Tacoma braces for ‘diminished' ability to repair streets after defeat of Prop 1
In a statement issued Wednesday, the city said it's concerned about maintaining the city's infrastructure needs – though it understands the tighter budgets that Tacoma residents are likely contending with.
In the first round of results released on election night, 54.05% of voters had voted against the measure, with a roughly 19.17% voter turnout in Tacoma and roughly 200 ballots left to count.
'Looking ahead, we anticipate that the level of service residents rely on will unfortunately be diminished over time as maintaining and upgrading our infrastructure becomes increasingly more challenging,' the statement reads.
Prop 1, if approved, would have been a permanent levy – whereas previous packages voters approved are on track to expire in December 2025 and February 2026.
The council is 'actively exploring' next steps, including a potential revised measure that could come back to voters at a later date, according to the statement.
The measure, known as Streets Initiative II or Proposition 1, proposed increasing property taxes by 25 cents per $1,000 of assessed value and increasing the utility-earnings tax by 2% for natural gas, electric and phone utilities – up from the 20 cents per $1,000 of assessed value and 1.5% utility-earnings tax hikes that voters last approved about 10 years ago.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Tacoma creates labor task force after workers bill of rights misses ballot deadline
The Tacoma City council voted Aug. 12 to start a task force charged with reviewing labor standards in Tacoma. The move came after the council missed the deadline to get a citizen's initiative seeking to improve working conditions in Tacoma on the November ballot. The council made their decision in a 7-1 vote, a rare split for a council that often makes decisions with unanimous votes. Council member Sandesh Sadalge was absent. Council member Olgy Diaz was the sole dissenting voice, saying that she feels the process was rushed and that she didn't understand how the task force would address concerns about the workers bill of rights. The newly-approved task force will consist of 15 people appointed by members of the council and the mayor. They will suggest recommendations to improve labor policy in Tacoma. The council's approval also directs $50,000 to be directed to support the task force's work. Mayor Victoria Woodards first proposed the task force at the council's Aug. 8 special meeting, saying that conversations about the workers bill of rights raised concerns and questions about labor standards in Tacoma that she hopes the task force can address. Diaz expressed doubts. 'I have a lot of pause about the mayor bringing this forward in such a rushed timeline,' she said at the meeting. 'We really need to be more transparent with folks about what the goal of this is and what that $50,000 is going to be used for and who that's going to go to. I don't know who would convene this, what kind of consulting process there's going to be.' The vote comes after controversy around the proposed workers bill of rights in Tacoma. Organizers with Tacoma For All, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 367 and the Tacoma Democratic Socialists of America had since February been gathering signatures to get the measure on the ballot. The proposal seeks to improve working conditions in Tacoma and set a $20 minimum wage. They delivered the signatures to city officials in late June, and city and county officials validated the petition by July 10, leaving Tacoma's City Council with 30 days to decide whether to approve it directly or to send it to the ballot. While council members have in recent weeks expressed support for the sentiments behind the measure, they also expressed concern about the logistics involved with implementing the measure. In the special meeting on Aug. 8 they voted unanimously to send it to the ballot – three days after the county's deadline to do so. Just before the council's Aug. 12 meeting, Tacoma for All, UFCW Local 367, and the Tacoma DSA filed a lawsuit against the city, Pierce County and County Auditor Linda Farmer alleging that they did not act with 'reasonable promptness' to get the item on the November ballot. The suit also called for a judge to put the item on the ballot despite missing the deadline. The council's on the task force was met with a mixed response from people at the meeting. Activists criticized the decision, some making the case that the task force is an effort from the city to get an alternative to the workers bill of rights on the table. Ty Moore, co-executive director with Tacoma For All, said it was similar to the council's efforts to propose an alternative measure to the tenants bill of rights which appeared on the ballot in 2023. The council is using the task force to prepare an alternative measure to the workers bill of rights, he said. The same activists in 2023 sued the city, Pierce County and county auditor, alleging that the city violated its charter when the council put an alternate renters' rights measure on the ballot that year. A judge ruled in favor of the activists, and voters eventually approved the tenant bill of rights. 'There is a right to initiative for a reason – it's because when voters disagree with the council, they should be able to exercise their right,' Moore said at the meeting. 'Voters did everything right and you failed in your obligation to sustain democracy in this city. Shame on you. ' Members of the business community expressed support for the decision, saying it will broadly represent workers and business owners in conversations about labor standards in a way that the workers bill of rights didn't. 'It's far better than Measure 2, that had been proposed without consulting stakeholders that really have a stake in the game,' Rose Gundersen of the Washington Retail Association said at the Aug. 12 meeting. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's how The News Tribune decides when to do candidate endorsements
Let me start by saying, I should have published this column over a month ago. Journalists hate missing deadlines, so it pains me to realize this information is overdue. No, I'm not telling you who The News Tribune editorial board is endorsing in the 2025 Tacoma mayoral race. But we've heard from quite a few Tacomans asking where that endorsement was during the primary election. So as Opinion Editor, I'm here to explain what our plan is, and to promise to make our process more clear going forward. The short version is this: this newspaper's editorial board will issue an endorsement for the 2025 mayoral race in October, on or before the day you receive your general election ballot in the mail. While the election results aren't certified yet, the current frontrunners from the primary election are Anders Ibsen and John Hines. In all likelihood, the board will be choosing between those two candidates. And here's the why. The editorial board makes decisions each year about which races to offer endorsements for in the primary election, and which to leave for the general. If we've already endorsed a candidate in the primary, we won't revisit that race for the general election. There are simply too many races to consider in one go. The editorial board is currently made up of two News Tribune employees and three community volunteers, and we have to use our time wisely. That requires a judgment call on when to endorse in a given race. Sometimes it's easy to spot when the editorial board should endorse in a primary or a general election. Some races skip the primary, such as the Tacoma City Council District 2 race, which only has two candidates. And some have a more manageable number of candidates in the primary, allowing the board to have a meaningful conversation on each candidate's stances. Others present more of a conundrum. The board this year decided to save the Tacoma mayoral race endorsement for the general election. There were pros and cons for both options, and we understand that many voters would have liked some guidance when choosing among six candidates for an open seat in the mayor's office. To arrive at a choice in October, the editorial board will pose questions to both mayoral candidates. We hope that diving deeper with two candidates will offer more insight into their visions for the city's government, and the differences between them. That's harder to get at in a six-person panel interview. There's still value in vetting the primary candidates. With this in mind, the editorial board did go through the endorsement process with all six candidates running for the at-large Tacoma City Council Pos. 6. What's more, our news team covered mayoral candidate forums and reported on the race during the primary campaign season. Going forward, the editorial board will aim to be transparent about what readers can expect leading up to primaries and general elections.
Axios
04-08-2025
- Axios
Seattle to vote on renewing Democracy Voucher Program
The future of Seattle's Democracy Voucher Program is on Tuesday's ballot, as voters decide whether to renew the public campaign financing system for 10 more years. The big picture: Supporters of Seattle's first-in-the-nation voucher program say it allows more people to participate in politics, while opponents argue that too few people use the system to justify its cost. How it works: Seattle residents get four $25 vouchers each election cycle, which they can donate to candidates who opt to participate in the program. Most Seattle candidates this year are accepting the vouchers, which come with fundraising and spending limits. A citywide property tax has raised $3 million annually to pay for the program over the past decade, costing the average Seattle property owner about $8 per year, per city estimates. The latest: If approved Tuesday, Proposition 1 will increase the tax slightly, generating $4.5 million yearly, or $45 million over 10 years. The owner of an $864,000 home — the median assessed value in Seattle this year — would pay $13 a year, about $5 more than under the existing levy. What they're saying: Program supporters say it has broadened the city's pool of political donors and encouraged more people to run for office by reducing financial barriers. "Today, campaign donors better reflect the diversity of our city, by income, race, age, and neighborhood," King County Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda said in a video voter guide statement supporting Prop. 1. The other side: Less than 5% of Seattleites used their vouchers in 2023, which opponent Ari Hoffman, a local talk radio host, says reflects a lack of interest in the program. "Seattle is one of the most expensive cities in America, and yet our city government is forcing you to pay a special tax just to fund political campaigns," Hoffman said in the video voter guide.
