Starmer defends Palestine recognition plan but hits out at Hamas
But he insisted the move was not a propaganda boost to Hamas, saying the 'terrorist organisation' could play 'no part in any future government'.
The Prime Minister's approach has been criticised by the Israeli government and a protest over his stance is due to take place in London at the weekend.
Demonstrators, including some British family members of hostages still held by Hamas, will march on Downing Street calling for the release of the remaining hostages before any talk about the recognition of Palestine.
Asked if he had given Hamas a public relations boost by talking about recognition, Sir Keir told Channel 5: 'They should release the hostages straight away and they should play absolutely no part in the governance of Palestine at any point.'
He said the hostages taken during the October 7 2023 attacks had been held for a 'very, very long time in awful circumstances, unimaginable circumstances, and Hamas is a terrorist organisation, and that's why I'm really clear about Hamas'.
Sir Keir added: 'We do, alongside that, have to do all that we can to alleviate the awful situation on the ground in Gaza. We need aid in volume and at scale.'
People have seen the 'images of starvation' in Gaza, he said, adding that 'the British public can see it and there's a sense of revulsion of what they're seeing'.
The Government had to do 'everything we can' to get aid in, working with other countries 'and it's in that context that I set out our position on recognition'.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said on Tuesday that 'Keir Starmer has made a mistake' and 'what we need to focus on now is a ceasefire and getting the hostages home'.
Tzipi Hotovely, Israeli ambassador to the UK, said the actions of Hamas 'must never be rewarded'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
4 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Salmond may have leaked sexual misconduct inquiry details, claims Sturgeon
In an excerpt of her new memoir, Frankly, published by The Times, Ms Sturgeon insisted she was not the one who had leaked the outcome of the Scottish government investigation into her predecessor as first minister to the press. She said: 'It crossed my mind many times that it might have been Alex himself or someone acting on his behalf. 'To those with no experience of the dark arts of media manipulation, I know this will sound preposterous. However, in many ways it would have been classic Alex. 'I had known him to make these kinds of calculations in the past. If there is damaging information certain to emerge about you and there is nothing you can do to stop it, get it out in a way that gives you the best chance of controlling the narrative.' Mr Salmond, who died last year, was investigated by the Scottish government in 2018 after two women made allegations of sexual misconduct against him. The findings of that investigation were leaked to The Daily Record on the day before they were due to be published, prompting Mr Salmond to launch a judicial review of the handling of the inquiry. The Scottish government initially defended the judicial review, before dropping its defence. But a separate police investigation resulted in a criminal trial in 2020 in which Mr Salmond was cleared of all 14 charges, being found not guilty on 12 counts while prosecutors withdrew another charge and one was found not proven. The next year Mr Salmond, who had been Scottish first minister between 2007 and 2014 as leader of the SNP, founded the pro-independence Alba Party. In her memoir, Ms Sturgeon said Mr Salmond had informed her that he was being investigated in April 2018 and initially appeared to be 'upset and mortified' before he 'became cold'. Claiming he 'effectively admitted the substance of one of the complaints, but claimed that it had been a 'misunderstanding'', Ms Sturgeon said it had been 'evident' that Mr Salmond 'wanted me to intervene' to stop or divert the investigation. She added that her refusal to do so turned him against her and 'made the break-up of one of the most successful partnerships in modern British politics all but inevitable'. Ms Sturgeon also accused Mr Salmond of attempting to 'cast himself as the victim' and being 'prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all'. She said: 'A conspiracy against Alex would have needed a number of women deciding to concoct false allegations, without any obvious motive for doing so. 'It would then have required criminal collusion between them, senior ministers and civil servants, the police and the Crown. 'That is what he was alleging. The 'conspiracy' was a fabrication, the invention of a man who wasn't prepared to reflect honestly on his own conduct.' In other extracts, published on Friday, Ms Sturgeon discussed her arrest in 2023, describing it as 'mental torture', her miscarriage in 2010 and her sexuality. Nicola Sturgeon served as Scottish first minister between 2014 and 2023. Her memoir, Frankly, will be published on Thursday.
Rhyl Journal
4 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Salmond may have leaked sexual misconduct inquiry details, claims Sturgeon
In an excerpt of her new memoir, Frankly, published by The Times, Ms Sturgeon insisted she was not the one who had leaked the outcome of the Scottish government investigation into her predecessor as first minister to the press. She said: 'It crossed my mind many times that it might have been Alex himself or someone acting on his behalf. 'To those with no experience of the dark arts of media manipulation, I know this will sound preposterous. However, in many ways it would have been classic Alex. 'I had known him to make these kinds of calculations in the past. If there is damaging information certain to emerge about you and there is nothing you can do to stop it, get it out in a way that gives you the best chance of controlling the narrative.' Mr Salmond, who died last year, was investigated by the Scottish government in 2018 after two women made allegations of sexual misconduct against him. The findings of that investigation were leaked to The Daily Record on the day before they were due to be published, prompting Mr Salmond to launch a judicial review of the handling of the inquiry. The Scottish government initially defended the judicial review, before dropping its defence. But a separate police investigation resulted in a criminal trial in 2020 in which Mr Salmond was cleared of all 14 charges, being found not guilty on 12 counts while prosecutors withdrew another charge and one was found not proven. The next year Mr Salmond, who had been Scottish first minister between 2007 and 2014 as leader of the SNP, founded the pro-independence Alba Party. In her memoir, Ms Sturgeon said Mr Salmond had informed her that he was being investigated in April 2018 and initially appeared to be 'upset and mortified' before he 'became cold'. Claiming he 'effectively admitted the substance of one of the complaints, but claimed that it had been a 'misunderstanding'', Ms Sturgeon said it had been 'evident' that Mr Salmond 'wanted me to intervene' to stop or divert the investigation. She added that her refusal to do so turned him against her and 'made the break-up of one of the most successful partnerships in modern British politics all but inevitable'. Ms Sturgeon also accused Mr Salmond of attempting to 'cast himself as the victim' and being 'prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all'. She said: 'A conspiracy against Alex would have needed a number of women deciding to concoct false allegations, without any obvious motive for doing so. 'It would then have required criminal collusion between them, senior ministers and civil servants, the police and the Crown. 'That is what he was alleging. The 'conspiracy' was a fabrication, the invention of a man who wasn't prepared to reflect honestly on his own conduct.' In other extracts, published on Friday, Ms Sturgeon discussed her arrest in 2023, describing it as 'mental torture', her miscarriage in 2010 and her sexuality. Nicola Sturgeon served as Scottish first minister between 2014 and 2023. Her memoir, Frankly, will be published on Thursday.
Wales Online
4 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Keir Starmer's latest approval rating is out and it's not good news
Keir Starmer's latest approval rating is out and it's not good news Two key issues, Israel and the Online Safety Act, were looked at in this latest polling Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a summer visit to a library (Image: PA) Keir Starmer's approval rating has shown no sign of improvement, latest polling has shown. His net score, on all leadership attributes, has fallen and he remains on a low rating of -41%. Polling by Opinium Research of 2,050 UK adults aged 18+ from August 6 to August 8 has been weighted to be politically and nationally representative. Politicians are currently not sitting in Parliament as it is the summer recess, but even that break has not given the Prime Minister any boost as he takes a political gamble. Two key issues, Israel and the Online Safety Act, were looked at in this latest polling. The pollsters say that in terms of the Israel/Palestine conflict, two in five (42%) now see Israel as a threat to the UK, while only 18% still see it as an ally. This is slightly more than view Palestine as a threat (36%). Public disapproval of Starmer's handling of the conflict has increased by 14 points since October 2024, with 45% disapproving (+12 points on October 2024), compared to 17% who approve (-2 on October 2024). While 33% think he has provided sufficient support to Israel and Israeli citizens, two in five (40%) think he has not provided sufficient support for citizens in Gaza and could show more. Meanwhile 44% think the UK should recognise Palestine as an independent state – almost double the amount who think it should not (23%). For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . The Online Safety Act, which has recently been implemented, has more than half of people's approval, with 54% supporting its aims. Just 17% oppose it. The pollsters also asked about social media and schools finding 83% of people think social media should be banned for children under 13, with three in five (58%) thinking it should be banned for under 16s. Seven in ten (70%) think mobile phone use should be banned during the school day for under-16s, with a further 36% thinking it should be banned for all pupils in school or college, even if they're up to 18 years old. Two thirds (66%) think schools should teach pupils how to use emerging technologies such as AI, whereas 20% do not. Additionally, while half (50%) think pupils should be allowed to use AI to do research, most people (73%) think schoolchildren should not be allowed to use it to write their homework or essays. James Crouch, head of policy and public affairs at Opinium, said: "There is growing disapproval of Israel, with more than twice as many Britons viewing it as a threat to the UK than as an ally. Public dissatisfaction is mounting over Keir Starmer's handling of the Israel–Gaza conflict, particularly regarding the support offered to Gazan citizens. Article continues below "With state recognition on the agenda, the British public believes Palestine has as much right to exist as Israel. "As Israel's actions drift further from British public opinion, its latest plan to move Gaza City's population south presents Starmer with a difficult challenge: navigating the conflict in a way that shows meaningful support without alienating his own voters."
