Here's the smart way for Trump to end the Israel-Iran war
Iran's flawed strategic doctrine, which was also practised by its proxy, Hezbollah, to equally bad result, is a doctrine I call trying to out-crazy an adversary. Iran and Hezbollah are always ready to go all the way, thinking that whatever their opponents might do in response, Hezbollah or Iran will always outdo them with a more extreme measure.
You name it – assassinate the prime minister of Lebanon, Rafik Hariri; blow up the US embassy in Beirut; help Bashar Assad murder thousands of his own people to stay in power – the imprints of Iran and its Hezbollah proxy are behind them all, together or separately. They are telling the world in effect: 'No one will out-crazy us, so beware if you get in a fight with us, you will lose. Because we go all the way — and you moderates just go away.'
That Iranian doctrine did help Hezbollah drive Israel out of southern Lebanon. But where it fell short was Iran and Hezbollah thinking they could drive Israelis out of their biblical homeland. Iran and Hezbollah are delusional in this regard – Hamas too. They keep referring to the Jewish state as a foreign colonial enterprise, with no indigenous connection to the land, and therefore they assume the Jews will eventually meet the same fate as the Belgians in the Belgian Congo. That is, under enough pressure they will eventually go back to their own version of Belgium.
But the Israeli Jews have no Belgium. They are as indigenous to their biblical homeland as the Palestinians, no matter what 'anticolonial' nonsense they teach at elite universities. Therefore, you will never out-crazy the Israeli Jews. If push comes to shove, they will out-crazy you.
Former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, both thought that Israel would never try to kill them personally, that Israel was, as Nasrallah liked to say, a 'spider web' that would just unravel one day under pressure. He paid with his life with that miscalculation last year, and the supreme leader probably would have as well if Trump had not intervened, reportedly, last week to stop Israel from killing him. These Israeli Jews will not be out-crazied. That is how they still have a state in a very tough neighbourhood.
That said, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his band of extremists running the Israeli government today are in the grip of their own strategic fallacy, which I call the doctrine of 'once and for all'.
I wish I had a dollar for every time, after some murderous attack on Israeli Jews by Palestinians or Iranian proxies, the Israeli government declared that it was going to solve the problem with force 'once and for all'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
16 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Lip service': Former Israeli prime minister rejects Palestinian recognition
Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, a passionate supporter of a two-state solution and fierce critic of successor Benjamin Netanyahu, has dismissed Australia's move to recognise Palestine as a populist, symbolic act that will not advance a two-state solution. Olmert, who served as prime minister from 2006 to 2009, said the Albanese government should have waited until key conditions, such as Palestinian elections, were met before recognising Palestinian statehood, rather than accepting assurances from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. 'I'm a supporter of a two-state solution, I presented a solution to the Palestinian leader in 2008 while we negotiated peace between Israel and Palestine,' Olmert said in an interview with this masthead. 'What I do not understand is why the prime minister recognises a state that doesn't exist rather than try and influence the two sides, the Palestinian side and the Israeli side, to embark on a negotiation that will help create it. 'I don't see what the practical dimension is in recognising a state that doesn't exist ... I have no problem with anyone who makes a statement saying they support a two-state solution. 'The question is: can we depart for a second from the political rhetoric and lip service [in favour of] a more consistent, thoughtful, careful and smart process, in collaboration with other countries, to create the necessary infrastructure and platform that will allow the actual implementation of such idea in reality.' Albanese said his government had recognised Palestine because 'there is a moment of opportunity here, and Australia will work with the international community to seize it'. 'The toll of the status quo is growing by the day, and it can be measured in innocent lives,' he said on Monday.
The Age
16 minutes ago
- The Age
‘Lip service': Former Israeli prime minister rejects Palestinian recognition
Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, a passionate supporter of a two-state solution and fierce critic of successor Benjamin Netanyahu, has dismissed Australia's move to recognise Palestine as a populist, symbolic act that will not advance a two-state solution. Olmert, who served as prime minister from 2006 to 2009, said the Albanese government should have waited until key conditions, such as Palestinian elections, were met before recognising Palestinian statehood, rather than accepting assurances from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. 'I'm a supporter of a two-state solution, I presented a solution to the Palestinian leader in 2008 while we negotiated peace between Israel and Palestine,' Olmert said in an interview with this masthead. 'What I do not understand is why the prime minister recognises a state that doesn't exist rather than try and influence the two sides, the Palestinian side and the Israeli side, to embark on a negotiation that will help create it. 'I don't see what the practical dimension is in recognising a state that doesn't exist ... I have no problem with anyone who makes a statement saying they support a two-state solution. 'The question is: can we depart for a second from the political rhetoric and lip service [in favour of] a more consistent, thoughtful, careful and smart process, in collaboration with other countries, to create the necessary infrastructure and platform that will allow the actual implementation of such idea in reality.' Albanese said his government had recognised Palestine because 'there is a moment of opportunity here, and Australia will work with the international community to seize it'. 'The toll of the status quo is growing by the day, and it can be measured in innocent lives,' he said on Monday.
9 News
16 minutes ago
- 9 News
US and China agree to critical extension, preventing tariff surge on the world's two largest economies
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Without the agreement, tariffs were set to immediately surge, risking a return to ultra-high levels that had formed an effective blockade on trade between the world's two largest economies. The news, first reported by CNBC, comes hours ahead of a 12.01am ET (2.01pm AEST) deadline when tariffs on Chinese goods were set to rise to 64 per cent from 30 per cent. US President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Monday, August 11, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) It's unclear what rates China would have charged on American goods, which are currently subject to minimum 10 per cent tariffs. It also comes after Trump imposed a slew of "reciprocal" tariffs on trading partners around the world, which have raised the United States' effective tariff rate to levels not seen since the Great Depression. Higher tariffs on Chinese goods, America's second-largest source of imports, would have almost certainly raised the costs many American businesses and consumers could pay — or already are paying — because of increased import taxes Trump has enacted. After meeting in Sweden last month, Chinese negotiators went as far as to say that a deal was reached. Chinese President Xi Jinping applauds during an international business meeting at The Great Hall Of The People on March 28, 2025 in Beijing, China. (Getty) Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, both of whom attended the meeting, disputed that, saying nothing was final without Trump's word. "We'll see what happens. They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi and myself," Trump said earlier on Monday. At the conclusion of last month's meeting with Chinese trade officials, Bessent said he warned his Chinese counterparts that continuing to purchase Russian oil would bring about huge tariffs under legislation in Congress that allows Trump to impose levies up to 500 per cent. It's not clear if the administration is prepared to double down on those threats yet. Trump recently threatened India, which also purchases Russian oil, albeit considerably less than China, with a 50 per cent tariff rate if it continues to do so by the end of this month. The move to penalize India and not other countries purchasing oil from Russia has been widely criticized by the Indian government, which claims it's being unfairly singled out. Trump suggested that more countries could face similar threats. "You're going to see a lot more. So this is a taste," he said last week. And over the weekend in a Fox News interview, Vice President JD Vance said such tariffs on China are on the table, though Trump had not yet made a decision. Containers are seen at the port in Qingdao, in China's eastern Shandong province, on August 4. The United States and China agreed to pause tariff hikes on each other's goods for an additional 90 days. (CNN) "Given that we seem to be headed toward some type of deal with China leading to some kind of meeting between Xi and Trump, the administration has definitely been more conciliatory towards China in the past few weeks," said Wendy Cutler, a former US trade negotiator who is now vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. Were China to give in to the administration's desires to stop purchasing Russian oil, it would be done "quietly and gradually" rather than a Trump announcement on social media, she added. Bessent also said he voiced concerns and regrets about China's sales of over $15 billion worth of dual-use technology equipment (that is, equipment that has both commercial and military uses) to Russia and its purchase of sanctioned Iranian oil. Another sticking point between the US and China has been exportations of rare earth magnets. China agreed to increase exports, but Trump says China has not held up its end of the bargain. The US also wants to find an American buyer for TikTok, which is currently owned by a Chinese company. Congress has set out a timeline for the app to find new ownership or face a US ban. US stocks closed lower Monday ahead of key inflation data set to be published Tuesday morning. World Donald Trump China USA tariffs CONTACT US
