‘Don't Touch My Pan!' France Bans Toxic PFAS, Except in Cookware
On Friday, that effort culminated in a national ban on PFAS that environmental and health experts hailed as a big step forward, with one notable exception.
After campaigning by the home appliances manufacturer, Tefal — including a rowdy rally by employees wielding pots and pans — nonstick pans and other PFAS-containing cookware were excluded from the ban.
'Victory against PFAS in the National Assembly! France confirms that it can lead the way in protecting public health,' Nicolas Thierry, a politician of France's Green Party who proposed the ban last year, wrote on Bluesky. Yet the exemption granted to cookware was his 'biggest regret,' Mr. Thierry later told Le Monde, the French daily.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of chemicals used in items like nonstick cookware, water-repellent clothing, cosmetics and firefighting foam. Known commonly as 'forever chemicals' because they don't easily break down in the environment, PFAS can damage the liver and immune system and have also been linked to birth defects, developmental delays and an increased risk of certain cancers.
France's new law, which goes into effect next year, bans the manufacture, trade and marketing of PFAS-containing cosmetics, footwear, certain textiles and ski wax. From 2030, the ban will cover all textiles containing the chemicals, except for protective clothing worn by firefighters and other professionals.
The law exempts pans and other cookware that use PFAS nonstick coatings, however, after the French manufacturer of Tefal nonstick cookware launched a public campaign to limit the law's scope. Tefal and its supporters say a ban on use in cookware would threaten jobs, limit choice for consumers and hurt France's industrial competitiveness.
'Our nonstick coatings are recognized as being safe,' a public poster campaign declared. In April, the company organized a rally near the French parliament, where employees banged on pots, held up signs that read 'Don't touch my pan!' and chanted 'Ecology yes, our jobs no.'
'We are fighting because we are within our rights,' Thierry de La Tour d'Artaise, chairman of Groupe SEB, which owns the Tefal brand, said at the rally. The proposed ban, he said, 'is bad for the consumer.'
Martin Scheringer, a professor of environmental chemistry at ETH Zurich, a public research university in Switzerland, said it was true that health risks from nonstick cookware itself were not the biggest concern. However, he said, manufacturing of nonstick materials can cause 'substantial emissions of PFAS to the environment.', with harmful effects on health.
Environmental groups also say that safer alternatives exist. And the discovery of PFAS hot-spots near chemical factories and military bases across Europe pointed to the need to rein in the chemicals at the source, said Hélène Duguy, an attorney at the environmental law firm ClientEarth. 'We're going to have to pay so much to clean it up in the future,' she said.
Despite its narrowed scope, the new law makes France the world's second country after Denmark to ban PFAS in a range of consumer products. Denmark has taken a more piecemeal approach, starting with PFAS in food packaging.
The European Union is considering a wider ban on PFAS chemicals that would cover both industrial and consumer uses, including cookware, a ban that would essentially override the French law. That process is in early stages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Despite Delays Suriname's Oil Boom is Fast Becoming a Reality
It is a long time coming, but the impoverished South American country of Suriname is poised to enjoy the fruits of a major oil boom. For nearly a decade, the government, in the capital Paramaribo, hungrily eyed neighboring Guyana's drilling success, which transformed that country into the world's newest petrostate. Yet Suriname's offshore drilling, despite yielding positive results, repeatedly experienced uncertainty and delays. This took place as the economic situation in the former Dutch colony deteriorated, causing to President Chandrikapersad Santokhi, a former police commissioner, to lose office. Newly appointed president opposition leader Jennifer Geerlings-Simons faces uncertainty over the economy and the anticipated oil boom. Paramaribo, since the 2020 pandemic, has been battling yet another deep financial crisis, which spilled over into violence at the start of 2023 as the cost of living spiraled out of control. Protestors stormed Suriname's National Assembly in February 2023 as then-President Chan Snatokhi's International Monetary Fund (IMF) mandated economic austerity hit hard in a country where nearly a fifth of the population lives below the poverty line. Despite the hardships triggered by the austerity program, which included slashing government spending, removing energy subsidies, and sharply devaluing the Suriname dollar, there are signs of success. The IMF Executive Board, after reviewing the arrangement in March 2025 stated: 'The objectives of the program have been broadly achieved. The economy is growing, inflation is receding, public debt is declining, the autonomy and governance of the central bank have been strengthened, and investor confidence is returning.' Related: Energy Transition Stalls as Oil Super-Cycle Risks Return There is, however, still a long way to go. The IMF outlined the need for Paramaribo to enforce fiscal discipline, strengthen tax administration, improve regulatory transparency, and bolster governance mechanisms. Despite notable progress, these enhancements were insufficient for President Santokhi. During July 2025, he lost office due to the fallout from those stringent economic austerity measures and ongoing corruption allegations. It was President Santokhi who saw Suriname's burgeoning offshore oil boom as a silver bullet for a crisis-prone economy, which over the last decade contracted sharply. For 2015, Suriname reported gross domestic product (GDP) of $5.13 billion, yet by 2024 it had plunged 13% to $4.46 billion. This marked decline is hurting the population of one of South America's poorest countries, where one in six people live in poverty During January 2020, APA, the then operator of Block 58, announced the first discovery in Block 58 at the Maka Central-1 well. This was followed by four more discoveries, with the most recent being the Krabdagu discovery made during 2022. Source: APA Corporation EnerCom Oil & Gas Conference. Since the last discovery, a series of appraisal wells were drilled at the Sapakara and Krabdagu discoveries, which confirmed the presence of a reservoir containing an estimated 750 million barrels of crude oil. The oil discovered in Suriname was determined to be light and sweet with API gravities of between 35 degrees and 60 degrees with a low sulfur content. Those are important attributes in a world with a focus on producing high-quality low low-emission fuels, which are cheaper and easier to manufacture from lighter sweet crude oil. First oil from one of the five significant oil discoveries made in offshore Block 58 was initially expected in 2026, although this did not occur, with TotalEnergies postponing development of the oil acreage. Poor exploration results, including several dry wells, inconsistent seismic data, and concerns about the reservoir related to a high gas-to-oil ratio, impacted the multi-billion-dollar final investment decision (FID). For those reasons, TotalEnergies at the end of 2022 postponed the FID to further appraise and better define the oilfield's attributes. Finally, in October 2024, TotalEnergies and APA announced the $10.5 billion FID for developing the Sapakara and Krabdagu discoveries, targeting first oil in 2028. The latest news from TotalEnergies shows development of Block 58 is well underway. The project, dubbed GranMorgu, is located 93 miles offshore east of Paramaribo, targeting a reservoir containing recoverable oil resources of over 750 million barrels. Source: APA Corporation Third Quarter 2024 Financial and Operational Supplement. GranMorgu will be comprised of one drillship and a semi-submersible rig with 16 production wells and 16 injector wells. The facility is designed with nameplate capacity of 220,000 barrels per day and storage for up to 2.1 million barrels. GranMorgu will yield 220,000 barrels of crude oil and 450 million cubic feet of natural gas each day. Commissioning and first oil are projected for 2028, which represents a two-year delay from Paramaribo's original timeline. The carbon intensity of oil extraction from GranMorgu is forecast to be low. This is an important attribute in a low carbon world where governments are substantially reducing greenhouse emissions and energy companies pledge to be net carbon neutral. This includes TotalEnergies, which plans to be net carbon zero across its worldwide operations by 2050. The supermajor recently confirmed the GranMorgu project fits that goal with an all-electric Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessel being installed at GranMorgu. TotalEnergies is committed to no routine flaring and for all gas produced to be injected into the FPSO's tanks. For these reasons, GranMorgu is forecast to emit less than 16 kilograms of carbon per barrel of oil equivalent extracted. This is lower than the global average of 18 kilograms of carbon produced per barrel of oil equivalent lifted, but higher than neighboring Guyana, where an average of only nine kilograms of carbon is discharged per barrel. This will ensure Suriname retains its status as a global carbon sink. The 38 million acres of forest covering the former Dutch colony absorbs 8.8 million tons of carbon annually, while the country only produces seven million tons. TotalEnergies pledged to assist Paramaribo with maintaining Suriname's status as a carbon-negative country. Once GranMorgu is operational, it will generate considerable income for a fiscally challenged Paramaribo, which is struggling to find sufficient income to balance the budget while meeting sovereign debt repayments. The potential government revenue is boosted by the national oil company and industry regulator Staatsolie securing a 20% interest in GranMorgu. This stake, which is worth $2.4 billion, forms an important plank in Staatsolie's goal of tripling revenue to almost $1.8 billion before the end of this decade. While estimates vary, GranMorgu is expected to earn $16 billion to $26 billion of revenue for Paramaribo over the life of the oilfield, dwarfing Suriname's 2024 GDP of $4.46 billion. By Matthew Smith for More Top Reads From this article on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
White House Proudly Promotes Trump's Snub to Greatest Allies
European leaders arrived at the White House on Monday not to be met by President Donald Trump, but by the former Fox News host Monica Crowley—a snub the Trump administration is now proudly promoting. The official White House account compiled a montage of top U.S. allies arriving at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave to be met by an unfamiliar face, with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky being the lone exception. The dramatic clip showed the arrivals of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. The seven leaders were greeted by Crowley, 56, who is the chief of protocol at the White House. The White House wrote on Instagram, 'Peace and American leadership are BACK under President Trump.' Crowley commented under the video herself, writing, 'It is an honor and a privilege to serve our greatest President and the American people as Chief of Protocol of the United States, and to welcome world leaders to the White House.' Trump, 79, rolled out the red carpet for Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska. He exited Air Force One first, while Putin waited on his presidential jet, and then struggled to walk in a straight line until he reached their meeting point. There, the president smiled and clapped as the longtime U.S. adversary approached him. He then surprised Putin with a U.S. Air Force flyover and a ride in his presidential limo. The White House has not explained why Trump opted not to greet the majority of the Europeans upon their arrival on Monday—something critics noted the president would demand from them if he ever hastily crossed the Atlantic Ocean for a meeting. Trump did trek to the White House's north entrance to greet Zelensky. The men shared a warm handshake and smiled as they met for the first time since February, when Trump and Vice President JD Vance ambushed him in the Oval Office and literally chased him out of the White House over his response. Zelensky, 47, appeared overly friendly with Trump on Monday. He is attempting to secure all-important guarantees from Trump that the U.S. will ensure his country's safety if he strikes a deal with Putin to end more than three years of fighting. Russia—and the Soviet Union before it—has been among America's top adversaries since the mid-20th century. However, Trump has long been sympathetic to Putin, and, after meeting with him in Alaska, aligned his position to be more in line with that of Russia. Trump has notably said he no longer wishes for a ceasefire, as Zelensky says is necessary. He instead wants to see an immediate peace deal made, even if it requires Ukraine to cede large swaths of its land to Russia. It is not all doom and gloom for Ukraine, however. The New York Times reported Monday that Trump is now considering security guarantees for Ukraine. That is a change from his previous position earlier this term, when he demanded that Europe alone should be responsible for protecting its mutual ally.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inside Trump world's reaction to the Zelenskyy reset
For Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Monday began with a diplomatic whirlwind. It ended with a great sigh of relief. Hours of meetings in Washington — Zelenskyy with President Donald Trump, Trump with a coterie of Europe's most powerful leaders, all of the above together in the Oval Office — culminated in a 'breakthrough,' in the words of NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte: Trump expressed a willingness to participate in security guarantees for Ukraine. On the international stage, that alone amounts to a new dawn not only for the relationship between the U.S. and Ukraine, but also Zelenskyy's relationship with Trump, and America's with some of its closest transatlantic allies. On the home front, it could be a bit more complicated. While there are no specifics yet on what exactly U.S. security guarantees might look like for Ukraine — Zelenskyy suggested those would be ironed out within 10 days — even the vague allusion to them hints that MAGA may be careening toward another foreign policy divide. In public, there are a few topline takeaways from yesterday. The biggest are the security guarantees, and the reality that Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin are hurtling toward a bilateral meeting; German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that summit could happen within the next two weeks. After that, Trump intends to join Zelenskyy and Putin for a trilateral meeting with the aim of ending Russia's war on Ukraine, he announced on social media. '[T]he optimism of your president is to be taken seriously,' French President Emmanuel Macron told NBC News. 'So if he considers he can get a deal done, this is great news, and we have to do whatever we can to have a great deal.' In private, there are more interesting details. Here's what Trump world insiders are talking in private about yesterday's cascade of diplomatic meetings — and how it perhaps recontextualizes parts of last Friday's Trump-Putin summit in Alaska. 1. The Trump-Zelenskyy reset is real. From the moment Trump complimented Zelenskyy on his suit — all the way through to Vice President JD Vance's more easy rapport with the Ukrainian president and the many 'thanks' Zelenskyy offered — it was a totally different mood than the disastrous February meeting. 'The vibe between the president and Zelenskyy was terrific,' a senior administration official told POLITICO. 'What happened in that first Oval meeting is well gone.' This official described the ensuing talks as 'really productive.' 2. The Europeans proved difference-makers. The goal of convening the Europeans was 'to say 'We're in charge; you'll sign on to anything we say,'' the senior administration official told POLITICO. And the White House was mostly pleased by what they saw. 'The Europeans were positive today, but they are tedious,' the official said. 'But they were really good. And if you just were an observer of the two hours today, you'd say, 'Wow, that's like a family — a happy family.' But they all have their own little thing that they want to have happen. And it really is more of a European war than an American war, but none of them has stepped up.' Was it unwieldy to have them all in a meeting together? Yes. 'They're heads of state,' the official continued. 'They're used to being in charge. And when you put seven of them in one room, you get what you would think. But it wasn't bad.' 3. Trump offered to go straight to a trilateral meeting. The senior administration official told POLITICO that when Trump called Putin to offer his presence at a meeting between Zelenskyy and the Russian leader, Putin said, 'You don't have to come. I want to see him one on one.' Trump's team 'started working on that,' the official said. 'Steve Witkoff has the assignment to get it figured [out].' 4. Alaska paved the way for the 'security guarantees' discussion. If there was any concern within the administration about how the Putin meeting in Anchorage went down, Monday all but evaporated it. 'After Alaska, we were excited that Putin was at least talking and there were signs we could negotiate,' a second senior administration official told POLITICO. One of those signs came on the topic of security guarantees: Putin was 'engaging on a conversation about security guarantees instead of, 'Nyet, nyet, nyet,' this second official said. 'If Alaska was not successful and Putin didn't give us a little bit of an opening, we wouldn't have [had] the Europeans at the White House.' Of Putin: 'He'll drive a hard bargain, but that opening is huge.' 5. Those security guarantees could be a sticking point internationally. It remains unclear just how big a commitment the U.S. has on the line here. 'We haven't even started [that discussion] other than a commitment,' the first senior administration official told POLITICO. 'The question is, 'Who participates to what percentage?' But the president did commit that we would be a part of it. No specifics. And then he said he would also help it get organized. And he alone could sell that to Putin. I don't think Putin would pay any attention to the others, and I'm not sure the others would do it without him.' 6. And those same guarantees could be a problem for Trump domestically. Does the administration have a red line when it comes to committing U.S. troops to keep a peace in Ukraine? 'I don't think there's a red line,' the first senior official told POLITICO. 'So I think it just kind of remains to be seen. [President Trump] would like the Europeans to step up. But I think if the last piece of the puzzle was for a period of time to be a part of a peacekeeping force, I think he would do it.' Meanwhile, as European leaders arrived at the White House, MAGA coalition minder Steve Bannon took to his influential 'War Room' podcast to warn about the U.S. security guarantees in Ukraine. 'I'm just lost how the United States offering an Article 5 commitment for a security guarantee to Ukraine is a win for the United States,' Bannon said on his show Monday morning. 'President Trump has done more than enough to bring the parties together,' Bannon told POLITICO late Monday night. 'Once again, this is a European problem; we have all the leverage here. If we don't fund this, it stops happening. The only way this goes forward — the only way this continues every day — is American money and American arms. The Europeans don't have enough either military hardware and/or financial wherewithal.' Bannon said he hopes Trump 'eventually stops listening to the [Sens.] Lindsey Grahams and Tom Cottons and the Mitch McConnells, and realizes that there can't be any guarantee here from the United States, because that's going to inextricably link us to this conflict.' In a Truth Social post on Monday about the next steps, Trump said 'Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, are coordinating with Russia and Ukraine.' That callout was striking. 'That's the first time JD and Marco have been dragged into a big foreign policy issue together,' the second senior administration official told POLITICO. 'If it's JD and Marco and Witkoff, who gets the credit and who gets the blame if it fails? This could be the first test of 2028.' Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's Playbook newsletter.
