Sars deducts billions from RAF for ‘Eskom payments' despite court interdict
Claims it had no choice otherwise National Treasury's records 'would not be accurate'.
There is no official comment about Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana reportedly having been due to provide 'a certain affidavit' to the court since April. Picture: Moneyweb
The South African Revenue Service (Sars) has, despite being interdicted from doing so, deducted R5.07 billion of the R5.1 billion it planned to deduct from the fuel levy payments it makes to the Road Accident Fund (RAF) – the R5.1 billion being the 'diesel refunds' amount Sars has agreed to pay Eskom.
This was confirmed on Wednesday by RAF head of communications McIntosh Polela in response to questions emailed to the fund on 13 June.
Moneyweb reported on 17 June that the RAF had applied for a contempt of court order against Sars because of its alleged failure to adhere to an interim interdict obtained by the fund in the High Court in Pretoria on 26 March 2025.
The interim interdict prohibits Sars from deducting R5.1 billion – or any part of this amount – from the RAF fuel levies it collects and pays to the fund.
Moneyweb requested comment from Sars, also on 17 June, about the alleged continuation of these deductions following the issuing of the interim interdict but has not yet received a response.
ALSO READ: RAF castigated in high court case, but gets further Sars 'relief' in another
Deductions continued
Polela said Sars made its most recent deduction on Monday this week, and up to that date (23 June) has deducted a total of R5 072 360 844.85.
He said deductions made by Sars to the monthly fuel levy payments it makes to the RAF were made this year on:
20 February (before the interim interdict prohibiting the deductions was issued)
28 March
22 April
27 May
23 June.
Sars's alleged non-adherence to the interim interdict emerged in a parliamentary portfolio committee on transport meeting with the RAF on 11 June.
Suspended RAF CEO Collins Letsoalo appealed to the portfolio committee to help the RAF with the issue of non-payment by Sars.
'Sars has acted recalcitrant,' said Letsoalo at the time.
'In fact, we have opened a case of contempt of court against them.'
He added that, since April, Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana is supposed to have submitted 'a certain affidavit' to court on an urgent basis, but he has not done this and 'so they [Sars] keep on deducting the money'.
'Sars is unlawfully deducting our money. I hope this portfolio committee will write to them and ask them because clearly the ministry has not helped us,' he said.
Questioned by portfolio committee chair Selelo Selamolela about the issue, Letsoalo said the RAF won its case against Sars, but the tax authority ignored the court order and still deducted the money.
He indicated that by then – 11 June 2025 – he was sure Sars had probably deducted R5 billion of the money.
ALSO READ: Scopa launches inquiry into RAF misconduct claims
What does Treasury say?
Moneyweb requested comment from National Treasury on 13 June about Godongwana's alleged failure to submit an affidavit to court related to the RAF's contempt of court application against Sars.
Moneyweb also asked National Treasury if it could confirm that Sars continued to deduct amounts from the monthly fuel levy payments it makes to the RAF after the high court interdict was issued – and, if so, for comment about these deductions while an interdict prohibiting these deductions is in place.
It responded last week, stating: 'The matter is before the court therefore, the National Treasury cannot comment until a ruling has been made.'
ALSO READ: RAF CEO placed on special leave with full pay, as MPs grill fund
Original dispute was with Eskom
The dispute between the RAF and Sars relates to 'diesel refunds' claimed by Eskom in terms of the Customs and Excise Act.
A dispute between Sars and Eskom arose when Sars decided that Eskom was not entitled to the diesel refunds for a period of about 30 months between 2019 to 2021.
However, Sars and Eskom then entered into a settlement agreement on 17 October 2024 in terms of which Sars claimed it was obliged to pay Eskom an amount of about R5.1 billion.
But Sars only informed the RAF of this agreement on 12 November 2024 – and that it would recoup the R5.1 billion from the RAF levies over a two-month period, which was subsequently extended to five months.
Despite the RAF declaring a dispute with Sars in December 2024 in terms of the Inter-Governmental Relations Framework (IRF) Act and the ongoing dispute resolution process in terms of this act, Sars deducted the first tranche of about R1.2 billion from the RAF monthly levy payments. The fund only became aware of this deduction on 26 February 2025.
Sars claimed it had no choice but to proceed in deducting/recouping the money because, if it did not, National Treasury's records would not be accurate.
This resulted in the RAF lodging its urgent high court application.
In a judgment handed down on 26 March 2025, Judge Ronel Tolmay said she was informed by counsel representing Sars that the certificate to National Treasury regarding the second tranche payment would be issued the same day she was hearing the matter.
Tolmay interdicted and prohibited Sars from making the deductions, declaring the order operative for a maximum of 45 days from the date of the judgment, or until the dispute in terms of the IRF Act has been resolved.
It is unclear when the RAF's contempt of court application against Sars will be heard.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
29 minutes ago
- IOL News
Road Accident Fund acknowledges Scopa's inquiry into its operations
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts has resolved to launch a full committee inquiry into allegations of maladministration, financial mismanagement, wasteful and reckless expenditure, and related financial misconduct at the Road Accident Fund. Image: File The Road Accident Fund (RAF) said on Friday it noted the decision of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) to institute a full committee inquiry into its affairs. This comes days after Scopa resolved earlier this week to launch a full committee inquiry into allegations of maladministration, financial mismanagement, wasteful and reckless expenditure, and related financial misconduct at the RAF. The decision was taken after attempts by the committee to obtain truthful, complete information from the RAF board and executive management came to no avail. The RAF said in a statement it respected Scopa as an accountability body which derives its functions and powers from Rule 245 of the rules of the National Assembly. 'We will continue to account to the people of South Africa through this important organ of Parliament. We reiterate and put emphasis on what we have already reported in the RAF annual reports for the last three years, that the RAF has been financially unsustainable since its establishment in 1946.' The RAF stated that it has been the subject of multiple commissions of inquiry, and the common thread across all commissions' findings has been the disconnect between the funding model and the benefit structure. 'The unsustainable funding and operating models were further compounded by an increase in administrative costs, driven mainly by legal and medical costs,' said the accident insurance fund. In a memorandum prepared for Scopa, committee Chairperson Songezo Zibi cited issues related to the organogram and vacancies at the RAF. Zibi also mentioned the submission of inaccurate, misleading, and/or false information to Parliament by the entity. There were also issues related to whistle-blower reports on two media services contracts worth R1 billion, RAF's acquisition of offices, as well as litigation against the Auditor-General and matters of rule of law. 'The information I set out raises numerous and serious concerns about corporate governance at the RAF,' he said. Scopa's secretariat is expected to draft the terms of reference for the inquiry to be considered by the MPs on July 1 and then use the period afterwards to prepare for the inquiry. The DA wants the inquiry to cover all of the outrageous financial mismanagement identified over the past months and years at the RAF. In the letter to Zibi, DA MP Patrick Atkinson said they welcomed the resolution to initiate the parliamentary inquiry into the worsening crisis at the RAF. 'However, for this inquiry to be meaningful and in the public interest, it must be comprehensive in scope. A surface-level examination will fail to address the systematic mismanagement, misconduct and abuse of public funds that have defined the RAF's recent history,' Atkinson wrote. The RAF defended its use of litigation against the Auditor-General, which will form part of the inquiry. The entity has pursued the legal action despite being advised not to do so by the Transport Department. The RAF said it is only in the audit of financial statements that the disagreement with the Auditor-General of South Africa on the accounting policy change resulted in an adverse opinion. It also said it has internal forensic investigations and ethics divisions to ensure proper and transparent management of corrupt and unethical practices. 'An independently managed ethics and fraud hotline is available for staff and stakeholders to anonymously report any unethical and corrupt practices. Furthermore, the introduction of the RAF Contact Centre will go a long way in ensuring that claimants' queries are addressed.' The RAF said despite its positive strides, it continued to manage challenges associated with a transforming organisation. 'The 2025–30 strategic plan presents an opportunity to optimise areas that have worked and to improve where gaps still persist. To this end, the RAF proactively subjected the 2025/26 annual performance plan to an independent review by the AGSA. 'The RAF reiterates that the most urgent task required to ensure financial and operational sustainability for the Fund is a legislative review.'
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
SARS to trial major change to auto-assessments
For the first time ever, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) will trial auto-assessments for a select group of provisional taxpayers. Image: SARS For the first time ever, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) will trial auto-assessments for a select group of provisional taxpayers, making the process quicker and simpler for eligible individuals. SARS will identify eligible provisional taxpayers and invite them to opt into the auto-assessment system and them to opt into the auto-assessment system This trial begins with notifications from 7 July 2025 If selected and eligible, provisional taxpayers will enjoy the same streamlined auto-assessment process previously available only to non-provisional taxpayers Auto-assessments are pre-populated tax returns based on third-party data from: Employers (PAYE) Medical aids Retirement funds Banks and insurers If everything looks correct: You do nothing – your return is automatically processed – your return is automatically processed Refunds (if due) are paid within 72 business hours If you owe money, you must pay SARS via eFiling, the MobiApp, or bank If the info is incomplete or inaccurate: You can edit and submit your return manually via eFiling Typically: Self-employed individuals individuals People earning income from multiple sources Taxpayers who pay advance income tax in two or three instalments each year based on estimated earnings Taxpayer type Opens Closes Auto-Assessments 7 July 2025 20 July 2025 Individual (non-provisional) 21 July 2025 20 October 2025 Provisional 21 July 2025 19 January 2026 Trusts 21 July 2025 19 January 2026 Notification from SARS via SMS or email Log in via eFiling or MobiApp to review your auto-assessment If accurate → do nothing If incomplete/incorrect → file a return with corrections by the relevant deadline Refunds paid within 72 hours (if banking details are correct) Payments due must be settled by the date SARS provides If you're part of this new provisional taxpayer auto-assessment trial, watch for a SARS invitation and review your return carefully, as more complex income situations often need adjustments. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Businessman fined R82,000 for tax evasion
Errant taxpayer, Roelof Serdyn, was convicted of one count of failure to submit an Income Tax return, eight counts of failure to submit Pay as You Earn (EMP201) returns, and 32 counts of failure to submit VAT returns. Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers Businessman and errant taxpayer, Roelof Serdyn, was fined R82,000 for failing to submit Income Tax returns, Pay as You Earn returns, and Value Added Tax returns to the South African Revenue Service (SARS) between 2018 and 2024. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson, Eric Ntabazalila, said Serdyn - sentenced in the Bellville Magistrate's Court this week - was convicted of one count of failure to submit an Income Tax return, eight counts of failure to submit Pay as You Earn (EMP201) returns, and 32 counts of failure to submit VAT returns - all in contravention of the Tax Administration Act. Immediately after his sentence, Serdyn paid R42,000, and the balance of R40,000 was paid in monthly instalments of R5,000. Ntabazalila confirmed that a further cumulative amount of R164,000 or, in the alternative, 246 months imprisonment was suspended for five years on certain conditions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Serdyn was charged alongside his company, Akvaba (Pty) Ltd, but the charges against the company were withdrawn after its liquidation. The court heard that Akvaba (Pty) Ltd was registered as a taxpayer and was therefore obligated to comply with all tax obligations towards the SARS. 'Serdyn was the representative taxpayer, employer, and representative vendor of Akvaba (Pty) Ltd. He was responsible for the company's tax affairs, which included the submission of all tax returns (IT, PAYE, and VAT) of Akvaba (Pty) Ltd. 'The accused ignored the reminders and final demand notices issued by SARS. When he was summoned to appear in court, the returns were submitted,' said Ntabazalila. In the lead up to the annual tax season opening, Ntabazalila said the case serves as a warning to persons acting as representative vendors, representative employers, and public officers who serve in these positions. 'These duties and responsibilities should not be taken lightly as non-compliance with such duties will have serious consequences for such incumbents in their capacity,' said Ntabazalila. The sentence in this case follows closely on the cases of J W Lubbe (and Jacor Transport Holding), who was sentenced to a fine of R148,000 on June 11, 2025, and H L van der Westhuizen (and Tempo Konstruksie CC), who was sentenced to a fine of R126,000 on May 30, 2025. In a statement, SARS said this tax season marks an important period where income tax returns of the majority of taxpayers are automatically assessed. The category of taxpayers who are automatically assessed will receive notification from SARS from July 7 to 20, 2025. Taxpayers who do not receive notifications from SARS that they are automatically assessed are encouraged to submit their tax returns in a timely and accurate manner from July 21, 2025. The Filing Season will close on October 20, 2025, for non-provisional individuals. SARS urged all taxpayers to prepare their documentation early to check their assessments and to avoid last-minute delays for those who must submit an income return. 'In line with our strategic objective to make it easy for taxpayers to comply, we have identified a large segment of non-provisional and provisional taxpayers who receives income from one or more sources from formal and other forms of employment and whose tax affairs are not complicated have been selected to be automatically assessed,' SARS said. Taxpayers can access their auto-assessed income tax returns through any of SARS's channels, such as the SARS MobiApp or SARS eFiling, to review and verify the completeness and accuracy of the information that resulted in the auto assessment. For more information, visit the SARS website.
