
Escalating trade tensions 'significant concern' for financial stability, warns ECB
Escalating global trade tensions have emerged as a "significant concern" for global growth and financial stability, the European Central Bank has warned.
In a special feature published by the bank on Tuesday, it said trade openness has largely stagnated in recent years as a result of heightened scepticism towards globalisation.
"The recent escalation of trade frictions between major economies – especially between the United States and its trading partners – has fuelled trade policy uncertainty and emerged as a critical concern for businesses and policymakers alike," six staff economists wrote.
"This increased uncertainty has the potential to redirect trade flows, reconfigure value chains, deter investment and dampen economic growth."
US President Donald Trump's trade war has unnerved global markets, with many multinationals and export-heavy businesses already feeling the sting of the President's punitive levies.
Ongoing trade tensions have also had a downward impact on the US dollar, which has fallen against almost every other major currency.
"In addition to trade policy uncertainty, the implementation of trade restrictions tends to reduce external demand, increase prices and raise production costs," the note said.
"Trade restrictions hinder technological advancement, stifling innovation, productivity and economic growth."
It also warned that adverse geopolitical developments unrelated to trade policy itself may also aggravate trade-related tensions, altering the volume of global trade as well as the relative shares of imports and exports between trading partners.
The ECB recommended that 'financial institutions should also take a number of proactive steps to cope with risks stemming from trade tensions.'
The report, which was prepared by economists Pauline Avril, Paul Bochmann, Stephan Fahr, Aoife Horan, Cosimo Pancaro and Riccardo Pizzeghello, echoes comments from ECB Vice President Luis de Guindos, who last week cautioned that the recent turmoil on tariffs could upend the region's financial system.
"The risks to growth resulting from trade tensions, combined with higher defence spending, may limit the fiscal space available to shield the economy from adverse shocks, address structural challenges associated with climate change, digitalisation and low productivity," Mr de Guindos said in a speech.
The European Central Bank will publish its biannual Financial Stability Review, on Wednesday May 21.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump-Musk feud shows president knows how to hit a narcissist where it hurts
Sometimes you're better off letting the children fight. That was president Donald Trump 's callous wisdom on looking the other way as the Russians and Ukrainians continue to kill each other. But it might better be applied to Trump's social media spat with Elon Musk . It's hard to think of two puer aeterni who are more deserving of a verbal walloping. Their venomous digital smackdown fulgurated on their duelling social media companies, flashing across the Washington sky. In March, Trump showed off Teslas in the White House driveway and bought a more-than-$80,000 red Model S. Now, he says he's going to sell it. READ MORE Thursday was the most titillating day here since the sci-fi classic The Day the Earth Stood Still, when a spaceship landed an alien to warn human leaders to stop squabbling like children, or the aliens would destroy Earth. On Friday, Trump tried to convey serenity. 'I'm not thinking about Elon Musk,' Trump said aboard Air Force One. 'I wish him well.' But Trump then jumped on the phone to knock Musk, telling ABC's Jonathan Karl that Musk has 'lost his mind' and CNN's Dana Bash that 'the poor guy's got a problem.' Trump had to know that would be seen as a reference to the intense drug use by Musk chronicled by the New York Times. As Raheem Kassam, one of the owners of Butterworth's, the new Trumpworld boîte on Capitol Hill, assured Politico, 'Maga will not sell out to ketamine.' [ Keith Duggan: Trump-Musk bromance descends into a jaw-dropping feud that is funny, dismal and nauseating Opens in new window ] The Washington Post reported on Friday: 'Across the government, the Trump administration is scrambling to rehire many federal employees dismissed under Doge's staff-slashing initiatives after wiping out entire offices, in some cases imperilling key services such as weather forecasting and the drug approval process.' On Truth Social on Thursday, Trump threatened to take away government contracts that have handsomely enriched Musk even though, as Leon Panetta pointed out on CNN, 'some of those contracts, particularly on SpaceX, are very important to our national security.' Musk tried to tie Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, offering no evidence. He shared a post on Epstein that said Trump should be impeached. Trump reposted a message from Epstein's last lawyer, saying the smear was 'definitively' not true. Musk deleted the post on Saturday. Musk did, however, expose Trump and Republican lawmakers as hypocrites, using his online bullhorn to shame them about their broken promises to reduce the debt. The big domestic Bill is a dog's breakfast of Republican proposals that could add more than $3 trillion to the debt to make the rich richer, while cutting healthcare coverage for the poor. Republicans are the ones who always claim they're fiscally responsible, even while they keep exploding the debt. Musk reposted Trump's old tweets on the social platform X, such as this one from 2012: 'No member of Congress should be eligible for re-election if our country's budget is not balanced – deficits not allowed!' Musk sneered: 'Where is the man who wrote these words? Was he replaced by a body double!?' As the weekend began, Trump seemed to be winning the fight, as Musk grew quieter and Fox News commentators had pleaded with their parents to get back together. Trump has exposed Musk's naive streak – something I saw in 2017 when I reported that another tech lord had to explain to Musk that he couldn't get away from artificial intelligence by going to Mars; it would just follow him there. Just because Musk hung in the Oval and Mar-a-Lago and debated moving into the Lincoln Bedroom, it didn't mean he understood politics or power – or Trump. Trump didn't care about the potential conflict of interest in having the SpaceX chief pick the head of Nasa. But he did care that Musk's candidate had donated to top Democrats – and about the aborted plan for Musk to attend a briefing about military strategy against China at the Pentagon, and about Musk's barbed public trashing of Trump's 'beautiful' tariffs and 'beautiful' Bill. When I studied Mary Shelley's Frankenstein in graduate school, I was struck by how much the 1818 novel by a teenage girl reminded me of the bros in Silicon Valley. The brilliant scientists with their edgy experiments, too high on their own supply to consider the ramifications of AI. What if your creation grows stronger than you and comes back to haunt you? Musk posted that Trump was ungrateful because the nearly $300 million he spent on Republicans is what made Trump president. Musk created the monster! But Trump created a monster, too. He gave Musk free rein and enormous power over a world he knew nothing about and people for whom he had no empathy. And in the end, of course, Musk's demon mode came out and Trump's monster turned on him. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,'' Trump acidly posted, knowing how to hit a narcissist where it hurts. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' For all his macho swagger, Trump sure loves a catfight. – This article originally appeared in The New York Times .

The Journal
13 hours ago
- The Journal
Why interest rate cuts are good news for Irish homeowners - but likely no help for buyers
BOY OH BOY, money's getting cheaper again! Well, borrowing it anyway. Earlier this week, the European Central Bank (ECB) cut its key interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point to 2%. As explained previously , the ECB rate is the interest banks receive for depositing money with the central bank. The important bit here is that when rates are increased, borrowing money becomes more expensive. This dampens consumer demand and reduces price inflation – that's why the ECB sharply increased rates in 2022. Now, the ECB wants to boost European spending. By cutting the rate, the ECB wants banks to lend more to consumers, fuelling economic activity. Like with every economic decision, there are winners and losers. Impact on owners and buyers In an Irish context, both mortgage holders and first time buyers have been portrayed as winners. The logic is that for people who already have a mortgage, they can get a better deal if they're refinancing (or among the group still on tracker mortgages ). And for first time buyers, the cut means their monthly repayment costs will be lower. Theoretically, this will allow them to get a bigger mortgage. Banks and mortgage brokers – anyone with an interest in selling mortgage loans, really – will say this 'increases borrowing power' and is a good thing for prospective buyers. But is this actually true? Well, at the risk of ruining the suspense too soon – probably not. The logic of the benefit holds true for existing mortgage holders. Those on fixed rates coming to the end of their term should be able to get a better deal. Others can shop around. Trackers obviously immediately benefit, as should variable holders. But it's not as simple for house buyers. Are there any benefits for buyers? You see, on paper, lowering mortgage rates for house buyers sounds great. Say you, our imaginary first time buyer, want to get a house that costs €350,000. You have a 10% deposit of €35,000, so you want to borrow €315,000. Let's say the term is a pretty standard 25 years. If your mortgage loan has a rate of 3.75%, which is around average in Ireland right now, you pay €1,620 per month. If the loan rate is lowered by just 0.25% to 3.5%, the monthly repayment is €1,577. A difference of €43 a month isn't exactly earth-shattering stuff. But over the course of a 25 year mortgage, it means you'd save about €13,000 – not bad. So maybe with a 3.5% rate, our imaginary buyer now feels they can stretch their budget a little more when they're house hunting. Maybe instead of paying €350,000, they're happy to go up to €360,000. Honestly, the effect of a single 0.25% rate cut is negligible. But it's not just this one – the ECB has slashed its main interest rate from 4% to 2% over the course of just a year. Going back to our hypothetical house hunter. The difference between 4% and 2% is over €300 per month – or about €100,000 over the lifetime of the mortgage. Of course, Irish banks were hesitant to increase mortgage costs in the face of ECB rate hikes, and will likely be slow again to lower them. But again, the cumulative impact is – borrowing costs are lower. So house hunters can afford to get a slightly better property, right? Advertisement Well, until we, of course, factor in that the rate cut applies to everyone . So all prospective housebuyers get pretty much the exact same boost in buying power. Will Lower Rates Solve the Housing Crisis? And, as you might have heard once or twice, Ireland has a shortage of new homes. We apparently should be building over 50,000 a year to meet demand. Completions came in at 30,000 in 2024, which was actually down slightly on 2023. House price inflation has also been on a steady upward march, rising by 7.5% in the 12 months to May . So with supply tight and the market already pretty hot, what will happen when you give all would-be house buyers the ability to borrow more money? Well, there's a decent chance prices will rise. That was the finding of a study published a few years ago looking at Australia's housing market, which is often compared to Ireland's. It found the reduction in interest rates after the financial crisis in 2008 'accounted for most of the subsequent boom in dwelling prices'. A 1% reduction in interest rates was estimated to be linked to a 2% property price rise over the next two years. A separate Australian study found the inflationary impact of interest rates tended to be even greater in areas where housing supply was tight. It suggested that lower interest rates 'increase housing wealth inequality, while higher rates do the opposite'. Although, it added the effects 'appear to be temporary'. This ties in with research previously carried out in Ireland by the Economic and Social Research Institute . It found that the real impact of interest rate is more on buyer behaviour. As rates start to come down, people expect they'll come down more. This makes buyers more confident, so they're more likely to spend money. The effect is similar either way. Lower rates = high prices. This largely cancels out the benefit of 'increased borrowing power' for buyers. Two other points worth noting quickly. One, the reverse of this is meant to be true. i.e, raising interest rates should lower house prices. The ECB hiked interest rates quickly between late 2022 and 2023. And while Irish house price inflation did significantly slow during that period, prices still rose , albeit at 'only' 2 – 4% for much of the year. Property price inflation then exploded in 2024, when consumers were told the rate hikes were over, and borrowing costs would eventually come down. The Central Bank also loosened Irish mortgage rules around this time . Again, this improved 'buyer affordability'. But when prices then surged by over 10% the following year, were buyers really any better off? The second point (and also the last one in this article). Lowering interest rates mean borrowers can saddle up with bigger debts. But Ireland doesn't do long term fixed rates. Mortgage rates are normally agreed for a maximum of five years, before home owners then have to renegotiate. But while interest rates change, how much you borrowed doesn't. Essentially – if you take on a mortgage of €325,000 instead of €315,000 at a 3.5% rate, you've stuck with that extra €10,000. When you have to refinance, that 3.5% rate could be 4%. But that extra €10,000 is still there. Of course, this can work the other way – interest rates can come down. But the ECB's current 2% rate is already pretty normal by historical standards . The only reason it was lowered below that in the first place was due to a generational recession after the 2008 financial crisis. Barring another one of those, chances are borrowing costs are more likely to rise than fall. What does all of this mean? Basically – don't believe the hype. Lower rates are good news for existing mortgage holders. But for prospective buyers currently house hunting – their 'increased borrowing power' will likely be cancelled out by further price rises. For them, the overall impact will probably be neutral at best. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


RTÉ News
14 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What do falling interest rates mean for borrowers and savers?
As widely expected, this week, the European Central Bank (ECB) cut interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point, bringing the main deposit rate down to 2%. It was the eighth consecutive cut, and the main interest rate is now at its lowest since the end of 2022. Between September 2023 and this month, rates have fallen by two percentage points overall - down from 4%. While we're still a long way off from the zero-percent ECB rates that persisted in the wake of the financial crisis, the fresh reductions bring more welcome news for borrowers. The 180,000 tracker mortgage customers in Ireland will see an immediate benefit, with their loans tracking the main ECB lending rate. Borrowers on variable rates will also see repayments fall but not necessarily right away. It will depend on the terms of their loan. Some lenders adjust variable rates monthly, others do it quarterly, while it can also be done on an annual basis. The ECB's 25 June basis-point cut means that for every €100,000 borrowed, monthly mortgage repayments will fall by around €13. This means payments falling by €65 monthly - or €780 annually - on a loan of €500,000. However, fixed-rate customers - which the majority of borrowers tend to opt for - won't see their repayments dropping. Though they will be in a stronger position to get a lower rate once their fixed-term has ended. Irish mortgage rates sixth highest in euro zone Even with the these latest cuts, Irish mortgage holders are still paying nearly half a percentage point more in interest than their euro zone counterparts, with rates here - averaging 3.67% - the sixth highest of the 20 countries using the euro. Fixed rates here can be as low as 3%, but after the ECB announcement on Thursday Sinn Féin Finance spokesperson Pearse Doherty pointed out that some borrowers, whose loans were sold to so-called vulture funds by the pillar banks that needed to offload bad loans, are paying much higher rates. According to Mr Doherty, last year there were over 100,000 households paying over 6% in interest to such funds, with 7,000 paying over 8.5%. He said "that can mean handing over thousands of euro more a year to these vulture funds than they would even with the high rates at traditional banks". The Sinn Féin TD is also calling on lenders to pass on the benefit of the ECB cuts promptly, adding that "the refusal by banks to pass on the benefit of interest rate cuts ... is completely unacceptable and the Government should immediately call in the banks. "Banks in the main have not cut mortgage interest rates in line with the four-interest rate cuts this year," he said. But lenders will argue that they did not pass on all of the increases when rates were going up in previous years. Good for borrowers, bad for savers Anyone investing money and hoping for a decent return won't like falling interest rates. Irish savers have around €160 billion on deposit and in recent months all of the main lenders - as well as the fintech banks - have reduced rates for savers and it's getting trickier to get make money on savings. Around 3% is the best rate available right now, though it you're looking to save more than a couple of thousands euro every month the rate will be closer to 2%. But these deposit rates are falling in line with the ECB cuts, and by the end of the year the best rates on the market for savers are expected to be nearer 1.5%. The advice to those looking to invest is to do so sooner rather than later to try and lock in a higher rate. What's likely to happen next? Interest rates are the ECB's main tool for managing inflation across the euro zone, with a target level of 2%. When inflation goes higher, rates are increased to discourage borrowing and encourage saving to bring it down. It's the opposite when inflation is lower - rates are lowered to help boost economic activity. Latest figures show euro zone inflation has fallen just below 2% (1.9% in May down from 2.2% in April) and with fears of global trade uncertainty, weaker economic activity, and a strengthening euro, interest rates are expected to be reduced further in the coming months. The general consensus is that we'll see the ECB lower its main deposit rate by another quarter of a percentage point - to 1.75% - and then settle at that point. This means mortgage holders should get a further boost, while savers will need to look that bit harder to maximise any returns. However, as with most things economy-related, trends are cyclical and we could easily end up in a new economic reality in the near future that necessitates the next cycle of either interest-rate cuts or rises.