Justice served in Kevin Morais murder case
In a statement today, the association said the ruling was significant not only for the late Morais and his family but also for all members of the judiciary and legal fraternity who uphold the rule of law without compromise.
'This tragic incident serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by legal officers, particularly deputy public prosecutors, in discharging their duties to uphold truth and justice despite constant risks and threats.
'Despite concerns over the recurrence of such incidents, legal officers in the judicial and legal services will remain firm and resolute in their commitment to uphold the supremacy of the Federal Constitution and the rule of law,' the statement said.
JALSOA also conveyed its appreciation to the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) for conducting a thorough and comprehensive investigation, as well as to the team of deputy public prosecutors from the Attorney General's Chambers for their professionalism, diligence and courage at every stage of the proceedings.
'To the late Datuk Anthony Kevin Morais, though our acquaintance was brief, your contributions and spirit live on in our memories and in the principles we uphold. Justice has been served and your legacy remains,' it said.
Yesterday, the Federal Court upheld the death sentence imposed on a former pathologist for the murder of Morais in 2015.
A three-man bench led by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat affirmed the murder conviction of Colonel Dr R. Kunaseegaran, 62, S. Nimalan, 31 and S. Ravi Chandran, 53.
However, both Nimalan and Ravi Chandran were spared the gallows after the court commuted the death sentences imposed on them by the High Court to life imprisonment.
Nimalan was sentenced to 35 years in prison with 12 strokes of the cane, while Ravi Chandran was sentenced to 40 years in jail. The court did not impose whipping on Ravi Chandran, as he is above 50 years of age.
Justice Tengku Maimun said Kunaseegaran's death sentence remained as he had withdrawn his appeal against the sentence.
Meanwhile, the panel, also comprising Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and Federal Court judge Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang, discharged and acquitted the other three individuals, namely R. Dinishwaran, 32, A.K. Thinesh Kumar, 31, and M. Vishwanath, 34, for the murder.
Morais, who was reported missing on Sept 4, 2015, was last seen leaving his apartment at Menara Duta, Kuala Lumpur, in a Proton Perdana.
His body was found in a cement-filled oil drum at Persiaran Subang Mewah, Subang Jaya, on Sept 16 the same year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 days ago
- New Straits Times
Sosma amendments should prioritise legal access and timely hearings, say experts
KUALA LUMPUR: As the government enters the final stages of reviewing the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma), a former Suhakam commissioner has identified key areas he hopes will be addressed during upcoming stakeholder consultations. Ragunath Kesavan said amendments should prioritise enhanced legal safeguards for detainees, including guaranteed access to legal counsel, the option of bail, and improved trial conditions. He also urged the government to shorten the extended remand periods currently permitted under Sosma and to ensure that hearings proceed without unnecessary delays. In addition, he stressed the need to strengthen procedural integrity to prevent abuse and ensure the law aligns more closely with the Criminal Procedure Code. The government recently announced it would hold engagement sessions with key stakeholders, including the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam), as part of the review process. Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Andrew Khoo called on the government to disclose its proposed amendments early, along with the rationale and justification for each proposed change. He also stressed the need for meaningful and substantive stakeholder engagement before the Bill is tabled in Parliament, warning against superficial consultations that amount to little more than a "tick-the-box" exercise. Ultimately, Khoo believes the law should be repealed in its entirety, citing reported abuses such as denying detainees access to legal counsel and prolonged delays in bringing cases to trial. On July 29, Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said the ministry planned to amend Sosma following sustained calls from rights groups for its review or repeal. The ministry intends to present the proposed amendments in Parliament, pending Cabinet approval. Saifuddin said 73 offences under the law had been identified and reviewed to ensure its implementation was consistent with the Federal Constitution, Malaysia's international obligations, and the principle of due process of law.
New Straits Times
4 days ago
- New Straits Times
Feasibility study on human rights tribunal underway, says Kulasegaran
KUALA LUMPUR: The government has formally set up a feasibility study committee to explore the establishment of a Human Rights Tribunal in Malaysia, with findings expected to be finalised by October. Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform), M. Kulasegaran, said the Feasibility Study Committee on the Human Rights Tribunal (JKKTHAM) was established in June, following an initial meeting chaired by him on Nov 21, last year to discuss the proposal. He said five JKKTHAM meetings have been held, and the research team presented its preliminary findings to the committee earlier this month. These findings include the conceptual and theoretical framework, an analysis of existing human rights mechanisms in Malaysia, a comparative study of international practices, and a proposed model for a Malaysian Human Rights Tribunal. "A focus group discussion (FGD) involving stakeholders was held on July 17 in Kuala Lumpur and will be followed by zonal FGDs, including sessions in Sabah and Sarawak. "The proposal to establish a Human Rights Tribunal is part of the Madani government's institutional reform efforts, aimed at creating a body that provides a more accessible alternative mechanism for victims of human rights violations to seek justice," he said. He also assured that the establishment of the tribunal would be aligned with the Federal Constitution and would also take into account input from syariah (Islamic law). Kulasegaran said the committee is chaired by former Court of Appeal judge Datuk Mah Weng Kwai and includes representatives from the Asean Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights, Suhakam, the Malaysian Bar Council, academia, legal practitioners, relevant government agencies, and civil society organisations. He was responding to a question from Teresa Kok (PH–Seputeh) on the update of the establishment of the tribunal and how the government would ensure Suhakam's recommendations are enforced through the proposed tribunal, given that many human rights violations are also criminal offences. She also cited the case of Teoh Beng Hock, who died at the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) premises and whose case was eventually marked as No Further Action, questioning whether his family could bring the matter to the tribunal once it is set up. Kulasegarran said the tribunal may serve as an alternative and accessible justice mechanism for victims of human rights violations, potentially hearing cases such as those involving Teoh Beng Hock, though the specific framework and jurisdiction are still under discussion. "I believe that cases involving human rights violations could fall within the scope of the tribunal once it is established. "However, it is still too early to say definitively, as the basic framework and parameters have yet to be finalised, which is why stakeholder engagement is ongoing. "But I concur with you that such matters can be investigated and further action can be taken, as is the practice in other countries with functioning human rights tribunals," he said. He added that they are also examining the implementation of Suhakam's recommendations or findings through the proposed Human Rights Tribunal, particularly in terms of feasibility and legal implications.
Malay Mail
4 days ago
- Malay Mail
Home minister: Sosma review in last stages, stakeholder engagements ongoing
KUALA LUMPUR, July 30 — The government is finalising its review of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma), with proposed amendments expected to be tabled in Parliament soon, Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said. In a written parliamentary reply to Bagan MP Lim Guan Eng, Saifuddin said the Home Ministry is also nearly done with a policy memorandum on the matter. Lim had asked for an update on the Sosma review, which involves scrutinising 73 offences under the Act for consistency with human rights standards, and whether stakeholder consultations had taken place. Saifuddin confirmed the ministry is reviewing all 73 offences to ensure their application aligns with the Federal Constitution and Malaysia's international human rights obligations. He added that the review process includes ongoing stakeholder engagements with the Royal Malaysia Police, the Attorney General's Chambers, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam), the judiciary, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), academics, and legal experts. 'The ministry has conducted and will continue engagement sessions with various parties to ensure a comprehensive and balanced outcome,' he said. Last week, Saifuddin had said his ministry plans to table a policy paper on the amendments in August. He said one of the key areas under review is Section 13, which deals with bail provisions, including offences categorised as bailable, non-bailable, and unbailable. Once complete, the amendments will be brought to Parliament following Cabinet approval. The Najib administration introduced Sosma when it repealed the controversial Internal Security Act (ISA), which had allowed for indefinite detention without trial.
