How ‘cosmopolitan' is Lord Hermer?
At one level, obviously not. Diogenes, we are told, travelled from place to place, rejected all conventional values, often lived in a large stone wine jar and performed all natural functions in public, like a dog – kunikos in Greek, whence our 'cynic'. Self-sufficiency, freedom of speech, indifference to hardship and lack of shame were Cynic hallmarks. Their aim was to build up inner resources, unconnected with worldly goods, that could be nurtured only by severe physical and mental self-discipline. Animals, primitive man, barbarians and the gods held the key to their ideal virtuous existence, which civilisation had wrecked with its notions of marriage, family, politics, the city, all social, sexual and racial distinctions, reputation, wealth, power, authority, literature, music and so on.
The move to humanise this stimulating lunacy was made by Stoic thinkers who associated cosmopolitan values with a common, shared rationality, drawn from divine reason, expressed by, for example, love of friends and family. 'All men are by nature brothers,' averred Epictetus (c. ad 50-135). As the Roman empire expanded so successfully across much of Europe, North Africa, Egypt and the Middle East, it is not surprising that Romans such as Cicero, Seneca and Marcus Aurelius identified Rome with the idea(l) of a universal cosmopolis bringing lengthy periods of peace to regions often at war (as much later did St Augustine, in different terms).
But modern human rights bear no relation to the ancient, and come at a very considerable social, financial and political cost, especially in relation to refugees. Perhaps Lord Hermer would be more suited to the UN, where 'no question of error is to be found in those for whom the height of virtue consists in the execution of their will' (Ammianus, 4th century ad) than the messy business of politics.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
36 minutes ago
- ITV News
As Europe's leaders head to Washington, Trump could shift to favouring Russia
They are travelling with a mood of collective concern — presidents, prime ministers, and a secretary general, descending on Washington today in a flotilla of flag-draped planes, uneasy that this is what it takes to help ensure their path towards a fair deal isn't thrown off course. As one European official told ITV News: "If we assume that Trump only hears the last person in the room, we should make sure that we are the last people in the room." For the United States, this is a moment of growing alignment — yes, alignment. But not with Britain, Germany, or France, as you might expect. Because, as European leaders travel to the White House with the transatlantic alliance on Ukraine sounding shaky - and their declarations of allegiance at times insincere - it's Washington and Moscow that emerged from Anchorage on Friday showing signs of agreement. Donald Trump is, in some ways, echoing Vladimir Putin's framing of the conflict at least as much as Volodymyr Zelenskyy's. And Putin has already set the trap: to portray Europeans and Ukrainians as the true obstacles to peace. On Friday, he warned Europe not to 'torpedo progress.' Yesterday, Kirill Dmitriev — a Kremlin negotiator and one of Putin's closest allies - went further, tweeting that 'European and British warmongers/saboteurs are in full panic mode. They should not stay in the way of Peace,' punctuating his message with a dove emoji. This was Russia draping itself in the robes of peacemaker, its critics cast as potential saboteurs. For European leaders, the danger isn't subtle - a narrative in which Putin gets to play statesman while they are painted as the wreckers. It's Donald Trump who Moscow hopes will buy that story. But what was agreed in Anchorage is still unclear, besides an agreement that Ukraine should be able to receive security guarantees like those it would receive if it was a member of Nato, the specifics are unclear. Trump himself was evasive on Friday: 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' What has since emerged is that Putin demanded Ukraine withdraw from Donbas — the Donetsk and Luhansk regions — as the price of ending the war, while offering a freeze along the rest of the frontline. Trump signalled willingness to back a plan that would see Russia handed not just occupied areas, but unoccupied Ukrainian territory too, in return for what he could present as peace. Whether Ukraine freezes the conflict or cedes land outright is more than a technical distinction; in practice, it is the difference between a country catching its breath or being permanently diminished. Last week, Trump assured Europeans that Moscow had made concessions which, it turned out, were never on the table. That ambiguity is exactly why Europeans are wary of Trump negotiating with Putin alone — and equally unwilling to leave Trump and Zelenskyy alone, mindful of the Oval Office humiliation in February when Trump berated the Ukrainian president in front of cameras. No European leader is prepared to risk a repeat of that scene. Meanwhile, Washington's tone has softened. Where the administration once threatened severe consequences if no ceasefire was reached, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Sunday that fresh measures would take time to bite and would only drive Russia from the table. The result: no new punishment for Putin, no clear cost for saying no. He left Alaska without agreeing to a ceasefire, but with a photo op, a red carpet, and a round of applause — prestige without compromise. It was against that backdrop that Zelenskyy and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen appeared together yesterday. Their message was blunt: Donetsk will not be handed to Russia, because Putin has failed to take it in twelve years of fighting. Talks cannot take place while Russian missiles still fall — 'it's impossible to negotiate under the pressure of weapons,' Zelenskyy said. This was a clear attempt to fix the terms of debate before heading to Washington. Two kinds of unity now shape this moment. The anticlimax in Alaska revealed the American president drifting closer to the Russian one. Washington could now reveal another — Europe's leaders rallying behind Ukraine not as bystanders, but as counterweights.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Government urged to intervene as London pubs struggle with rising costs and high tax rates
The British Beer and Pub Association is calling on the government for more support for pubs in the capital that are struggling with rising costs and high tax rates A survey by the BBPA found 59% of Londoners think business rates for pubs are unfair. It comes despite data from the Office for National Statistics suggesting London saw a net loss of just 10 pubs between 2023 and 2024. The government says its protecting and extending business rates relief. In a statement the Treasury added: "We know the vital importance of pubs to local communities and the wider economy, which is why we are protecting pavement pints and al fresco dining, have cut alcohol duty on draught pints in the pub, and are protecting and extending business rates relief which would have ended without this government's action. "The tax decisions we took at the Budget last year mean that we have been able to deliver on the priorities of the British people, from investing in the NHS to cutting waiting lists and putting more money in their pockets with a wage boost for millions as we deliver on the Plan for Change." Figures from the Office for National Statistics reveal: 59% of Londoners say the current business rates deal for pubs is unfair 50% of voters in London would back a party that pledges to cut pub taxes, turning rates reform into a potential election lever 69% have taken part in a community activity in a pub this year, and 44% fear losing that space if their local shuts – highlighting the pub's role as a lifeline. Kate Davidson, Publican of The Old Ivy House in Clerkenwell said: "We knew it would be tough, but it's become relentless. "We're growing, but the profits don't reflect that proportionally. "The pub isn't just about pints; it's about lonely people finding connection, students bonding with retirees, and parents feeling welcome. That's the value the current rates system completely ignores."
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Iran using Taliban ‘kill list' to hunt British spies
Iran's revolutionary guards are hunting British spies using a leaked Ministry of Defence list provided by the Taliban, The Telegraph has learnt. A group of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officials flew to Kabul last week to discuss a cooperation deal with Taliban leadership, according to senior Iranian and Afghan officials. The officials, whom sources said travelled to Afghanistan without the knowledge of Tehran's civilian government, wanted to use the list to capture suspected spies to use as bargaining chips in discussions with the West over the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme. In return, the Taliban is seeking recognition by Iran as the new official rulers of the war-ravaged country. The leaked database contains names of Afghans who applied for asylum in Britain, including soldiers who worked with the British Army, as well as intelligence assets and special forces personnel. Some on the list are believed to have fled to Iran to escape Taliban reprisals. A senior Iranian official, speaking from Tehran, said that four IRGC officials had travelled to Kabul. 'They promised the Taliban that they would pressure the government [in Tehran] to expedite their recognition,' the official said. 'The Taliban gave them the list. They want to find British spies before the 'snapback' to have something to pressure London behind closed doors.' 'The focus is just on British spies' Iranian border forces have arrested several people whose names appeared on the leaked list in recent days, The Telegraph understands. 'Many were released because they were only former Afghan soldiers, while others are being held for further checks,' they said. 'The focus is just on British spies.' The move comes after Britain, France and Germany threatened Iran this week with crippling economic sanctions if it does not begin talks to renew its nuclear programme by the end of August 2025. A 2015 nuclear deal provided Iran's economy relief from nearly a decade of trade and banking restrictions in exchange for curbs on its nuclear enrichment program designed to prevent development of nuclear weapons. On Wednesday, the European powers told UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres they were prepared to trigger a 'snapback' mechanism – reimposing all UN sanctions that existed before the 2015 agreement – if Iran fails to act by the deadline, though they offered an extension if Tehran complies. The 2015 deal expires on October 18. The official added: 'The IRGC is doing everything it can to find bargaining chips for talks before the deadline. 'The government has little idea of what they're doing and [the IRGC] fears that, after the war and all the damage, Iran will enter negotiations from a position of weakness.' 'Modified' list given to Revolutionary Guard The Telegraph revealed earlier this month that the IRGC had officially asked the Taliban for the list. The so-called 'kill list' was accidentally leaked in February 2022 when a Royal Marine emailed the complete file to Afghan contacts in Britain instead of sending a small extract, according to sources familiar with the incident. The spreadsheet contained names, telephone numbers and email addresses of Afghan soldiers, government workers and family members who applied to relocate to Britain under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy after the Western military withdrawal. The list also included identities of more than 100 British special forces personnel and MI6 operatives who had vouched for Afghan applicants seeking relocation. The Taliban's decision to share the database followed internal deliberations within its leadership in Kandahar. A senior Taliban official said some faction members opposed cooperation with Iran because of Tehran's mistreatment of Afghan refugees. However, the prospect of Iranian recognition ultimately swayed the decision.
