Donald Trump calls climate change a hoax — but 70% of Americans want global action & support the Paris agreement; here's what we know
A recent international survey has found that 70% of Americans support global climate policies aimed at reducing global warming. This public opinion sharply contrasts with the federal stance under current US President Donald Trump, who withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement soon after his inauguration on January 20, 2025. Trump cited that the agreement did not align with US values or its approach to balancing economic and environmental goals.
Majority of Americans prefer global action on climate
The global survey was co-authored by researchers at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. It involved over 40,000 participants across 20 countries that together contribute to about 75% of the world's carbon emissions. When asked where policies to address climate change should be implemented, 70% of US respondents selected the "global level", according to the report published by PTI.
In a separate 2023 survey of 8,000 people from both the United States and the European Union, participants supported the idea of carbon pricing. They approved of a system where carbon would be priced at USD 90 per ton by 2030, with adults receiving a global monthly reimbursement of USD 30 per person.
US President Donald Trump | Credit: X
Trump maintains climate change is a 'Hoax'
President Donald Trump's stance on climate change has remained consistent with his earlier views from his first term in 2017. He has frequently referred to climate change as 'mythical', 'nonexistent', or an 'expensive hoax,' as reported by the BBC.
Under his administration, the US pulled out of the 2015 Paris Agreement, which included commitments by 188 countries to limit the rise in global temperatures to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Trump also reversed several key environmental policies introduced by former President Barack Obama.
Key environmental rollbacks under Trump administration
Among other measures, Trump dismantled Obama's Clean Power Plan, which aimed to reduce carbon emissions from coal and gas-based power plants. It was replaced with the Affordable Clean Energy rule, which had less stringent emission regulations.
In addition, Trump attempted to freeze federal fuel efficiency standards for new vehicles and tried to restrict California from enforcing its own tougher emissions rules, according to the BBC.
What is global climate policy?
Global climate policy consists of coordinated international actions to combat the effects of climate change. It includes initiatives like emission reduction targets, adaptation measures, and agreements such as the Paris Climate Accord. These policies often require collaboration between governments, institutions, and civil society to address climate issues on a global scale.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
Troops Deployed, Teargas Fired – Is LA Under Trump's Martial Law? California Guv To Sue US Prez Over Immigrant Raids
Los Angeles (United States): Governor Gavin Newsom has announced a lawsuit against President Donald Trump over what he calls an 'illegal and authoritarian' deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. The decision has led to an escalation of the already strained relationship between California and the federal government. What began as a wave of protests against immigration raids has now snowballed into a full-blown constitutional showdown between Sacramento and Washington. Over the weekend, Los Angeles erupted as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested dozens of undocumented immigrants from city streets. The sweeping raids triggered mass protests. Demonstrators blocked freeways and clashed with the police – demanding an end to what they called a 'militarised war on migrants'. By Monday, nearly 2,000 National Guard troops had been dispatched to the city under direct orders from the White House – a move Governor Newsom says was made without his knowledge or consent. 'This is not only about California. This is about a president who believes he can federalise any state's National Guard, bypassing governors, the Constitution and the people. It is illegal. It is immoral. And we are going to court,' Newsom said in an appearance on MSNBC. The governor took to social media as well and warned that Trump's executive order could set a dangerous precedent. 'What he has done in L.A., he can now do in any state. We will not allow California to be his testing ground for tyranny,' he wrote on X (formerly Twitter). Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who is a California native, too joined the chorus and accused Trump of 'manufacturing a crisis to inflame division and distract from his own failures'. The protests began last Friday after ICE conducted raids in several neighborhoods. The crackdown led to the arrest of at least 44 undocumented immigrants. Demonstrators quickly flooded the streets and accused federal authorities of targeting vulnerable communities and acting with little regard for due process. The police responded with tear gas, flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets. The unrest intensified over the weekend and prompted Trump to invoke what he called a 'necessary federal intervention'. 'These are not protesters, they are insurrectionists. Governor Gavin Newsom and 'Mayor' Bass have lost control of their city. They should apologise to the people of Los Angeles for this disaster,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. However, city officials flatly rejected Trump's narrative. While coordinating emergency response efforts, LA Mayor Karen Bass condemned the federal intervention as 'reckless and inflammatory'. Legal experts say Newsom's lawsuit could spark a constitutional battle over the limits of federal power. While the president does have authority to federalise the National Guard in rare situations, doing so without state consent – particularly for domestic law enforcement – is legally murky. 'Trump is testing the boundaries of presidential power in ways we have not seen in decades. If the courts side with Newsom, it could rein in executive overreach. If they don't, it could open the door to more unilateral deployments in the future,' said Dr. Emily Serrano, a constitutional law professor at UCLA. As tensions continue to rise in the streets and now in the courts, Los Angeles has become the latest flashpoint in the nation's deepening political divide. Whether this battle is resolved by judges or ballots remains to be seen. But for now, California is sending a message it will not back down.


New Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
‘We're suing him': California Governor slams Trump's National Guard move as protests continue across LA
California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, told MSNBC that he plans to file suit Monday against the Trump administration to roll back the National Guard deployment, which he called 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' In a post on X, Newsom said, 'This is exactly what Donald Trump wanted. He flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalise the National Guard. The order he signed doesn't just apply to CA. It will allow him to go into ANY STATE and do the same thing. We're suing him.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'In breach of natural justice': Bombay HC sets aside student's rustication from Pune college; she criticized govt over Operation Sindoor
Bombay high court (File photo) NEW DELHI: The Bombay high court on Monday set aside the rustication of a student from a Pune-based engineering college over her post on Operation Sindoor . The division bench of justices Makarand S Karnik and Nitin R Borkar noted that the expulsion letter by Sinhgad Academy of Engineering was "in breach of natural justice" as the student was rusticated without being heard, news agency PTI reported. However, the bench granted the institute liberty to take an appropriate decision after hearing her and complying with the principles of natural justice. This comes after the court, on May 27, suspended Sinhgad Academy's order to expel her. It also allowed the girl to appear for her second-year semester examinations. Also Read: HC raps Maharashtra government for arresting 19-year-old over Operation Sindoor post However, the court also stated that the permission should not be seen as its observation on the merits of the case. The controversy began on May 7 when the student, pursuing a Bachelor of Engineering (Information Technology) degree, shared a post on Instagram from an account named "Reformistan." She criticised the government for Operation Sindoor, which was launched earlier that day, and targeted terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Also Read: Why a Pune student's jail time for a deleted post should scare anyone who values free speech However, realising her mistake, she deleted the post and apologised for reposting it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Neuropathiepijn? Miljoenen praten over dit apparaat KneeTens Undo Despite this, the Kondhwa police in Pune registered an FIR on May 9 and arrested the teenager. She was later sent to judicial custody and lodged at Yerwada prison. The college also rusticated her immediately. Challenging her rustication and seeking quashing of the FIR, the student approached the Bombay high court.