North Dakota considers 2 proposed natural gas pipelines that would stretch across the state
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A state official briefed regulators Thursday on two separate underground pipelines that companies plan to build across hundreds of miles of North Dakota, bringing natural gas from the oil fields in the west to mostly industrial users in the more populated east.
Both pipelines — one by Intensity Infrastructure Partners and Rainbow Energy Center, the other by WBI Energy — would span about 350 miles (563 kilometers) roughly from the Watford City to Fargo areas. Segments would come into service in 2029 and 2030. The companies didn't disclose the projects' costs.
The presentation to a state industrial panel of elected officials was among the first steps in a process for the state to sign on with a 10-year, $50 million-per-year line of credit. That is essentially a backstop so projects can proceed with the intent that the state back out one day when other users join. Companies won't build a pipeline without firm commitments from users.
North Dakota has a critical need for more natural gas transportation as oil wells age and produce more natural gas relative to oil, North Dakota Pipeline Authority Director Justin Kringstad said.
Republican Gov. Kelly Armstrong welcomed the projects for helping oil production, which is a huge driver of the state budget.
'If you can't move your gas and you have a finite amount of capital to invest in drilling, you're going to drill where you can market your gas, or you're going to do it in a different manner,' the governor said. 'So being able to move gas out of the Bakken (oil region) will help produce more oil.'
North Dakota is producing a near-record 3.5 billion cubic feet (99.1 million cubic liters) per day of natural gas.
The state has long wanted such pipelines, but efforts never succeeded in the past because of developments that hurt demand, such as oil price declines and the COVID-19 pandemic, Kringstad said.
'Today we're seeing a much stronger pull on the demand side than we've ever seen in these efforts,' Kringstad said. 'We've always seen the push and the need in the west, but today the appetite across the state for natural gas and for energy is at the highest that I've ever seen.'
The gas will mostly be used for industrial purposes but also growing residential needs, he said. The pipelines could carry as much as 1 million dekatherms per day, a volume he said would be 'extremely meaningful in addressing the challenges that North Dakota is facing.'
Capturing and moving the gas out of the oil field has been an issue over the years as officials and industry have sought to boost infrastructure and reduce flaring, or the burning of natural gas into the air. Although the state captured about 96% of the gas in April, critics have long raised environmental and health concerns about flaring.
The Trump administration has pushed for increased domestic energy production, largely from fossil fuel sources. Doug Burgum, a former North Dakota governor and now the U.S. Interior secretary, has long called for raising energy extraction efforts.
Other pipeline projects in North Dakota have drawn enormous pushback in recent years, including huge protests of the Dakota Access oil pipeline and landowner resistance around the Midwest to Summit Carbon Solutions' proposed carbon dioxide network.
Armstrong said some degree of pushback is likely, 'but the reality is pipelines are the easiest way to move things.'
It's unclear whether eminent domain, or the taking of private property with just compensation, will come into play for the pipelines. A Rainbow Enegry Center leader said Intensity Infrastructure Partners has never utilized eminent domain in more than 2,000 miles (3,200 kilometers) of pipeline it has built in North Dakota. A WBI Energy spokesperson said he couldn't answer.
Iowa-based Summit Carbon Solutions has faced intense opposition over eminent domain for its proposed five-state carbon dioxide pipeline. Some landowners have opposed eminent domain as the company seeks to build the pipeline, and South Dakota's governor earlier this year signed a ban on eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Centrica in Advanced Talks for 15% of Sizewell C Nuclear Project
Centrica Plc is in advanced discussions to acquire a 15% stake in the UK's Sizewell C nuclear power project, according to a person familiar with the matter. A decision on whether the owner of British Gas becomes a key shareholder is expected in the coming weeks, according to the person, who asked not to be named because the matter is confidential. Still, there is no certainty that an agreement will be reached, the person said.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shell probably won't buy BP: Here's a 'more realistic' outcome
A potential Shell (SHEL) and BP (BP) merger is on investors' minds after The Wall Street Journal reported Shell is in early talks to acquire BP, though Shell has denied the report. Tortoise senior portfolio manager and managing director Rob Thummel says it makes sense for the two energy companies to combine, but it's unlikely that Shell would buy BP outright, explaining that it's more probable that BP will sell parts of its business to Shell and others. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. While Shell is denying the Wall Street Journal report that it's in talks with BP about a possible merger, our next guest says a deal could be a first step towards improving the valuations of the combined company. Here with more, we've got Rob Dummel, who is the Tortis Senior portfolio manager and managing director. Great to have you here with us. So, just take us into your analysis of the deal-making environment now through the lens of Shell and BP, and what it could mean for the sector. Well, so, so thanks for having me. So, if you just look at what's happening in the overall sector, obviously commodity prices are down. Oil prices are down a lot. And so, it's hard for deals to be made today, uh, just because, uh, because of the low oil price. And a lot of these oil and gas producers, oil producers in particular, have really repaired their balance sheet so they don't need to do deals. But it's a little different for Shell and Shell and BP. So, if you look at the valuations of Shell and BP, they're really low. They trade at much lower valuations than their peers: Exxon, Chevron, Total. So, obviously, there are a lot of investors that are looking for ways to unlock that value. I know Elliott's been active in in BP to try to, to try to encourage them to sell several of their assets to try to realize and get the market to recognize a more of a sum of the parts type of valuation. So, does it make sense for the two to combine? Uh, yeah, it probably does longer term if you think about, then what will the what will combined entity do? It's much bigger. Um, and then ultimately what it needs to do, and I think both companies need to do, is continue to be disciplined, continue to deliver cash back to the shareholders in the form of dividends and stock buybacks. And, and I think if you put all those together, then ultimately, you result in in an improving valuation. But, but clearly, there these, both of these stocks are at really discounted valuations. What is the likelihood that this deal even goes through knowing that there are now more restrictions in different parts of the world for this to be necessary or be possible to take place, considering British stock regulations that have now come more into light which would mean that essentially there would be a six-month period that Shell would have to wait, uh, if this indeed was rejected and, and ultimately they would have to find, uh, some other approach. Yeah, I, I think the odds of Shell buying BP as it is today is very low. Uh, um, what I think the more realistic, uh, possibility is that, you know, BP starts to sell off certain pieces of its business and then ultimately a combination between Shell and BP, uh, makes a little more sense. I think BP's obviously interested in the oil and gas producing assets, the Gulf of Mexico, um, some of its international oil and gas producing assets. Um, and I think BP has a little bit of LNG as well that, that that would, would be complementary. But, but uh, but there are other businesses, I think, inside of BP that that may make sense in the hands of other buyers rather than Shell. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How a Shell–BP deal would compare to energy sector's past M&A
Shell (SHEL) and BP (BP) are in focus after The Wall Street Journal reported Shell is in early talks to acquire BP, though Shell has denied the report. Yahoo Finance anchor Brad Smith takes a closer look at mergers and acquisitions (M&As) in the energy sector, finding that a Shell–BP deal would be one of the biggest deals in the history of the sector. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Shell is in early talks to acquire rival BP according to a Wall Street Journal report. People familiar with the matter say talks between company representatives are active, and that BP is considering the approach carefully, but Shell is dismissing the report, telling the Journal it's quote further market speculation and no talks are taking place. A possible combination of the energy companies could end up as the biggest oil deal since Exxon and Mobil's $80 billion plus merger more than 25 years ago. And you can see on this chart some of the biggest deals in history in the energy space. Exxon and Mobil back in 1998, Shell's acquisition of BG group in 2015 and more recently, Exxon Mobil acquiring Pioneer, plus Occidental's deal with Anadarko Petroleum. Now, one of the other things to keep in mind is what the outlook has been. Even though we saw in November, once investors were trying to wrap their minds around what the election results meant, and if there would be more of a mindset for deal making, we haven't seen that fully play out just yet. And even coming into the first and second quarter of this year, we got some commentary from EY Parthenon, and in their expectations, they are looking for a slight rise in total US deal volume in 2025 for deals over $100 million. So when we're talking tens of billions of dollars worth of deals, you can bet that the tires are going to get ticked and kicked just a little bit harder. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data