logo
Nothing about the A9 dualling project suggests momentum

Nothing about the A9 dualling project suggests momentum

A promise to fully dual the single carriageway between Perth and Inverness by 2025 was first made in the SNP's 2007 manifesto, with plans to widen around 80 miles of road in 11 sections formally set out in 2011.
However, little more than 11 miles – in just two sections –were dualled in 12 years.
Six miles of the trunk road from Moy to Tomatin, south of Inverness, are currently being upgraded under a £185 million contract.
In 2023, the Scottish Government admitted the dualling would now not be completed until 2035 at the earliest.
However, that didn't stop Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop taking hyperbole to new heights with the latest pronouncement on the A9.
She announced that a contract for the dualling of a fourth section of the road is due to be awarded imminently.
Transport Scotland announced on Friday that Wills Bros Civil Engineering was the preferred bidder in the £152.7m deal to dual the road between Tay Crossing and Ballinluig.
The government has planned to upgrade the road – one of Scotland's most dangerous – for more than a decade, with the work initially due to be complete this year.
But it has since been pushed back to 2035.According to Transport Scotland, the section will be complete in 2028, with 45% of the A9 between Perth and Inverness to be dualled by that time.
I have walked amongst Scotland's largest seagulls - and they are a menace
It is high time that irresponsible campervan users are taxed off the NC500
Alan Simpson: Giving CalMac contract is right - now give them better ships
Alan Simpson: The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains
The Transport Secretary said the announcement showed the 'continued momentum' of the project.
"In addition to the improvements delivered through dualling, this investment will provide lasting social value to the communities and businesses local to these areas,' she said.
'We have seen already how contractors across the programme are making a positive impact through our social value programme, and I look forward to seeing further benefits delivered in the construction of this section.
'This is the second contract to be awarded since our delivery plan for A9 dualling was announced in 2023, and clearly demonstrates that we are delivering on our promises.
'The receipt of three valid tenders during this procurement process means that we can also be confident that our investment in this A9 dualling contract demonstrates value for money, and that the changes we have made to our contracts in recent years are making a real difference.
'We are achieving the targets we have laid out, and making steady progress across the corridor to ensure that the full route between Perth and Inverness is dualled by 2035.'
While this is welcome news, to call it 'continued momentum' is a stretch and a bit of an insult to the hard-pressed regular users of the road.
There is simply nothing that screams momentum about the A9, whether it be the glacial pace of dualling or getting stuck behind a lorry on the many single carriageway sections.
Ms Hyslop also takes the biscuit for announcing that an announcement is imminent.
That isn't really an announcement at all but perhaps shows the desperation among ministers to try to show that work is at least progressing.
But just two sections of single carriageway, totalling about 11 miles (18km) of road have been upgraded over the past decade.
About 77 miles (124km) have still to be improved as part of the £3 billion project, which will extend from Inverness to Perth.
Delays and rising costs have repeatedly hit the dualling upgrades, which were initially scheduled to be completed this year.
Why it is being done in sections is beyond me – surely a firm should just get the contract to build the whole lot, rather than handing out projects that seem to be by the yard.
Earlier this year, the much-maligned quango Transport Scotland apparently rewrote the laws of physics by claiming that accelerating the dualling will not save any time on the project.
In a report, the quango said it had explored whether some sections should be speeded up on safety grounds, or where lengthy diversions could be put in place, should the road be closed.
It said it had considered introducing 'overlapping' construction on the carriageway to speed up the project.
It also suggested rescheduling the planned programme of work around the areas of the road deemed to be least safe.
However, it said its findings revealed that current scheduling 'achieves an earlier overall completion date than would be achieved were it to be rescheduled'.
In the meantime, more than 300 people have been injured in car crashes on the A9 over the past four years, recent figures revealed.
According to the figures, 28 people were killed between 2021-22 and 2024-25, including 13 in 2022-23 alone.
There were 321 collisions resulting in injury during that period, 134 of which were considered serious and 159 classed as minor.
Of course, the fact that much of it is still single carriageway will not be a contributory factor in every crash, but every one should be a stark reminder to the Scottish Government of the pressing need for an upgrade.
But given the track record of Transport Scotland and successive governments, we shouldn't hold our breath.
The A75 urgently needs upgraded as does the A96 and the A82.
It is easy to think that they all remain in poor condition in poor condition because they are all in rural areas, miles away from the glare of Holyrood.
Out of sight, out of mind.
Compare this to when the Forth Road Bridge fell into disrepair – a sparkling new crossing was delivered on time and on budget, and fairly quickly too.
Only a cynic could suggest this happened because the bridge carries the main road into Edinburgh and many in the capital have holiday homes in the East Neuk of Fife.
Transport infrastructure projects always seem to be a problem under a quango that orders ferries that are too big for ports and electrifying railway lines without ordering enough electric trains.
In other European countries, roads seem to get built in one fell swoop rather in bits and pieces like here in Scotland.
This leads to inevitable cost overruns and delays which adds millions more to the bill which on the face of it seems unnecessary.
The more contracts that are handed out, the more can go wrong. So, surely, it would be sensible to award less.
But sense seems to be in short supply at Holyrood.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Environment Secretary urged to apologise for ‘misleading' Scottish water claims
Environment Secretary urged to apologise for ‘misleading' Scottish water claims

South Wales Argus

time25 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Environment Secretary urged to apologise for ‘misleading' Scottish water claims

Mr Reed came under fire after claiming that under publicly-owned Scottish Water 'pollution levels in Scotland are worse than they are in England'. The UK Government minister made the remarks to Channel 4 News as he dismissed calls for water services south of the border to be nationalised. Scottish Climate Action and Energy Secretary Gillian Martin has written to Mr Reed, urging him to apologise (Andrew Milligan/PA) Gillian Martin, the Scottish Government Secretary for Climate Action and Energy, said she was 'extremely disappointed' that Mr Reed had made the 'inaccurate and misleading comments regarding performance in Scotland' as he sought to 'dismiss out of hand the value of public ownership of a key asset like water'. She wrote to Mr Reed noting that Monday's report from the Independent Water Commission, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, had found 66% of Scotland's water bodies to be of good ecological status, compared with 16.1% in England and 29.9% in Wales. And while she accepted the figures for the different countries were 'not calculated on the same basis', Ms Martin stated: 'It is clear that Scotland has a higher performance.' She insisted that 'much of the improvement' seen in water in Scotland was 'due to significant investment in the water industry to reduce pollution', which she said was driven by both Scottish Water and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa). My letter to UK Gov Minister Steve Reed asking him to retract his false statements about the condition of water in Scotland. IWC was able to report we're in a much better position than rUk with 87% 'high' or 'good' status. Public ownership works. — Gillian Martin (@GillianMSP) July 22, 2025 Ms Martin told the UK Environment Secretary: 'Your comments sought also to undermine the idea of public ownership in the minds of voters, yet this is clearly what the people of Scotland continue to want. 'Indeed, it is the very fact of that public ownership and control which has allowed us to keep water bills lower for people, compared to what people with privatised water supplies in England have to pay.' Noting that Sepa had found 87% of the Scottish water environment to be of 'high' of 'good' quality – up from 82% in 2014 – she insisted this was 'in part, due to water being a publicly-owned asset, allowing for investment without shareholder returns or the pressure to make profits'. The Scottish Government minister went on to tell Mr Reed: 'I am therefore asking that you acknowledge that your comments were inaccurate, that you apologise publicly for making them, and seek to correct them.' Sir Jon's review of water services south of the border did not explore renationalising water companies – with the Government at Westminster opposed to this despite demands from campaigners for a return to public ownership in England. Mr Reed however warned that nationalisation would cost £100 billion and would slow down efforts to cut pollution. The UK Government has been contacted for comment.

Bank of England chief says ‘not sensible' to tear up ring-fencing rules
Bank of England chief says ‘not sensible' to tear up ring-fencing rules

Leader Live

time25 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Bank of England chief says ‘not sensible' to tear up ring-fencing rules

Andrew Bailey also stressed that the UK cannot 'compromise' on financial stability amid the Treasury's plans to rip up red tape across the sector. Ring-fencing was brought in after the 2008 financial crisis and requires banks to separate their retail services from their investment banking activities. It aimed to protect UK consumers from the effects of any shocks felt by other parts of a bank and in the global financial markets. But Government plans to reforms the rules, unveiled last week, are intended to make Britain more competitive globally and give banks more flexibility. Mr Bailey told MPs on the Treasury Committee: 'I do think the ring-fencing regime is an important part of the structure of the banking system. 'It makes the resolution of banks if they're in trouble much easier, and it benefits, particularly in terms of the UK, consumers, business and households. 'I'm sure there are things that can be improved and we will work constructively to get through that process.' He added: 'I think it has established itself as part of the system and to me it would not be sensible to take it away at this point.' The ring-fencing shake-up formed part of Rachel Reeves's 'Leeds reforms' – a package of measures which she said are set to be the biggest changes to financial services for more than a decade. Ms Reeves said regulation 'still acts as a boot on the neck of businesses' in many areas, and urged regulators to avoid 'excessive caution'. Asked if he agreed with those comments, Bank of England chief Mr Bailey said: 'It's not a term I'd use.' 'I think there are areas that we clearly should look at it… we've announced a whole range of things we're doing, and that's a good thing,' he told the committee. 'But we can't compromise on basic financial stability and that would be my overall message.' However, Mr Bailey added that, post-Brexit, the UK is in a better position to reshape the financial rule book to suit the sector, rather than relying on EU rules.

No plans for England tourism tax, No 10 insists, after claims Rayner backed one
No plans for England tourism tax, No 10 insists, after claims Rayner backed one

Leader Live

time25 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

No plans for England tourism tax, No 10 insists, after claims Rayner backed one

The Deputy Prime Minister has been pushing for councils to be allowed to introduce a tax on tourism in their areas as part of the Government's devolution agenda, according to several media reports. Rachel Reeves, however, is said to have blocked the move for fear it would reduce revenues for businesses struggling with higher national insurance contributions and a rise in the minimum wage already brought in by the Government. The Prime Minister's official spokesman would not be drawn into saying whether there were plans for such a tax. 'We have previously said there's no plans to introduce a tourism tax in England,' the spokesman said. He added: 'Places can already choose to introduce a levy on overnight stays through working with their local tourism sector, using the accommodation Business Improvement District model. 'Tourism obviously plays an important role in the UK's economy. Inbound tourism is the UK's third largest service export. 'The UK is the seventh most-visited country in the world, and we're committed to continuing to support the sector.' Pressed again whether a tourism tax had been shelved after an intervention from the Treasury, the spokesman said: 'Well, there's no plans to introduce it.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves earlier sidestepped a question about Ms Rayner's call for a tourist tax. Asked for her response, Ms Reeves said she had made decisions on tax in last year's 'once-in-a-generation budget' which was intended to 'fix the mess' left by the Conservatives. She added: 'We'll have another budget later this year, and I'll be setting out our tax policy there.' A similar levy already exists in Scotland, and the Welsh Government is also in the process of introducing a tourism tax. Tourists staying in countries across Europe are required to pay local taxes aimed at offsetting the impact of large numbers of visitors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store