logo
Kim Soo Hyun fans sue YouTuber for defaming actor, deny claims of his sexual addiction to minors amid Kim Sae Ron controversy

Kim Soo Hyun fans sue YouTuber for defaming actor, deny claims of his sexual addiction to minors amid Kim Sae Ron controversy

Time of India08-05-2025

Fans of actor Kim Soo Hyun have taken a firm stand against YouTuber Kwon Young Chan, filing a police complaint for defamation. They accuse Kwon of spreading false information about the actor's personal life, including serious allegations tied to the late Kim Sae Ron, during livestreams and YouTube broadcasts.
Complaint filed with Seoul Seongbuk Police Station
On May 8, attorney Yang Tae Young, representing the Kim Soo Hyun Fan Association, officially submitted the complaint at the Seoul Seongbuk Police Station. The group also turned in 56 instances of alleged defamatory statements made by Kwon between March and April 2025.
False claims about Kim Soo Hyun's alleged relationship with Kim Sae Ron
The complaint strongly refuted claims made by Kwon suggesting Kim Soo Hyun had a physical relationship with actress Kim Sae Ron when she was a minor.
"The victim, Kim Soo Hyun, has never dated or had sexual relations with Kim Sae Ron when she was a minor, has never committed a crime against the deceased, and has never been found to have a sexual addiction to minors or to be a pedophile," his fans claimed.
Kwon Young Chan accused of misleading the public
The fan association claimed that Kwon introduced himself as a counselling expert and director of a celebrity suicide prevention group, using those titles to boost his credibility. He also claimed to have evidence, which he threatened to release to media outlets—further worsening the actor's public image without confirmation.
Impact of defamation on Kim Soo Hyun's career and reputation
The fan group further claimed that the unfounded accusations have caused significant social and financial harm to Kim Soo Hyun. "Due to the false allegations that were not confirmed, Kim Soo Hyun has suffered social and economic damage that isn't easy to recover from," it said.
Kim Sae Ron's family's press conference sparks renewed backlash
Adding to the controversy, an audio recording was released at a press conference involving Kim Sae Ron's family and Kim Se Ui of the Garo Sero Institute. The recording allegedly features Kim Sae Ron speaking about a relationship with Kim Soo Hyun. In the audio, she claimed that Kim Soo Hyun had sex with her when she was in 8th Grade.
Kim Soo Hyun's agency, GOLDMEDALIST, has denied the allegations, and claimed that the audio recording is AI-generated.
Chinese fans rally behind Kim Soo Hyun
LED TRUCKS Support for #KimSooHyun has finally arrived near at the pressconference today from chinese fans, kim soohyun Global fan Union and We Support Team. pic.twitter.com/FphqNNXS2t
As the backlash intensified, Kim Soo Hyun's Chinese fans sent support trucks during the press conference held by Kim Sae Ron's legal representatives. These fans had earlier parked support trucks outside GOLDMEDALIST's building in Seoul.
For all the latest K-drama, K-pop, and Hallyuwood updates, keep following our coverage here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marc Anderesen, Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg? The many inspirations of tech bromance Mountainhead
Marc Anderesen, Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg? The many inspirations of tech bromance Mountainhead

Time of India

time20 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Marc Anderesen, Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg? The many inspirations of tech bromance Mountainhead

Image credits: X When Succession premiered, the HBO series earned widespread acclaim from both viewers and critics. While it wasn't the network's all-time biggest hit, it was a highly successful show, garnering numerous awards and cementing its reputation as one of the most incisive television dramas of the decade. Inspired by real-life media dynasties such as the Murdochs, Redstones, and Hearsts, the show was widely considered Jesse Armstrong 's finest work—until now. Armstrong's latest creation, Mountainhead, might just be a new contender for that title. The 2025 film, written and directed by Armstrong, is now streaming on Max. It follows four men—three billionaires and one millionaire—played by Steve Carell , Jason Schwartzman, Cory Michael Smith , and Ramy Youssef , who retreat to a snowy mountain lodge for their annual weekend getaway just as the outside world begins to spiral into chaos. 'No deals, no meals, no women in heels' is the motto of their gathering, which appears to be an old ritual of sorts. Steve Carell plays Randall, who arrives at the retreat having just received a sobering cancer diagnosis. Cory Michael Smith portrays Venis, the richest of the four and the founder of Traam, a social media platform resembling X. Ramy Youssef plays Jeff, a pioneer in artificial intelligence, while Jason Schwartzman's character Souper is a down-on-his-luck millionaire who's bitter that he hasn't yet broken into the billionaire club. The film presents itself as a caustic meditation on the personalities that dominate the tech world—ambitious, brilliant, morally compromised men trying to reshape the world in their own image. Though fictional, Mountainhead offers a sharp reflection of contemporary fears around artificial intelligence, the billionaire class, and the collapsing boundaries between power, technology, and ethics. What inspired Mountainhead? Image credits: X While Mountainhead is not based on a true story, Armstrong has described the characters as 'Frankenstein monsters with limbs sewn together'—composites of real-life tech figures. Each of the four main characters represents a distinct archetype: The Father, The Dynamo, The Usurper, and The Hanger-On. Steve Carell's Randall – The Father Image credits: X An ageing investor and technologist, Randall evokes a hybrid of Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel. Like Andreessen, he champions America's dominance in AI to thwart Chinese technological supremacy. Like Thiel, he was Venis' first backer, reminiscent of Thiel's early investment in Facebook. He also carries the same quasi-philosophical, near-apocalyptic tone both men are known for. Cory Michael Smith's Venis – The Dynamo Image credits: X As the founder of Traam, a social media empire, Venis bears similarities to Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. His fixation on outer space, emotionally stunted relationship with his child, and moral detachment from the platform's societal consequences place him squarely in the mould of Silicon Valley's most notorious disruptors. Ramy Youssef's Jeff – The Usurper Image credits: X Jeff begins the film with a conscience but gradually succumbs to the ruthless survivalist ethos of his peers. He reflects the trajectory of figures like Sam Altman , who launched OpenAI as a non-profit but later oversaw its transformation into a capped-profit entity. Other influences include Demis Hassabis and Dario Amodei—pioneers of AI who straddle the line between idealism and pragmatism. Jason Schwartzman's Souper – The Hanger-On Image credits: X Souper is the outsider, the least wealthy, constantly trying to fit in. While not directly based on any specific figure, he channels the mindset of minor players in the tech world desperate to be accepted into the elite club—even if it means compromising every shred of dignity. With Mountainhead, Armstrong trades the dynastic machinations of legacy media for the sociopathic ego trips of modern technocracy. The setting may be remote and insulated, but the questions the film poses—about power, legacy, mortality, and morality—are anything but.

What Makes SEVENTEEN Different? 10 Years Of Loving The K-Pop Thirteen That Outsmarted The System
What Makes SEVENTEEN Different? 10 Years Of Loving The K-Pop Thirteen That Outsmarted The System

NDTV

time24 minutes ago

  • NDTV

What Makes SEVENTEEN Different? 10 Years Of Loving The K-Pop Thirteen That Outsmarted The System

New Delhi: You don't often hear the word "anomaly" used as a compliment in the hyper-formatted, hyper-efficient machine that is the K-pop industry. But SEVENTEEN wears it like a crown. Ten years into their journey, the thirteen-member group has not only survived the churn-and-burn nature of idol stardom, but they've also reshaped what it means to thrive. Call it staying power. Call it self-definition. Call it the quiet revolution of a group that turned being "too big" into their biggest strength. In an industry built on glossy perfection and strict creative hierarchies, SEVENTEEN has always been a little too hands-on, a little too collaborative and a little too good at what they do. Now, as they celebrate a decade together in 2025, the question isn't whether they're successful; it's how they've managed to stay this original, this relevant, and this fan-connected for this long. And the answer? They never stopped being themselves, they just kept evolving. 13 + 3 + 1 = SEVENTEEN: A Name, A Philosophy When SEVENTEEN debuted in 2015 under PLEDIS Entertainment, their name confused more people than it clarified: why Seventeen when there are clearly 13 members? But the math was more poetic than literal - 13 members, divided into 3 specialised units (hip-hop, vocal, performance), coming together as 1 cohesive team. It was a statement of structure and synergy and also, quietly, a vision for longevity. Each unit brought something distinctive: the hip-hop team ( Wonwoo, Mingyu, Vernon) crafted sharp, introspective raps. The vocal team (Woozi, Jeonghan, Joshua, DK, Seungkwan) delivered emotional depth with soaring harmonies. The performance unit (Hoshi, Jun, The8, Dino) turned the stages into kinetic art. But the brilliance was in the balance - no member was left behind, no skill left undeveloped. It was democratised stardom from the start. Unlike many K-pop acts whose output is driven by behind-the-scenes producers, SEVENTEEN was branded as "self-producing idols." That wasn't just PR polish; main vocalist Woozi has long helmed the group's songwriting and production alongside in-house producer Bumzu, while Hoshi and the performance team are responsible for much of the group's dynamic choreography. They didn't just perform the art. They made it. And they've never stopped. Why SEVENTEEN Feels Brand-New Even Today Most K-pop groups spend their early years finding a sound, middle years perfecting it, and late years clinging to it. SEVENTEEN, somehow, has sidestepped that linearity. In 2024 alone, they performed on the main stage at Glastonbury Festival - the first K-pop act to do so and headlined Lollapalooza Berlin. Their RIGHT HERE World Tour drew 1.5 million fans across continents. At the Billboard Music Awards, they took home the Top K-pop Touring Artist award. But the numbers aren't the most interesting part. The art is. The group's recent mini-album SPILL THE FEELS landed on Billboard's "25 Best K-pop Albums of 2024." The standout track Spell from their best-of compilation 17 IS RIGHT HERE, was named one of the year's best K-pop tracks and music videos. And all of it, despite their decade-long tenure, feels fresh, not recycled. That's because SEVENTEEN hasn't stayed relevant by repeating past formulas. They've dismantled them. Their sound now shapeshifts between alternative R&B, synth-pop, orchestral ballads and hyperpop-adjacent experiments. There's a level of musical risk here that few idol groups, especially those this established, are allowed to take. And yet, SEVENTEEN is producing chart-friendly hits that aren't afraid to be complex, strange, or vulnerable. What Is SEVENTEEN's Real Superpower? SEVENTEEN has always understood the power of narrative. But instead of leaning on mystery or mythology like many idol groups, they leaned into transparency. Through YouTube reality series like GOING SEVENTEEN and Debut Big Plan, fans (affectionately known as CARATs) have watched the members grow up - bickering, failing, celebrating and changing. This access, paired with the group's input into everything from set design to vocal mixing, means their story feels authored by them. More impressively, SEVENTEEN has sidestepped the common K-pop trap of becoming a brand before becoming people. Their personalities, from Seungkwan's variety show genius to Jeonghan's gentle chaos to The8's philosophical art-boy aura, aren't scripted archetypes. They're human. And that realness is a form of reinvention in an industry that often insists on perfection. The Power Of 13 SEVENTEEN is one of the rare groups whose size never felt like a gimmick. If anything, it gave them the tools for something more cinematic. Their choreography is an exercise in precision and spectacle - think kaleidoscopic formations, visual metaphors and dance breaks that feel like short films. In Don't Wanna Cry, the members move like streetlights and shadows. In My My, their bodies become ocean waves. The choreography isn't just technically impressive. It's narrative. And that's because the performance unit, under Hoshi's lead, doesn't choreograph to fill time. They choreograph to say something. That's what makes SEVENTEEN performances feel less like concerts and more like art installations, designed to be watched and rewatched with new meaning each time. The Future Isn't A Rebrand, It's A Reinforcement At ten years, most idol groups either rebrand to stay afloat or settle into nostalgia. SEVENTEEN has done neither. Instead, they've reinforced who they've always been: hyper-collaborative, fiercely creative and impossible to copy. The industry has caught up to them in some ways, and self-producing idols are no longer anomalies. But none have done it quite like SEVENTEEN. And none have lasted this long while doing it their way. As they enter their second decade, SEVENTEEN isn't just rewriting K-pop's rules. They're rewriting its rhythm - one beat, one verse, one vision at a time. And if you're still wondering why they're called SEVENTEEN, here's your answer: because being more than the sum of your parts isn't a contradiction. It's the whole point.

Chinese Company Cons Parents Out Of Rs 44 Lakh By Staging Fake Kids' Fashion Shows
Chinese Company Cons Parents Out Of Rs 44 Lakh By Staging Fake Kids' Fashion Shows

NDTV

time24 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Chinese Company Cons Parents Out Of Rs 44 Lakh By Staging Fake Kids' Fashion Shows

A Chinese company has been fined 600,000 yuan (approximately Rs 72 lakh) by the government for running fake children's fashion shows and defrauding parents of 367,000 yuan (around Rs 44 lakh). According to the South China Morning Post, the Shanghai-based firm had been falsely promoting a series of fashion shows under the name "Paris Kids Fashion Week" since 2020. The company branded the events part of the globally recognised Paris Fashion Week, and used images of famous tourist spots in France, like The Louvre, on its website to lend credibility to the shows. The firm organised shows in major cities in China, as well as Paris and Toronto, SCMP reported. During one of its fashion weeks in Shanghai, it also promoted four events using the names of luxury brands like Dior, Gucci, Burberry and Fendi, and charged parents 6,000 yuan (approximately Rs 72,500) for a single appearance. It also set up a parent-child event for parents to appear together with their children. The elaborate scam came to light after Gucci's Shanghai office filed a complaint, prompting an investigation by the Shanghai Market Regulatory Bureau in 2023. During the investigation, officials found that the firm used Gucci's logos and knock-off emblems with the words Gucc101 and Gucc100. A member of the company's staff also admitted that the firm charged parents more than 10,000 yuan (around Rs 1.20 lakh) for each costume their children wore in the show. However, not all the clothes were authentic. The report stated that the company's owner, surnamed Huang, bought counterfeit clothes online. He argued that he only bought the fake clothes to take photos, and did not sell them. The authorities said the company's activities constituted trademark infringement. The firm made a total of 367,000 yuan from registration fees, which the investigation identified as improper gains. A procurator in Shanghai said the firm had been fined by market regulatory departments in other parts of China, but it did not correct its business. The bureau fined the company 600,000 yuan, which is approximately Rs 72 lakh.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store