In Michigan's Wayne County, voters weigh in on Trump's first 100 days in office
If you ask Wayne County residents, they'll tell you President Donald Trump's first 100 days back in the White House have ranged from "turbulent" to "strong" to "evil."
Last year, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris outpaced Trump, 62% to 33% in Wayne County. Home to Detroit and Michigan's most populous county, Wayne County is a hub for Democratic votes. But Republicans have made concerted efforts in the region — Trump campaigned multiple times in Detroit last year, and made stops in Dearborn and Hamtramck to appeal to Arab American and Muslim voters.
The Detroit Free Press, Lansing State Journal and Center for Community Journalism - Michigan spoke with voters in the region as part of a project interviewing more than 100 Michiganders about Trump's first 100 days.
Natasha Blakely, 30, of Hamtramck, is a Democrat who leans progressive and she has a long list of concerns. For one, she's horrified by the Trump administration's "weird fixation" on transgender people's rights. For another, the back-and-forth on tariffs has "wreaked havoc" on everybody's lives and the economy, she said. Asked how she feels about the next four years of President Donald Trump, Blakely said she doesn't feel good about it but still remains hopeful.
A number of friends want to leave the country and she has thought about it, too, but she doesn't think that's the right move. "I don't think that's a long-term solution and it's not practical anyway for people to just leave en masse but I get the desire to just leave for somewhere that might feel better but, ultimately, I'm not somebody who likes to give up," Blakely said.
— Nushrat Rahman
Imad Hamad, executive director of the American Human Rights Council in Dearborn, voted for Green Party candidate Jill Stein in the November election. A Palestinian immigrant, Hamad said he was concerned about the Biden administration's support for Israel, with money and weapons, as it launched attacks against Palestinians and others.
Vice President Kamala Harris, running on the presidential Democratic ticket, lost in many of the heavily-Arab precincts in Wayne County. "We felt that we don't want our vote to go to waste, and we chose to support third party, even if it indirectly helped the election of President (Donald) Trump," Hamad explained.
Now, Hamad is concerned about some of Trump's actions, such as targeting immigrants with pro-Palestinian views, but he adds that this type of targeting is not new. "These are the most interesting and challenging 100 days ever in the history of presidential administrations," he said. There is "a state of fear and anxiety" creating "chilling effects" among immigrants, he added. "The Constitution is on trial."
— Niraj Warikoo
David Hardin Jr., 51, is the owner of a Detroit barbershop in Detroit's West Village, where he also lives. Hardin typically votes Democratic and he had a Kamala Harris campaign sign posted in his shop throughout the election season. In a word, Hardin described the first 100 days of President Donald Trump's second term as "unconstitutional," and then he went on to describe a feeling of powerlessness.
"What's frustrating is that now everything is out of the hands of the voters. Even the Republicans that aren't with what he is doing are standing quiet. They need to speak up so it can't be done. If you stand mute, you might as well be with what he's doing." Hardin's examples of "unconstitutional" actions taken by Trump include "deporting people without due process" and the "attack on the Department of Education."
— Scott Talley
Steve Kerr, 66, of Canton, is a retiree who is concerned about a collection of actions by the Trump administration, including tariffs on the nation's allies and the influence of billionaire Elon Musk. "My daughter is a lawyer in California. She's ready to leave this country because of him and what he's doing to our nation," Kerr said.
— Jalen Williams
Kate Mason, 37, of Hamtramck, is a Democrat disappointed with her party at the state and national levels. Mason described the Trump administration as a "dumpster fire" that's "dismantling democracy right in front of us."
"The destruction of so many people's lives for no reason other than just sheer malice and hatred is staggering," she said, pointing to cuts to the federal workforce and the move to deport Venezuelans to El Salvador.
She said she's worried, scared and furious about the prospect of another four years of President Donald Trump. She feels a "deep sense of despair and sadness" but her work for a statewide grassroots nonprofit helps her channel her worries. Political leaders on the left are not meeting the moment, she said. When Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris lost in November, Mason said she was shocked but not surprised.
"We're gonna have to do a reckoning on the left and figure out how we come back from this," Mason said.
— Nushrat Rahman
Curtis White, 78, a Vietnam War veteran from Detroit, marched down Woodward Avenue on April 5 as part of 'Hands Off' protests held in opposition to President Donald Trump's policies. He said he's worried about veteran benefits and programs being defunded and shut down. He said he doesn't align with a party but uses his discretion each election.
'We (veterans) are concerned about what's going to happen with our benefits, the veterans who are homeless and the veterans who need so many other things," he said. "All the things that have supposedly been shut down, there are people concerned about that and I am among those people concerned about that. … It seems like everything is on a downward spiral.'
— Natalie Davies
Ashley Lawrence, 36, of Inkster, works on the cleaning crew at the Macy's store at Southland Center in Taylor and is a caregiver for a girl with autism. In the last election, she said she wrote in Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' name for president.
She described President Donald Trump's first 100 days in office as "scary."
'I've been seeing like some crazy things happening with planes and stuff that I wasn't seeing before,' Lawrence said, adding that she wishes there were fewer fights and less finger-pointing in politics and more 'respect and willingness to help the people who really need the help.'
She said she opposes mass deportations but agrees with Trump's opposition to LGBTQ+ and transgender rights.
"That might be one thing he got right,' Lawrence said.
'We've just got to see what's gonna happen at this point and just pray because, at the end of the day, it doesn't matter who the president is. God is in charge.'
— Kristen Jordan Shamus
Jay Carter, 49, of Taylor, voted for President Donald Trump in the November election.
"I'm optimistic,' said Carter, who oversees laundry services at the Red Roof Inn Ann Arbor North. In his view, the president's first 100 days in office are going 'extremely well.'
'I like what I'm seeing economically so far. … Prices are a little high but as someone who took an economics course, I understand that when you start imposing tariffs … it's going to get worse before it gets better. I'm willing to wait six months to a year because I know these things do take time.'
Carter said he isn't fond of the confrontational tact Trump has taken with Canadian leaders.
'The whole Canada as the 51st state bit was funny at first but, to me, it comes off as antagonistic,' he said. 'I have no problem with the Canadian people. … I'm not a fan of their government but I don't conflate the government of Canada with the people of Canada.'
Carter said he'd love to see the president's economic policies put more money in the pockets of all Americans — 'it doesn't matter how they voted. And I would like to see a lot less … divisive rhetoric on both sides of the aisle because, I'm going to be totally honest here, as a citizen I'm a little tired of seeing that."
— Kristen Jordan Shamus
Majed Moughni, 54, a Dearborn attorney, voted for an independent candidate, Cornel West, in the November election due to concern over deaths in Gaza and Lebanon. Moughni's views were echoed by many in Dearborn, which has the highest percentage of residents of Middle Eastern descent among cities in the U.S. President Donald Trump won in Dearborn and Jill Stein got almost 19% of the vote. Now, some are concerned with Trump's attacks on immigrants and worry his tariffs will hurt the economy. Michiganders have "been affected by Trump's tariffs and immigrant policies," Moughni said. "Many are at risk of being deported. He has struck a fear in their hearts."
Moughni added that Trump "trampled the U.S. Constitution by arresting and deporting legal residents." Trump is acting reckless by surrounding "himself with 'yes men' and like the 'emperor who has no clothes', he has no one to tell him he is wrong," Moughni said.
— Niraj Warikoo
Chuck Staffeld, 65, of Canton, is a retired assembly engineer who is a Libertarian at his core. He said he is suspicious of former President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party, wants President Donald Trump to "keep deporting and sending criminals to jail" and believes the federal government is too big. "They don't need to be doing all these things for me. I don't want them to do these things for me," Staffeld said.
— Jalen Williams
Arlene Hunter, 63, of Detroit, is a retired federal employee who used the word "horrible" to describe President Donald Trump's first 100 days of his second term. And without hardly any hesitation, she went on to describe specifically why she considers Trump's actions horrible: "I think that he is overstepping his power. There's no way that all of those probationary employees should have been fired because I worked for the Internal Revenue Service for 38 years and they say that we don't do any work. Well, I spent eight, nine, 10 hours a day on the phone talking to people and helping them make installment agreements so that they could pay their taxes. I just think that he's in there to be a power person. He's not being fair and the tariffs are messing with people's businesses and their money."
— Scott Talley
Reco Spencer, 50, of Canton, works at Henry Ford College. When voting in the past, he typically leaned Democratic, but in the 2024 presidential election, he voted for independent candidate Cornel West.
"I can see what Trump's trying to do, but it's so erratic," Spencer said of the beginning of Trump's term. "I think he's going about the tariffs the wrong way. I understand what he's trying to do, but then it becomes more like, 'you do something to me, I'm gonna get back at you.' And then it starts to look like two kids fighting."
— Nour Rahal
Faye Nemer, 39, of Dearborn, is the CEO of the MENA American Chamber of Commerce. Typically a Democratic voter, she said she backed Trump for the first time in 2024, citing his early promises of bringing Middle East peace through diplomacy.
Trump played an "integral role" in achieving the ceasefire resolutions in both Lebanon and Palestine, Nemer said. "There were violations, but it wasn't to the extent of what we were experiencing under President Biden. And then, lo and behold, we felt like there was a 180 (degree) shift in Middle East policy, and the gloves were off with regard to Palestine."
Though initially optimistic about Trump, Nemer said she has grown increasingly concerned with the administration's military aid to Israel, ongoing wars in the Middle East, and crackdowns on student protesters. However, she still believes the administration can be held accountable through a shift in foreign policy and stronger outreach to Arab Americans.
— Nour Rahal
Morgan Smith, 19, of Detroit, is a student interested in the arts and in the latest election, she voted for Kamala Harris. She is concerned about President Donald Trump's imposition of tariffs, and has seen costs in her own life increase. She enjoys playing "Mario Kart" and "The Legend of Zelda" but has watched the price of games skyrocket. "They're like, $90 now, when it used to be like $60, that's ridiculous," Smith said. "I can't really afford those, I can't get them when they come out." Looking toward the rest of his term, she said, "I'm happy this is the last time we'll see him."
— Dana Afana
Garrett Ellis, 52, of Detroit, worked as a machine operator in automotive manufacturing but he's out of work and looking for a job. He said the industry is slow due to difficulties in acquiring materials. "He's cutting everything out," Ellis said. "How are people going to live?" Imposing tariffs is "killing the world," he added.
Ellis, an independent who did not vote in 2024, feels doubtful about the remainder of Trump's term. "I feel it's not gonna really get any better. I think it's gonna get a little worse. For real, you know, it's gonna get worse because he wants to be a dictator instead of a president, and he wants to be a businessman at the same time too."
— Dana Afana
Shavone Melton, 39, of Detroit, voted for President Donald Trump because she didn't like the other choices on the ballot. She thought he'd do a good job, she said, but now the mother of five doesn't like the direction of his administration. She's particularly concerned about food stamps, which help keep her children fed, particularly as food prices increase. "They're too high to even afford," she said.
— Lily Altavena
Shelby Beard, 31, of Flat Rock, is a biologist working in the science and medical research field, where she said there have been a lot of layoffs because of EPA cuts. She voted for Harris/Walz and thinks the few things Trump has done right, "don't outweigh the horrible things he has done." Beard hopes Trump accomplishes everything he wants to "so we can see the destruction he is capable of." After Cory Booker's speech, she is very optimistic. "I think it gave a lot of hope to the left. And, proves that we are not going to sit by and let everything that Trump is doing happen," she said.
— Susan Selasky
Rhea Williams, 77, of Detroit, says this country is heading toward a dictatorship. 'He said that he would be a dictator if he became president. And he's trying to do that," Williams said of President Donald Trump.
And he's a leader who hasn't made good on his promises, she said. "Don't threaten my Social Security," Williams said. "Prices are just too high and he promised that prices would go down and they are not."
— Andrea Sahouri
Haley Cislo, 32, of Woodhaven, is a schoolteacher who has voted Republican in the past two elections. Although President Donald Trump and DOGE have taken steps to dismantle the Department of Education, she remains supportive of the administration and is "looking towards the future."
"It's not easy topics but I'm remaining open and, again, trusting that whatever changes are made will ultimately support students and us educators," Cislo said.
— Eric Guzman
David Burbo, 62, of Trenton, said he believes President Donald Trump is doing the right thing. With tariffs, Burbo believes the U.S. should do the same to other countries. "We can't let everyone come over and get a free deal. Instead of giving these countries tons of money and not expecting anything from them," he said.
Burbo believes that U.S. borders need to be secured: "We have to know who is coming to this country, from criminals to diseases and sicknesses," he said.
— Susan Selasky
John Linares tends to vote independent but didn't cast his vote during this past presidential election as a result of not supporting a candidate. The 69-year-old from Dearborn Heights said that President Donald Trump has done a terrible job in his first 100 days in office.
'I don't like what he's doing and I don't support him whatsoever,' Linares said. 'I think he's hurting more Americans and I think his interest is mainly on him.'
— Eric Guzman
Miklos Penzes, 57, of Wyandotte, said he voted for President Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential election. While he said he believes things have been going well and has supported the efforts from the president addressing Social Security and implementing DOGE, he also said that the tariffs have started to scare him and he doesn't want the administration to be all talk.
"'Cause anyone can say stuff and if it don't happen, then it's just saying stuff," Penzes said.
— Eric Guzman
John Nixon, 62, a Detroit landscaper who works for himself, said he has voted in every presidential election — always Democratic. President Donald Trump's second term has been 'terrible' he says, raising the deportation of visa holders as one reason why. While Nixon hasn't been directly affected by Trump's policies, as an aging Black man who relies on Medicaid, he said he worries about potential cuts to health care and the emboldening of 'racist' police.
Nixon said he was stressed about the direction the country was heading before Trump — particularly rising violent crime among youths. That stress is now amplified, with nightly flareups at 11 p.m., when he watches the TV news. 'I think Trump is gonna have us in a war and I really do think he's very prejudiced,' Nixon said.
If Trump has one redeeming quality, it's that he 'stands up for America,' but in the next breath, Nixon backpedals, noting that Trump can also instigate foreign conflict. Referencing nuclear warfare, he said, 'Trump could push a button and everybody is gone.'
— Violet Ikonomova
Michael Hatch, 47, is a member of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians who lived in the Upper Peninsula for more than 30 years before recently moving to Flat Rock.
He works as a carpenter, but also paints Native American art and is a Horse Dancer at Pow-Wows. Hatch never votes, not even in tribal elections, because 'They are modeled after the U.S. system.'
He doesn't see much difference between the parties and would prefer a more native form of government where the grandmothers of the village ruled. He said President Donald Trump's tenure has been 'uninformed'and he'd like to see less 'bigotry and lying.'
Hatch said the increase in ICE activity under Trump is affecting Native Americans. 'Just because we're brown, we look like Mexicans. I hate to say it, but it was like almost racial profiling, right there.'
He said he has had friends and relatives detained who had to show their papers before being released.
'Like we always say, Natives don't cross borders, borders crossed us,' he said.
— John Wisely
Economic uncertainty brought on by President Donald Trump's global tariffs was particularly on the mind of Davis Greene, 23, of Detroit, a student at Macomb Community College, who called himself an independent.
"I can tell it's already affecting a lot of society," he said. "I know some business owners who do business overseas. And now that prices are going up, that affects their livelihood.
"I think the power of the U.S. dollar is severely going to change. The U.S. as a country, we're built a lot on our money."
But Greene is staying even-keeled overall. "We've gone through a lot of different things through the years with different presidents, both good and bad," he said. "I'm a man of faith. As long as people have God with them, they will be all right. Once this term is over, we'll have another president, and he or she is going to have their own priorities and policies."
— Keith Matheny
Biaohua Yu, a 36-year-old neuroscience researcher who lives in Detroit, said he felt that "anger coming during the election. I see that anger manifesting now in terms of anger at the LGBT community, especially the transgender community, immigrants and … ignoring due process. It's manifesting more severe than I thought it was ever going to be."
Yu, who is an immigrant — and U.S. citizen — said he will work on getting his parents' naturalization papers in order in case anyone should question their citizenship. He believes in streamlining the government but also believes the people President Donald Trump has put in charge of doing so are operating beyond their level of expertise. And Yu, who is gay, is worried that the Supreme Court's decision allowing same sex marriage could be overturned. "More racism, more expensive stuff and a lot more anxiety, that is what we get in this presidency," he said.
— Georgea Kovanis
Betty Romo, 40, of Lincoln Park, has lived in Michigan for 23 years after moving from Jalisco, Mexico, at a young age. She now lives in Lincoln Park and works at her family's business in southwest Detroit, which will celebrate its 40th anniversary this May. Romo has worked there for the past 10 years.
'I carry a deep sadness with me because of everything happening in our government," Romo said. "My heart aches for my community, for the fear we live with every day. The uncertainty about our future, about whether we'll be safe or allowed to stay, makes me feel helpless.'
— David Rodriguez Muñoz
Dachelle Carter, 28, of Lincoln Park and a grad student at Wayne State University, said the start of the President Donald Trump administration has just been chaos and a lot of things have been overturned. 'I'm currently at school and there has been a lot of pressure trying to finish school and knowing that everything, the changes that (have) been happening, has been affecting me and my schooling and financial aid," she said. The changes, Carter said, put her in distress because there is so much 'uncertainty regarding everything that is going on.'
Pandora Hanshaw, a 56-year-old Detroit retiree, has always voted Democratic, but considers herself more of an independent — a fan and foe of various positions on either side of the aisle. Ahead of the last presidential election, she became a rare swing voter. Her socially conservative values and desire to see blue-collar jobs return to the Midwest from overseas almost prompted her to cast a ballot for now-President Donald Trump — and, in the Republican presidential primary, she even did. But by the time of the general election, with the Democratic nominee by then a Black woman, she decided to stick with personal tradition and vote blue.
Hanshaw has mixed feelings on Trump's first 100 days. While she appreciates the spirit of his tariffs, she believes their rollout threatened to put the country in a worse position economically. And she disagrees with Trump's zealousness on immigration, as "there's more things going on." She also resents how he behaves. "His presentation is horrible to me," Hanshaw said.
— Violet Ikonomova
This series was reported by: Dana Afana, Lily Altavena, Sarah Atwood, Tresa Baldas, Duante Beddingfield, Dave Boucher, Lisa Vidaurri Bowling, Jackie Charniga, Natalie Davies, Paul Egan, Eric Guzman, Christina Hall, Brad Heineman, Clara Hendrickson, Brendel Hightower, Johnathan Hogan, Violet Ikonomova, Cassidey Kavathas, Georgea Kovanis, Jamie L. LaReau, Eric D. Lawrence, Arpan Lobo, Keith Matheny, Sarah Moore, Darcie Moran, David Rodriguez Muñoz, Corey J. Murray, David Panian, Jenna Prestininzi, Nour Rahal, Nushrat Rahman, Liam Rappleye, Don Reid, Adrienne Roberts, Andrea May Sahouri, Beki San Martin, Susan Selasky, Kristen Jordan Shamus, Scott Talley, Kristi Tanner, Connor Veenstra, Tess Ware, Niraj Warikoo, Jalen Williams, John Wisely, Suzanne Nolan Wisler and Frank Witsil.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: In Michigan's Wayne County, voters weigh in on Trump's first 100 days
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
19 minutes ago
- Politico
‘It's made up': Democrats say Rubio isn't playing it straight about foreign aid cuts
Democrats are accusing the Trump administration of lying about the state of America's top global health program following massive cuts to foreign aid led by Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency. The administration has cut more than a hundred contracts and grants from the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the HIV and AIDS program credited with saving millions of lives in poor countries. President Donald Trump has shut down the agency that signed off on most PEPFAR spending and fired other staffers who supported it. But Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested Democrats' concerns are overblown, considering that PEPFAR remains '85 percent operative.' Rubio has made the claim repeatedly in budget testimony before Congress, but neither he nor the State Department will provide a detailed accounting to back up the figure. For flummoxed Democrats, it indicates a broader problem: How to respond to Trump's budget requests when his administration refuses to spend the money Congress has provided. Trump last month asked Congress to cut PEPFAR's budget for next year by 40 percent. 'It's made up,' Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz said when asked by POLITICO about the 85 percent figure. 'It's the most successful, bipartisan, highly efficient life-saving thing that the United States has ever done and Elon Musk went in and trashed it.' Schatz confronted Rubio about the cuts at a Foreign Relations Committee hearing in May, telling him: 'You are required to spend 100 percent of the money.' Rubio said the 15 percent cut targeted programs that weren't delivering the services the government was paying for. He pointed to fraud in Namibia and armed conflict in Sudan as reasons for slashed funding, although it isn't clear those instances were related to PEPFAR. Asked repeatedly by POLITICO for more clarity on what the 85 percent figure represents, a State Department spokesperson said that 'PEPFAR-funded programs that deliver HIV care and treatment or prevention of mother to child transmission services are operational for a majority of beneficiaries.' Data collection is ongoing to capture recent updates to programming, the spokesperson also said, adding: 'We expect to have updated figures later this year.' The day after his exchange with Schatz, Rubio told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that he meant 85 percent of PEPFAR's beneficiaries were still getting U.S. assistance. But the goal, he said, was to pass off all of the work to the countries where the beneficiaries live. 'We're by far the most generous nation on Earth on foreign aid, and will continue to be by far with no other equal, including China, despite all this alarmist stuff,' he said. People who worked on implementing PEPFAR, both inside and outside the government, as well as advocates for HIV prevention and care, are alarmed nonetheless. A State Department report from the month before Trump took office underscores the breadth of its services. In fiscal 2024, the report says, PEPFAR provided medication to 20.6 million people, including 566,000 children, HIV prevention services to 2.3 million girls and women, and testing for 83.8 million. After DOGE dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development in February, several recipients of PEPFAR grants and contracts said they'd had to lay off staff even as Rubio insisted that life-saving aid was continuing. Rubio's skeptics point to the Trump administration's cancellation of more than 100 HIV grants and contracts, representing about 20 percent of PEPFAR's total budget, according to an analysis by the Center for Global Development, an anti-poverty group. In addition to shutting down USAID, the agency that dispensed and monitored much of that funding, the administration fired experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's global health division who worked on the program, including those specializing in maternal and child HIV. 'I'm not sure where he got these numbers,' Delaware Sen. Chris Coons, a senior Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said of Rubio's 85 percent claim. The lack of clarity has angered HIV activists, who protested against the PEPFAR cuts during the budget hearings where Rubio testified. 'It's unconscionable and alarming to know that 130 days into this administration, Rubio has overseen the completely unnecessary decimation of life-saving services to millions of people, then lying about that fact over and over again,' said Asia Russell, executive director of Health GAP, a nonprofit working on access to HIV treatment in developing countries. Russell was among those arrested for disrupting Rubio's House Foreign Affairs hearing. The confusion around how much of America's celebrated global health program is still operational adds to the uncertainty about the Trump administration's spending plans for the funds Congress appropriated for 2025. And it comes as Congress gears up to consider the president's 2026 budget request. Last month, Trump asked Congress to reduce the PEPFAR budget from $4.8 billion this year to $2.9 billion next. And on Tuesday, the White House asked Congress to claw back $900 million Congress had provided for HIV/AIDS services and other global health initiatives this year, but insisted that it was keeping programs that provide treatment intact. Even if the Trump administration isn't cutting treatment funding, it has cut other awards that ensure drugs reach people, Russell said. She pointed to a terminated USAID award that was delivering drugs to faith-based nonprofit clinics in Uganda. 'The medicine is literally languishing on shelves in a massive warehouse behind the U.S. embassy,' Russell said. Coons said prevention, if that's what's on the chopping block, is as important as treatment: 'For us to step back from supporting not just treatment but prevention puts us at risk of a reemergence of a more lethal, drug resistant form of HIV/AIDS.' Leading Republicans aren't objecting, even though PEPFAR was created by then-President George W. Bush and long enjoyed bipartisan support. Senate Foreign Relations Chair Jim Risch of Idaho declined to comment when POLITICO asked him about the program. Earlier this year, Risch said PEPFAR was 'in jeopardy' after the Biden administration acknowledged that Mozambique, a country in east Africa, had misused program funds to provide at least 21 abortions. Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), who leads the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said he agrees with the cuts Trump has made and suggested he would want more in the future. 'We also need to be asking the question: How long should American taxpayers borrow money to fund HIV medication for 20 million Africans?' Mast said. The top Democratic appropriators in the House and Senate accused the White House in late May of failing to provide detailed and legally required information about what the administration is doing with billions of dollars Congress directed it to spend. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut wrote to the White House Office of Management and Budget that the administration's decision to not abide by a funding law Trump signed in March has 'degraded Congress' capacity to carry out its legislative responsibilities' and move forward with fiscal 2026 spending bills. It has also clouded plans for reupping the law that directs the PEPFAR program. It expired in March. Mast has said that Congress would consider PEPFAR's future by September, as part of a larger debate about State Department priorities. But Democrats wonder how they could move forward with reauthorizing the program given the uncertainty surrounding it, said a Senate Democratic aide speaking anonymously to share internal debates.


CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
US and China set to kick off fresh round of trade talks in London over intractable issues
A new round of trade negotiations between the United States and China is set to begin Monday in London as both sides try to preserve a fragile truce brokered last month. The fresh talks were announced last week after a long-anticipated phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, which appeared to ease tensions that erupted over the past month following a surprise agreement in Geneva. In May, the two sides agreed to drastically roll back tariffs on each other's goods for an initial 90-day period. The mood was upbeat. However, sentiment soured quickly over two major sticking points: China's control over so-called rare earths minerals and its access to semiconductor technology originating from the US. Beijing's exports of rare earths and their related magnets are expected to take center stage at the London meeting. But experts say Beijing is unlikely to give up its strategic grip over the essential minerals, which are needed in a wide range of electronics, vehicles and defense systems. 'China's control over rare earth supply has become a calibrated yet assertive tool for strategic influence,' Robin Xing, Morgan Stanley's chief China economist, wrote in a Monday research note. 'Its near-monopoly of the supply chain means rare earths will remain a significant bargaining chip in trade negotiations.' Since the talks in Geneva, Trump has accused Beijing of effectively blocking the export of rare earths, announcing additional chip curbs and threatening to revoke the US visas of Chinese students. The moves have provoked backlash from China, which views Washington's decisions as reneging on its trade promises. All eyes will be on whether both sides can come to a consensus in London on issues of fundamental importance. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will meet a Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. On Saturday, Beijing appeared to send conciliatory signals. A spokesperson for China's Commerce Ministry, which oversees the export controls, said it had 'approved a certain number of compliant applications.' 'China is willing to further enhance communication and dialogue with relevant countries regarding export controls to facilitate compliant trade,' the spokesperson said. Kevin Hassett, head of the National Economic Council at the White House, told CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday that the US side would be looking to restore the flow of rare earth minerals. 'Those exports of critical minerals have been getting released at a rate that is higher than it was, but not as high as we believe we agreed to in Geneva,' he said, adding that he is 'very comfortable' with a trade deal being made after the talks. In April, as tit-for-tat trade tension between the two countries escalated, China imposed a new licensing regime on seven rare earth minerals and several magnets, requiring exporters to seek approvals for each shipment and submit documentation to verify the intended end use of these materials. Following the trade truce negotiated in Geneva, the Trump administration expected China to lift restrictions on those minerals. But Beijing's apparent slow-walking of approvals triggered deep frustration within the White House, CNN reported last month. Rare earths are a group of 17 elements that are more abundant than gold and can be found in many countries, including the United States. But they're difficult, costly and environmentally polluting to extract and process. China controls 90% of global rare earth processing. Experts say it's possible that Beijing may seek to use its leverage over rare earths to get Washington to ease its own export controls aimed at blocking China's access to advanced US semiconductors and related technologies. The American Chamber of Commerce in China said on Friday that some Chinese suppliers of American companies have received six-month export licenses. Reuters also reported that suppliers of major American carmakers – including General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis – were granted temporary export licenses for a period of up to six months. While China may step up the pace of license approvals to cool the diplomatic temperature, global access to Chinese rare earth minerals will likely remain more restricted than it was before April, according to a Friday research note by Leah Fahy, a China economist and other experts at Capital Economics, a London-based consultancy. 'Beijing had become more assertive in its use of export controls as tools to protect and cement its global position in strategic sectors, even before Trump hiked China tariffs this year,' the note said. As China tackles a tariff war with the US head on, it's clear that it is continuing to cause economic pain at home. Trade data released Monday painted a gloomy picture for the country's export-reliant economy. Its overall overseas shipments rose by just 4.8% in May compared to the same month a year earlier, according to data released by China's General Administration of Customs. It was a sharp slowdown from the 8.1% recorded in April, and lower than the estimate of 5.0% export growth from a Reuters poll of economists. Its exports to the US suffered a steep decline of 34.5%. The sharp monthly fall widened from a 21% drop in April and came despite the trade truce announced on May 12 that brought American tariffs on Chinese goods down from 145% to 30%. Still, Lü Daliang, a spokesperson for the customs department, talked up China's economic strength, telling the state-run media Xinhua that China's goods trade has demonstrated 'resilience in the face of external challenges.' Meanwhile, deflationary pressures continue to stalk the world's second-largest economy, according to data released separately on Monday by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). In May, China's Consumer Price Index (CPI), a benchmark for measuring inflation, dropped 0.1% compared to the same month last year. Factory-gate deflation, measured by the Producer Price Index (PPI), worsened with a 3.3% decrease in May from a year earlier. Last month's drop marks the sharpest year-on-year contraction in 22 months, according to NBS data. Dong Lijuan, chief statistician at the NBS, attributed the decline in producer prices, which measures the average change in prices received by producers of goods and services, to a drop in global oil and gas prices, as well as the decrease in prices for coal and other raw materials due to low cyclical demand. The high base of last year was cited as another reason for the decline, Dong said in a statement. CNN's Hassan Tayir, Simone McCarthy, Fred He contributed reporting.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Kansas town doesn't hate immigrants enough. So the Trump administration plots vengeance.
Lawrence and Douglas County appeared on a Department of Homeland Security list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions.' (Clay Wirestone/Kansas Reflector) The Trump administration has put my town — the place my family and I call home — on its hit list for a thought crime. What horrible thing have the people of Lawrence and wider Douglas County done to deserve this fate? Apparently, we don't sufficiently detest immigrants. Put questions of legal status aside. As we all know, it doesn't matter to the hate-bloated buffoons in Washington, D.C., what papers a person has or doesn't have. They will ship you off to a foreign gulag if you're the wrong color or in the wrong place. Because Lawrence had the unmitigated audacity to care about people who look different, it has been threatened with the full wrath of the federal government. It might be shocking, if so little was shocking these days. The Department of Homeland Security posted a list of 500-plus 'sanctuary jurisdictions' on its website May 29, highlighting cities and counties that supposedly run afoul of its anti-immigrant agenda. Three days later, officials took down the page after an outcry from local law enforcement. Thanks to the Internet Archive, you can still browse the list and read the government's inflammatory rhetoric: 'DHS demands that these jurisdictions immediately review and revise their policies to align with Federal immigration laws and renew their obligation to protect American citizens, not dangerous illegal aliens.' There's a lot to unpack there — immigrants commit fewer crimes than those born in the United States, for one thing — but let's press on. The point is that my town and county landed on the list. Let's try to figure out why. Back in 2020, the city passed an ordinance protecting undocumented folks. Two years later, the Kansas Legislature pushed through a bill banning sanctuary cities, and Lawrence subsequently revised its ordinance. You can read the current city code here. What's important to note is that the current language gives wide berth to state and federal law, making clear that the city won't obstruct or hinder federal immigration enforcement. By the same token, that doesn't mean the city has to pursue a brazenly anti-immigration path. Lawrence can and should represent the will of voters, while following applicable law. And those voters, through their elected representatives, chose to make their city a welcoming one. So how did Lawrence end up on the list? Apparently because it didn't spew enough hatred for the White House's liking. A senior DHS official told NPR that 'designation of a sanctuary jurisdiction is based on the evaluation of numerous factors, including self-identification as a sanctuary jurisdiction, noncompliance with federal law enforcement in enforcing immigration laws, restrictions on information sharing, and legal protections for illegal aliens.' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pontificated on Fox News: 'Some of the cities have pushed back. They think because they don't have one law or another on the books that they don't qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals.' Note those phrases from the official and Noem: 'Self-identification as a sanctuary jurisdiction.' 'One law or another.' In other words, it doesn't matter what ordinances a city or county has on the books. It doesn't matter what the actual laws may be. It apparently depends on what a city calls itself and how the Trump administration feels about it. No city or county sets out to break the law. They have attorneys on staff or retainer to make sure they don't break myriad legal restrictions. Lawrence followed the law in enacting its original ordinance, and when the law changed, officials followed along. But few want to step out and say such things publicly, given that federal officials have tremendous resources behind them. They could crush any city or county if they wished, through legal bills alone. Thankfully, as mentioned above, sheriffs across the nation pushed back. 'This list was created without any input, criteria of compliance, or a mechanism for how to object to the designation,' said National Sheriffs' Association president Sheriff Kieran Donahue. 'Sheriffs nationwide have no way to know what they must do or not do to avoid this arbitrary label. This decision by DHS could create a vacuum of trust that may take years to overcome.' Douglas County Sheriff Jay Armbrister was similarly outspoken in comments to the Lawrence Journal-World: 'We feel like the goalposts have been moved on us, and this is now merely a subjective process where one person gets to decide our status on this list based on their opinion.' Thanks to the U.S. Constitution and its First Amendment, we are not required to love, like or even respect our government. We are not required to voice support of its goals. We are not required to say anything that we don't want to say about immigration, immigrants or ICE. Republicans understood that full well when Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama were in office. Both faced torrents of criticism on this very subject. Those presidents took the abuse. It was, and is, part of the job. Now President Donald Trump and his anti-immigration minions have to deal with the fact that a different segment of the public vehemently disagrees with their immigration policies. That's OK. That's protected expression. Within the bounds of law, we are also free to define our towns, cities and counties however we want. Accusing local governments of thought crimes desecrates and defames our Constitution. Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.