UC to replace 'biological' bathroom signs, apologizes to students for any harm caused
The University of Cincinnati will be replacing bathroom signage using the word "biological men" and "biological women", according to an email administrators sent to students Wednesday afternoon.
"This was an error on our part, and we apologize for the harm it may have caused," read the email from vice provost Nicole Mayo and vice president Bleuzette Marshall, referring to the bathroom signs that had sparked outrage after being posted on Reddit and going viral last week.
In response to a question during a student protest of a UC trustee meeting Tuesday about whether using the word "biological" was legally necessary, university president Neville Pinto called the signs "an error."
More: UC president calls 'biological' bathroom signs error as students, faculty protest
The Enquirer has requested records about the cost of creating as well as installing the "biological" bathroom signs and any email discussions associated with the installation.
Some schools, including Ohio State University, left their bathroom signs as they were, and Ohio Rep. Adam Bird, R-New Richmond, who co-sponsored Senate Bill 104, told an Enquirer reporter Tuesday that changing the words on the signs was not necessary, although UC's initial decision did fall in line with the new law.
Ohio's new law requiring students to use multi-occupancy bathrooms, shower rooms, changing rooms and locker rooms that align with their assigned sex at birth took effect Tuesday.
In doing so, the law is intended to prevent transgender students from using facilities that correspond with their gender identity.
The law applies to multi-occupancy facilities, so schools are still permitted to offer single-occupancy bathrooms, more than 300 of which are available across UC's campus.
More: Ohio's transgender bathroom law goes into effect today. How will schools comply?
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: UC to replace 'biological' bathroom signs
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democrats are spending $20 million to learn how to talk to men. Here's what they should do instead
It sounds like a joke, but it isn't. Democrats are spending $20 million on a program called SAM, or 'Speaking with American Men,' to help them learn how to communicate with the demographic that is shifting the political landscape in the Trump era. 'Above all,' it urges, 'we must shift from a moralizing tone.' But that's what Democrats do best! The Dems could have saved that money and gotten better advice on winning back voters by spending $30 on UC law school professor Joan C. Williams' new book, 'Outclassed: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back.' Bay Area liberals — and those like them around the country — are part of the problem. She calls them 'the cultural elites.' College-educated voters who are in the upper 20% of income-earners in this country. You know the type. Perhaps you are the type. The virtue-signaling, sign-posting, Facebook-oversharing, holier-than-thou tsk-tskers among us. 'That's us, most of us in this room,' Williams said during a recent book reading in Berkeley. 'Too often, we don't rail against economic elites, but we also fuel that narrative that we look down on people in the middle over time. They're 'deplorables' (Hillary Clinton's description of some Donald Trump supporters) 'clinging to guns and religion' (Barack Obama's line). They're 'stupid Trump voters who don't understand their own self-interest' (typical liberal Facebook post, an allusion to Thomas Frank's 'What's the Matter With Kansas?'). These are all class insults that just fuel the far right.' All those pulldowns do, Williams said, is 'reinforce the right's populist scripts that elites are looking down on you.' And that script is playing nonstop on your favorite conservative media outlet. Williams cites a study showing that former Fox News host Tucker Carlson mentioned the term 'ruling class' in 70% of his episodes from 2016 to 2021. Yes, Carlson is an annoying, bow tie-wearing dweeb, but he also hosted a top-rated cable news show. And his relentless messaging was echoed across the conservative world, including by Donald Trump. It was effective. Two-thirds of non-college-educated voters — once the base of the Democratic party — have consistently backed Trump. Meanwhile, only 20% of ads run by Democratic House candidates in competitive districts in 2022 'critiqued economic elites in any way whatsoever,' Williams writes. Williams notes there are two kinds of populism: 'The left's version of populism: 'They're robbing you blind.' Where the villains are the economic elites, the 1% as we like to call them. And then there's the right's version, which is 'They (the cultural elites) look down on you.'' Republicans do the bidding of the 1% (like the Trump tax bill that disproportionately rewards wealthy taxpayers) by co-opting the working class voters onto their side through culture wars against the cultural elite. 'We keep walking into the same old traps over and over,' Williams said. For 40 years. Nevertheless, Williams doesn't scold liberals. Instead, she suggests ways to win back working-class voters. Here's the most important: 'Make them feel seen.' Feelings rule among progressives, she said. She cites the virtue-signaling yard signs that are everywhere in the Bay Area: 'In this house, we believe: Black lives matter / Women's rights are human rights / No Human is illegal / Science is real / Love is love / Kindness is everything. 'But that empathy and connection is strictly optional when it comes to working-class people,' Williams said, guessing what a liberal might say about them: 'They're just dumb people who are trashing democracy, who are duped by the right.' Said Williams: 'We are very upset about how people are disadvantaged by race and gender — and completely blind, or largely blind, to people who are disadvantaged by class,' she said. The backlash: That unfeeling toward working-class voters, Williams said, puts a target on the backs of immigrants and trans kids and people of color, and 'sculpts anger against them,' she said as some may wonder, Why are we less deserving than them? Williams said if you're asking why working-class voters 'are so angry, they're angry because we have a rigged economy.' Over the past 35 years, the wages of college graduates have increased 83% while those of working-class Americans have stagnated. And if the left doesn't channel that anger, Williams said, 'We know who will.' Here's one of her tips for winning them back: Candidates should stop focusing on 'defending democracy.' Defending democracy is low on the scale of needs for someone working three jobs who can't afford decent child care. 'Defending democracy is not best done by talking incessantly about defending democracy,' Williams said. 'And the people who we've lost — non-college voters — they're not too interested in defending democracy, because they think democracy has failed them. We need to focus on economics, not defense of democracy.' Take how liberals often talk about climate change. Calling conservatives 'climate deniers' may be accurate, but it comes off sounding like 'We're smarter than you.' she said. Instead, progressives can connect with farmers, who can become messengers who can say, 'I can no longer grow what my grandfather grew on this land,' Williams writes. In coastal and fire-prone areas, she writes that progressives 'can point out that insurance companies are already changing underwriting habits due to fires and floods exacerbated by climate change.' It's a way to unite different classes in a populist way against Big Insurance. When it comes to religion, progressives often look down at churchgoing non-college grads. That's a mistake, as religion is central to their lives, Williams writes, providing 'for many non-elites the kind of intellectual engagement, stability, hopefulness, future orientation, impulse control, aspirations to purity and social safety net that elites typically get from their careers, their therapist, their politics, and their bank accounts.' She tilted the chapter that contains that passage: 'Therapy's expensive, but praying is free.' 'Religion is very functional in the lives of non-elites,' Williams said. 'Religion is so powerful in offering sort of mental ballast and stability that being a believer actually erases the effects of class disadvantage.' In 2020, 84% of white evangelical Christians voted for Trump, a thrice-married man who bragged about sexually assaulting women on the 'Access Hollywood' tape. Williams notes that 40% of college grads say they are neither spiritual nor religious. Williams is not advocating that progressives move toward the center and abandon advocating for marginalized groups that can be politically polarizing, like the trans community. 'Politically, it doesn't make sense,' Williams said at her Berkeley reading last month. 'Raise your hands if you will support a Democratic candidate that gives up on all of the issues that you cherish most.' Instead, she suggested channeling Sen. John Fetterman, the Pennsylvania Democrat whom she paraphrased as saying, 'If you get your jollies bullying trans kids, then you really need another job.' She said Fetterman is using a 'blue-collar style of conversation. It's not fancy, it's not policy based. It's poking fun at somebody. He's doing all the things that Trump does. Trump channels a certain style of American working-class masculinity to victimize trans kids. Some politicians, not all of them, can channel the same style of masculinity to say, you know, if you're bullying kids, you know, you got to find another job.' The challenge is finding Democrats who can pull that off.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
With Tech, Fed And Corporate Layoffs Surging, One Question Is Gaining Traction: 'Are We Being Pushed To Enlist Into The Military?'
Mass layoffs have rattled the U.S. workforce over the past year, hitting nearly every sector from tech to federal agencies. As job security erodes and economic uncertainty deepens, one uncomfortable question is echoing louder in online communities: Are we being quietly pushed to enlist in the military? That question recently took center stage in a popular Reddit thread on r/Layoffs. The original post was straightforward: 'With all the layoffs, are we being pushed to enlist into the military?' Commenters responded, not with patriotism, but with sarcasm, exhaustion and deep cynicism. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. 'I've been unemployed over 2 years. Sure, give me a weapon,' one person wrote. Another added, 'They won't take me. I'm too old now. I think we're just supposed to die for the oligarchy?' While some dismissed the idea outright, others pointed to the rising economic pressure and lack of job alternatives, especially for younger people or those without a college degree. One person said, 'The military is not for the faint of heart. Wendy's suits you more,' mocking the narrow options many face. A handful of veterans and current service members shared a different perspective. One Redditor, who served a short stint in active duty, said he and his wife left the military with paid-for degrees, $400,000 in investments, and about $5,000 a month in tax-free disability pay. 'Mileage may vary,' he noted, but the payoff can be real. Trending: Another encouraged young people to consider it strategically: 'If you are under 30 and can't get a job... consider joining the military. It's not a bad idea. You only need 25 years of service to retire... You are also the first choice for hire in city jobs.' Several commenters noted that even if they wanted to enlist, they likely couldn't. The military has strict entry requirements. 'The basic physical minimums probably eliminate 70% of people alone,' someone said, adding that antidepressants, past drug use, and even dental issues can disqualify applicants. The original poster shared his own doubts: 'I'm 37M who weighs about 300lbs and I don't have a thyroid gland... I can lose weight but idk if the military will accept my medical condition.'Many tied the issue to broader trends: AI taking over junior white-collar jobs, soaring housing prices, and what some called a 'coordinated effort' to push people out of higher education and into manual labor or military service. 'They just want manual labor now as they believe AI will take over all thinking jobs,' one comment read. Others echoed distrust in the system altogether. 'We are forced on 401(k)s on a market that can't grow forever, have money in banks that steal from us, and depend on our health care from jobs that get rid of us like flies.' Whether the shift toward military enlistment is intentional or not, the sentiment is that many people are starting to feel boxed in. As one person put it, 'Joining the military is just another way to sell your body to rich men.' Read Next: Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they're on pace —Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article With Tech, Fed And Corporate Layoffs Surging, One Question Is Gaining Traction: 'Are We Being Pushed To Enlist Into The Military?' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Bernie Sanders did not say 'Why not both?' to impeaching Trump and deporting Musk
Claim: U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders said, "Elon is calling for Trump's impeachment. MAGA is calling for Elon's deportation. Why not both?" Rating: As U.S. President Donald Trump and tech billionaire and Tesla CEO Elon Musk engaged in a war of words over social media in early June 2025, many people online attributed a quote to Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-VT. According to a Reddit post, Sanders allegedly said: "Elon is calling for Trump's impeachment. MAGA is calling for Elon's deportation. Why not both?" (Reddit user u/Pumuckl4Life) Even though he has been a critic of Trump and Musk, Sanders never said the above words. We found no evidence in his publicized statements, in the news media or on his social media accounts to corroborate the claim. As such, we rate this claim as an incorrect attribution. We reached out to Sanders for comment on whether he made the above statement. A spokesperson from his office denied the above claim. We also looked for examples of Sander's comments to the media by searching for segments of the above quote on Google News. If Sanders had said this in public it would have been widely covered by news media publications. We also found no similar statements on Sander's Senate website or his social media accounts. However, on June 5, the Facebook group U.S. Democratic Socialists did post the statement without attributing it to anyone. Sanders has used similar language. In a June 6 post from his official campaign account on X. Sanders criticized both Trump and Musk by using their arguments to bolster his point: Trump's right: The easiest way to save money is to eliminate the "Billions and Billions" in corporate welfare Elon Musk has received. Musk's right: Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" is a "disgusting abomination" that must be defeated. Let's do both. It'll be a win-win for America! Sanders was referring to Trump's threats to cut off federal subsidies and contracts with Musk's companies, which could cost Musk billions of dollars. He also was referring to Trump's tax and spending bill, which Musk called a "disgusting abomination" on X. Since Trump's inauguration, Sanders has been traveling the country on a "Fighting Oligarchy Tour" looking to build up resistance to the Trump administration. While Sanders did not advocate for Musk's deportation, in February 2020, he did vote to convict Trump in the Senate impeachment trial during his first administration. He also voted to convict Trump in his second impeachment trial in 2021. Meanwhile in June 2025, Steve Bannon, a former aide to Trump, called for an investigation into Musk's immigration status: "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status, because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately." "Bernie Sanders Brings His Fight against 'Oligarchy' to Philadelphia." WHYY, Accessed 6 June 2025. Booker, Brakkton. "Trump Impeachment Trial Verdict: How Senators Voted." NPR, 13 Feb. 2021. NPR, Breslow, Jason. "In a Break with Trump, Elon Musk Calls the GOP Megabill a 'Disgusting Abomination.'" NPR, 3 June 2025. NPR, Accessed 6 June 2025. Liles, Jordan. "Trump Once Calling Epstein 'fun' and 'Terrific Guy' Resurfaced during Feud with Musk." Snopes, 5 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. "Trump Threatens to Cut off Elon Musk's Federal Subsidies. That Could Cost Tesla and SpaceX Billions." CBS News, 5 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. Pager, Tyler. "Steve Bannon Says He Told Trump to Investigate Elon Musk's Immigration Status." The New York Times, 5 June 2025. Accessed 6 June 2025. "Senator Sanders Votes to Convict President Trump " Senator Bernie Sanders." Senator Bernie Sanders, Accessed 6 June 2025.
