
‘Astonished by the question': Jaishankar rejects nuclear war fears over India-Pak clash
India and Pakistan were never on the brink of nuclear conflict during their recent military clash, External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar said in an interview with German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, challenging Western assumptions about South Asia and dismissing US claims of brokering the ceasefire.
Asked whether the world had the US to thank for the May 10 ceasefire, Jaishankar credited India's armed forces instead. 'The cessation of firing was agreed between the military commanders of both sides through direct contact,' he said. 'The morning before, we effectively hit and incapacitated Pakistan's main airbases and air defence system. So, who should I thank for the cessation of hostilities? I thank the Indian military because it was the Indian military action that made Pakistan say: We are ready to stop.'
India and Pakistan agreed on a ceasefire after three days of cross-border hostilities. On May 7, India launched airstrikes under 'Operation Sindoor' on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians. Pakistan responded by launching hundreds of drones at Indian military installations and civilian areas. India then targeted Pakistani military facilities, causing heavy damage. Soon after, Pakistan's military reached out to India and a ceasefire was agreed upon.
While the Donald Trump administration has publicly taken credit for facilitating the ceasefire — with Islamabad also thanking Washington — New Delhi has maintained that it was a bilateral decision between the two neighbours.
Jaishankar said US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance had expressed concern but played no direct role in negotiations. 'We made one thing very clear to everybody who spoke to us, not just the US but to everybody, saying if the Pakistanis want to stop fighting, they need to tell us. We need to hear it from them. Their General has to call up our General and say this. And that is what happened,' he said in an earlier interview with Dutch broadcaster NOS.
Asked if the ceasefire returned the region to pre-conflict conditions, Jaishankar said the message to terrorists was unambiguous: there would be consequences. 'We have sent a clear signal to the terrorists that there is a price to be paid for carrying out such attacks, as they did on us in Kashmir in April. The firing was then started by the Pakistani military. We fired back in self-defense and once the Pakistanis understood that they were taking a harmful course, we were able to stop firing. This situation has not changed for two weeks, that is the status.'
When the interviewer asked, 'How far away was the world from a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan?' Jaishankar expressed disbelief. 'Very, very far away. I'm frankly astonished by your question. We have terrorist targets. Those were very measured, carefully considered and non-escalating steps. After that, the Pakistani military opened fire on us. We were able to show them that we could disable their air defence systems. Then the firing stopped at their request.'
'At no point was a nuclear level reached,' he added. 'There is a narrative as if everything that happens in our part of the world leads directly to a nuclear problem. That disturbs me a lot because it encourages terrible activities like terrorism. If anything, much more is happening with the nuclear issue in your part of the world.'
The minister was also asked whether China played any role in the conflict. 'You know, many of the weapons systems that Pakistan has are of Chinese origin and the two countries are very close. You can draw your own conclusions from that,' he replied.
On questions regarding India's ties with Russia and its stance on the Ukraine war, Jaishankar pushed back strongly against Western expectations. 'Relationships do not develop because one partner simply adopts the concerns of the other as their own. Relationships are built on finding common ground. For you in Europe, other concerns and worries are important than for me in Asia. When you think of conflict, you think of Ukraine. When I think of conflict, I think of Pakistan, terrorism, China and our borders. Our perspective cannot be the same.'
When the interviewer pressed him further on Russia's violation of international law, Jaishankar responded: 'As soon as you bring a rule or norm into play, it is again linked to the situation that is your priority. You talk about rules and think of Ukraine. I talk about rules and I think of my own borders, of Pakistan, which has violated my borders, and China, which has done the same. So when you talk about borders and territorial integrity, I ask you: What about my borders?'
As the interviewer continued to challenge India's alignment with Moscow, the minister hit back by highlighting European ties with Pakistan. 'My neighbour Pakistan has caused every conceivable problem under the sun — from nuclear weaponisation, to the transfer of nuclear technology to irresponsible partners, to terrorism. But doesn't Germany also do business with Pakistan?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Home Minister's remarks on West Bengal CM opposing Operation Sindoor incorrect and motivated, says TMC
The Trinamool Congress on Monday said that the remarks by Union Home Minister Amit Shah that West Bengal Chief Minister and party chairperson had opposed 'Operation Sindoor' was 'factually incorrect and politically motivated'. The West Bengal's ruling party took to social media and shared video of the speech of the Home Minister made in Kolkata on June 1 as well as remarks made by the Chief Minister on Operation Sindoor on three days May 9, May 19 and May 29. 'Smt. @MamataOfficial has always stood by our armed forces and backed every national interest with full @abhishekaitc, as part of India's delegation, has represented our firm stand against terrorism on the global stage. HM @AmitShah should've done his homework before spreading lies!' the Trinamool Congress shared on X. In a statement the Trinamool Congress said that 'the CM has consistently backed national security initiatives, including Operation Sindoor' .'The party provided records confirming her support for the Centre's actions against terrorism. AITC also pointed out that Abhishek Banerjee was nominated as part of the official Indian delegation representing the nation's position on the global stage showing how serious the party was with Operation Sindoor,' the statement added. On June 1, the Home Minister Amit Shah had accused the Trinamool Congress chairperson of opposing 'Operation Sindoor' to 'appease the Muslim vote bank'. Ms. Banerjee had expressed support for India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack, stating that she stood 'shoulder-to-shoulder' with the Union government in the fight against terrorism. She had nominated her nephew and Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee to be part of one of the all party delegations visiting foreign countries and highlighting the country's stand against terrorism. A war of words between the Trinamool Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party over the issue started on May 29, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a public rally targeted the Trinamool Congress government on several counts including the recruitment scam and the communal riots at Murshidabad. The Chief Minister launched a scathing attack on the Prime Minister and accused him of politicising 'Operation Sindoor'. Three days after the Prime Minister's rally the Home Minister also targeted the Trinamool Congress government on similar fronts but accused the Chief Minister of opposing ' Operation Sindoor'.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
RJD MP defends Tej Pratap, says 2 marriages now new in country
1 2 3 4 5 6 Patna: Citing the example of former Union minister Ram Vilas Paswan who had two wives, senior RJD leader and Buxar MP Sudhakar Singh on Monday defended Lalu Prasad's elder son and former state minister Tej Pratap Yadav on the issue of having relationship with another woman, apart from his wife. Tej Pratap had on May 24 announced on social media that he had been "in a relationship for 12 years" with the woman, despite being married, and his divorce petition pending before a family court here. He, however, deleted the post a few hours later, claiming that his social media page was "hacked". Defending Tej Pratap, the RJD MP, while talking to reporters in East Champaran's Motihari, said, "Solemnising another marriage does not fall under the category of immorality. The tradition of having two marriages in India is not new. Indian society has had the tradition of multiple marriages for centuries..." Citing the example of late Paswan, Singh said, "We have seen and heard in the past many instances of multiple marriages by a man. Take the case of Union minister Chirag Paswan, who was born to Ram Vilas's second wife." Singh also urged RJD chief Lalu Prasad to reconsider his decision about Tej Pratap. "Lalu Prasad, as a father, should reconsider his decision of expelling Tej Pratap from the party," Singh said. A day after Tej Pratap declared his relationship with another woman, the RJD supremo on May 25 expelled him from the party and snapped all family ties with him. Lalu, who announced his drastic move on social media, made no mention of the previous day's happenings, but criticised his elder son's actions, public conduct and "irresponsible behaviour", saying "disregard for moral values in personal life weakens our collective struggle to achieve social justice". Lalu also admonished Tej Pratap for behaving in a manner "not in consonance with the values of my family", and declared: "He is expelled from the party for six years."


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
PM to meet delegations after world tour next week
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to meet the seven multi-party delegations, which are currently touring key international capitals to underscore India's zero-tolerance for terrorism and New Delhi's 'new normal' against the menace, sometime next week, people aware of developments said on Monday. According to the people cited above, the date for Modi's meeting is yet to be finalised but it might happen on June 9 or 10. Before the PM meets all seven delegations, they will debrief external affairs minister S Jaishankar in a process starting from Tuesday with the team led by Bharatiya Janata Party leader Baijayant 'Jay' Panda, the people added. Panda's delegation, which left Delhi on May 24, is set to be the first to return home after visiting Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and Algeria. The meeting with Jaishankar is scheduled at 2.30pm on Tuesday. The delegation comprises BJP leaders Nishikant Dubey, Phangnon Konyak, Rekha Sharma, All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi, nominated Rajya Sabha member Satnam Singh Sandhu, former minister Ghulam Nabi Azad, and former foreign secretary Harsh Shringla. The PM's decision to meet all the delegations is a significant step as top-ranking functionaries suggested that the main idea to send the teams across the globe after Operation Sindoor came from the PM. It will be the first interaction between the PM and the delegations, which began leaving Delhi on May 21. The multi-party delegations—comprising 59 lawmakers, in addition to former diplomats — have already covered a bulk of their itinerary of 33 countries, including the European Union. The leaders, briefed by foreign secretary Vikram Misri before leaving Delhi, have focused on exposing Pakistan's duplicity on combating terror by showing pictures of the country's army general attending funeral of terrorists killed during Operation Sindoor and the discovery of 9/11 accused Osama Bin Laden in Abbottabad, and underlined how repeated peace initiatives by New Delhi met with disappointment and more attacks, people familiar with the matter said. All seven delegations – headed by senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor; Bharatiya Janata Party leaders Ravi Shankar Prasad and Panda; Janata Dal (United) leader Sanjay Jha, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar) leader Supriya Sule, and Shiv Sena leader Shrikant Shinde – have met parliamentarians, ministers, government officials and policy makers to exchange views on furthering cooperation on counterterrorism and combating radicalism, especially after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that left 26 civilians dead. The Indian delegations spoke about major terror attacks sponsored by Pakistan, how Islamabad refused to act even after New Delhi provided clinching evidence of photos, DNA samples and call records in the aftermath of the 2008 Mumbai attacks, and pointed out that all major international terror attacks including the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks and the 2005 London bombing had direct or indirect links to Pakistan, said the people cited above. Two of the delegations – one to Russia and another to Japan – concluded their visits on Saturday with 'constructive meetings', said the people cited above. Operation Sindoor was India's direct military response to the April 22 terror strike at Pahalgam in Kashmir that killed 26 civilians in what was the worst attack on civilians since the 26/11 Mumbai strikes. India launched the operation in the early hours of May 7, bombing nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The pre-dawn strikes --- which killed at least 100 terrorists --- sparked a series of attacks and counter attacks across the western border, involving fighter jets, missiles, armed drones, and fierce artillery and rocket duels. In one such counterattack on the night of May 9-10, the air force struck targets at 13 Pakistani air bases and military installations. After four days of fighting, military hostilities were stopped on May 10 as the two nations reached an understanding. The move to send political delegations abroad started on May 17, roughly a week after India and Pakistan agreed to an understanding to cease hostilities. In Algiers, Panda said that India's appeal to place Pakistan back on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list was gaining significant resonance globally, emphasising the role of illicit financing in fuelling terrorism. 'Pakistan is not interested in improving itself or helping its people... They have diverted the money for terrorism and its army and looted it... Terrorism is fuelled by two things. One is ideology and the other is illicit finance... Ideology-wise, these Islamic countries have taken a strong stand... They do not permit any kind of fundamentalism from their soil... Financing part is the other aspect,' Panda said. In Paris, former Union minister M J Akbar asserted India's clear and thought-through 'no first use' doctrine on nuclear weapons and said, 'Pakistan is a military state, it is no longer a civilian state. And a military state has a vested interest in conflict because conflict justifies its presence… Now, it sometimes thinks it can provide a nuclear shelter to terrorists. The Prime Minister (Modi) has made it very clear that there can be no nuclear blackmail.' In Tokyo, Trinamool Congress lawmaker Abhishek Banerjee said, 'If terrorism is a rabid dog, Pakistan is a vile handler…We are here to share the message and the truth that India refuses to bow down. We will not kneel to fear. I belong to a political party that is in the Opposition. It is in the public domain that I have said that Pakistan needs to be taught a lesson in the language they understand,' he said.