logo
Russia watches Israel-Iran crisis with few tools to intervene

Russia watches Israel-Iran crisis with few tools to intervene

Miami Herald7 hours ago

Russia is watching Israel's bombardment of Iran with mounting concern for the survival of a key ally, though the Kremlin recognizes it has few levers to influence the escalating conflict in the Middle East.
Iran hasn't asked for Russian help and Moscow doesn't plan to offer any defense assistance, according to a person close to the Kremlin. No one can stop Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from pursuing the bombing, and Russia won't be able to act as a mediator to stop the conflict if the goal is regime change, the person said, asking not to be identified discussing sensitive issues.
"At the moment, mediation does not seem likely," said Fyodor Lukyanov, head of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, a think tank that advises the Kremlin. "If it comes to some form of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, Russia is more likely to play a role between Iran and the United States - Israel's interest in negotiations is not apparent."
Russia has deepened its ties with Iran since President Vladimir Putin ordered the 2022 invasion of Ukraine and triggered Europe's biggest conflict since World War II. Iran has provided Russia with hundreds of combat drones used to attack targets in Ukraine, and the U.S. and Europe last year accused it of supplying ballistic missiles to Moscow, though Tehran denied the allegation.
Russia, which built Iran's atomic power plant at Bushehr, took part in international negotiations that led to a landmark 2015 accord restricting the Islamic Republic's nuclear program in return for an easing of sanctions. U.S. President Donald Trump pulled out of the deal in his first term.
Putin offered to help mediate a resolution to the Israel-Iran conflict during a nearly hour-long phone call with Trump on Saturday in which he warned of "unpredictable consequences" for the entire Middle East from the crisis.
"The situation is currently on a path of further galloping escalation," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters Tuesday.
The Russian leader, who also spoke to Netanyahu and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Friday, had proposed taking Tehran's enriched uranium stockpile before Israel's attack halted U.S.-Iran negotiations aimed at reaching a nuclear deal.
"A joint peace plan between Russia and the U.S. is possible, which would strengthen Russia's global standing and create a foundation for the U.S. to consider lifting anti-Russian sanctions," said Sergei Markov, a political consultant close to the Kremlin.
Any such deal would bolster Putin's relationship with Trump just as the U.S. is increasingly distancing itself from efforts to end Russia's war in Ukraine. Even short term, though, Moscow's war machine may benefit.
"For Russia, Israel's attack on Iran could be as much of a geopolitical jackpot as the election of Donald Trump," said Ruslan Pukhov, a Moscow-based defense expert. "The sheer aggressiveness of Israel's strikes will weaken the West's moral case against Russia, while a war with Iran will likely raise oil prices - dashing hopes of cutting Moscow's vital war revenues."
A new Middle East war would divert global attention from Russia's actions in Ukraine and likely trigger a shift in U.S. military support from Kyiv to aiding Israel, according to Pukhov.
Still, after the sudden overthrow of Russia's Syrian ally President Bashar Al-Assad by rebels in December, the Kremlin has a lot to lose from an extended U.S.-backed Israeli military campaign that wrecks Iran's infrastructure and may lead to the demise of the regime in Tehran.
Joint projects including a North-South transportation corridor that would help ease sanctions pressure on both countries would potentially be at risk from a prolonged conflict and political instability in Tehran, according to Nikita Smagin, an expert on Russia-Iran ties.
"Russia sees the situation as potentially mirroring its experience with Assad in Syria," he said. "Suddenly finding itself dealing with a new and uncertain leadership, pushing out a partner it had relied on."
-----------
-With assistance from Thomas Hall.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate passes landmark GENIUS stablecoin bill, giving crypto industry its first major win
Senate passes landmark GENIUS stablecoin bill, giving crypto industry its first major win

CNBC

time12 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Senate passes landmark GENIUS stablecoin bill, giving crypto industry its first major win

The Senate on Tuesday passed the GENIUS Act, a landmark bill that for the first time establishes federal guardrails for U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins and creates a regulated pathway for private companies to issue digital dollars with the blessing of the federal government. The bill passed with a 68-30 vote. It's a milestone day for the crypto industry and for President Donald Trump's sprawling digital asset empire. This is the first legislative victory for the digital asset industry, which put around $250 million in the 2024 cycle to elect what's now considered to be the most pro-crypto Congress in U.S. history. The bill still faces hurdles in the Republican-held House, but passage in the Senate signals a turning point — not just for the technology, but for the political clout behind it. The GENIUS Act, short for the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, sets guardrails for the industry, including full reserve backing, monthly audits, and anti-money laundering compliance. It also opens the door to a broader range of issuers, including banks, fintechs, and major retailers looking to launch their own stablecoins or integrate them into existing payment systems. The bill grants sweeping authority to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who last week told a Senate appropriations subcommittee in a hearing that the U.S. stablecoin market could grow nearly eightfold to over $2 trillion in the next few years. "Stablecoin legislation backed by U.S. Treasuries or T-bills will create a market that will expand U.S. dollar usage via these stablecoins all around the world," Bessent said. GENIUS now heads to the House, which has its own version of a stablecoin bill dubbed STABLE. Both prohibit yield-bearing consumer stablecoins — but diverge on who regulates what. The Senate's version centralizes oversight with Treasury, while the House splits authority between the Federal Reserve, the Comptroller of the Currency, and others. Reconciling the two could take a while, according to Congressional aides. The GENIUS Act was supposed to be the easiest crypto bill to pass, but took months to reach the Senate floor, failed once, and passed only after fierce negotiations. "We thought it would be easiest to start with stablecoins," Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said on stage in Las Vegas at this year's Bitcoin 2025 conference, which focused heavily on stablecoins. "It has been extremely difficult. I had no idea how hard this was going to be," she said. At the same event, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., echoed the frustration: "It has been murder to get them there," he said of the 18 Senate Democrats who ultimately crossed the aisle. Stablecoins are a subset of cryptocurrencies pegged to the value of real-world assets. About 99% of all stablecoins are tethered to the price of the U.S. dollar. The appeal is simple: Stablecoins offer instant settlement and lower transaction fees, cutting out the middlemen and directly threatening legacy payment rails. Shopify has already rolled out USDC-powered payments through Coinbase and Stripe. Bank of America's CEO said last week at a Morgan Stanley conference that they're having conversations with the industry and individually exploring stablecoin issuance. Payment stocks like Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Block slid after The Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon and Walmart are exploring their own stablecoins. That action has helped drive Circle's blockbuster stock surge, with shares up 400% since its public debut on June 5. Deutsche Bank found that stablecoin transactions hit $28 trillion last year, surpassing that of Mastercard and Visa, combined. Still, there are limits. The GENIUS Act limits non-financial Big Tech companies from directly issuing stablecoins unless they establish or partner with regulated financial entities — a provision meant to blunt monopoly concerns. JPMorgan, meanwhile, is taking a different route, launching JPMD, a deposit token designed to function like a stablecoin but tightly integrated with the traditional banking system. Issued on Coinbase's Base blockchain, JPMD is only available to institutional clients and offers features like 24/7 settlement and interest payments — part of the broader push by legacy finance to adapt to the stablecoin era without ceding ground to crypto-native firms. While Democrats tried to amend the bill to prevent the president from profiting off crypto ventures, the final legislation only bars members of Congress and their families from doing so. Trump's first financial disclosure as president, released Friday, revealed he earned at least $57 million in 2024 alone from token sales tied to World Liberty Financial, a crypto platform closely aligned with his political brand. He holds nearly 16 billion WLFI governance tokens — the crypto equivalent of voting shares — which could be worth close to $1 billion on paper, based on prior private sales. That's just one slice of the Trump crypto pie. The family's ventures, which include the controversial $TRUMP meme coin, a $2.5 billion bitcoin Treasury and proposed bitcoin and ether ETFs via and a newly launched mining firm called American Bitcoin, reflect a full-throttle push into digital finance. Forbes recently estimated Trump's crypto holdings at nearly $1 billion, lifting his total net worth to $5.6 billion.

Democratic Support for Expanding Border Wall Surges by Double Digits: Poll
Democratic Support for Expanding Border Wall Surges by Double Digits: Poll

Newsweek

time16 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Democratic Support for Expanding Border Wall Surges by Double Digits: Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democrats' support for a southern border remains minimal compared to Republicans, though the percentage of left-leaning Americans who support expansion of a wall between the United States and Mexico has increased double digits in the past six years, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. Why It Matters Border crossings have drastically decreased under the current administration of President Donald Trump, fulfilling one of his major campaign promises to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country. Trump's mass deportation efforts, which have included immigrant raids criticized by portions of the American public, have extended into other federal policies including more severe travel bans and visa restrictions. What To Know A 56 percent majority of Americans now favor expanding the wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, up from 46 percent in 2019, according to a survey of 5,044 people conducted from June 2 to June 8 by the Pew Research Center. While Republican support for a border wall remains high, with roughly 88 percent supporting wall expansion, Democratic support for expansion has increased to 27 percent—up from 14 percent in 2019. Migrants turn themselves in to U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officers after crossing over a section of border wall into the U.S. on January 5 in Ruby, Arizona. Migrants turn themselves in to U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officers after crossing over a section of border wall into the U.S. on January 5 in Ruby, total, 42 percent approve and 47 disapprove of the Trump administration's overall approach to immigration. Divisions in views on immigration shift based on partisanship. About 78 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents approve of the administration's approach to immigration, including 51 percent who strongly approve. Just 12 percent disapprove. Democratic antipathy toward the Trump administration's policies are more striking, with 81 percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners disapproving. Among them, 53 percent strongly disapprove. About 9 percent approve. Respondents also said that current policies will cost taxpayers more money (53 percent) rather than save money (29 percent). A majority also said that these policies will make the U.S. economy weaker (46 percent) instead of stronger (34 percent). Just about two in 10 (19 percent) said immigration policies won't have much of an economic impact either way. Terrell County, Texas, Sheriff Thad Cleveland told Newsweek on Tuesday that his community near the southern border had a little activity in March and April, but May and June have been "really slow." He said there's also a Department of Defense presence. "I attribute the decrease to Trump's voice on the issue and additional support brought to the border," Cleveland said. "During the Biden administration I often said it would take a president with a strong voice letting the world know you can't come to America, [it] would have the biggest impact for illegal entries. "I still think we, Terrell County, will see an increase as other portions of the border continue to see resources." Cleveland does wonder how long the policies and resources will be sustained, saying that eventually "something has to give." He's looking to lawmakers and not Trump for long-term answers. "President Trump has done his part, now Congress must do their part and pass legislation to continue to add technology, infrastructure and manpower, as well as ensuring a future president can't come in and open the borders as was done the previous four years," the sheriff said. Following the heightened period of the COVID-19 pandemic, border crossings under former President Joe Biden surged from the end of 2021 through early 2024, hitting a peak of 370,883 in December 2023. The Pew survey also shows that Hispanic (83 percent) and Black (78 percent) adults are more likely than Asian (63 percent) and white (58 percent) adults to say that undocumented immigrants should be able to stay if they meet certain requirements. Overall, 38 percent of white adults and 30 percent of Asian adults said there should be a national effort to deport immigrants illegally in the country. In contrast, 17 percent of Black adults and 14 percent of Hispanic adults shared that sentiment. What People Are Saying U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in its announcement Monday about a new app for legal border crossings: "Those who use the CBP Home mobile app to self-deport receive cost-free travel, forgiveness of any civil fines or penalties for failing to depart the United States, and a $1,000 exit bonus, paid after their return is confirmed through the app. If they already submitted their intent to depart using previous versions of CBP Home, they will not need to resubmit." What Happens Next The Trump administration's immigration efforts have received praise from none other than immigrants in the U.S. Immigrant voters, who favored Democrats by 32 points on immigration policy in 2020, now trust Republicans more on the issue by 8 points—a seismic 40-point swing in four years, according to an analysis of the American National Election Studies (ANES) by CNN's Harry Enten.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store