logo
Trump administration asks tiny Pacific nation of Palau to accept migrants deported from US

Trump administration asks tiny Pacific nation of Palau to accept migrants deported from US

The Guardian23-07-2025
The Trump administration has requested that the small Pacific nation of Palau accept asylum seekers currently residing in the US, amid a wider push from the US to deport migrants to countries they are not from.
Palau, a country of about 18,000 that lies just east of the Philippines, is considering a draft agreement to resettle 'third country nationals' from the US who 'may seek protection and against return to their home country'. The draft agreement does not detail how many individuals may be sent to Palau, nor what the Pacific nation would receive in return.
'Both Parties shall take into account … requests by third country nationals for asylum, refugee protection, or equivalent temporary protection,' the draft agreement, seen by the Guardian, states. 'The Government of the United States of America shall not transfer unaccompanied minors pursuant to this Agreement.'
A letter from Palau's president Surangel Whipps Jr regarding the draft agreement and seen by the Guardian, makes clear the proposal is far from final and is subject to further discussion. It also states Palau would have 'full discretion to decide whether or not to accept any individuals.'
The request to Palau marks the latest attempt by the Trump administration to remove migrants from within its borders. A supreme court ruling in June paved the way for the US government to remove migrants and transfer them to countries they are not from. Since then, the US has completed the transfer of migrants including South Sudan and Eswatini.
According to Doris Meissner, who leads the Migration Policy Institute's US Immigration program and who is a former commissioner of the US Immigration and Naturalization Service, the draft agreement with Palau mirrors other Trump administration requests made to 'scores' of other countries for migrant resettlement.
'Because most of the countries are small, far from the US, and not familiar to most Americans, the reason for such actions is primarily to heighten fear within immigrant communities in the US of being sent to distant places where they have no family or other connections,' Meissner said.
Unlike the United States, Palau is not a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention, an international treaty which obliges countries to protect people fleeing persecution and which provides a framework on how asylum seekers and refugees should be treated in the country of refuge. Noting this, the draft agreement states that Palau would instead act 'in accordance with its constitution' and its 'underlying humanitarian principles'.
Last week Palau's President convened a meeting with the country's national congress and Council of Chiefs to discuss the request. In response to questions on the matter, Palau's Office of the President directed the Guardian to a statement issued after the meeting, stating that leaders 'reiterated their longstanding partnership with the United States' but more information was needed 'before any decision is made'.
A spokesperson from the US state department said that it was a 'top priority' to implement 'the Trump Administration's immigration policies'.
'In some cases, we will work with other countries to facilitate the removal from the United States of nationals of third countries who seek asylum or other forms of protection in the United States,' the spokesperson said. 'Ongoing engagement with foreign governments is vital to deterring illegal and mass migration and securing our borders.'
Palau holds deep ties with the US under a Compacts of Free Association (Cofa) agreement, which gives the country millions of dollars in budget support and aid. In 2023, Cofa funds accounted for about 30% of Palau's government revenue. This relationship may mean Palau's leaders 'feel pressured to accept this deal,' Camilla Pohle, a Pacific analyst, said.
'The compact provides Palau with a lot of funding as well as programs and services, and there's so much uncertainty under Trump about what kinds of things could end up on the chopping block,' said Pohle, whose position with the US Institute of Peace was recently terminated as a result of cuts made by the Trump administration.
'A deal like this has no material benefit to Palau whatsoever, and if Palau agrees to it, it will be essentially under duress, fearing that if they say no, that there will be some kind of negative repercussion,' she added.
Pohle said that coupled with the Trump administration's decision to pull away from its climate commitments – a key priority for Pacific nations – the request would have a long-term impact on geopolitics in the region.
'This kind of policy is doing such damage to the US strategy in the Pacific that China will easily be able to capitalise on it,' Pohle said. 'It's taking what the Trump administration wants while offering almost nothing in return.'
This is not the first time the US has asked Palau to accept people. In 2009, Palau agreed to resettle 17 Chinese Muslims held in Guantánamo Bay.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We're prepared if protests turn violent, police say ahead of string of anti-migrant demonstrations
We're prepared if protests turn violent, police say ahead of string of anti-migrant demonstrations

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

We're prepared if protests turn violent, police say ahead of string of anti-migrant demonstrations

Police chiefs have warned they are ready to 'mobilise significant and specialist resources' if unrest breaks out at a string of anti-migrant protests planned at hotels housing asylum seekers. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) is working with forces across the country and monitoring intelligence in preparation for a fresh wave of protests on Friday, with demonstrations planned at up to 14 hotels across the country. It comes as the Metropolitan Police is also expected to come under pressure on Saturday when a National March for Palestine is planned in the capital. A separate pro-Palestine Action rally could result in mass arrests with 500 people expected to hold signs saying 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' in defiance of anti-terror laws. Anti-migrant protesters are expected to return to The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, on Friday, where violence erupted last month after an Ethiopian refugee was charged with sexual assault for allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Demonstrators are also set to return to the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf, where a group wearing face masks and carrying smoke bombs made a 'concerted effort' to break in last weekend. Other anti-migrant demonstrations are planned at hotels in Birmingham, Wolverhampton, Leeds and Norwich, among others, in what is being billed as UK-wide protests to 'abolish the asylum system'. Organisers have said the events will be 'locally led peaceful protests ' with no masks and no alcohol in posters shared widely on social media. Ahead of the widespread action, Chief Constable BJ Harrington, chair of the NPCC Operations Coordination Committee, said: 'We have robust and well-tested proactive plans in place, with the ability to mobilise significant and specialist resources, if necessary. "Public order response officers will be supported by investigation teams who will gather evidence and ensure those responsible for any acts of criminality, should they occur, are identified and held to account. 'Policing is not anti-protest, we are anti-crime and we will continue to work with local communities to ensure that they are safe and serious disruption is prevented.' The Police Federation, which represents rank and file officers, has warned that another summer of unrest places forces and officers under strain. 'Public order duties often mean long shifts, cancelled leave, missed family time and real risk,' a spokesman added. 'That takes its toll. This isn't just about numbers; it's about resilience, wellbeing, and a system under strain.' It comes ahead of the possibility of yet more mass arrests in London on Saturday, after the Met vowed to continue its crackdown on those showing support for Palestine Action. Campaign group Defend Our Juries has said more than 500 people are ready to be arrested by holding placards supporting the banned direct-action group in Parliament Square. They have warned their demonstrations will continue until a legal challenge over its proscription as a terror group is heard at the High Court in November. At least 221 people have been arrested across the country under terror laws for supporting Palestine Action since it was banned in July, with ten people charged so far. Despite plans for a large-scale demonstration with the 'intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system', a spokesperson for the Met said they are prepared for 'any eventuality' and anyone showing support for the group should expect to be arrested. Vicki Evans, senior national coordinator for Prevent and Pursue at Counter Terrorism Policing, said that they have 'robust plans' in place to respond to activity in support of Palestine Action. 'At this time, it remains illegal to be a member of or encourage support for the group Palestine Action,' she added. 'This legislation is specific to that group and does not interfere with the right to protest in support of the Palestinian cause. 'Operational plans are in place to ensure this right can be preserved over the coming days with protests expected in several major cities, including London.' Despite pressures on prison capacity, a Ministry of Justice spokesman insisted the system is prepared to 'act quickly' if more cells are needed. Officials will not hesitate to use contingency measures if they are faced with a sudden influx to the prison estate, The Independent understands. This could include activating Operation Early Dawn, which allows defendants to be held in police cells until prison beds become available. 'The swift and coordinated response to last year's unrest shows the criminal justice system is prepared to act quickly if needed to maintain stability and keep the public safe,' the spokesperson added.

Trump starts firing purge of top FBI agents opposed to his administration as they decry 'retribution'
Trump starts firing purge of top FBI agents opposed to his administration as they decry 'retribution'

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump starts firing purge of top FBI agents opposed to his administration as they decry 'retribution'

The Trump administration has reportedly dismissed multiple top FBI officials, according to several sources. Brian Driscoll, who served as acting director of the agency before Kash Patel took over, was one of those told to leave the agency, Fox News reports. Walter Giardina, a special agent who investigated Trump advisor Peter Navarro and Steven Jensen, the acting director of the FBI 's Washington Field Office, were also forced out, sources told the outlet. Jensen reportedly played a role in the department's January 6 investigations. Giardina was also involved in probing many matters related to Trump and has been accused by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, of being politicized against the president. 'Whistleblowers allege the following of Special Agent (SA) Walter Giardina, who played a significant role in the investigation and prosecution of Trump advisor, as well as, Crossfire Hurricane, Special Counsel Mueller's investigation, and the Dan Scavino, Roger Stone and Hillary Clinton cases,' Grassley's office wrote in a June press release. 'Giardina was an initial recipient of the Steele Dossier and falsely said that the report was corroborated as true,' it claimed. 'Giardina stated openly his animosity toward President Trump and made known his personal motivation to investigate Trump.' One official with knowledge of the firings told Fox News the removals were 'retribution.' The three senior FBI officials were reportedly told to leave the agency by Friday, though they were not given specifics as to why. The FBI did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment.

ICE Barbie' Kristi Noem's cosmetic surgery and puppy slaughter is brutally-mocked in latest South Park episode
ICE Barbie' Kristi Noem's cosmetic surgery and puppy slaughter is brutally-mocked in latest South Park episode

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

ICE Barbie' Kristi Noem's cosmetic surgery and puppy slaughter is brutally-mocked in latest South Park episode

South Park continued its rampage against the Trump administration in its latest episode, which portrayed Kristi Noem as a Botox-obsessed puppy killer. The second installment of the show's latest season, titled Got a Nut, showed Noem shooting several dogs as Botox melted off her face - a reference to her admission that she once put down a rowdy puppy. 'A few years ago I had to put my puppy down by shooting it in the face, because sometimes doing what's important means doing what's hard,' Noem said in the episode as she introduced herself to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recruits. 'Now I will ask for the same determination from you. Because detaining and questioning people is never easy,' Noem's South Park version added as she flipped her hair. The Secretary's good looks then disappeared as she takes a bath on the episode, before a glam squad appeared to put her public face back on. The episode eventually showed ICE agents and Noem raiding heaven as her face melted and fell onto the floor, taking on a life of its own. 'No more brownies in heaven!' Noem's Comedy Central version said to the agents. The Secretary of DHS then headed to Mar-A-Lago where she asked president Donald Trump if he was trying to replace her. 'Think I can't handle myself because I'm a lady with good looks that drives men wild?' she said as her face melted off again and moved across Mar-A-Lago on its on. South Park's new episode also targeted Vice President JD Vance, portraying him as a man-child servant to Trump. Vance did not seem bother by the portrayal, and wrote on Twitter: 'Well, I've finally made it.' The show also took aim at conservative pundit Charlie Kirk, showing him getting caught by his mom as he is 'master-debating' in his bedroom. It comes after the show's season premiere showed President Trump in bed with Satan. The premiere also took aim at Paramount and its $16 million recent settlement with Trump just hours after creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone signed a five-year deal with the company for 50 new episodes and streaming rights to previous seasons. The installment touched upon the controversial cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, which critics baselessly allege was axed by the network to appease Trump despite it losing $40 million each year. The White House issued a statement on the 27th season premiere after it aired last month. 'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in the statement. 'President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history – and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' Earlier this week, however, the Department of Homeland Security's X account shared an image of South Park's ICE depiction as it called on Americans to join the agency. 'Wait so we ARE relevant?' replied the South Park account on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store