
A luxury hotel could transform this California town. Some residents are fighting back
On paper, the Appellation Hotel proffers one vision of the future for downtown Petaluma: A hefty cube of ceramic tile, anchored by a farm-to-table restaurant and crowned with an airy rooftop bar.
Rising 72 feet from what's now a weed-choked lot, the building would dwarf its neighbors, a scattering of feed stores, Victorians and plazas with old-timey architecture. To some, the hotel concept appears too big and modern for that rustic setting. To others, it represents prime in-fill development that the North Bay town would be foolish to squander.
These two competing mindsets have stoked a battle among Petaluma leaders and residents, one that has led to scurrilous attacks online and shouting matches at City Council meetings. In the Bay Area, the story is familiar. Every community, at one point or another, confronts the vexing politics of change.
But emotions are particularly charged in Petaluma, where a landscape of grain silos and backyard chicken coops sprawls along the border of Wine Country. Neighboring cities like Healdsburg have already converted into tourist destinations, trading their scruffy charm for Michelin-starred restaurants and luxury hotels — including another Appellation, set to open this summer.
'Petaluma is like Healdsburg was 20 years ago,' said Charlie Palmer, a celebrity chef who co-founded the Appellation brand. He watched Healdsburg residents evolve from skepticism, to acceptance, to a point where the former outpost for prunes and lumber now has 22 tasting rooms ringing its main square. Such economic prosperity bouys everyone, said former Healdsburg Mayor Gary Plass.
'A town of 11,000 can't survive and have good schools just by taxing the people who sleep there,' Plass said. 'You have to find ways to support it. You have to pick the right projects.'
While Petaluma has a different culture and mentality, it sits right at that crossroads and could easily become the next wine and foodie mecca.
So far residents and merchants have resisted the transition. The downtown has a trapped-in-amber quality, with seemingly every business opening inside a factory from the early 1900s. A river cuts past the train station and warehouse district, and chain retail gets hidden behind corniced masonry. Plaques commemorate birth dates of the saloon and fire department; T-shirts celebrate the 'egg capital of the world.'
Locals who fiercely protect this sense of tradition and independent spirit cast a wary eye toward new real estate.
'Petalumans do not want to become Healdsburg,' said Jane Hamilton, a former city councilmember and volunteer for the group Petaluma Historic Advocates, which is pressing for a ballot measure — possibly for a special election or the 2026 June primary — that would undo a recent zoning ordinance to enable construction of the hotel.
'We already have tourists,' Hamilton continued. 'We draw people in because we're a unique, quaint town that everybody can walk around in, and visit all of our small businesses. The hotel will serve people who don't live here, and make life for people who do live here very difficult.'
Proponents of the hotel argue, to the contrary, that it would inject tax money and vitality into a sleepy town beset by retail vacancies.
'This is the gateway to Sonoma County,' said Ebbie Khan Nakhjavani, CEO of EKN Development, the Southern California firm that partnered with Palmer for the Petaluma venture (EKN is not involved in other Appellation hotels). Nakhjavani views the small North Bay city as ripe with potential, and uniquely positioned to define its next phase.
'And we want to be on the ground floor,' Nakhjavani said. 'We want to capitalize on Petaluma's incredible history, on its DNA.'
That pitch appealed to Petaluma City Councilmembers who in February approved a zoning overlay to allow dense structures of up to 75 feet in three sections of downtown. Following a backlash, the council reduced the scope of its new zoning rule in March, limiting it to one subarea that encompassed the lot at B Street and Petaluma Boulevard, where the six-story Appellation would open in 2028.
'We've listened to everybody, and we were really careful to preserve and protect this historical district,' said Petaluma Mayor Kevin McDonnell, who counts himself among the hotel's supporters. He touts the jobs, tax revenue and tourism it would bring, and the ripple benefits for surrounding businesses. And the height would be relatively innocuous, McDonnell said, with a recessed fifth floor below the breezy rooftop terrace. The edifice would feel 'more like four stories' to anyone looking up from the street.
Unsatisfied, opponents of the hotel and the upzoning began gathering signatures for a voter referendum. They expect to have 5,000 by next week, exceeding the 4,100 needed to qualify for the ballot. With the deadline looming, Hamilton spent part of Wednesday morning outside Umpqua Bank, clipboard in hand, making her case to anyone who would listen. She and others plan to hoist a giant weather balloon near the site at B Street and Petaluma Blvd. this weekend, to show how big 72 feet can be.
Joggers, shoppers and dogwalkers who passed by the lot on Wednesday appraised it with bemused expressions. Most people were familiar with the hotel proposal and had strong feelings about it, though opinions were sharply divided.
'Well, I'm definitely against it,' said Mandy Podesta, owner of The Hunter & the Bird, a baby clothes boutique where the shelves teem with tiny floral print dresses and gingham onesies. Tucked into an old grain mill that's been repurposed for shops and restaurants, Hunter & the Bird is located half a block from the hotel site, within what critics would consider its blast radius. Hunter & the Bird might not stay there long according to the store's Instagram page, which announced a relocation in June.
Even so, Podesta worries about potential traffic and parking impacts for other businesses, as well as the hotel's sheer bulk.
'It's just too big to fit in that little space,' she said.
Others expressed undiluted enthusiasm for the project.
'I think it's going to be great,' said longtime resident Jessica Scerri. She and her brother, Seth Nonmann, were walking down B Street to grab lunch at Ayawaska RestoBar, a Peruvian restaurant inside a former brick manufacturing plant.
Like McDonnell, she hoped the new commercial development would help energize a downtown that's surviving, but not thriving.
'We've had so many vacancies,' Scerri said, gesturing at the row of shops in the grain mill and at a similar strip mall across the street, also in a salvaged building fronted by a dusty brick facade.
Amid this hodge-podge of retail sits the lot, a third acre of dead space with signs advertising The Appellation. Previously it housed a Chevron gas station which closed more than a decade ago. Now, the parcel is fenced off and strewn with grass and hay.
Preservationists insist they would accept a hotel there if it were four stories instead of six, and more in keeping with Petaluma's bohemian small-town vibe. Nakhjavani scoffed at this, saying the detractors would find something wrong with any proposed development.
'They've been all over the place: 'It's too tall, it's too big, we don't need it,'' Nakhjavani said, barely suppressing his frustration. 'I've addressed every allegation, every potential concern. I can't really hit a moving target.'
Still, even those who want the hotel say they understand why it's provoked conflict.
Reflecting on the situation, Scerri and Nonmann looked at each other and shrugged. Change, they said, 'is just really hard for this town.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts
Aldermen took a step Wednesday toward giving themselves the power to ban Airbnb's and other short-term rentals from opening in their wards. The City Council's License and Consumer Protection Committee advanced the ordinance that would allow aldermen to unilaterally block new short-term rentals one precinct at a time. It could now face a final vote by all aldermen as soon as next week. Sponsor Ald. Anthony Napolitano, 41st, called the city's current ordinance made a decade ago 'extremely sloppy.' The existing law allows short-term rentals to be blocked only when 25% of a precinct's registered voters sign a petition calling for it. 'This is the only ordinance written in the city of Chicago where, when there is a problem in the industry, the onus is put on residents to fix it,' Napolitano said. The Far Northwest Side alderman's ordinance seeks to reverse that, allowing aldermen to block short-term rentals in a precinct on their own. It would then give companies the chance to overturn the ban by collecting signatures from 10% of the precinct's voters. Most aldermen in attendance backed the ordinance in a voice vote. Several cited issues in their ward with disruptive parties at short-term rentals, a problem Ald. Brendan Reilly, 42nd, said is 'on steroids' in dense downtown high rises. 'The guests are taking over common areas, pool decks, lobbies, fitness rooms,' he said. 'With the late night parties and noise complaints, et cetera, God help you if you own a condo next to one of these nightly rental units.' Napolitano argued the ordinance will not hurt short-term rental companies, but instead simply gives aldermen a tool to advocate for residents when issues arise. But Airbnb is strongly opposed to the proposal. 'Alderman Napolitano's ordinance amendment is an over-broad and misguided violation of Chicagoans' property rights, which would punish responsible homeowners and local businesses who rely on the income from travel on short-term rentals — especially in neighborhoods outside of Chicago's traditional tourism hubs,' Airbnb spokesperson Jonathan Buckner said in a statement Wednesday. Mayor Brandon Johnson is continuing to not take a side on the issue. Asked where he stood on the ordinance at a Wednesday morning news conference, he said he wanted to 'continue to ensure that we are building a safe, affordable city.' 'This particular measure, quite frankly, I'll have to look into a little bit deeper,' Johnson said. 'But I know that there are a number of alders who mean well and are trying to show up for their particular pocket of the city.' Several aldermen noted the absence of staff from Johnson's Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, adding that they wished someone could answer questions about how bans could affect tax revenue. Alds. Matt O'Shea, 19th, and Bill Conway, 34th, voted against the measure, with O'Shea noting taxes on the rentals sent around $4 million to fight domestic violence. 'Have we thought of how we are going to replace that?' O'Shea asked. 'It's been my experience working with Airbnb that when a problem is identified, it's addressed.' Ald. Marty Quinn, 13th, used the city's current process requiring residents' signatures to ban short-term rentals from every precinct in his Southwest Side ward. The whole-ward ban took 12,000 signatures and seven years to complete, he said. The ward is '95% single family dwellings,' and short-term rentals 'would have an adverse impact on our quality of life,' Quinn said. Asked what he thinks of Airbnb's argument that the ban is similar to historic racist efforts to keep Black and Latino people out of certain neighborhoods, Quinn called it a 'desperate statement from a company who got exactly what they wanted' when the original ordinance passed. 'I'm not saying that Airbnb isn't good in some parts of the city,' he said. 'It's just not good in the Bungalow Belt, and I have 12,000 signatures that would suggest that.' Aldermen also Wednesday advanced a measure to crack down on illegal pedicabs with potential impoundments.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inside Austin's Agenda: City Council Member Marc Duchen
AUSTIN (KXAN) — On Wednesday's episode of Inside Austin's Agenda, host Grace Reader will sit down with Austin City Council Member Marc Duchen to talk about upcoming budget conversations now that the council has wrapped up for its summer break. Austin is projecting a budget deficit heading into the next fiscal year. Austin Mayor Kirk Watson has also stated that the city will need to address 'budget asteroids' — including the state tax cap and the expiration of American Rescue Plan Act, or ARPA, dollars. KXAN has covered ARPA funding running out extensively. The Austin City Council will have to work with city staff to address those budget concerns and approve the final budget before the fiscal year begins on Oct. 1. Inside Austin's Agenda: Mayor looks to beef up budget process amid financial uncertainty Inside Austin's Agenda is live every other Wednesday at 3 p.m. Watch every episode at the top of this article, on Facebook, and on our KXAN+ streaming app. You can find previous episodes here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why are there no Michelin-starred restaurants in New Mexico?
NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – It's one of the top honors a restaurant can receive: being recognized by the Michelin Guide for its cuisine. Over 1,500 U.S. eateries are published in the guide, and 260 have earned a coveted Michelin star. But why are none of those establishments in New Mexico? It turns out the Land of Enchantment joins a long list of states in the country that are not considered by Michelin Guides, and it's not because they lack top restaurants or food. As of 2025, Michelin inspectors only cover cities in seven states: New York, Chicago, California, Florida, Colorado, Texas, and Atlanta, and D.C. Los Ranchos De Albuquerque restaurant named 2025 James Beard award finalist That list will be expanding soon, as the Michelin Guide announced in April that it would include states in the South, including Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. Michelin is always looking to expand, but only after certain standards or criteria are achieved. 'To publish the Michelin Guide [in a specific area], we need first and foremost culinary potential,' Gwendal Poullennec, the international director of the Michelin Guide, told Bon Appetit in 2024. 'Today, I have inspectors scouting about 20 destinations where we do not yet have a restaurant selection, but that we are considering for future years. It's always a several-year process because we must see the openings and the consistency.' But it's more than just consistency or 'culinary potential' that brings a Michelin Guide to town. In recent years, Michelin has partnered with local and state tourism boards to help fund the creation of a new guide for that area — but only after the inspectors have deemed the local food scene to be worthy. In 2023, The New York Times reported that California's tourism board had paid Michelin $600,000 in 2019 to cover the cost of expanding its culinary inspections beyond the Bay Area and Napa Valley. Tourism groups in Florida, Atlanta, Colorado and Texas all reportedly agreed to similar financial partnerships. When asked about these newer financial partnerships, Poullennec, speaking with Bon Appetit in 2024, suggested that the Michelin's arrangements with these tourism boards (or, as he called them, 'destination marketing organizations' or DMOs) help to defray the editorial expenses involved with producing the guides. 'The involvement of DMOs in establishing new Guides does not have any influence on the Inspectors' judgments regarding the destination assessment, the restaurants in the selection, or award distinctions,' the inspector told Nexstar. 'DMO teams have no access to the Inspectors' work or the final selection until the list of selected restaurants is revealed by the MICHELIN Guide.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.