'Orwellian': Louisiana redefines natural gas — a planet-warming fossil fuel — as green energy
Louisiana is the latest state to redefine natural gas as green energy under a new law the Republican governor signed this week, even though it's a fossil fuel that emits planet-warming greenhouse gases.
Three other states led by Republicans— Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee— have passed similar legislation. In some Democratic-led states, there have been efforts to phase out natural gas. New York and California cities like San Francisco and Berkeley have moved to ban natural gas hookups in new buildings, though some of these policies have been successfully challenged in court.
President Donald Trump has signed a spate of executive orders promoting oil, gas and coal, which all warm the planet when burned to produce electricity. The European Union previously designated natural gas and nuclear as sustainable, a move that Greenpeace and the Austrian government are suing over.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, a major booster of the state's petrochemical industry, says the new law 'sets the tone for the future' and will help the state 'pursue energy independence and dominance.'
Environmental groups say these new laws are part of a broader push by petrochemical industry-backed groups to rebrand fossil fuel as climate friendly and head off efforts to shift electric grids to renewables, such as solar and wind. It's "pure Orwellian greenwashing,' said Tim Donaghy, research director of Greenpeace USA.
Globally, the term green energy is used to refer to energy derived from natural sources that do not pollute — solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal energy. Louisiana's law could enable funds slated for state clean energy initiatives to be used to support natural gas.
Natural gas has been the top source of electricity generation in the United States for about a decade, since surpassing coal. Coal and natural gas both produce carbon dioxide that warms the planet when burned, but coal produces over twice as much.
Switching from coal to natural gas lowers carbon dioxide emissions, but it can increase emissions of methane. The primary component of natural gas, methane is an extraordinarily powerful greenhouse gas, more potent at trapping heat than carbon dioxide and responsible for about 30% of today's global warming.
Besides coal, everything else is better than gas for the planet, said Rob Jackson, a Stanford University climate scientist. Building new gas plants locks in fossil fuel emissions for decades, he added.
Redefining natural gas
Louisiana's law orders state agencies and utilities regulators to 'prioritize' natural gas, along with nuclear power, on the grounds that it will improve the affordability and reliability of the state's electricity.
The law's author, Republican Rep. Jacob Landry, runs an oil and gas industry consulting firm.
'I don't think it's anything crippling to wind or solar, but you got to realize the wind don't blow all the time and the sun don't shine every day,' Landry said. The legislation 'is saying we need to prioritize what keeps the grid energized,' he added.
Landry told The Associated Press that he used a model bill by the American Legislative Exchange Council as a template. ALEC is a conservative think tank with ties to the oil and gas industry's billionaire Koch family.
ALEC helped shape Ohio's 2023 law to legally redefine natural gas as a source of green energy, according to documents obtained by the watchdog group Energy and Policy Institute and first reported by the Washington Post.
ALEC spokesperson Lars Dalseide said that just because an Ohio lawmaker left the 2022 ALEC convention with what he described as a model for legislation to define natural gas as clean energy does not mean the group shaped Ohio law. Dalseide said the convention is 'a place where legislators from across the country gather to exchange ideas.'
Ohio's legislation was also heavily influenced by an advocacy group led by Republican megadonor Tom Rastin, a now retired gas industry executive.
According to Dave Anderson, policy and communications manager for the Energy and Policy Institute, these laws are part of a long-running disinformation campaign by the gas industry to cast their product as clean to protect their businesses and prevent a shift to renewable energy sources that will address the climate crisis.
'The goal is to elbow out competition from renewables from wind and solar, and in some cases preempt localities' ability to choose to pursue 100% truly clean energy,' Anderson said, adding that ALEC's legislation makes natural gas 'eligible for state and local clean energy standards and funding.'
Questions over grid reliability
Gov. Landry and other proponents of the new law said they want to make sure that residents and businesses have a reliable electric grid. Nearly 80% of Louisiana's grid is already powered by natural gas.
Landry said that businesses will come to Louisiana if they know they can count on the state's electric grid. He highlighted Meta's plan to build a massive AI data center powered by three natural gas plants.
Louisiana's law orders utilities providers to prioritize nuclear energy as well. Nuclear power does not emit greenhouse gases while producing electricity. However, critics say it is more expensive than solar and wind and the U.S. does not have a sufficient long-term solution for storing the waste.
Consumer advocates say states do not need to embrace natural gas at the expense of wind, solar and other technologies to have a reliable grid.
Legally mandating that utilities prioritize natural gas is 'blind to innovation, market evolution, and the practical demands of modern electric systems,' Jeffrey Clark, president of the Advanced Power Alliance, a renewable energy advocacy group, wrote in a statement opposing Louisiana's law.
It's unclear to what extent Louisiana's utilities regulators will act on the order to prioritize natural gas over renewable energy. While Public Service Commissioner Davante Lewis, a Democrat, called the law 'unenforceable' and pledged to ignore it, his Republican counterpart Jean-Paul Coussan said promoting natural gas 'aligns well' with the state's economic growth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Forward
2 hours ago
- Japan Forward
Make Ceasefire Permanent, Ask Iran to End Nuclear Program
このページを 日本語 で読む United States President Donald Trump announced that the warring nations of Israel and Iran have agreed to a "complete and total ceasefire." According to US media reports, Qatar had mediated the ceasefire plan. It officially took effect at 7:00 AM local time on Tuesday, June 24. Trump said he thought the ceasefire would "last permanently," although uncertainty remains. We urge both Israel and Iran to exercise maximum restraint, adhere to the ceasefire, and bring the war to an end. Black smoke rises from the Iranian state broadcasting headquarters following an attack by Israeli forces in Tehran on the 16th (©Kyodo) Israeli aircraft began attacking Iranian nuclear facilities and other military targets on June 13. Their stated intention was to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iran retaliated with ballistic missiles fired at Israel. Although Israel maintained the upper hand, it could not seriously damage Iran's nuclear facilities. Then, on June 21, the US dropped bunker buster bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities. In the background, Iran had quickly and significantly increased its store of uranium fuel enriched to 60%, "a short technical step away" from weapons-grade levels, reported the Associated Press, quoting from a May 31 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report. There was concern that Tehran would be able to enrich this stock of uranium to 90% quickly to produce nuclear weapons. Moreover, Iran has explicitly stated it does not recognize Israel's right to exist as a state. There were fears that if Iran acquired nuclear weapons, it could use them to attack Israel, either directly or by using pro-Iranian militant proxies. That in turn could set off a nuclear war. Trump delivered a short speech immediately after the B-2 bombers dropped the bunker busters. In it, he urged Iran to make peace quickly, framing it as a choice between "peace or tragedy." The Trump administration has not hesitated to use force. Fairly speaking, it has pushed the Iranian leadership into a corner ー if the ceasefire holds. People gather near a damaged site, hauling a destroyed vehicle away, after what Syrian and Iranian media described as an Israeli air strike on Iran's consulate in the Syrian capital Damascus April 1, 2024. (©REUTERS/Firas Makdesi However, we must be cautious about Iran's actions going forward. There are likely forces within the Iranian military and the Revolutionary Guard who undoubtedly harbor a desire for retaliation. They would not likely take kindly to such a one-sided thrashing. The same holds true for pro-Iranian militant groups. Military and terrorist attacks would not be surprising. Concerns also remain that Iranian hardliners could block the Strait of Hormuz. That narrow neck of water is a major artery for global shipments of crude oil, including those bound for Japan. Alternatively, they could attack US naval vessels or tankers belonging to Western nations. Japan and Europe must urge Iran to exercise restraint. The most important thing is to eliminate the root cause of the war. We would like to see Iran declare that it will not become a nuclear weapons power. It must cooperate with IAEA inspections and agree to the destruction of its uranium-enrichment facilities. The Iranians must also turn over to the IAEA any highly enriched uranium they might be concealing. Withdrawing from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, as some in the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Iranian Parliament) are calling for, or other such actions, must not happen. Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun このページを 日本語 で読む
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Medicaid changes in Trump's budget bill found to violate Senate rules, sending the GOP scrambling
The Senate parliamentarian has advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to U.S. President Donald Trump's tax cut and spending bill does not adhere to the chamber's procedural rules, delivering a crucial blow as Republicans rush to finish the package this week. Guidance from the parliamentarian is rarely ignored and Republican leaders are now forced to consider difficult options. Republicans were counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks, their top priority. Additionally, the parliamentarian, who is the Senate's chief arbiter of its often complicated rules, advised against various GOP provisions barring certain immigrants from health care programs. Republicans scrambled Thursday to respond, with some calling for challenging, or even firing, the non-partisan parliamentarian, who has been on the job since 2012. GOP leaders dismissed those views and instead worked to revise the various proposals. Republicans in Congress agree to drop retaliatory proposal to raise taxes for Canadian companies 'We have contingency plans,' said Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota. Friday's expected votes appeared to be slipping, but Thune insisted that 'we're plowing forward.' But Democrats, who are unified against the package as a tax giveaway for the wealthy at the expense of American safety net programs, said the procedural decisions would devastate the GOP package. Senator Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said the Republican proposals would have meant US$250-billion less for the health care program, 'massive Medicaid cuts that hurt kids, seniors, Americans with disabilities and working families.' The outcome is a setback as Senate Republicans race toward a weekend session to pass the bill and send it back to the House for another vote before Trump's Fourth of July deadline. Trump hosted House Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP lawmakers in the East Room at the White House, joined by truck drivers, firefighters, tipped workers, ranchers and others that the administration says will benefit from the bill. 'We don't want to have grandstanders,' Trump said of the GOP holdouts. Trump said there are 'hundreds of things' in the emerging package of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered money to carry out his mass deportation plans. 'It's so good.' At its core, the big bill, which has passed the House and is now being revised in the Senate, includes US$3.8-trillion in tax breaks that had been approved during Trump's first term but will expire in December, imposing a tax hike if Congress fails to act. To help offset lost revenues, Republicans are relying on steep cuts to health care and food stamps, and imposing new fees on immigrants. GOP leaders were already struggling to rally support for Medicaid changes that some senators said went too far and would have left millions without coverage. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office has said more than 10.9 million more people would not have health care under the House-passed bill; Senate Republicans were proposing deeper cuts. After the parliamentarian advised against the Medicaid provider tax change, Republicans said they would try to revise the provision to make it acceptable, perhaps by extending the start date of any changes. They are rushing to come up with similar adjustments to other proposals that have run into violations, including one to change the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps. It's all delaying action on the bill, but Republican leaders have little choice. They are counting on the health care restrictions to save billions of dollars and offset the cost of trillions of dollars in tax cuts. Senator Lindsey Graham, the Budget Committee chairman, rejected calls to fire the parliamentarian, and said in a statement he was working with the office to 'find a pathway forward.' States impose the so-called provider tax on hospitals and other entities as a way to help fund Medicaid, largely by boosting the reimbursements they receive from the federal government. Critics say the system is a type of 'laundering,' but almost every state except Alaska uses it to help provide health care coverage. The House-passed bill would freeze the tax, while the Senate would cut the tax that some states are allowed to impose. Several GOP senators have opposed cutting the Medicaid provider tax, saying it would hurt rural hospitals that depend on the money. Hospital organizations have warned that it could lead to hospital closures. Senator Josh Hawley, among those fighting the change, said he had spoken to Trump late Wednesday and the President told him to revert to the earlier proposal from the House. 'I think it just confirms that we weren't ready for a vote yet,' said Senator Thom Tillis, who also had raised concerns about the provider tax cuts. More than 80 million people in the United States use the Medicaid program, alongside the Obama-era Affordable Care Act. Republicans want to scale Medicaid back to what they say is its original mission, providing care mainly to women and children, rather than a much larger group of people. To help defray lost revenues to the hospitals, one plan Republicans had been considering would have created a rural hospital fund with US$15-billion as backup. Some GOP senators said that was too much; others, including Senator Susan Collins of Maine, wanted at least US$100-billion. The parliamentarian has worked around the clock to assess the legislation and ensure it complies with the so-called Byrd Rule, named for the late Senator Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia. It essentially bars policy matters in budget reconciliation bills. If leaders moved ahead without altering the provisions, the measures could be challenged, requiring a 60-vote threshold to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate divided 53-47 and with Democrats unified against Trump's bill. 'It's pretty frustrating,' said Senator Rick Scott, who wants even steeper reductions. Overnight Wednesday the parliamentarian advised against GOP student loan repayment plans, and Thursday the parliamentarian cited those that would have blocked access to Medicaid and other health care programs from immigrants who are not citizens. Earlier, plans to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were also found to violate the rules. But Senator Kevin Cramer said there's no desire to challenge the parliamentarian's advice. 'It's the institutional integrity,' he said. 'Even if I'm convinced 100 per cent she's wrong.' At the same time, Republicans lost another potential revenue source Thursday after agreeing to a request from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to remove the so-called revenge tax provision, Section 899, that would have allowed the government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners and investors from certain countries. Bessent said he has reached a separate agreement with such countries.
Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
How Donald Trump finally learned to love NATO — for now
WASHINGTON — It will go down as the summit where U.S. President Donald Trump learned to stop worrying and love NATO. Trump revelled in gushing praise from leaders in The Hague — including being called 'daddy' by alliance chief Mark Rutte — and a pledge to boost defense spending as he had demanded. But it went further than just lapping up flattery. Trump also spoke of what sounded like an almost religious conversion to NATO, after years of bashing other members as freeloaders and threatening to leave. 'I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing, but I left here a little bit differently,' Trump said at his closing press conference on Wednesday. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'I watched the heads of these countries get up, and the love and the passion that they showed for their country was unbelievable. I've never seen quite anything like it. 'It was really moving to see it.' A day after returning to the White House, Trump still sounded uncharacteristically touchy-feely about his time with his 31 NATO counterparts. 'A wonderful day with incredible and caring Leaders,' he posted on his Truth Social platform on Thursday. Turnaround It was a remarkable turnaround from the US president's first term. Trump repeatedly berated allies as not paying up and threatened to pull the United States out of NATO as part of his wider disdain for international institutions and alliances. At his first summit in 2017 in Brussels, Trump memorably shoved aside Montenegro's prime minister Dusko Markovic as he made his way to the front of the stage. A year later Trump publicly lambasted Germany and privately talked about wanting to quit. But this time NATO leaders had carefully choreographed the trip. They massaged the numbers to give Trump the defense spending deal he craved. And while Trump headed to the summit dropping F-bombs in frustration at a shaky Iran-Israel ceasefire, NATO leaders love-bombed him from the moment he arrived. The Netherlands put him up overnight in the Dutch king's royal palace and gave him a royal dinner and breakfast — 'beautiful,' according to Trump — while NATO organizers kept the summit deliberately short. Frederick Kempe, the chief executive officer of the Atlantic Council, said Trump had 'waxed poetic' about NATO in a way he had never done before. 'Trump — the vilifier of European deadbeats on defense and crusader against allies for what he sees as unfair trade practices — sounded like an altered man,' he said in a commentary. 'Daddy's Home' The question now is what it means for NATO when the alliance's priorities end up guided by one man. The final summit statement's language on Russia's invasion of Ukraine was watered down from previous years. It also made no mention of Ukraine's push to join NATO. Reporters were not allowed into Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The move was partly because of their Oval Office bust-up in February, but it also deprived Zelensky of the set-piece he had craved. 'The biggest loser was Ukraine,' said Ed Arnold of the Royal United Services Institute in London. Trump also hinted at what lies in store for any backsliders on the defense spending pledge, threatening to make Spain 'pay' on trade over its resistance to commit to the new target. As with any relationship, the pressure will now be on NATO to keep up the first flush of love over the three summits that are due to take place over the rest of Trump's second term. 'The real worry is that NATO will be unable to keep up the hype,' said Arnold. For now, though, Trump and his administration seem to be content. As he arrived back in Washington, the White House posted a video of summit highlights, with the caption: 'Daddy's Home.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
