Multiple students injured in school bus crash carrying more than 40 kids on first day back to school
The bus was carrying 43 people — 42 children and the bus driver — some of whom suffered serious injuries, Austin-Travis County officials said.
The incident occurred around 3.15 p.m. Wednesday, when the school bus, traveling south on Nameless Road, veered off the right side of the road 'for an unknown reason' and rolled over, Department of Public Safety Sgt. Billy Ray said at a news conference.
The preliminary crash investigation is still ongoing, Ray said.
Twelve people were transported to local hospitals. At least one person has life-threatening injuries, while two others have 'potentially life-threatening injuries,' Assistant Chief Kevin Parker, with Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services, said during the press conference.
The victims have not been named. The driver was among those taken to the hospital, officials said.
'This tragedy this afternoon is really breaking our hearts,' Leander Independent School District Superintendent Bruce Gearing said, noting that the community is still reeling from the floods that devastated the state last month.
The bus, a 2024 vehicle equipped with state-regulated seatbelts, was primarily used to transport students from Bagdad Elementary School, Gearing said.
No students had been dropped off yet when the bus veered off course, the superintendent added.
'We want each of those students and their families to know that our prayers are with them, our thoughts are with them and we will do everything that we can in our power to support them,' he said.
Photos captured the damaged yellow school bus, flipped onto its side next to the rural road, with a broken windshield.
Officials said Round Mountain Baptist Church was being used as a reunification site.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
New Mexico State, Greg Heiar settle wrongful termination suit
August 16 - New Mexico State and former men's basketball head coach Greg Heiar settled a wrongful termination suit on Friday with the university agreeing to pay him $600,000. Heiar was fired on Feb. 14, 2023 - less than one year into a five-year contract with a $300,000 annual base salary. Heiar's dismissal came less than one week after New Mexico State cancelled the rest of the team's season and placed the coaching staff on paid leave while the school investigated a police report that accused three players of hazing and sexually assaulting one of their teammates. Those incidents reportedly occurred from July 2022 to Feb. 2023. On Nov. 19, 2022, New Mexico State forward Mike Peake shot and killed a New Mexico student in Albuquerque. While police ruled Peake acted in self-defense because he had been lured to the New Mexico campus by four students - including victim Brandon Travis - Heiar and members of his staff appeared to play roles in stunting the police's initial investigation. Heiar had his team board a bus to leave Albuquerque even though the police asked to interview three New Mexico State players. A member of Heiar's staff, Lorenzo Jenkins, was found in possession of Peake's gun while Peake's phone later was found with an unnamed NMSU administrator. Heiar's contract called for a $1.2 million buyout if fired without cause, but NMSU denied that buyout by claiming he was fired "with cause." Heiar, who currently serves as head coach for Trinity Valley (Tex.) Community College, claimed he was innocent. In the wake of the settlement, Heiar's attorneys sent a statement to KRQE-TV in Albuquerque. "On behalf of our client, Greg Heiar, we are pleased to announce that a settlement has been reached in the arbitration of Coach Heiar and New Mexico State University. Coach Heiar is pleased that this matter is now fully and finally resolved to our satisfaction, and excited to continue his coaching career. Coach Heiar wishes NMSU, the men's basketball program, and the Aggie fans all the best going forward." --Field Level Media
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
NBA legend-turned TV icon Kendrick Perkins reveals how ESPN security tracked down man threatening to kill his wife and kids
NBA champion-turned-ESPN regular Kendrick Perkins has detailed the horrifying series of events that led to a man being jailed for threatening to kill his wife and kids. After retiring from the NBA in 2018, Perkins moved into the world of broadcasting and quickly became a fans' favorite on ESPN - and he has since received his fair share of hatred from faceless trolls online. Back in 2021 when he was analyzing the NBA Finals, a comment he made on two-time MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo sparked a terrifying chain of events that could have escalated out of control had Perkins not taken action. After making his opinions live on air about the Bucks star - that he wasn't the No 1 option for the team - Perkins received a barrage of abuse from one NBA fan. 'This dude was sending me threat after threat after threat... "Imma kill your kids, as soon as you get there, I know where you stay, Imma murder you",' Perkins recalled on his Road Trippin' podcast this week. 'This was real life.' Desperate to ensure the safety of his family, Perkins revealed that he then quickly contacted ESPN security to find a resolution, hoping that they would be able to protect him and those closest to him before the threats became reality. Incredibly, the Boston Celtics champion received a positive outcome - with the might of Disney's employees managing to track down the faceless abuser. 'They locked the motherf***er up,' Perkins revealed. 'They found the dude and locked him up.' The discussion on the podcast came amid a conversation about the hatred current players receive from sports bettors, after 'failing' to win them cash. More and more nowadays, athletes are speaking out about the hatred they are receiving online for simply doing the job they are paid to do.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump administration partially retreats from a takeover of Washington's police. Here's what to know
Federal troops are patrolling the National Mall and neighborhoods across Washington while President Donald Trump 's administration exerts extraordinary power over law enforcement in the nation's capital. But the administration backed down from an attempt to take over the city's police department by installing its own emergency police commissioner after a federal judge indicated she would rule against it. The partial retreat interrupted one aspect of the most sweeping uses of federal authority over a local government in modern times. How it will play out and whether the federal government will use this experience as a potential blueprint for dealing with other cities remains up in the air. Here's what to know about the situation and what might come next: Why is Trump taking over the police in DC? The Republican president this week announced he's taking control over Washington's police department and activating National Guard troops to reduce crime, an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. But District of Columbia officials say the action isn't needed, pointing out that violent crime in the district reached historic 30-year lows last year and is down significantly again this year. Can he do that? D.C.'s status as a congressionally established federal district gives Trump a window to assert more control over the district than other cities. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser didn't offer much resistance at first, allowing city workers to clear homeless encampments and work closely with federal immigration agents. But on Friday, the heavily Democratic district asked for an emergency court order blocking Trump officials from putting a federal official in charge of D.C. police. So, who is in charge of police in Washington? The Trump administration on Friday agreed to leave the Washington, D.C., police chief in control of the department. That came one day after Attorney General Pam Bondi said the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration would take over the police chief's duties, including authority over orders issued to officers. The two sides sparred in court for hours before U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes after the city sued to stop the order. The judge indicated the law likely doesn't grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably does give the president more power than the city might like. She pushed the two sides to compromise, promising to issue a court order temporarily blocking the administration from naming a new chief if they couldn't agree. But while Attorney General Pam Bondi agreed to leave the police chief in charge, she directed the District's police to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. What's at stake The showdown in Washington is the latest attempt by Trump to test the boundaries of his legal authority to carry out his tough-on-crime agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. What are the federal troops doing in DC? About 800 National Guard troops are being activated, with Humvees parked along the Washington Monument and near Union Station. Troops have been spotted standing outside baseball's Nationals Park and neighborhood restaurants. The White House says guard members aren't making arrests but are protecting law enforcement officers who are making arrests and helping deter violent crime. Trump says one of the objectives will be moving homeless people far from the city. How long can this go on? Trump has the authority to do this for 30 days and says he might look into extending it. But that would require congressional approval. Whether Republicans in Congress would go along with that is unclear. Some D.C. residents have protested against the increased police presence. For some, the action echoes uncomfortable historical chapters when politicians used language to paint predominantly Black cities with racist narratives to shape public opinion and justify police action. Will Trump try to take control in other US cities? Washington is very different from any other American city, and the rules that govern it give the federal government much more control than it would have anywhere else. Whether Trump is using this as a blueprint for how to approach cities — largely Democratic cities — that he wants to exert more control over remains to be seen.
