Texas moves close to ban on some land sales to foreigners
With just three days left before the deadline, the House has approved the negotiated version of a bill that bans people tied to the governments of China, North Korea, Russia and Iran from purchasing land in the state. The bill awaits Senate approval before going to the governor.
Senate Bill 17 has moved forward in Texas despite a federal court ruling that a similar law in Florida was likely beyond the state's authority. It's the second attempt by Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, who said in 2023 that the right time to address concerns over foreign entities owning Texas land is before it becomes widespread — something she sees as a way to bolster national security.
The latest data available shows that investors from the four countries own a small portion of farmland in Texas and nationally. Chinese investors own about 383,000 total acres of U.S. farmland — about 600 square miles — which is less than 1% of total, foreign-held acreage, according to the United States Department of Agriculture's 2021 land report.
On Thursday, the House approved a conference report on the measure after both chambers passed versions of the bill. Last session, although the Senate passed a similar measure, the House failed to take it up.
In mid-May, Kolkhorst initiated a process to reconcile differences between the chambers over who should be banned. The select group of lawmakers known as a conference committee worked in private on the conference version that is now up for a vote in the Senate.
The conference report preserves the last-minute amendments from the bill passed by the House: giving the governor the authority to add more countries to the list, restricting leaseholders from renting for up to 100 years to just one year, and including language that barred people who were part of a ruling political party from buying land.
The conference committee version requires that the person have permission to live in the U.S. legally, but also that the property would serve as a primary residence. Under that version, those in the United States on work or student visas are also barred from buying a controlling interest in land as a business investment.
'The metric by which we decide who can and cannot be buying land here is to help the asylum seeker, but not to allow someone that just happens to be here on a tourist visa or a student visa to buy multiple properties, investment properties and everything else,' Kolkhorst said on the Senate floor in May.
Asian Texans for Justice, an advocacy group that opposes the effort, said they see the bill as racist and discriminatory. The group has said the bill revives 'a shameful chapter in American history — when Asian immigrants were banned from owning land.'
Lily Trieu, executive director of the group, said that by passing the bill, lawmakers were setting up Texans to have their taxpayer dollars spent on inevitable lawsuits.
'The Florida bill is caught up in the courts. So why would you model a bill after one that's being challenged legally?' she said in an interview. 'Why wouldn't you file a bill that you know is legally sound and constitutional?
The conference committee version also lays out specific procedures for the attorney general to investigate, and the process by which land could be reclaimed if someone were found to have violated the law.
Texas and Florida are not alone in their attempts to pass such legislation: between January 2023 and July 2024, at least 22 other states initiated similar bills, according to the federal Congressional Research Service.
Florida's law, which also includes Cuba, Syria, and Venezuela, was struck down by a U.S. District Court in 2023, but the law remains in effect while the state is appealing it.
In a 2023 letter to the court, the U.S. Department of Justice said the law violates the federal Fair Housing Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution: 'These unlawful provisions will cause serious harm to people simply because of their national origin, contravene federal civil rights laws, undermine constitutional rights, and will not advance the State's purported goal of increasing public safety,' the Department of Justice wrote.
The Texas chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union raised similar concerns.
"Discriminating against residents based on their national origin is not only barred by the Constitution's requirements for due process and equal protection, but it also tramples on the United States' prerogatives on foreign relations," said David Donatti, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas.
Sarah Cruz, a policy and advocacy strategist with the ACLU, said the policy could also lead to racial profiling.
'How is it going to look in practice?,' she said. 'If an individual who just simply looks like they may be from one of those designated countries, does that open them to … some additional scrutiny?
The bill is a priority of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, and has received the encouragement of Gov. Greg Abbott.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Musk-Trump alliance craters
Musk-Trump alliance craters | The Excerpt On Friday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer has the latest on the feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Plus, Josh takes a look at how the feud might end. Here's what you need to know about this week's travel ban. The Department of Homeland Security is ending its Quiet Skies surveillance program. The Supreme Court sides with a straight woman in a 'reverse discrimination' case. USA TODAY National Correspondent Elizabeth Weise tells us about invasive Asian needle ants. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending an email to podcasts@ Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text. Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here Taylor Wilson: Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson, and today is Friday, June 6th, 2025. This is The Excerpt. Today, Musk and Trump take their feud to a new level. Plus, details on this week's travel ban. And let's talk about invasive ants. ♦ Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's beef reached a new level of personal jabs yesterday. I caught up with USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer for a look at their ramped-up feud. Hello, sir. Josh Meyer: How's it going, Taylor? Taylor Wilson: Good, good, Josh. Thanks for hopping on, on this. We've been keeping a close eye on this alliance between Trump and Musk for weeks, and now this relationship really seems to be blowing up. What's the latest as Trump threatens to cut billions in federal contracts with Musk's companies? Josh Meyer: Well, it's blowing up in spectacular fashion, Taylor. Trump has threatened to end billions of dollars in federal contracts that Musk's companies have or have had with the government. He's also seeking billions more in contracts through SpaceX, through his AI company, and so forth. Trump, in one of his tweets during this escalating feud, said, "The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts." He said, "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it". Of course, Musk replied, and it kept escalating from there. Taylor Wilson: Absolutely. We'll get to some of those escalations. He also responded to this threat over government contracts by saying SpaceX will pull back from some of its work, and we know SpaceX does a lot of work for the government. What can you tell us here? Josh Meyer: Musk said he's already going to be decommissioning their Dragon spacecraft, which does payload deliveries to the International Space Station. Musk has already taken steps, he says, to pull back some of the deliveries from his contracts, including to NASA and the Defense Department. I'm not sure he can do that. I assume there's going to be some lawsuits flying from both of these guys in terms of this, but this is really like two junior high school kids that break up, and they're just getting very personal and very nasty, and they're just threatening all sorts of things and won't talk to each other. Who knows where this is going to end? Taylor Wilson: Speaking of nasty, I know Musk has even alleged that Trump's name is listed in classified files related to Jeffrey Epstein. What did he say here? What happened here? Josh Meyer: Basically, Musk said, "Time to drop the really big bomb. Real Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day DJT." I mean, it's really getting quite nasty here. Taylor Wilson: Yeah. Well, Musk's various companies have benefited from billions in government contracts over the past two decades. We've touched on some of this. What would this Trump threat to pull billions mean for Elon's businesses if came to fruition? Josh Meyer: A lot of the billions in subsidies came in the early years. I mean, Tesla got hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars of subsidies early on. We're at the point now where, I think, it's 18 different companies or entities from within the Musk empire are getting some federal money, and it's not that easy to just pull them back. I mean, Trump is threatening to do this, but SpaceX delivers a lot of payloads to the International Space Station. It helps get satellites up into space. It's interwoven within the fabric of the US government in ways that would be hard to disentangle. I'm not sure how much of this is actually going to happen, but I can say that there's people that are watching X, as it's now called very, very carefully to see how much more they escalate. I know that there's people acting as intermediaries to try to get both of them to calm down, but we don't really know where this is going to end. Taylor Wilson: As you write, Josh, the political battlefield is littered with the scorched remains of some of Trump's previous allies who picked a fight with him or were on the receiving end of one. I'll ask you, could Musk be next? Josh Meyer: Well, I think he already is next. The question is how much. I talked to John Bolton, who is Trump's national security adviser, and that was fired by Trump/faced Trump's vindictiveness, too. I mean, he wrote a book called In The Room Where It Happened. Trump tried to get it shut down before it could be published, claiming that he was using classified materials. Tried to get him prosecuted. What Bolton said about the current spat, "It's going to end up like most mud fights do, with both of them worse off. The question is how much worse the country is going to be off as a result." Taylor Wilson: All right. I'm sure this is not the last of this. Josh Meyer covers domestic security for USA TODAY. Thanks, Josh. Josh Meyer: Thanks, Taylor. ♦ Taylor Wilson: We're learning more about President Trump's travel ban this week. On Wednesday, he signed the sweeping proclamation that will bar or partially restrict entry to the US from nearly 20 countries, citing national security concerns. The ban prohibits travel into the US for foreign nationals from Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Haiti, Iran, and many other countries, and he issued travel suspensions for a number of other nations. The White House emphasized that the ban targets countries with high visa overstay rates and that are deficient with regards to screening and vetting. There are similarities to Trump's controversial 2017 ban, which targeted several majority-Muslim nations and faced widespread protests and legal challenges. Former president Joe Biden repealed that ban in 2021, calling it a stain on our national conscience. This latest ban includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, current visa holders, and certain visa categories, and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. Though, those qualifications were not specified. ♦ The Department of Homeland Security is ending its controversial Quiet Skies surveillance program for airline travelers, saying yesterday that since its existence, it has failed to stop a single terrorist attack while costing US taxpayers $200 million a year. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that the program had been improperly politicized and that under the guise of national security, the Quiet Skies watch list was used to target political opponents and benefit political allies. Noem said the Transportation Security Administration will maintain its critical aviation and security vetting functions, and the Trump administration will return TSA "to its true mission of being laser-focused on the safety and security of the traveling public". Quiet Skies was revealed in 2018 by the Boston Globe, which said the program deployed air marshals who fly armed and undercover to thwart terrorists, to track dozens of suspicious travelers daily. Lawmakers and civil rights groups have long criticized the program for potentially masking racial or religious discrimination in deciding who to focus on. Part of identifying suspicious travelers had relied on noticing behaviors like fidgeting or having a penetrating stare, which government watchdogs and some lawmakers have criticized in the past as an unreliable basis for probable cause. ♦ The Supreme Court agreed yesterday that a worker faced a higher hurdle to sue her employer as a straight woman than if she'd been gay. The unanimous decision could trigger a wave of reverse discrimination lawsuits, and it came amid a national backlash from some against DEI programs. The justices rejected a lower court's ruling that Marlean Ames could not sue the Ohio Department of Youth Services because she had failed to provide background circumstances showing the department was that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority. US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit said back in 1981 that, while white people are covered by the Civil Rights Act, it defied common sense to suggest that the promotion of a Black employee justifies an inference of prejudice against white coworkers in our present society, but the law itself, which bans discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, does not set different thresholds for members of minority and majority groups. You can read more with the link in today's show notes. ♦ Asian needle ants are spreading across the country. I spoke with USA TODAY National Correspondent Elizabeth Weise, to learn more about this invasive species. Thanks for joining me, Beth. Elizabeth Weise: Once more into the scary creatures beat. Taylor Wilson: Well, I love the scary creatures beat, Beth. Let's start with the basics, though. What are these ants? Elizabeth Weise: They're called Asian needle ants, and the problem with them is they look like a lot of other ants, so there's no way that they're Asian needle ants until they sting you. Then, you know. Taylor Wilson: Well, all right. What does happen when they sting you? Elizabeth Weise: They are carnivorous. They hunt prey, especially termites. They love termites. They're used to attacking. If they sting you... They're not very aggressive, but if you reach into where they live, they will sting you. First, you feel this intense sharp pain like somebody poked you with a needle. That lasts for a couple of minutes, and then it fades and you're like, "Cool, I'm fine." Then, five minutes later, you feel the same thing again as if you'd just been stung but you hadn't. The pain continues to reoccur in the same place. It disappears. It comes back. It disappears. It comes back. One of the researchers I spoke with said, for him, that pattern lasts for about two hours, but he has talked to people for whom the reoccurring pain can go up to two days. That's not the only thing. These ants also... They can cause severe allergic reactions in some people and in about 1% of the people that get stung, they can cause anaphylactic shock, which can kill you. Taylor Wilson: Well, in terms of how they got here and how they've spread in the US, tell us about this mystery behind this. Elizabeth Weise: It's a bit of a mystery. They were first recorded in the US in Georgia in 1932, but they must have been here before that because two years later in '34, they were being seen in three different states, mostly in the southeast. They live in mulch and loamy soil. It's thought they probably came over in the root ball of trees that were being imported. They're originally from Asia. They occur natively in China, Japan, and Korea. There's thought that they might've come over perhaps in the flowering cherry trees, the ones that we just had the blooms of and that are popular in Washington, that were very popular at the turn of the 20th century. A lot of them were imported from Japan. At that time, trees were transported with soil around their roots. We don't do that anymore, partly because it's dangerous because they can carry things with them. Taylor Wilson: I guess you don't want heaps of these in your back or front yard. What can folks listening at home do about these ants? Elizabeth Weise: Yeah. There's not a lot you can do to prevent their arrival. They're now in more than 20 states, mostly in the southeast, but they've been seeing as far north as Connecticut/as far south as Florida. If you leave them alone, they will be fine. They will not bother you. They're not like fire ants that will go on the rampage. But they do like to live in mulch and loam, so if you're out gardening... Or they also like to live in rotting logs, so if you've got a wood pile and you pick that up/up a log, you might disturb a nest. They're a little hard to deal with because they don't lay pheromone trails. Most ants lay a pheromone trail, and so, one, you can see where the nest is. You follow it back. And two, you can disrupt the pheromone trail and stop them. These don't. You have to look to see where their nest is. Then, you can put out bait. Protein bait works really well. That will kill off the nest. But all the entomologists I spoke with said, "Don't try and do just widespread spraying because it's not going to work because they're underground, and you'll kill a lot of things that you want in your garden and you probably won't kill the ants." Taylor Wilson: And they are invasive, right? These ants, Beth? What have they done ecologically? Elizabeth Weise: I mean, that's the other problem, is that like a lot of invasive species, when they show up someplace where they did not evolve, they out-compete other native ants. It turns out they will push out other ants. They'll eat a lot of insects that would've been there otherwise. Those are important... I mean, even termites. You don't want termites in your house, but you sure need termites out in the forest because they're what break down fallen logs. If you don't have termites, those logs don't necessarily break down as fast. Another thing is, this was interesting, a researcher who's now in Hong Kong did some work. There are ants that disperse seeds. They eat them, and they carry them away, and then the seeds get dispersed and plants and trees grow. The Asian needle ants out-compete those seed-dispersing ants. The Asian needle ants don't disperse the seeds. They just stay where they fall and they die. Then, they're seeing places where plants that should be spreading naturally are not. Taylor Wilson: All right. Elizabeth Weise is the national correspondent with USA TODAY. Thanks, Beth. Elizabeth Weise: You're so welcome. Thanks a lot. ♦ Taylor Wilson: Thanks for listening to The Excerpt. We're produced by Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan, and our executive producer is Laura Beatty. You can get the podcast wherever you get your audio, and if you're on a smart speaker, just ask for The Excerpt. I'm Taylor Wilson, and I'll be back tomorrow with more of The Excerpt from USA TODAY.


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Arizona Teen Girl Dies After Copying Viral 'Dusting' TikTok Trend
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A 19-year-old girl from Arizona has died after taking part in a deadly social-media trend. Renna O'Rourke died on Sunday, June 1 after seven days in an ICU. Her death came after she participated in an act known to many on social media as "dusting." "She was the light in every room she walked into, and the pain that her family and friends feel is simply immeasurable," Renna's father, Aaron O'Rourke, said in a GoFundMe set up to cover his daughter's medical and funeral costs. Her organs were donated following her death. An offshoot of "huffing" and "chroming," two other forms of inhalant abuse, "dusting" involves the inhalation of computer dusting spray in an effort to achieve a momentary sense of intoxication. But the inhalation of these toxic chemicals can seriously impact the nervous system resulting in dizziness, slurred speech and, potentially, death. Newsweek has contacted Aaron and Dana O'Rourke, Renna's parents, for comment on email and social media. TikTok has also been contacted for comment. Why It Matters O'Rourke's death is a reminder of the dangers posed by inhalant abuse and the role social media has in tragedies of this kind. In March 2024, an 11-year-old boy from the U.K. died after copying videos he had seen on social media of people sniffing or inhaling toxic substances. Sherri-Ann Gracie, the mother of Tommie-lee, called for action to be taken on social media when her son was found unresponsive after a sleepover at a friend's house; he later died. In May 2023, Esra Haynes, 13, from Melbourne, Australia, died after inhaling chemicals from an aerosol deodorant can while imitating a social-media trend. What is especially concerning to Dana O'Rourke is the easy availability of many of the inhalants used in viral trends like "dusting." She told AZFamily: "There's no ID required. It's odorless. It's everything kids look for. They can afford it, they can get it and it doesn't show in mom and dad's drug test." What To Know Though repeated use can lead to serious health issues, Renna O'Rourke died as a result of "sudden sniffing death syndrome;" this can result from a single session of inhalant use by an otherwise-healthy young person. The DEA says that sudden sniffing death is particularly associated with the abuse of butane. Though inhalation abuse is not a new practice, figures cited by CNN show an increase in the number of teens taking part. From 2015 to 2022, the number of 12- to 17-year-old American adolescents using inhalants declined from 684,000 in 2015 to 554,000 in 2022, according to the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. However, by 2023, SAMHSA data showed that number was on the rise, climbing to 564,000. There are a huge number of easily available and potentially dangerous inhalants, with the DEA estimating the total is in excess of 1,000. In February 2022, TikTok introduced new measures designed to address the rise of potentially harmful online challenges. Under the changes, any users attempting to search for content designated as potentially harmful would be directed to an in-app guide, while searches for content violated community guideless blocked. A new four-step process for engaging with an online challenge was also introduced. Despite this, some concerns still remain. What People Are Saying Dr. Randy Weisman. from the intensive care unit at HonorHealth Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center, told AZFamily: "When they inhale these chemicals in the gas it will actually replace the oxygen within their lungs and within the rest of their body." He warned just one huff can prove deadly resulting in "failure of the liver, heart failure, disease of the lungs." What Happens Next Several state legislatures have taken steps to try to deter young people from buying these legal products by placing a restriction on the sale of these products to minors. However, despite posing a risk, many of these substances are not currently controlled by the Controlled Substances Act. Renna's parents look set to challenge this, with Aaron O'Rourke confirming, via the family's GoFundMe, that they will be "pursuing legislation to help prevent any other families from having to go through this."


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
California Fourth Grader Detained By ICE Sparks Outrage
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A 9-year-old boy in California was detained by federal immigration agents at an immigration hearing. Martir Garcia Lara, a fourth-grader at Torrance Elementary School, was taken into custody along with his father on May 29 after reporting to federal authorities in downtown Los Angeles. They were transferred the next day to an immigration facility in Texas, where they are currently held pending deportation to Honduras. A spokesperson for ICE told Newsweek they remain in federal custody pending deportation to Honduras. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers wait to detain a person, Jan. 27, 2025, in Silver Spring, Md. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers wait to detain a person, Jan. 27, 2025, in Silver Spring, Md. Alex Brandon/AP Why It Matters The arrest comes amid a hardline crackdown on immigration by President Donald Trump's administration, which has vowed to deport millions of migrants without legal status. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained under the second Trump administration that ICE does not arrest children. What To Know "Martir Garcia-Banegas, 50, illegally entered the United States July 10, 2021 with a family member, Martir Isaac Garcia Lara, 9," a spokesperson for ICE told Newsweek. On September 1, 2022, an immigration judge issued an order for the family to be removed to Honduras. Garcia appealed this decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals; however, the appeal was dismissed on August 11, 2023, according to ICE. After being detained by officials in Los Angeles, the father and son were transferred to the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Dilley, Texas. The administration has taken an estimated 500 children into government custody since Trump returned to power, according to CNN. Courthouses nationwide have recently become focal points in the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. Federal agents have been stationed to arrest individuals immediately after they appear before immigration judges. Many of these individuals have been in the U.S. for less than two years, and attorneys from the Department of Homeland Security often request that their deportation cases be dismissed. When a judge approves such a request, immigrants leaving the courtroom are sometimes taken into custody by plainclothes federal agents for expedited removal. What People Are Saying A spokesperson for ICE told Newsweek: "Parents, who are here illegally, can take control of their departure with the CBP Home App. The United States is offering aliens $1,000 and a free flight to self-deport now. We encourage every person here illegally to take advantage of this offer and reserve the chance to come back to the U.S. the right, legal way to live the American dream. If not, you will be arrested and deported without a chance to return." A spokesperson with Torrance Unified School District said in a statement: "It is our responsibility as a District to support the families of every student and connect them to resources and assistance for their continued education and healthy wellbeing, if, and when, a family requests it." What Happens Next Martir and his father will remain detained at a facility in southern Texas pending removal.