logo
Linda McMahon says there's been 'progress' from Harvard and Columbia amid Trump's attacks

Linda McMahon says there's been 'progress' from Harvard and Columbia amid Trump's attacks

Yahooa day ago

Education Secretary Linda McMahon on Friday defended President Donald Trump's attacks on elite universities like Harvard and Columbia, while saying that she is seeing "progress" from the institutions on the administration's demands.
"I have seen progress. And you know why I think we're seeing progress? Because we are putting these measures in place, and we're saying we're putting teeth behind what we're looking at," McMahon said in an interview with NBC News at her office in Washington.
Still, McMahon said Harvard still needs to do more to combat antisemitism on campus and vet international students.
'It's very important that we are making sure that the students who are coming in and being on these campuses aren't activists, that they're not causing these activities,' the education secretary said.
'Students should not come on campus and be afraid to be there and not feel safe to be on campus," McMahon added.
The secretary acknowledged that the universities have taken positive steps to combat what she said was growing antisemitism on campus, but credited Trump for pushing them to do so.
"I'm really happy to see what Harvard did, but I wonder if maybe they didn't get a little spur from our action, because they talk a lot about it, but I think we really started to see a lot of their actions once we were taking action," McMahon said.
Her comments came after Trump on Wednesday signed a proclamation that aims to deny visas for foreign students seeking to study at Harvard. A federal judge in May blocked Trump from revoking Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students.
Asked directly whether international students already enrolled at Harvard would have to leave the U.S. due to Trump's proclamation, McMahon demurred, saying, "Well, that's actually more up to the State Department than it is to Department of Education," and reiterating that "we have to do more careful vetting."
She echoed comments Trump made Thursday in the Oval Office, when he told reporters that he had no problem with Harvard enrolling foreign students, as long as their names were disclosed to the federal government.
"We want to have foreign students come. We're very honored by it, but we want to see their list," Trump said during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.
"Harvard didn't want to give us the list. They're going to be giving us the list now. I think they're starting to behave, actually, if you want to know the truth," the president added.
The Trump administration has also accused Harvard and Columbia of fomenting antisemitism on campus, with the federal government in April canceling $2 billion in grants to Harvard and in March canceling $400 million in grants to Columbia. Each grant cancellation came alongside a statement from the Trump administration's Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism accusing the universities of not doing enough to combat antisemitism on campus.
The cancellation of Harvard's federal grants came after several members of the Trump administration wrote to Harvard's leadership with 10 demands that included a requirement to screen admissions of foreign students 'to prevent admitting students hostile to the American values and institutions inscribed in the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence, including students supportive of terrorism or anti-Semitism.'
The letter also included demands that Harvard audit their student body, faculty and staff for 'viewpoint diversity,' to discontinue all diversity, equity and inclusion programs on campus and to root out what the Trump administration labeled as antisemitism in certain programs and schools on campus.
On Friday, McMahon defended the contents of the letter, saying that "only 3 percent of [Harvard's] faculty were conservatives."
"Do you think that's a diversity of viewpoint on campus? Because those — you can't possibly believe that," she added. "And I do think that that's one of the things that Harvard and Columbia and other universities are taking a serious look at, is, what is that balance?"
Asked directly what a diversity of viewpoints would practically look like on campus, McMahon called for "balancing what the curriculum is going to be."
"I think Harvard and other universities need to do a better job in that," she added.
The Trump administration in recent months has also targeted individual students who it says are advocating for terrorism and antisemitism by participating in pro-Palestinian speech or protests.
In March, the administration drew national outrage after federal authorities arrested Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil, a permanent U.S. resident and graduate student. A federal judge last month ruled that the effort to deport Khalil was likely unconstitutional.
And in early May, Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk was freed from ICE custody after she had been detained by federal law enforcement agents in Massachusetts in March.
McMahon on Friday painted the international students facing arrest and detention as 'students at Columbia and Harvard en masse attacking other students, yelling hate crimes at those students, making them afraid to walk across their campus, and driving them even underground.'
'I think the American public is looking at that, is saying, 'I want my kids to go to college and be safe. They shouldn't have to worry going from class. That's not why — that is not why I sent them to campus,'' the education secretary added.
McMahon also said that any foreign students arrested for violence or for antisemitism will have the chance to prove whether the detention is 'unjust.'
'If there's a false arrest made, and that person shows that, that that was an unjust [arrest] and that person is released, OK,' she said. 'But how many others are not being arrested because we don't have the proper vetting in place?'
McMahon also spoke favorably about the Trump administration's decision earlier Friday to ask the Supreme Court to allow it to continue with mass layoff plans at the Department of Education after a federal judge blocked the move. The layoffs were part of a broader Trump plan to dismantle the department.
'The president made it very clear to me, when he asked me to serve in this job, that he believed that I would be successful in my job once the Department of Education was dismantled, and that the agencies, other agencies, would continue the work of the Department of Education. So I have known what that mandate was from the very beginning,' McMahon said.
The Department of Education, in its budget proposal this week, is also seeking to cut its funding to the department's Office of Civil Rights, which is tasked with investigating claims of discrimination, from $140 million to $91 million. There is currently a backlog of cases.
'We haven't missed any statutory deadlines and are performing our tasks because we're operating more efficiently,' McMahon said. 'We have streamlined that department.'
This comes as the administration has also targeted efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion in the federal government and at elite universities and has targeted transgender students across the country.
On Friday, McMahon defended Trump's efforts to eliminate DEI programs on college campuses, saying that she favored merit-based admissions instead.
"What we found when we admit students through merit and meritocracy and, and their studies, that diversity comes on campuses by itself," McMahon said. "You don't need to have a particular program that says we have to have diversity, equity, inclusion."
McMahon also said she agreed with the Trump administration's assertion that allowing transgender girls to participate in girls sports was a violation of the federal Title IX anti-discrimination law.
"What the president has said in his executive order [is] men are men and women are women, and so women should participate in women's sports and men should participate in men's sports. Otherwise it's not a level playing field," McMahon said, referring to athletes by their sex at birth.
Asked directly whether she though the Trump administration's decision to sue Maine over federal funds was a proportional response to the issue of transgender girls participating in girls' sports, the education secretary simply said, "To uphold the laws of the United States, we have to take action."
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2026 races loom at Georgia Republican convention as Trump loyalty dominates
2026 races loom at Georgia Republican convention as Trump loyalty dominates

Hamilton Spectator

time35 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

2026 races loom at Georgia Republican convention as Trump loyalty dominates

DALTON, Ga. (AP) — Steve Bannon took the stage Friday night at the Georgia Republican Convention to say it's too early to be talking about 2026. 'Don't even think about the midterms,' the Republican strategist told activists. 'Not right now. '26, we'll think about it later. It's backing President Trump right now.' But it didn't work. There was plenty of praise for Donald Trump . And while the party took care of other business like electing officers and adopting a platform, the 2026 races for governor and Senate were already on the minds of many on Friday and Saturday in the northwest Georgia city of Dalton. 'Everybody campaigns as quick as they can,' U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene told The Associated Press Saturday. Lots of other people showed up sounding like candidates. Greene, after passing on a U.S. Senate bid against Democratic incumbent Jon Ossoff , laid out a slate of state-level issues on Saturday that will likely fuel speculation that she might run for governor to replace term-limited Republican Gov. Brian Kemp. Echoing Trump's signature slogan, Greene told the convention to 'Make Georgia great again, for Georgia.' She called for abolishing the state income tax, infusing 'classical' principles into Georgia's public schools, reopening mental hospitals to take mentally ill people off the streets, and changing Georgia's economic incentive policy to de-emphasize tax breaks for foreign companies and television and moviemakers. 'Now these are state-level issues, but I want you to be talking about them,' Greene said. In her AP interview before the speech, Greene said running for governor is an 'option,' but also said she has a 'wonderful blessing' of serving her northwest Georgia district and exercising influence in Washington. 'Pretty much every single primary poll shows that I am the top leader easily, and that gives me the ability to think about it. But it's a choice. It's my own, that I will talk about with my family.' More likely to run for governor is Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, who is expected to announce a bid later this summer. 'I promise you, I'm going to be involved in this upcoming election cycle,' Jones told delegates Friday. Like Greene, Jones is among the Georgia Republicans closest to Trump, and emphasized that 'the circle is small' of prominent Republicans who stood by the president after the 2020 election. Jones also took a veiled shot at state Attorney General Chris Carr , who declared his bid for governor in December and showed up Friday to work the crowd, but did not deliver a speech to the convention. 'Always remember who showed up for you,' Jones said. 'And always remember who delivers on their promises.' Carr told the AP that he didn't speak because he was instead attending a campaign event at a restaurant in Dalton on Friday, emphasizing the importance of building personal relationships. Although Trump targeted him for defeat in the 2022 primary, Carr said he's confident that Republicans will support him, calling himself a 'proud Kemp Republican,' and saying he would focus on bread-and-butter issues. 'This state's been built on agriculture, manufacturing, trade, the military, public safety,' Carr said. 'These are the issues that Georgians care about.' The easiest applause line all weekend was pledging to help beat Ossoff. 'Jon Ossoff should not be in office at all,' said U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter , who is spending heavily on television advertising to support his Senate run. 'Folks, President Trump needs backup, he needs backup in the Senate,' said state Insurance Commissioner John King , who is also running for the Senate. 'He's going to need a four-year majority to get the job done. And that starts right here in the state of Georgia.' Former University of Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley , who expressed interest Friday in running for Senate, did not address delegates. But one other potential candidate , U.S. Rep. Mike Collins, did. Collins told delegates that in 2026 it was a priority to defeat Ossoff and replace him with a 'solid conservative.' It's not clear, though, if Collins himself will run. 'We're going to see how this thing plays out,' Collins told the AP. 'I'm not burning to be a senator, but we've got to take this seat back.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump-Musk feud shows why GOP can't actually balance the budget
Trump-Musk feud shows why GOP can't actually balance the budget

Indianapolis Star

time41 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Trump-Musk feud shows why GOP can't actually balance the budget

The honeymoon phase of President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's bromance has been waning for weeks, and now their relationship appears torn beyond repair just as publicly as it started. The pair exchanged blows on social media June 5, with Trump threatening on Truth Social to strip Musk's companies of subsidies, while Musk took credit for the 2024 GOP victory and took to X to accuse Trump of being on the Jeffrey Epstein list. This ridiculous escalation distracts from the real point at issue, though. Musk seems frustrated that Republicans used him in their charade to balance the federal budget, frustrated that Trump used him for his own end. But he really should be frustrated that he was so gullible – because he should have seen all of this coming. I'm frustrated that this is the only thing receiving attention, considering the amount of work that needs to be done with the budget. Whether Musk genuinely believed himself when he promised to cut $2 trillion (before quickly tempering that estimate) is up for debate. If he did believe it, he was entirely naive about both the current state of the Republican Party and our federal government. Republicans thought they could use Musk as a political win and distraction, allowing him to claw back government spending through the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency, while congressional Republicans authorized massive deficit increases. Even after accounting for the economic growth that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would stimulate, it's projected to add $2.4 trillion (yes, with a T) to the federal deficit over the next decade. This figure stands as a mountain next to the small pile of $2 billion (yes, with a B) worth of verifiable budget cuts from DOGE. Hicks: Soaring national debt means cities need to prepare for cuts All the while, Republicans and Trump sang Musk's praises, knowing that they would turn around and spend money that we don't have. But Musk should have realized it was all a show. Trump skyrocketed the deficit in his first presidency, and every promise he's ever given for a balanced budget has been a lie. As much as MAGA likes to claim otherwise, Trump's GOP is no different than the swamp creatures they like to criticize. Those who are actually interested in cutting government spending, which I think Musk at least somewhat seems to be, should not attach the idea to political parties because they will inevitably disappoint. There hasn't been a genuine effort to produce a balanced budget since the late 1990s, and there isn't likely to be from either Republicans or Democrats anytime soon. I'm not the least bit surprised that these two narcissists' relationship flamed out so quickly. There was never enough room in Trump's White House for both his and Musk's personalities. Trump has never maintained an extended relationship with somebody who is willing to disagree with him publicly. During his first term, Trump had extremely high personnel turnover rates, both among his Cabinet and his aides. Trump's 'you're fired' catchphrase really says a lot about his approach to relationships. He is quick to turn on people who disagree with him or even just publicly embarrass him. Hicks: Indiana's startling Medicaid math forces unpleasant choices Musk has been loudly advocating against Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" for its impact on the deficit. After a week of Musk criticizing the deficit spending in Trump's bill, the president has clearly had enough. He cannot tolerate a dissenting voice from within his ranks. Trump and the GOP are now likely to kick a powerful ally to the curb, all because Trump is so vain that he cannot handle differing opinions. This is why the Republican Party is now made up of yes-men, because they have allowed Trump to push all the spine that he can out of the party. Now that the sideshow of Musk is gone, Republicans have one less thing to hide behind. I'm not sure that makes it any more likely they'll act responsibly, but at least it's more transparent to Americans now.

Musk Floats Idea of Starting New Rival Political Party—and Even Names It—Amid Trump Feud
Musk Floats Idea of Starting New Rival Political Party—and Even Names It—Amid Trump Feud

Time​ Magazine

time43 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Musk Floats Idea of Starting New Rival Political Party—and Even Names It—Amid Trump Feud

In an escalation of Elon Musk's fractured relationship with President Donald Trump and his Republican allies, the Tesla CEO has floated the idea of starting a new political party to rival the two-party system. Musk conducted a poll via his social media platform X (formerly Twitter), asking his 220 million followers: 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' The public results show that around 80% of respondents voted yes. 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle!' Musk said, reacting to the results of his Thursday, June 5, poll. 'And exactly 80% of people agree…This is Fate.' On Friday, Musk shared a potential name: " The America Party." The moniker echoes that of his super political action committee (PAC), America PAC, which was founded in 2024 to support Trump's efforts to return to the White House. The super PAC reportedly spent around $200 million to help elect Trump. Musk's donations made him Trump's largest, and most prominent, donor in the 2024 election. During the 2022 midterm elections, Musk said he intended to vote Republican, and that later developed into him becoming Trump's close ally, which was cemented when the President positioned him as lead of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a role he held until recently. However, Trump and Musk have now had an explosive fall-out, which has played out in the public arena via social media over the past few days. It started with Musk's disapproval over Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' which he called an " abomination" and told his social media followers to 'call your Senator, call your Congressman… kill the bill.' On Thursday, the back-and-forth between the two influential men escalated, with Musk alleging that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this and, as of early Saturday morning, the post has been deleted. Musk also, in another since-deleted X post, endorsed a message that said: "Trump should be impeached" and that Vance "should replace him." Trump has argued on his own social media platform, Truth Social, that "Elon was wearing thin" and that he asked the Tesla CEO to leave the White House. Meanwhile, when talking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday night, Trump said he didn't have any plans to speak with Musk. But some lawmakers are convinced that the feud between Trump and Musk will soon thaw, and that the latter's idea for a new political party won't come to fruition. On Friday, Republican Rep. Jimmy Patronis of Florida told NewsNation's Blake Burman: 'Elon Musk is not gonna create a new political party... Trump knows that sometimes you're going to have [a] falling out with those that you trust, you like, that you're friends with. It happens with us in D.C. all the time. Mark my words, about a month from now, these guys will be hanging around again.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store