NZ First MP Tanya Unkovich quits Parliament
New Zealand First MP Tanya Unkovich.
Photo:
VNP / Phil Smith
New Zealand First MP Tanya Unkovich has resigned from Parliament, with plans to head back into the private sector.
Before becoming an MP, Unkovich was self-employed and was a public speaker, published author and international life and business coach, according to the New Zealand First website.
1 News reported the MP's departure came in part as a result of her coaching and consultancy work, with a view to heading back to the private sector.
Unkovich was a member of select committees for social services, economic development, science and innovation.
More to come...
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Taxes will have to increase to cope with ageing population, government spending
The IRD has warned government spending needs to change or taxes will need to increase in the future. Photo: RNZ Inland Revenue is warning that unless what the government spends its money on changes, taxes will need to increase in the coming years to cope with an ageing population. It is currently seeking submissions on its latest long-term insights briefing. It notes that in the coming years, if the current settings are maintained, government spending as a proportion of the economy will rise. "A core driver of these fiscal pressures is that New Zealand's population is ageing." By 2060, a quarter of the population will be older than 65. "This means that the amount the government needs to spend on superannuation and health care will increase if the government maintains current policy settings. "In its last Long-term Fiscal Statement, the Treasury predicted that government expenditure will exceed government revenue by 13.3 percent of GDP by 2061 if the government takes no response to rising fiscal pressures," IRD said. That would mean either that existing taxes would need to be levied at a higher rate - such as higher levels of income tax or GST - or there would need to be new taxes implemented. It said New Zealand taxed a more limited set of capital gains than most other OECD countries. It could be possible to broaden that scope. "The absence of a general approach to taxing capital gains can provide an incentive for individuals to reduce their tax liability by undertaking activities that are not taxed rather than those that are taxed. "This can reduce government's ability to raise more revenue in a way that is progressive." It pointed to an estimate for a Tax Working Group report in 2019 that, if a capital gains tax took effect from the 2022 tax year, it would raise about $3 billion in the 2026 tax year. Revenue would increase over time. IRD said this was in line with revenue raised in other countries from capital gains taxes. "Revenue from capital gains could therefore make a meaningful contribution to addressing long-term fiscal challenges. "However [as noted above] the last Treasury LTFS projected an operating deficit of 13.3 percent of GDP by 2061 under current settings. "Therefore, even with more comprehensive taxation of capital gains other tax or expenditure measures would be needed in the longer term. "Therefore, Inland Revenue considers that it is also important to consider how to increase the flexibility of the tax system to changing revenue needs." It said capital gains taxes could also have relatively high compliance costs. Inland Revenue said GST was a substantial source of tax revenue. But if it were to be increased, there would be concerns about the effect on lower-income households. While wealthier households pay more GST overall, poorer households spend more of their money on GST. IRD said GST could be applied at a lower rate on some goods and services that were bought by lower-income households, or there could be assistance via the welfare system to help those households. "Several international and New Zealand-focused studies have shown that using cash transfers is a more cost-effective way to target assistance to lower-income groups compared to applying lower rates to certain goods and services. "Several countries have implemented permanent GST-offset schemes for this reason." The report used modelling of GST at 18 percent. It also considered how other taxes such as payroll tax, wealth tax, inheritance tax, land and property tax could be used to add further tax bases to the New Zealand system. But it said there were difficult trade-offs with each of these. "Payroll taxes provide a means of shifting the balance of taxation away from capital income and onto labour income, but they are likely to have some disadvantages relative to GST and income tax. "Wealth taxes are likely to impose higher distortionary costs than a broad-based income tax, and they face similar challenges to those that would make an idealised income tax that includes accrued capital gains impractical. "Inheritance taxes are likely to have similar distortionary costs to income taxes when people are intentional donors, but they will have much lower distortionary costs when people are unintentional donors. "Land taxes are widely seen as one of the least distortive taxes, and they impose fewer distortionary costs than property taxes or stamp duties. "However, they would have a significant impact on certain groups. As with any tax, providing preferential tax treatment to certain groups or in certain situations would tend to increase efficiency costs and reduce horizontal equity on some margins." IRD said this underscored the importance of income tax and GST being designed in a way that was as efficient and fair as possible while having the flexibility to adjust to changing revenue needs. "New Zealand faces difficult choices in designing a durable tax system in the face of long-term fiscal challenges. "In Inland Revenue's view, a priority for future work should be on how to make New Zealand's main bases of income tax and consumption tax more flexible to changing revenue needs over time." It said, with different personal and company tax rates there was an incentive for people to "shelter" their income in companies. "This incentive is likely to increase the wider gap between top personal tax rates and the company rate, however, in the context of rising fiscal pressures, a system that requires alignment of the company rate and top personal rate is unlikely to be a durable tax system." Economist Shamubeel Eaqub said IRD had a clear message that either tax rates would need to increase, or the tax base - or both. "There are some difficult choices to be had in the future, if spending choices don't change then our revenue choices have to. "And we can either tax more using the same instruments that we have on the same bases that we have or we can increase the bases, and there are no easy answers. "There are always trade-offs, there will be winners and losers. And we're going to have to make a considered decision of what we're going to do - no tax is easy. "No one likes paying tax. I think it's about finding the least disruptive system given the public services that we want." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Queenstown council wants Environment Court to make decision on discharge into Shotover River
The Shotover River where Queenstown Lakes District Council discharged 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater in March. Photo: RNZ / Tess Brunton The Queenstown Lakes District Council wants its retrospective application to discharge treated effluent to Shotover River to go directly to the Environment Court. In late March, the council enacted emergency powers under the Resource Management Act to pump at least 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater into the river each day from the Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant after its disposal field failed. The council submitted a retrospective resource consent to the Otago Regional Council in May and asked for it to be publicly notified. The Queenstown Lakes District Council has now applied to the regional council to directly refer its resource consent to the Environment Court. District council property and infrastructure general manager Tony Avery said it believed that this would provide the most efficient and robust approach given the nature of the consent. "Shotover River is a significant natural resource and comes with considerable cultural and community values. "As such, we believe it is beneficial for the evaluation of and decision on council's application to be made in an experienced and well-resourced court," Avery said. If approved, it would mean the regional council would no longer be the decision-maker in the first instance - the Environment Court would. Earlier this year, the regional council took the district council to Environment Court over repeated resource consent breaches at the plant . It resulted in the [. district council being ordered to pay at least $235,000] in costs and fix the issues at the plant The Queenstown Lakes District Council said that meant the Environment Court was already well acquainted with the matter and "would help to provide an efficient and comprehensive decision from a neutral arbiter". Public notification, submission timeframes and assessing the application would still fall under the regional council's jurisdiction, and it would still need to provide that assessment and a report before the matter was heard by the court. The district council said the Environment Court would be able to properly test evidence to assist decision makers. "Referring the matter to the Environment Court would result in a faster decision, ensure access to the necessary resourcing in a cost-effective way, and provide a simple process that the public can engage with and take part in if they wish to," the district council said. "Rights of appeal would remain intact." If the regional council declined the request, it would stay as the decision maker and a council hearing would be held. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
The House: Parliament's Week Ended Early But Was Still Packed Full
This year, 2025, is the middle year of the 54th Parliament. Middle years in a three-year term are typically when the largest number of bills get passed by a government. The current executive is certainly trying to follow that pattern. In two weeks before Christmas in 2023 five new laws were enacted. During 2024 Parliament passed 44 laws (including one member's bill). Now, half-way through 2025's sitting year it has completed 30 bills. Eight of those were finalised this week. One reason for the very rapid pace is the sheer number of bills that have not graced a Select Committee, even for a brief period of public consultation. Of the 79 bills passed, 40 are noted as being considered in committee. The apparent nearly 50/50 split of bills skipping select committee is misleading - the total of bills passed includes eight appropriations and imprest supply bills (about cash not policy). A more accurate number is 40 bills considered in committee from 71. Across recent parliaments the use of extra sittings and urgency seems to have accelerated. Urgency in and of itself is now barely newsworthy. This week's sprint under urgency to finalise those eight bills in just two days was impressive, but it is important to know what laws are being debated and agreed - at whatever speed that happens to be. Below is a quick rundown on the bills debated this week - those finalised and those initiated. First readings this week Each of these bills was referred to a Select Committee and will now be available for public feedback. The Overseas Investment (National Interest Test and Other Matters) Amendment Bill would make approvals for incoming foreign investment, faster and easier. Investment tests would be coalesced and a three-week deadline imposed for approvals to be given unless there are reasonable grounds for a national interest assessment. The Immigration (Fiscal Sustainability and System Integrity) Amendment Bill gives the Minister of Immigration a range of new powers, imposes new penalties, fixes some legislative holes and allows immigration-related levies to be charged to new groups. The Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme-Forestry Conversion) Amendment Bill seeks to disincentivise the conversion of farms into exotic forestry by no longer allowing owners to register for benefits through the Emissions Trading Scheme. The Game Animal Council (Herds of Special Interest) Amendment Bill adjusts current legislation so that species currently designated as needing extermination (as pests) can be kept from being eradicated by being designated herds of special interest by the minister. These are things such as Himalayan tahr that were initially naturalised as a hunting target then later legislated against as being environmentally problematic. This bill seeks to preserve some for the original purpose. Third and final readings this week The below bills were all read for a third and final time and will now be signed into law. The House completed the Supplementary Estimates (which updates last year's budget numbers), and an Imprest Supply Bill (which affords the government an ongoing cash supply). The Social Security (Mandatory Reviews) Amendment Bill creates a mandatory requirement for those receiving specific benefits or supplements to re-apply for these yearly. It also appears to widen the allowance for what sounds like AI to make decisions about matters like ending benefits or imposing sanctions. The Rates Rebate Amendment Bill slightly increases the earnings limit within which SuperGold Card holders can apply for a rates rebate. Don't get too excited: it's a small increase, but the bill was widely supported but without acclaim. The Racing Industry Amendment Bill widens the current betting monopoly held by the TAB to include online betting. The Invest New Zealand Bill creates a new agency with the objective of attracting international investment. The Oversight of Oranga Tamariki System Legislation Amendment Bill changes the mechanism and agencies responsible for watching over the performance of Oranga Tamariki, the child protection agency. The Employment Relations (Pay Deductions for Partial Strikes) Amendment Bill allows employers to withhold wages from employees for undertaking partial strikes, like working to rule or refusing overtime. The Victims of Sexual Violence (Strengthening Legal Protections) Legislation Bill seeks to enhance protection for victims of sexual violence participating in court processes. *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ.
