Wikipedia loses High Court challenge against UK Government
The non-profit Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), along with an anonymous editor known as BLN, wanted the website to be exempt from certain regulations that came into force earlier this year.
They argued that compliance with the new law would mean Wikipedia would have to impose verification on people who did not want it or limit the amount of monthly UK users.
But in a judgment on Monday, Mr Justice Johnson rejected those claims, saying there may be ways to work within the law 'without causing undue damage to Wikipedia's operations'.
The Online Safety Act has provisions aimed at reducing the spread of harmful content.
Part of the regulations classify some sites as category one, which is defined by the number of monthly users a site has as well as the systems through which information is shared.
Rupert Paines, for WMF, told a previous hearing that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, who were defending the claim, had made the regulations too broad.
He said that if Wikipedia is to be classified as category one, and verification is to become mandatory for all users, it would make articles 'gibberish' because content from non-verified users would be filtered out.
The regulations were more designed for 'major, profit-making technology companies' such as Facebook, X and Instagram, he argued, while imposing verification on Wikipedia users would be a breach of their human rights.
Cecilia Ivimy KC, for the Government, said ministers reviewed Ofcom guidance and considered specifically whether Wikipedia should be exempt from the regulations and rejected that.
She said they decided that Wikipedia 'is in principle an appropriate service on which to impose category one duties' and how ministers arrived at that choice was not 'without reasonable foundation nor irrational'.
Rejecting WMF and BLN's claims, Mr Justice Johnson said his decision 'does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations'.
Doing so would mean the Government would have to justify the imposition as proportionate, he added.
The judge also said that the decision to make Wikipedia a category one service now lies with Ofcom.
If that happens, it may open a possible avenue for further legal action.
Mr Justice Johnson said: 'Ofcom's decision as to which services fall within category one is a public law decision which is potentially amenable to the court's review on grounds of public law error.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Villagers put on 'crazy' lockdown while JD Vance holidays
Villagers have been put on lockdown as JD Vance arrived for his first day in the Cotswolds. Nobody without authority could enter the village of Dean, near Chipping Norton, on Monday, August 11. The US Vice President is to spend the next week staying within the six acres of Dean Manor and sightseeing the area. READ MORE: Police set up road blocks at both ends of the village, preventing anybody from entering. Public footpaths into farmer fields surrounding Dean Manor were also blocked with officers sat at each entrance preventing access. No access to Dean from the Chipping Norton end (Image: Newsquest, Matt Simpson) Police in Dean (Image: Joseph Walshe / SWNS) One officer on scene said to us: 'Nobody is allowed through without us checking their ID beforehand. 'Unless they have a lawful reason to enter, or they live here, we cannot let anybody in for security reasons.' FOLLOW OUR LIVE COVERAGE HERE: Another said he didn't know how long the village will be locked down for, but said: 'We'll stand down when we're told.' One Charlbury resident visiting his sister in Spelsbury, the next village, said the past 24 hours has been 'crazy' with undercover officers. He said: 'There has been a lot of police activity in the last 24 hours. 'Every footpath is closed off, there are undercover cops everywhere. 'We've all known that JD Vance would be staying here for a while, but the police won't tell us anything.' He added the Republican vice president will be staying within walking distance of former prime minister David Cameron's home. The unnamed man speculated: 'I'm sure they will meet up during his stay.' Police in Dean (Image: Newsquest) A motorcade passing through Chipping Norton on Monday afternoon (Image: Emma Trimble / SWNS) It is understood from two separate people living in Spelsbury that JD Vance will be having his dinner in a pub in Charlbury on Monday evening. One woman in Spelsbury added: 'The police haven't told us anything [about JD Vance's visit]. 'The security must be tight be we all knew he was staying here.' JD Vance's 29-vehicle motorcade had earlier in the day been spotted driving through Chipping Norton, consisting of blacked out SUVs including American imports. Thames Valley Police's spokesman said: "Thames Valley Police is supporting the United States during the Vice President's visit to our area to ensure the safety of all involved." The force has been asked who is paying for the police security. Plans are in place for a protest on Tuesday afternoon at Mill Field in Charlbury dubbed the 'Vance not welcome party'. An email seen by this newspaper said: 'It's not a mass demonstration but we plan to make ourselves heard, show the Vance meme image that we know the thin-skinned Vance can't stand, and 'dance against Vance'."
Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Denmark Injects Billions Into Orsted, Sparking Political Backlash
Denmark's plan to inject billions of dollars into the offshore wind giant Orsted has sparked political backlash. Taxpayers are already spending more on defense and the fiscal bonanza from drug giant Novo Nordisk is fading. US President Donald Trump's policies to limit offshore wind have stifled the company's ability to sell stakes in developments already in train. Orsted, which pioneered offshore wind, has now canceled more projects than any of its competitors including a huge site in the UK and two major farms in the US.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act verification rules
Wikipedia has lost a legal challenge to new Online Safety Act rules which it says could threaten the human rights and safety of its volunteer editors. The Wikimedia Foundation - the non-profit which supports the online encyclopaedia - wanted a judicial review of regulations which could mean Wikipedia has to verify the identities of its users. But it said despite the loss, the judgement "emphasized the responsibility of Ofcom and the UK government to ensure Wikipedia is protected". The government told the BBC it welcomed the High Court's judgment, "which will help us continue our work implementing the Online Safety Act to create a safer online world for everyone". Judicial reviews challenge the lawfulness of the way in which a decision has been made by a public body. In this case the Wikimedia Foundation and a Wikipedia editor tried to challenge the way in which the government decided to make regulations covering which sites should be classed "Category 1" under the Online Safety Act - the strictest rules sites must follow. It argued the rules were logically flawed and too broad, meaning a policy intended to impose extra rules on large social media companies would instead apply to Wikipedia. In particular the foundation is concerned the extra duties required - if Wikipedia was classed as Category 1 - would mean it would have to verify the identity of its contributors, undermining their privacy and safety. The only way it could avoid being classed as Category 1 would be to cut the number of people in the UK who could access the online encyclopaedia by about three-quarters, or disable key functions on the site. The government's lawyers argued that ministers had considered whether Wikipedia should be exempt from the regulations but had reasonably rejected the idea. 'Left the door open' In the end, the court rejected Wikimedia's arguments. But Phil Bradley-Schmieg, Lead Counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation, said the judgment did not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State, in Mr Justice Johnson's words, "a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations". And the judgement makes it clear other legal challenges could be possible. Wikimedia could potentially challenge Ofcom's decision making if the regulator did ultimately decide to classify the site as Category 1. And if the effect of making Wikipedia Category 1 meant it could not continue to operate, then other legal challenges could follow. "Wikipedia has been caught in the stricter regulations due to its size and user created content even though it argues (convincingly) that it differs significantly from other user-to-user platforms," said Mona Schroedel, data protection litigation specialist at law firm Freeths. "The court's decision has left the door open for Wikipedia to be exempt from the stricter rules upon review." The communications regulator Ofcom, which will enforce the act, told the BBC: "We note the court's judgment and will continue to progress our work in relation to categorised services and the associated extra online safety rules for those companies." Wikipedia legally challenges 'flawed' online safety rules
