logo
The questionable experts with the Global Fact-Checking Network, Russia's verification organisation

The questionable experts with the Global Fact-Checking Network, Russia's verification organisation

Yahoo01-08-2025
Russian organisation the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), which was launched in April 2025, claims to fight disinformation. But a number of the 60-odd members of the network regularly share disinformation online. We take a look.
It was to be a platform 'uniting experts dedicated to exposing unreliable information', according to the spokesperson for the Russian ministry of foreign affairs, Maria Zakharova. On April 9, she announced during a press conference the launch of the Global Fact-checking Network (GFCN), a platform promoting the verification of information 'that fosters an honest and open approach to fact-checking'.
And yet, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), the GFCN is the 'Kremlin's latest propaganda tool'.
'This initiative is part of a well-established Kremlin strategy: mimicking independent institutions to better spread its propaganda,' the international non-profit dedicated to press freedom said in a report published on June 24 about the GFCN.
GFCN is upfront that it wants to serve as a counterpoint to Western fact-checking services, including the International Fact-checking Network (IFCN), an initiative founded in 2015 that brings together 170 fact-checking organisations [including our team at the FRANCE 24 Observers] from across the world around a shared code of ethics about fact-checking practices.
At first glance, GFCN seems to resemble a fact-checking organisation like IFCN: the network has, for example, a 'code of responsible fact-checking", which includes values like objectivity and impartiality and the use of verified data. Since early June, it has also offered courses on fact-checking techniques as well as an "international contest" to help people learn to better detect AI-generated videos.
Co-founded by Tass and an NGO under sanction
However, critics of GFCN say that the organisations behind it aren't necessarily poster children for these values. GFCN was cofounded by the Russian state press agency TASS, the New Media School – a government-run training programme for Russian journalists – and the NGO Ano Dialog.
A number of specialists and Western governments have described this NGO, which is currently under US sanctions, as being closely linked to the Kremlin – as well as a number of different disinformation operations. Its director general, Vladimir Tabak, who has been placed under sanctions by a number of Western countries, is now president of GFCN as well.
Maxime Audinet and Colin Gérard, researchers specialised in Russian influence, say that Tabak is one of the main actors in the disinformation operation Doppelgänger, which creates fake websites that resemble Western news outlets to share false information.
'Our goal within the Network is to unite experts, journalists, and media representatives who are ready to jointly defend the right to reliable information,' said Tabak in mid-July 2025. At that point, GFCN was made up of 65 members from 40 different countries.
Eight fake news items in 12 days
However, a number of the experts who appear on GFCN's website regularly share false information online and draw from unverified, unsourced content.
"Many of the voices on this list are extremely biased and lack legitimacy,' says Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in the United States and author of a number of reports about Russian online disinformation networks.
When our team took a look at the X account of Tim Anderson, the first name on the list of so-called experts, we noticed a number of fake news items on his feed. Anderson used to be a professor at an Australian university and founded an organisation called the Center for Counter Hegemonic Studies. From our count, Anderson shared eight false news items during the 12-day war between Israel and Iran last June.
Among the fake news items he shared that are still online: images taken from video games or generated by artificial intelligence that Anderson claimed were proof that Iran had shot down Israeli F-35 bombers. And yet, as our team reported, there is still no viable proof to date that Iran downed any of these planes.
Anderson also shared a video that claimed that Mossad chief David Barnea had died – which is also not true. These errors run counter to GFCN's purported code, which stipulates that it is important to 'verify information sources to make sure that they are reliable and authentic'. You can see our analysis of the eight fake news items shared by Anderson by following this link.
Other GFCN experts have also shared false claims based on unverified sources. Pakistani journalist Furqan Rao, for example, shared on two separate occasions photos that were either false or taken out of context about the conflict between India and Pakistan last May. In one case, he shared a video of a military simulation game that made it look like Pakistan had destroyed a military base. He also shared a video filmed in Dubai in 2021 and falsely claimed that it showed a cache of Indian missiles that had been targeted. He did not publish corrections about his posts.
The list of experts also includes people who are not journalists, like Roigar López Rivas. GFCN says that López Rivas is the president of the National Institute for the Development of Small and Medium Industry in Venezuela. Yet he appeared on a panel of experts at a GFCN event held in June.
Between November 2023 and July 2025, this fervent supporter of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro got 33 Community Notes – notes added by users of the platform X to add context to false or misleading posts –, according to the tool Community-Notes-Leaderboard. These notes include a false montage criticising Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a false poster calling for the FBI to capture Venezuelan opposition figure Juan Guaido – which was investigated by our fact-checking partner IFCN Cazadores – as well as a video that he claimed was a strike on Moscow and which was actually an Iranian strike on Israel.
Experts with links to 'Storm-1516'
GFCN's list of experts also includes names of people known to work within other pro-Russian online disinformation networks. This includes Dutch independent journalist Sonja Van den Ende and Brazilian analyst Lucas Leiroz, both identified by the Clemson Institute or the French government agency for the defence against foreign digital interference Viginum as important figures within the Russian disinformation operation "Storm-1516".
Storm-1516 is a complex operation whose main aim is to spread false information, primarily about the war in Ukraine and Western countries. They employ various methods of dissemination, but most often transmit these stories through fake news sites or websites that regularly share fake news.
Both Sonja Van den Ende and Lucas Leiroz shared eight different narratives from this operation between 2023 and 2024, according to a report from the Clemson Institute. One that they shared was a fake news story from a Nigerian media outlet claiming that Zelensky had purchased a house in Egypt. Though Zelensky denied this and numerous fact-checking articles were published debunking this story, their X posts featuring the fake news story are still online (see links here and here).
Leiroz is also known for his work in the BRICS Journalists Association (BJA), which claims to represent non-Western journalists. However, this organisation was just placed under European sanctions on July 15 for 'disseminating pro-Russian narratives and disinformation under the guise of independent journalism' following reports describing the involvement of several BJA members in Storm-1516.
Leiroz has also publicly defended Irish RT journalist Chay Bowes, who is considered one of the main actors within Operation Storm-1516, as our team has documented on numerous occasions.
"Russia's main success is that it has managed to build up a collection of voices that disseminate false information and give it legitimacy,' says Linvill, who describes organisations like the BRICS Journalists Association as 'tools for legitimising disinformation', in the same way as GFCN.
Chay Bowes also has the support of Timofey V, whose real name is Vasiliev. Vasiliev, who is presented on GFCN's site as the head of the NGO ANO Dialog, is also behind the media outlet War on Fakes, which disseminated Russian propaganda under the guise of fact-checking. In February 2025, Timofey V shared a fake video posted by Bowes about an alleged electoral fraud carried out against the far-right German political party AfD. Our fact-checking colleagues at AFP Factuel reported that this video was staged.
Our team contacted GFCN, which said that 'the experts in the articles posted under the aegis of GFCN respect the ethical and professional norms outlined in the Code of the association.'
'Communicating' on the international level
"GFCN is not a structure that operates independently from the rest of the Russian influence network,' Pauline Maufrais, the RSF Regional Officer for Ukraine and author of the report on GFCN, told our team. "We see the same figures from the pro-Kremlin propaganda, who have been bouncing around in these circles for years and who pop up again when there are new projects.'
Another GFCN participant is the media outlet International Reporters, founded in late 2023. This project is primarily run by French journalist Christelle Néant, who has been working in the Donbass region since 2016 and speaks out against what she says are Western 'lies' about Russia.
Linvill says that the choice to bring in influential figures from across the globe is part of Russia's strategy of global influence.
"Russia is very talented at giving the impression of being inclusive,' he says. 'This serves several functions – not only does this give them a good image, but it also enables them to communicate effectively in these communities.'
"It's not insignificant that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is so involved,' Maufrais says. "The aim is to go and find new audiences to share their narrative with the aim of being visible on the international stage.'
Russian embassies in Bangladesh and South Africa have also been known to tout the GFCN.
An African press agency that has bought into GFCN
The African Initiative, a Russian press agency created in 2023 that aims to be the main 'information bridge between Russia and Africa', joined the list of GFCN participating organisations – another sign of the collaboration between different bodies of Russian influence.
The structure is an agency that promotes anti-Western and pro-Kremlin propaganda across the African continent, according to a report published by Viginum and the European External Action Service (SEAE) in May 2025. Like GFCN, the African Initiative also offers training sessions about disinformation so that it can 'independently counter the propaganda imposed by the West'.
"Most Russian disinformation and propaganda aims to delegitimize the West politically, culturally, and institutionally,' says Linvill. "An organisation like the GFCN does these three things at once.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North Korea is removing speakers from their tense border, South Korea military says
North Korea is removing speakers from their tense border, South Korea military says

CBS News

time24 minutes ago

  • CBS News

North Korea is removing speakers from their tense border, South Korea military says

Seoul, South Korea - South Korea's military said Saturday it detected North Korea removing some of its loudspeakers from the inter-Korean border, days after the South dismantled its own front-line speakers used for anti-North Korean propaganda broadcasts, in a bid to ease tensions. South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff didn't disclose the sites where the North Koreans were removing speakers and said it wasn't immediately clear whether the North would take all of them down. In recent months, South Korean border residents have complained that North Korean speakers blasted irritating sounds, including howling animals and pounding gongs, in a tit-for-tat response to South Korean propaganda broadcasts. The South Korean military said the North stopped its broadcasts in June after Seoul's new liberal president, Lee Jae Myung, halted the South's broadcasts in his government's first concrete step toward easing tensions between the war-divided rivals. South Korea's military began removing its speakers from border areas on Monday but didn't specify how they would be stored or whether they could be quickly redeployed if tensions flared again. North Korea, which is extremely sensitive to any outside criticism of its authoritarian leadership and its third-generation ruler, Kim Jong Un, didn't immediately confirm it was taking down its speakers. South Korea's previous conservative government resumed daily loudspeaker broadcasts in June last year, following a yearslong pause, in retaliation for North Korea flying trash-laden balloons toward the South. The speakers blasted propaganda messages and K-pop songs, a playlist designed to strike a nerve in Pyongyang, where Kim has been pushing an intense campaign to eliminate the influence of South Korean pop culture and language among the population in a bid to strengthen his family's dynastic rule. The Cold War-style psychological warfare campaigns further heightened tensions already inflamed by North Korea's advancing nuclear program and South Korean efforts to expand joint military exercises with the United States and their trilateral security cooperation with Japan. Lee, who took office in June after winning an early election to replace ousted conservative Yoon Suk Yeol, wants to improve relations with Pyongyang, which reacted furiously to Yoon's hard-line policies and shunned dialogue. But Kim Yo Jong, the influential sister of the North Korean leader, rebuffed overtures by Lee's government in late July, saying that Seoul's "blind trust" in the country's alliance with the United States makes it no different from its conservative predecessor. She later issued a separate statement dismissing the Trump administration's intent to resume diplomacy on North Korea's denuclearization, suggesting that Pyongyang - now focused on expanding ties with Russia over the war in Ukraine - sees little urgency in resuming talks with Seoul or Washington. Tensions between the Koreas can possibly rise again later this month, when South Korea and the United States proceed with their annual large-scale combined military exercises, which begin on Aug. 18. North Korea labels the allies' joint drills as invasion rehearsals and often uses them as a pretext to dial up military demonstrations and weapons tests aimed at advancing its nuclear program.

Ex-Washington Post fact-checker faces criticism over claims of 'straight' media coverage
Ex-Washington Post fact-checker faces criticism over claims of 'straight' media coverage

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Ex-Washington Post fact-checker faces criticism over claims of 'straight' media coverage

One of the internet's most famous fact-checkers, former Washington Post writer Glenn Kessler, was grilled by author and podcaster Mark Halperin on Friday over media bias. The man behind The Washington Post's "Pinocchios" announced in late July he would be leaving the paper without anyone to fill his shoes. Kessler, who reportedly edited more than 3,000 fact checks as editor and chief writer of The Fact Checker, announced that week he had taken a buyout deal, ending his lengthy career at the Post. "After more than 27 years at The Washington Post, including almost 15 as The Fact Checker, I will be leaving on July 31, having taken a buyout," Kessler wrote on his Facebook page. "Much as I would have liked to keep scrutinizing politicians in Washington, especially in this era, the financial considerations were impossible to dismiss." With his career and the Washington Post's recent record in the spotlight among many shakeups at the publication, Halperin raked Kessler over the coals on his "Next Up" podcast. "How could it be that I see The Post as fundamentally anti-Trump in every day, in every crevice of every story practically, and you say 'We are down the middle by the book,' and 'the fact that our readers are liberal is because we're in Washington DC.' How could that be?" Halperin asked on his show. Kessler disagreed with the characterization of newsrooms like the one he worked in, arguing, "It's not like people in the newsroom are saying, 'We've got to get Donald Trump. We've got to write this story. We're going to slant it in a way that is negative to Donald Trump.'" "I agree with you, it's more insidious than that," Halperin said, arguing it would be more comforting if they gave up the pretense of objectivity. "Your audience, by your own acknowledgment, and by every indication, is super liberal," Halperin said. "We saw that when the owner did things that were pro-Trump - perceived as pro-Trump, and you lost a huge percentage, as you cite in your Substack, a huge percentage of your readers. So, your audience is liberal and you're addicted to their revenue." He then asked, "How could you work at a place for decades and say 'we're addicted to liberal revenue' and not be screaming at the top of your lungs, 'Boy, half the country might have a point that we're liberally biased. Let's examine that.'" "I maintain, as a longtime Washington Post reporter, that the news coverage is straight," Kessler insisted. "But Glenn, it's not just me. It's half the country. I'm not alone," Halperin replied. "Half the country is affected by Donald Trump saying we're [the] 'enemy of the people,'" Kessler argued. "Well, George Bush thought it was true, too," Halperin retorted. "Ronald Reagan thought it was true, too. This is not some new thing. It's only because of 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' that the papers' news section has become even more aggressive of saying 'We must defeat Republicans.'" Fox News Digital reached out to The Washington Post for comment.

Ex-Trump Adviser Bolton Says Putin Meeting Brings Back Memories of Taliban Camp David Talks
Ex-Trump Adviser Bolton Says Putin Meeting Brings Back Memories of Taliban Camp David Talks

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ex-Trump Adviser Bolton Says Putin Meeting Brings Back Memories of Taliban Camp David Talks

John Bolton has voiced his criticism over the announcement of a meeting between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, scheduled to take place in Alaska. What Happened: President Trump's announcement of the meeting, which was made on the social media platform Truth Social, has drawn attention and criticism, including from Bolton. He expressed his disapproval during a recent interview with CNN. The meeting between President Trump and President Putin is set to occur on Friday, August 15, 2025. 'The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska,' Trump wrote in the post. Bolton, who served as President Trump's national security advisor during his first term, likened the upcoming meeting to Trump's contentious invitation of the Taliban to Camp David. Bolton said, 'This is not quite as bad as Trump inviting the Taliban to Camp David to talk about the peace negotiations in Afghanistan, but it certainly reminds one of that.' Also Read: Trump Says He Could Influence Putin To Free Kidnapped Ukrainian Children: 'It's Pretty Tough Stuff, But I Believe I Could Do That' He further characterized the meeting as a 'great victory for Putin,' describing the Russian leader as a 'rogue leader of a pariah state.' 'The only better place for Putin than Alaska would be if the summit were being held in Moscow. So, the initial setup, I think, is a great victory for Putin. He's a rogue leader of a pariah state and he's going to be welcomed into the United States,' he further said. Why It Matters: Bolton's criticism of the announced meeting underscores the ongoing controversy surrounding President Trump's foreign policy decisions. The comparison to the contentious invitation of the Taliban to Camp David highlights the potential implications of this meeting. Bolton's comments suggest that the meeting could be perceived as a win for Putin, further complicating the already strained U.S.-Russia relations. The reaction to this meeting, particularly from those within Trump's own administration, will be a key factor to watch in the lead-up to the scheduled date. Read Next Jim Cramer Has Blunt Message for Fed Chair Powell After July Job Numbers Tanked UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Ex-Trump Adviser Bolton Says Putin Meeting Brings Back Memories of Taliban Camp David Talks originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store