Transport demo to take to skies
Whoosh chief executive Dr Chris Allington said it would begin operating as soon as the middle of next year, and more information would be released soon.
"Within the next few weeks, we'll be cutting ribbons and starting to dig holes."
He told an audience at the Electrify Queenstown trade show yesterday the on-demand system, which moves fully-electric, self-driving cabins around an elevated cable network, could solve the resort town's traffic congestion issues.
The company unveiled a working prototype at its Christchurch base last September after six years of development.
The demo system, which was being jointly funded by Whoosh and Remarkables Park Ltd, would have all its key features including cabins for four or five people, stations and an app.
It would give residents the opportunity to experience it and provide feedback.
"We'll then make it better, and hopefully we can work with the team and deliver something down here."
The company had mapped out a 50-station network that linked the resort's town centre to Frankton and the eastern and southern suburbs.
It already had projects under way in the United States and the first, in a 485ha park in the city of Irvine, California, was expected to be operating by the end of next year.
It was also working on projects in Japan and the Middle East.
Dr Allington said a Whoosh system had many advantages over a gondola system.
It could disperse its users across a greater number of smaller stations, avoiding the queues likely at peak commuter times with a gondola system's fewer, larger stations.
Its modular nature allowed it to be expanded as demand required.
"You can form three-dimensional networks in your cities which fit in the existing urban spaces.
"You're no longer stuck with straight lines and a limited number of stops."
Whoosh was not the only mass transportation system being touted for Queenstown yesterday, which also featured a talk by Doppelmayr New Zealand chief executive Garreth Hayman.
Doppelmayr NZ is working with tech entrepreneur Rod Drury and former Infrastructure Commission chief executive Ross Copland on a gondola system designed to move 3000 people an hour.
The first stage, estimated to cost $250m, would run from the town centre up to a Queenstown Hill station, along to a Lake Johnson station, down to the Frankton bus hub, then on to the airport.
Part of the Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago district councils' regional deal submission, the plan's backers hope to have it operating by late 2028.
Dr Allington told the Otago Daily Times a gondola "solves one problem, but not every problem", and could co-exist with Whoosh.
If a Whoosh system was wanted for Queenstown, his company would be "very happy" to build one.
"If not, we've got plenty of projects to keep us busy."
guy.williams@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
16 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Ride-hailing company eyes up Christchurch
European ride-hailing company Bolt is eyeing up Christchurch and Wellington after an Auckland launch quickly surpassed rider and driver targets. Bolt's entry into Auckland in mid-June extended the competition beyond marketplace kingpin Uber and India's DiDi, which moved into the capital city last month. The Estonian headquartered company repeated its plans to open up in other cities, but would not be moved on when it might expand its app-based service to the south. Aside from taxis, Uber is the only ride-hailing operator in Christchurch. Bolt New Zealand general manager Adam Muirson said the company wanted to continue building an Auckland base before looking at other cities. "We definitely have got strong national aspirations, but the important thing right now is we are focused on getting Auckland right. "So we have a number of goals to get here before we further our thoughts or put a timeline to the expansion." Extending ride-hailing to other cities was expected to be easier than setting up in a new country as it had an onboarding platform for riders and drivers already in place. The next steps would be to alert regulators and partners, opening up the app for drivers to apply and let new riders know it was open for ride requests. Muirson said New Zealand was positively positioned for expansion as, unlike some countries, it had one set of regulations to follow. Bolt had developed strong relationships with regulatory bodies. "So opening in another city is far simpler compared with opening the first. Of course there is a lot of work and complexity which goes into it, but it won't take anywhere near as long as it did for Auckland." He said the Auckland launch over the past two months had exceeded expectations. More drivers joining than expected had provided strong coverage within the first week, while rider sign-ups had surpassed targets. "We are months ahead of where we thought we would have been from both of those numbers ... We have got many, many Aucklanders trying Bolt for the first time and because we have got so many more partner drivers and riders signed up than expected total rides are far ahead of where we projected." He said the strong demand reflected the desire for better value in ride-hailing. Stagnant competition had resulted in riders and drivers "piling" into Bolt quickly. Within the first week of opening competitors had provided discounts in response to incentives promoted on the Bolt app for riders and drivers, he said. Bolt's entry follows the exit of Ola and Zoomy over the past two years. The company is Europe's leading ride-hailing platform, operating in more than 600 cities across 50 countries and has more than 200 million users world-wide. Over the past year, Bolt has opened up in Greece, Canada under the brand name Hopp, Dubai and Malaysia. Among the first NZ riders were Kiwis who had Bolt accounts when they were travelling abroad. Muirson said the company had taken lessons learned from operating in four continents and applied them to New Zealand so riders were paying less and partner drivers were being paid more. Bolt has a local team in Auckland and drivers can book drop-in sessions with staff to address any challenges or general queries. A few weeks ago the company released a family plan so trips could be taken and paid under a single account. Bolt-branded signage was launched last week for drivers in return for increased earnings. Muirson said ride hailing was helping people move away from private car dependency and providing a more affordable option for getting around the city. Bolt is about to release further target achievements over the next few days.
NZ Herald
7 days ago
- NZ Herald
Driverless cars from China expanding into Europe next year through ride-hailing companies
Momenta will soon provide assisted driving technology to Chinese company IM Motors for its cars sold in Britain. While Momenta has not specified the model Uber will be using, it has already signalled it will choose a Chinese model. In China, 'the pace of development and the pressure to deliver at scale push companies to improve quickly,' said Gerhard Steiger, the chair of Momenta Europe. A worker on an electric car assembly line at Jiangling Motors factory in Nanchang, China. The factory will make the RT6 for Baidu and Lyft to use in Europe. Photo / Keith Bradsher, The New York Times China's state-controlled banking system has been lending money at low interest rates to the country's electric car industry in a bid for global leadership. Chinese driverless cars are starting to move into other markets as well. Baidu and Uber announced last month that they would start offering their self-driving cars this year in Asia outside China and in the Middle East. Automakers in China have not yet tried to offer driverless cars in the United States. That is partly because of concerns about the high costs of personal injury lawsuits and the 100% tariffs imposed last year on electric cars imported from China. In addition, the US, citing security, severely limited in January the use of Chinese assisted-driving systems. For navigation, the cars use cameras that take dozens of high-resolution images per second of the road and roadside areas. Automakers and software companies have said that very little information from these photos is uploaded or stored. But collection of the data has raised concerns among US policymakers and companies. China also has stringent restrictions on driving-related data. Elon Musk, chief executive of Tesla, began offering driverless cars in Austin, Texas, in June. Waymo, formerly known as the Google self-driving car project, also has driverless cars in Austin as well as Los Angeles, San Francisco, Phoenix and Atlanta. In Europe, Volkswagen has said it is developing a driverless version of its electric ID. Buzz minivan. But automakers outside China face very high costs for radars, cameras, and other technology required for so-called robotaxis. The price of the electric cars themselves is also higher. An ID. Buzz, without self-driving gear, retails for US$62,000 to US$72,000. The somewhat smaller Jiangling RT6 is less than US$30,000 ($51,000). Self-driving car experiments are already under way in more than a dozen Chinese cities and are being conducted by at least 19 automakers. Last year, Baidu turned its experiment in Wuhan, a city in central China, into the world's largest. A driverless Baidu robotaxi on a road with other vehicles in Wuhan, China. Photo / Qilai Shen, The New York Times The Chinese Government has backed the technology. The government sets demands on the safety of driverless technology and has used censorship to suppress online discussion of crashes and other safety incidents. And China's legal system makes it difficult to win large verdicts from car manufacturers. As a result, Chinese companies are accumulating databases of real-world driving they can use to train their autonomous driving models. Momenta and Baidu trained their driverless car systems in China. In the US, personal injury lawyers have begun focusing on the industry. Last week, a jury in Florida found that flaws in Tesla's self-driving software bore one-third of the responsibility for a crash in 2019 that killed a 22-year-old woman and severely injured her boyfriend. The jury verdict, if upheld on appeal, would require Tesla to pay as much as US$243 million in punitive and compensatory damages to the woman's parents and to her boyfriend. Driverless technology works better with electric cars than with fuel-powered cars. This is because computers can vary the power going to the wheels in an electric car extremely quickly. China is the world's main producer of electric cars. Expanding robotaxi services to new cities, not to mention new countries, is not easy. While the individual cars do not have drivers, they typically require one controller for every several cars to handle difficulties and answer questions from users. And the cars often need to be specially programmed for traffic conditions unique to each city. Lyft and Baidu nonetheless said they had plans for 'the fleet scaling to thousands of vehicles across Europe in the following years'. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Keith Bradsher Photographs by: Qilai Shen, Keith Bradsher, ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
NZ Herald
01-08-2025
- NZ Herald
China dominates the global market for electric vehicles, batteries and solar panels - all invented in the US
Electric vehicles Once, it looked like America's roads would be filled with electric cars. The US inventor William Morrison developed the first successful electric car in 1890, and interested urbanites soon began converting stables to charging ports. By the early 1900s, about one-third of all vehicles on the road were electric. In New York City, a cab company called the Electric Vehicle Company operated electric vehicles with exchangeable batteries, like an early form of Uber or Lyft. At the time, however, many rural areas still lacked reliable electricity: it wasn't until the 1930s that widespread electrification got under way. Oil companies, though, had already created a network to distribute fuel across the country. 'A lot of rural America was still using gasoline for stoves and kerosene for home lighting,' said David Kirsch, a professor of management and entrepreneurship at the University of Maryland. 'You could buy it at many, many general stores across the country.' That made fuel engines more convenient for consumers. The internal combustion engine was improving much faster than battery technology. The Ford assembly line allowed the new fuel cars, like the Model T, to be produced more quickly. By the 1930s, there were only a tiny number of EVs on the road. More than 50 years later, the country had another chance. California said it would require automakers to sell a certain amount of electric vehicles. General Motors built the EV1, a small two-seater sedan that became quickly popular in the state. But when the California regulators backed off the plan in the mid-1990s, GM quietly repossessed the vehicles and discarded them. The US would continue to focus on fuel cars. It was that dominance in fuel-powered cars that initially motivated China to move into EVs more than a decade ago. Around 2010, China's Minister of Science and Technology, Wan Gang, began pushing the country to branch out into electric cars. American companies were already dominating combustion engines, and the country was looking for technologies that its companies could dominate over the next few decades. Between 2010 and 2023, China rolled out a huge bank of subsidies to encourage EV adoption. Interested buyers could get a rebate on an EV of up to 60,000 yuan, or roughly US$8000 ($13,600) – a huge benefit in a country where the average new car costs just US$23,000. EV owners also were exempt from sales tax and received a special coloured licence plate (green instead of blue) that allowed them to bypass the years-long wait for a licence. Manufacturers also received boosts, including tax breaks and faster permitting and siting for factories that produced EVs and batteries. According to one estimate from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the Chinese Government poured around US$231 billion into EV adoption – and that's likely an underestimate. The investments paid off. In 2010, both China and the US were selling just over 1000 EVs a year. Last year, the US sold 1.2 million – while China sold 6.4 million. And as Congress cuts EV incentives, the divide is likely to widen. 'There's a real danger of the US becoming more technologically isolated in the automotive sector,' said Ilaria Mazzocco, deputy director and senior fellow in Chinese business and economics at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Lithium-ion batteries Batteries followed a similar trajectory to electric vehicles. In the early 1970s, M. Stanley Whittingham, then a scientist at Exxon, created the first functional lithium-ion battery – a design that was later improved upon by John Goodenough at the University of Oxford and the Japanese scientist Akira Yoshino at Asahi Kasei Corp. Initially, the new technology became popular in the 1990s in electronics such as early laptops and cellphones – they were compact and reliable. By the early 2000s, the batteries began making their way into a new generation of electric cars. An American company called A123 was an early manufacturer of lithium iron phosphate batteries with enough capacity to power a car. In 2009, the Department of Energy gave the company hundreds of millions of dollars in a grant under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. But the US wasn't boosting the sales of EVs, and early battery companies struggled to find a toehold in a market dominated by fuel-powered cars and trucks. A123 went bankrupt and was later purchased by a Chinese company. By the early 2010s, as China boosted its sales of EVs, the country was also pouring billions of dollars into battery technology and battery manufacturing. At the same time, the country invested in processing critical minerals like cobalt, nickel and graphite – adding stability to the complex battery supply chain. In 2021, the technology got another boost: China began to require that companies add 10 to 30% battery storage to the grid for each gigawatt of wind or solar coming online. Battery production surged. 'It just exploded,' said Iola Hughes, head of research at Rho Motion, a battery research firm and part of the consulting firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. Today, China boasts 85% of the world's global capacity for battery cell manufacturing. For EV batteries, the picture is even starker: China holds 94% of the market share for producing lithium iron phosphate batteries. Solar panels For decades, solar panels were a distinctly American creation. In 1954, scientists at Bell Labs created the world's first commercially viable solar cell, which converted 6% of incoming light into electricity. By the 1970s, solar was booming in the US. The country was in the midst of an oil crisis, and the federal Government directed millions of dollars into research and development of solar. Scientists and engineers from around the world flooded into the US to develop solar technologies. President Jimmy Carter had 32 panels installed on the roof of the White House. According to one estimate, 95% of the world's solar industry in 1978 was based in the US. But in the 1980s, everything changed. President Ronald Reagan slashed funding for renewables and research and development into solar power. 'It was really ideological,' said Greg Nemet, professor of public affairs at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. 'They cut the solar budget by 85% within a couple of years.' Germany and Japan filled the vacuum left by American leadership, gobbling up experienced engineers and scientists. Then, in the early 2000s, European countries began offering huge subsidies for installations of wind and solar. Chinese companies saw an opportunity – and started building millions of panels. 'There was a lot of growing demand in the early to mid-2000s, thanks to all these incentives in Europe, and a lot of entrepreneurs in China just set up factories to serve that demand,' Mazzocco said. After the 2008 financial crisis, Europe shut down those subsidies as the continent shifted towards austerity. But unlike the US decades before, China decided to continue to support the development of solar power. 'The Chinese Government stepped in,' Mazzocco said. So far, China has invested US$50b in new solar power production, and the country now accounts for about 80% of the global solar supply chain. Today, eight of the top 10 solar panel manufacturers are based in China. The other two are in India and Singapore. Experts say that the country's success is based on two things: reliable policy and a push to adopt the new technologies. 'I look across the period from say '69 to the present – what strikes me is how inconsistent we have been with policy,' said Kirsch. 'The Chinese have just cleaned our clock by having consistent policy.' At the same time, China pushed consumers to adopt the technologies even as they encouraged manufacturers to build them. 'Technologies succeed when you combine a technological opportunity with a market opportunity,' said Nemet. Despite all of the US inventions, Nemet says, the country never focused on making sure there was enough domestic demand for those technologies. 'The US was really good at creating these technological opportunities – but we just weren't supporting the market side enough,' he said.
