trump's administration has threatened allies with consequences if they attend an upcoming UN conference on a possible two-state solution between Israel and Palestine. The diplomatic demarche, sent on Tuesday, says countries that take 'anti-Israel actions' following the conference will be viewed as acting in opposition to US foreign policy interests and could face diplomatic consequences from Washington, Reuters reported. France and Saudi Arabia are co-hosting the gathering next week in New York that aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. 'We are urging governments not to participate in the conference, which we view as counterproductive to ongoing, lifesaving efforts to end the war in Gaza and free hostages,' read the cable. Emmanuel Macron has suggested France could recognise a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territory at the conference. French officials say they have been working to avoid a clash with the US, Israel's staunchest major ally. 'The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state, which adds significant legal and political obstacles to the eventual resolution of the conflict and could coerce Israel during a war, thereby supporting its enemies,' the cable read. This week Britain and Canada, also G7 allies of the United States, were joined by other countries in placing sanctions on two Israeli far-Right government ministers to pressure prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to bring the Gaza war to an end. 'The United States opposes the implied support of the conference for potential actions including boycotts and sanctions on Israel as well as other punitive measures,' the cable read. Israel has repeatedly criticised the conference, saying it rewards Islamist Hamas militants for the Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the Gaza war, and it has lobbied France against recognising a Palestinian state. The US State Department and the French foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump, 78, Has Got Another Mystery Bruise on His Hand
The massive bruise on President Donald Trump's right hand has returned. The pronounced mark on the president's dominant hand was first noticed in the Spring of 2024, during his Manhattan court battle against former porn star Stormy Daniels. It has been spotted several times since. It was most pronounced in February after what the White House claimed was a grueling schedule of hand-shaking, following a summit with French President Emmanuel Macron. In April, it was seen again during a presentation ceremony for the Commander-in-Chief Trophy in Washington, D.C. as Trump clutched a football. The bruise now appears to have resurfaced. It is visible in shots of the president at Fort Bragg military base in North Carolina, where he denounced L.A. rioters and promised to rename military bases during a Tuesday speech supposed to be about the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. On Monday, Trump—who recently stumbled and nearly fell when walking up the steps into Air Force One—spoke at the Invest America Roundtable in the State Dining room at the White House. At one point he lifted his hand, revealing a brownish color permeating around the area under his knuckles. Also on Monday, Trump sat down with journalist Miranda Devine in the White House library for the maiden episode of the New York Post's new podcast, called Pod Force One. The 42-minute interview was released Wednesday morning, with the president talking about everything from the unrest in Los Angeles to his faltering relationship with Elon Musk. The president, who turns 79 on Saturday, was ranting about his predecessor, Joe Biden, when the bruise first became visible. This time, the mark appeared to be covered in makeup. In her subsequent column, published Wednesday, Devine mentioned the bruising. 'He will endure constant bruises on the back of his hands from well-wishers showing their gratitude with vigorous handshakes that he reciprocates warmly, even though he's a renowned (maybe reformed) germaphobe,' she wrote. A doctor said in February, after Trump's latest handshake showdown with Macron, that all of that 'aggressive' squeezing could indeed cause bruising. Dr Stuart Fischer, an internal medicine physician in New York, told the Daily Mail that age could also be a factor. He also mooted Osteoarthritis, a degenerative disease that breaks down cartilage and bone in the joints. 'I think it's probably all of those things together,' Fischer said. The Mayo Clinic says while easy bruising is common with age, it could be a sign of something more nefarious such as a blood-clotting condition or a blood disease. Before he jetted off to the Pope Army Airfield in Fort Bragg Trump was pictured covering the hand with his left as he sat in the Oval Office and addressed reporters and camera crews. He was met on the tarmac by Secretary of the Army Daniel Driscoll, who greeted him with a handshake. He also shook the hands of several officials and high-ranking officers, including Army Brigadier General John Cogbill. Excessive handshaking was the reason given for the president's brownish-blue hand back in February. 'President Trump is a man of the people and he meets more Americans and shakes their hands on a daily basis than any other President in history,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Beast after people started to notice the mark. Leavitt added, in a statement to NBC News, 'President Trump has bruises on his hand because he's constantly working and shaking hands all day every day.' He gave a similar reason when interviewed by Time magazine for their 2024 Person of the Year issue. He explained that it came from 'shaking hands with thousands of people.' While Biden was the oldest ever president to serve in office, Trump is the oldest to be sworn into office. Trump and his close circle have long attacked Biden's apparent lack of fitness for office. Cries of a cover-up of his ailing health intensified after the release of Original Sin, a book by well-connected journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson. In one damning section of the book, the authors wrote that Joe Biden's close circle floated the idea of getting the aging politician a wheelchair if he was re-elected as president. 'Biden's physical deterioration—most apparent in his halting walk—had become so severe that there were internal discussions about putting the president in a wheelchair, but they couldn't do so until after the election,' it read. The White House has been contacted for comment on Trump's hand.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Austrian president questions gun laws after school shooting tragedy
Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen has called for a review of the country's relatively relaxed gun laws in the wake of a school shooting in Graz that left nine students and a teacher dead. "Does the legal situation really meet modern requirements? That will have to be examined," Van der Bellen said on Wednesday during a visit to the city, according to the APA news agency. On Tuesday, a 21-year-old man opened fire in his former high school, killing 10 people and taking his own life. The attacker was armed with a shotgun and a handgun, both of which he legally owned, police said. Van der Bellen, who once led the Green Party, said politicians must now address "how it can be that a 21-year-old has a handgun and a long gun and has the opportunity to buy the appropriate ammunition and cause this disaster." Calls for tighter gun laws have intensified in the wake of the attack. The communist mayor of Graz, Elke Kahr, has urged a ban on private firearm ownership. Under current Austrian law, purchasing handguns requires official authorization, but rifles and shotguns can be bought without a permit.