‘There might be some issues' – Championship club could be forced to leave beloved 27,111-seater stadium for third time
CHARLTON ATHLETIC managing director Jim Rodwell has not ruled out the club leaving The Valley.
The Addicks are back in the Championship for the first time since 2020 next season.
2
2
Nathan Jones masterminded a charge up the League One table after Christmas, eventually beating Leyton Orient in the playoff final.
But Charlton continue to be dogged by questions over the future of their South London ground.
The Valley is under the control of the club's former owner Roland Duchatelet.
He sold the club six years ago but retained ownership of the 27,111-seat stadium and the club's training ground.
A 15-year lease was signed by the club in 2021, with 11 years remaining before it expires.
The EFL require clubs to have at least ten years left on a stadium lease.
Charlton director Rodwell admits talks are ongoing with Duchatelet over an extension.
But he did not rule out the possibility that the club could eventually have to leave the site - home to the club for most of their 106-year existence.
He told talkSPORT: "Yes, Mr Duchatelet, or his company, do still own the stadium and training ground.
"We've made no secret of the fact we would like to buy the stadium or enter into a longer term lease on the right terms.
EFL club release 'gorgeous work of art' kit and even rival fans want to buy it
"Those conversations are ongoing. We have a considerable period of time left. I know fans like certainty and so do businessmen.
'It's always a possibility [we will have to move]. I think the desire would be to stay at The Valley.
"It's a brilliant ground and great atmosphere. It's fit for purpose."
He added: "Our [lease] is getting down to [ten years], so there might be some issues there."
Charlton left The Valley between 1923 and 1924 for nearby Catford.
They played at the now-demolished Mount Stadium, before a proposed merger with Catford Southend FC fell through.
Charlton left the Valley again in 1985 after the ground fell into disrepair and the club's debts spiralled.
They ground-shared with Crystal Palace before a triumphant return to a completely renovated stadium in December 1992.
Rodwell continued: "What is The Valley actually worth? It's worth a lot to Charlton but probably not a lot to a developer.
"What else could you stick on there?
"I'm always a great believer that commercial reality would hit home.
"There's always a deal to be done there. Talks are ongoing. They have been conducted in the right spirit."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
33 minutes ago
- Times
Florian Wirtz: a quiet leader off the field and rare talent on it
F lorian Wirtz began to win the hearts of Liverpool fans before he had even signed for the club. As his £100million move from Bayer Leverkusen — which was completed after his medical on Friday — was being negotiated, there was a suggestion that Wirtz would demand the No10 shirt, at present worn by Alexis Mac Allister. Wirtz posted on social media that he would not and had not made such a demand. In doing so, he sent two messages to Liverpool fans: first, that he was indeed heading for Anfield; second, that he does not deserve any special status, even if the £16million of potential add-ons to his transfer fee make him the most expensive signing in Premier League history.
Times
41 minutes ago
- Times
Are interest-only mortgages too risky for first-time buyers?
Interest-only mortgages are to become an option for most first-time buyers for the first time since the financial crisis. From Monday Gen H, which specialises in loans for first-time buyers, is offering interest-only deals for those with at least a 20 per cent deposit and a minimum income of £50,000. Buyers will need to demonstrate how they will repay the loan, for example by showing that they can save the difference between the monthly costs of a repayment mortgage and their interest-only payments. Gen H will also lend to first-time buyers with as little as 5 per cent deposit on a part interest-only, part repayment basis. Many lenders have started making it easier for first-time buyers to borrow, with some lending up to seven times salary, instead of the standard limit of 4.5 times. But, in an uncertain market, with house prices stagnant in many areas, could this all be too risky? A shove up the ladder Research by the Building Societies Association (BSA), a trade body, suggests that there are 2.2 million 'missing' first-time buyers who should have bought since the financial crisis but have been unable to, either because they have struggled to save a deposit or can't borrow enough. To fill this gap, the government, as part of its drive for economic growth and increased homeownership, has prompted the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the City regulator, to lean on banks and relax the lending rules. In the past three months, almost all high street banks have reduced the interest rate at which they 'stress test' borrowers, to see if they could afford payments if rates went up dramatically. Borrowers can now also find more loans at 100 per cent loan-to-value (LTV), where you borrow what the property is worth, without a deposit — another fixture of the pre-2008 mortgage Building Society offers five-year mortgage deals to those with less than a 5 per cent deposit who can prove they have been paying rent at the same level as mortgage repayments for two years. April Mortgages, which began lending in the UK last year, has a no-deposit deal for those with a household income of at least £24,000 who are happy to fix for ten or 15 years. And the ratio of debt to income is being relaxed, with April Mortgages lending up to seven times a borrower's income on its ten or 15-year fixed-rate deals, provided they have at least a 15 per cent deposit. Skipton will lend 5.5 times a buyer's salary if they have an income of £50,000 — up from . £100,000. The downside While lenders have been praised for finding innovative ways to get more people onto the property ladder, concerns have been raised that making it easier to borrow will simply push house prices up, leaving first-time buyers having to find bigger deposits and take on even greater debt. The estate agency Savills estimated that a 1.25 percentage point reduction in stress rates by high street lenders could increase first-time buyer sales 24 per cent over the next five years, but could also push up prices between 5 and 7.5 per cent. That could be a problem when buyers are already stretching themselves. Some 7 per cent of new mortgages were at 90-95 per cent LTV in the first three months of the year, their highest share since 2008, according to the FCA. And while mortgage rates have fallen over the past year, first-time buyers are spending a bigger chunk of their cash on repayments. In March they spent an average of 22.6 per cent of income on their mortgage, the highest proportion since November 2008, according to UK Finance, a banking industry body. 'I'm nervous,' said Neal Hudson from the property data firm Residential Analysts. 'There are good reasons for a bit more flexibility but I fear that lenders and the government are going too far. Now that rates are falling, that saving is being used to push up house prices rather than reducing repayments. That's not good.' Paul Broadhead from the BSA said the return of part repayment and part interest-only loans could be popular because they 'provide a lower deposit threshold but also help affordability, which we know are the two important barriers for first-time buyers'. Critics, however, believe that interest-only loans should remain limited to those with more equity and assets. Martin Stewart from the mortgage broker London Money said: 'Let's not forget that interest-only was one of the significant contributors to the crash in 2008, along with pushes for higher loan-to-value lending and excessive income multiples. Throwing all these things together to limp the housing market forward feels like a dangerous game.' How the interest-only deal works The Gen H interest-only mortgage rates will start at 5.09 per cent for a two-year fix at up to a 60 per cent LTV, with a £1,499 fee, and 5.33 per cent for a five-year fix with the same maximum LTV and fee. For comparison, the best two-year fix for a standard repayment mortgage at 60 per cent LTV is 3.95 per cent and 3.99 per cent for a five-year deal. For those with only the minimum 20 per cent deposit (80 per cent LTV) the two-year fixed rate is 5.44 per cent. For a five-year fix it is 5.38 per cent. In time, Gen H plans to make interest-only deals available to those whose parents can support them by using their investments, buy-to-let property or pension pot as the initial repayment strategy for the loan, which could change if their child was later able switch to a repayment deal. Peter Dockar from Gen H said: 'Interest-only mortgages have long been pigeon-holed as a tool for the rich. But we believe they could fill important gaps for first-time buyers and households on average incomes too. In this landscape, buyers need all the help they can get. We all need to consider how familiar tools might be used in new ways to benefit more people.' Why interest-only became rare Interest-only mortgages were common before the financial crisis, when buyers could get larger loans with few questions about how they planned to repay them. At their peak in 2007 some 51 per cent of new mortgages were either fully or partially interest-only, according to the FCA. House prices fell about 20 per cent between 2007 and 2009 during the financial crisis. This led to mortgage rules being tightened in 2014, making it harder to get interest-only deals and forcing lenders to be much stricter about repayment methods. At the end of last year the total number of home loans on an interest-only basis was 541,000, down from 963,000 in 2012, according to the trade association UK Finance. Only 8.7 per cent of new mortgages in the first three months of 2025 were fully or partially interest-only. Interest-only loans have tended to be limited to wealthier borrowers with more equity. Applicants normally need to earn at least £75,000 a year (or a total of £100,000 on a joint application) and have a 25 per cent deposit and proof of how they will repay the loan. They can only use the sale of their main home as a repayment strategy if there will be enough equity afterwards to buy somewhere else. This has made them largely inaccessible for first-time buyers — lenders including Nationwide Building Society will not give them interest-only mortgages at all. Gen H said buyers would be able to list downsizing as a repayment strategy provided that the interest-only portion of their loan was capped at 60 per cent LTV, and that they would have at least £200,000 in equity (£300,000 in London) after repaying the interest-only mortgage. This would be based on their initial deposit and the capital repayment portion of their loan, and would not assume a future rise in house prices. Other options available Paul Barnes, 40, and James Hope, 36, expected to be saving for another five years to buy their first home in Cambridge — until they found out about an unusual scheme from Cambridge Building Society. Rent to Home offered buyers the chance to enter a ballot, where they could rent a property from the building society for up to three years, after which they could get back 70 per cent of what they had paid in rent to use as a house deposit, as long as they took out their mortgage with the building society. The couple won their chance in 2023: 'We were actually hesitant when we got the call because we thought there must be a catch,' said Barnes, who works for an exam board. 'Cambridge is its own little bubble and it is quite an expensive and competitive market.' They moved into a four-bedroom townhouse in Longstanton, near Cambridge, paying rent of £1,450 a month. It means that after three years they could get about £36,500 back as a deposit. The couple are now two years in and hope that they will own their home by next summer. 'I can't believe schemes like this aren't widely available. It's a massive opportunity for people like us, who might otherwise be struggling to get a foot on the housing ladder due to the cost of living and fierce rental market,' said Hope, who works for the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Bettys loaf cake, beer snakes and polite applause are the perfect antidote to football's tribal toxicity: OLIVER HOLT spends a day basking in the cricket at Headingley
Summer started on a heavy, hot day in Leeds on Friday. It started with the morning sun glinting off the Leeds and Liverpool Canal and cricket supporters striding happily along the towpath through its Victoriana, past Granary Wharf and Monk Bridge Viaduct, towards the cathedral of Headingley, on the hill. It started with a bacon and sausage butty from Ugly Mugs Cafe on St Michael's Lane, opposite the ground, already busy more than two hours before the first ball of this Test summer was bowled, the summer that is a prelude to an Ashes winter in Australia, the summer when Bazball is being told to grow up or go home. Ugly Mugs is David Lloyd's pre-match eatery of choice and there is an item called Rob Burrow's Number 7 on the menu, in honour of one of Leeds' favourite sons. It is a place to watch the cricket walk by. 'You just missed Harry Brook,' one of the customers said to no one in particular, as he peered over the mountain of his full English from one of the outside tables. Queues had already started to form outside the gates. Signs pointed us to summer, too. They pointed to familiar, comforting names such as the Kirkstall Lane End. Inside, the great expanse of the Western Terrace lay empty and expectant and daunting, ready for its bacchanal. The nets were up on the outfield and there was the smack of ball on bat, and the buzz of broadcasters doing pieces to camera. Ben Stokes was on the front cover of the programme, with his collar turned up, and on the desks in the press room there were pieces of loaf cake from Bettys in Harrogate that had been 'steeped' in Yorkshire Tea. And Bumble was here now and Michael Atherton and Nasser Hussain, broadcasters who have done so much to illustrate their game with colour and life and beauty and complexity. On the field, Stokes won the toss and said, 'We'll have a bowl', and the hum grew a little louder. Some looked up at the sky and saw it was blue and wondered at the wisdom of the decision. Others pointed out that the previous six Tests on this ground had all been won by the team bowling first. Music from a DJ booth called Punjabi Roots drifted over the ground. Yashasvi Jaiswal pushed the first ball of the day from Chris Woakes judiciously away, left the next four and then guided the final delivery through gully to the third man boundary for four. It was the start of a day of elegance and admiration. Jaiswal was a joy to watch. He gave a first hint of what was to come with a sumptuous drive through mid-off from the penultimate ball of Woakes's second over. Soon after, he carved Brydon Carse like a dish fit for the gods, viciously through point to the boundary. Soon, it started to feel as if maybe India were not going to miss Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma quite as much as everyone had thought. Jaiswal and KL Rahul drove and cut with majesty. Stokes offered some resistance, as Stokes always does. England's captain is never less than a force of nature and he removed India's debutant, Sai Sudharsan, for a duck with the last ball before lunch. It was only a brief reprieve. By mid-afternoon, as India began to accelerate away from their hosts, Stokes's decision to put them in started to excite comparisons with Hussain's decision to bowl against Australia at the Gabba in 2002. That didn't end well. On the evidence of the first day, at least, neither will this. But this is only the opening skirmish. Just the first day of summer. England were strong favourites to win this series before the start, so this was just the start this five-Test challenge needed. The first signs are that it will be a battle royal. The crowd seemed to recognise that, too. When Jaiswal was finally dismissed for 101, clean bowled by Stokes, after tea, the crowd crammed on to the Western Terrace — even those involved in the patient building of a gargantuan beer snake — stood to applaud him as he headed back towards the pavilion. That kind of generosity is not uncommon in cricket but after another season of football's endless toxicity and relentless tribalism, it still felt like a cool breeze in the stifling heat of the afternoon. It was not England's day but it was impossible not to appreciate the feast India were serving up. Nor did they relent. Shubman Gill, who some had expected to wilt under the pressure of being the new India captain, ended the day unbeaten on 127. He brought up his century with a stunning cover drive off the bowling of Josh Tongue. It was a sobering day for England's bowlers. Their attack looked light and ineffectual. Maybe Jofra Archer will be back for the second Test at Edgbaston. England need him. Mark Wood is sorely missed, too. His return will take longer. There was no flurry of wickets before stumps. Rishabh Pant took his turn to cut loose. He clubbed his second ball of the day back over Stokes's head for four. Stokes grinned broadly. Game recognised game. In the final overs, Pant hoiked a six high over the midwicket boundary off the bowling of Woakes, as India raced towards 359 for three at the close.
