Movie Review: ‘Eephus' is the best baseball movies since ‘Moneyball'
In Carson Lund's 'Eephus,' two teams – the Riverdogs and Adler's Paint – gather on a neighborhood field for a baseball game. The leaves are already starting to turn — 'It's getting late early,' as Yogi Berra said — and this is to be the final game for their adult rec league. The field is to be demolished.
No one would confuse them for all-stars. A suicide squeeze unfolds in creaky slow-motion. The rotund left fielder mutters 'Mother McCree' under his breath when the ball is hit in the gap. But, regardless of skill level, they all care sincerely about the game.
'Eephus,' as leisurely as a late-August double header, simply unfolds along with their game. Except to chase a foul ball or two, the movie stays within the lines of Soldier Field, the nondescript Massachusetts baseball field they're playing on sometime in the 1990s. It spans nine innings, with dugout chatter and fading light. In this slow-pitch gem of a baseball movie — a middle-aged 'Sandlot' — time is slipping away, but they're going down swinging.
Money, analytics and whatever's on ESPN can sometimes cloud what sports is to most people: A refuge. 'Eephus,' in that way, is a change-up of a baseball movie, an elegiac ode to the humbler weekend warriors who are driven by nothing but genuine affection for the game. Richly detailed and mordantly deadpan, 'Eephus' adopts their pace of play, soaking up all the sesame-seed flavor that goes along with it.
The title comes from an unnaturally slow pitch not slung but lobbed toward home. When I was a kid pitching, I liked to uncork one from time to time, much to my coach's dismay. The metaphor isn't hard to grasp. One player describes it as a pitch you can get bored watching, even making you lose track of time.
Much of the same applies to 'Eephus,' which drifts player to player, play to play, less as an ensemble piece than like a roving spectator. The guys, themselves, have no more than a handful of fans, including the diehard scorekeeper Fanny (Cliff Blake). Frederick Wiseman, the great documentarian whose films chronicle nothing so much as institutions kept alive over time, is the voice of the announcer.
I earlier called Lund's film an ode, but it's not a sentimental movie. Time's passage, which no ballgame or perfectly thrown eephus can halt, grows increasingly disquieting as the afternoon light gives way to nightfall. That, to finish the game, they play into near-total darkness, with only headlights to see the ball, is a sign of desperation as much as it is commitment. After all, one guy in the dugout is listening to a radio broadcast of a ballgame, from 1972.
What's being lost? It's not a strip mall the field is to be turned into but something harder to quibble with: a school. They could drive half an hour to another field, but that's said to be half Little League, half farmer's market. They aren't a collection of pals, either. They don't hang out away from the diamond. Things they don't talk about: work, families, politics. Things they do: eyecare for the ump.
In the annals of baseball movies, 'Eephus' doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame with 'Bull Durham' or 'A League of Their Own.' The closest it gets to the big leagues is an appearance by Bill 'Spaceman' Lee, the 1970s southpaw and eephus adherent.
But 'Eephus' is just as deserving of a place in that hardball pantheon, only in some minor ball realm, well below single A. Here, they don't throw 'high cheese' but such meatballs that, as one player riffs, you could call it pasta primavera. To call this a field of dreams would be pushing it. But it's a lovely way to pass some time.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'I always hated it': NHL expert blasts Edmonton Oilers for major tactical fail
This in from ESPN's Ray Ferraro, perhaps the sharpest commentator in hockey, his assessment of the failure of the Edmonton Oilers to cleanly move the puck out of their own end in Game 5 of the Stanley Cup playoffs. On The Ray & Dregs podcast, Ferraro noted the Oilers often attempted to lob the puck out, only to lose possession in the neutral zone and have the pounding Panthers come right back at them. 'That high flip has become a tactic around the league,' Ferraro said. 'And I always hated it because we finally get the puck, and now it's like we're on the punt coverage team. Right? They flip it up, we go down, they've got the puck again. Like, why can't we pass it out? And if Edmonton's D can get back to make a first clean touch, I think their first play has got to go up the middle of the ice. You rim it around the boards, and Florida just snuffs it out. Like, (Edmonton needs to) get back quick as you can. Maybe that open spot is the middle of the ice, and that backs off their D. And if it doesn't, then you can go to the high flip.' Ferraro added: 'But it's not easy, right? Like Florida is not going to give you any time to do it.' 1. To check the validity of Ferraro assessment I went over zone exist in the first period when the Oilers were most on their back heal against the Panthers. Florida built up a 2-0 lead in the first period on two even strength goals, the second one coming after the Oilers failed to advance the puck, Edmonton's Mattias Ekholm whiffing on a clearance and Florida charging right back into the Oilers zone to score. 2. I looked at every time the Panthers or the Oilers gained possession of the puck when they were in their own d-zone. If they made a clean break out play — which included any d-zone clearance that went deep into their opponent's end and gave the clearing team a chance to forecheck effectively — they got a passing grade. If the puck was picked off in the d-zone or neutral zone leading to a quick counterattack, they got a failing grade. 3. Florida made clean exits on 26 out of 40 attempts, a success rate of 65 per cent. 4. Edmonton made clean exits on 26 out of 53 attempts, a success rate of 49 per cent. 5. That's a significant difference between the two teams. That's a major advantage for the Panthers. In building their 2-0 lead, they relied heavily on effective counterattacks, while thwarting Edmonton's attempt at the same. This led to more offensive zone time for the Panthers and led directly to one goal. 6. So what to do? The Oilers have seven d-men who can move the puck. But Troy Stecher struggled most to move it against Florida in Game 5. John Klingberg is a sound passer of the puck and more creative than Stecher. The Oilers should likely go back to him. Ekholm also had his struggles, so maybe move him back to pair up with Evan Bouchard. Darnell Nurse and Klingberg would be one other pairing, with Brett Kulak and Jake Walman rounding things out. These d-men can all make a pass. They can all skate with the puck. They're full capable of beating the Florida forecheck, even as the checkers come in fast, hard and dirty. Lobbing the puck out or rimming the puck around the boards didn't work will in Game 5. Not one lob or rim worked to move the puck out under possession in that key period. The play can work as a last resort, but they also fly in the face of Edmonton's strength, quick advancement of the puck to fast forwards like Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl. It also strikes me that Edmonton's centres might provide a bit more support in the d-zone, working with the d-men to advance it, something Florida excels at, a three-man unit pushing the puck up ice, two d-men and usually the centre helping out. 7. The key to this series is whether Edmonton's d-man puck movement can get the best of that fierce Florida. forecheck. If Edmonton can, they will launch dangerous counterattacks and be more able to dump the puck in places where Oilers forecheckers can create havoc, either winning the puck or hammering on the Florida defenders. It's time for Edmonton to launch it's own blitz of passing, skating and hitting. Florida is at their worst in their own defensive half of the ice. They can be exploited with stretch passes for breakaways. Now is the time. Game 6 is the moment.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aaron Judge reacts to tying Lou Gehrig in franchise history
The post Aaron Judge reacts to tying Lou Gehrig in franchise history appeared first on ClutchPoints. The notion that 'records are meant to be broken' unquestionably applies to New York Yankees slugger Aaron Judge. Yesterday, Judge achieved history against the Red Sox by hitting the mark of 23 home runs and batting .396 through 64 games. Advertisement In addition, his two home runs equaled him to the 'iron horse' Lou Gehrig with his 43rd career multi-homer game, per Jorge Castillo of ESPN. This places him 3rd in Yankees franchise history, with Mickey Mantle (46) and Babe Ruth (68) at the top. Afterward, Judge spoke candidly about the significance of being placed among these Yankees greats. 'Any time you get mentioned with those legends, it's quite an honor,' he said. 'But it would've been sweeter to talk about it after a win.' Along with his batting average, Judge has 95 hits, 23 home runs, and 55 RBIs. Even though the Yankees lost 11-7, they are still first in the American League East at 39-25. Meanwhile, Judge continues his pursuit of history. In late April, Judge was in the quest of Ruth by batting .343 with 63 home runs and 137 runs over 162 games. In truth, Judge has already solidified his place in Yankees history. Advertisement The question begs, what is there left to do? Aaron Judge can make more Yankee history. In addition to surpassing Gehrig, Judge can certainly add more to his pantheon of greatness. He's on pace to bat .400 this year, the first time for a Yankee. Judge is leading in the AL in the categories of batting average, home runs, and runs batted in. If he keeps it up, he could very well win the Triple Crown. Also, Judge could finish with another 60+ home run season at the pace he is at. In 2022, Judge hit 62 home runs, surpassing Ruth, who hit 60 in 1927, and Roger Maris, who hit 61 in 1961. Whatever happens, there is virtually no stopping Judge's continuous journey through history. Related: Red Sox pitcher Hunter Dobbins backs controversial Yankees quip with 'fun' admission Related: Yankees' Jazz Chisholm Jr. calls out 'crazy' Red Sox rookie
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man United retain faith in Rasmus Højlund despite striker links
Manchester United remain committed to Rasmus Højlund's development, despite widespread expectation that the club will sign a new centre-forward this summer. The Danish striker has been the subject of scrutiny following his £72 million move from Atalanta in 2023. Advertisement In two Premier League seasons, he has scored 14 goals—a modest return given the club's long-standing search for a consistent number nine. According to ESPN, the 22 year old still retains the belief of those within Old Trafford. While his output has not yet met expectations, there is hope he can evolve into the elite front-line striker United envisioned when signing him. United's interest in experienced forwards remains. Viktor Gyökeres of Sporting and Napoli's Victor Osimhen are both being considered. Gyökeres, who excelled in Portugal last term, has been heavily linked, while Osimhen, who spent last season on loan at Galatasaray is another marquee option admired by the club. Advertisement The dual-track approach suggests United are open to strengthening their attack without necessarily sidelining Højlund. ESPN's assertion that there is still 'some faith' in the former Atalanta man hints at a longer-term plan rather than an immediate replacement. There had been speculation that Højlund could be moved on or at least phased out as part of a tactical overhaul under INEOS. But this latest report indicates a desire to nurture his potential rather than discard it prematurely. Such a stance could influence the club's transfer priorities. Rather than pursuing a marquee signing to lead the line, United may instead look for a player who can complement Højlund or offer experienced depth in the role. This recalibration might allow investment in other areas of the squad—centre-back, midfield or right wing, where gaps remain and first-team improvements are also needed. Advertisement Gyökeres and Osimhen both profile as high-cost acquisitions. If Højlund remains central to the long-term vision, United may be more cautious about breaking the bank in attack this summer. Featured image: Carl Recine via Getty Images Follow us on Bluesky: @