
Julie was smart and competent, yet her less qualified colleagues surpassed her. Imposter syndrome held her back
Julie's* intelligence and quick wit seemed to belie the very reason for attending therapy – despite reams of qualifications and years of professional experience, she felt dissatisfied with her work achievements. Having never put herself forth for a promotion, Julie had spent the better part of two decades being surpassed in position and remuneration by younger, less qualified (and mostly male) colleagues. Deflated and discouraged, Julie's avoidance of career advancement only sought to reinforce negative self-beliefs about her intelligence and competence.
'I know I could do a higher role. Sometimes, I think I could do it with my eyes closed. But what if I can't, and then I'm found out to be a fake?'
Julie was exhibiting hallmark characteristics of impostor syndrome. This phenomenon is defined by consistent doubt of one's own accomplishments, feeling undeserving of success or achievement, and fear of being exposed as a fraud, despite evidence to the contrary. While not a clinical diagnosis, this 'therapy speak' term is now very much entrenched in everyday language.
I empathised with Julie's position. As a psychology student and trainee therapist, I also experienced feelings of imposition. Competitive selection criteria and demanding training requirements make psychology studies an ideal breeding ground for impostor syndrome. Convinced that my admission to postgraduate training had been a clerical error, I'd spent a long summer fretting that I would be found to be a 'phoney' on the first day of semester.
First identified and investigated in the 1970s, research into impostor syndrome focused on the self-doubt commonly experienced by high-achieving professional women. Men were observed to experience less impostor syndrome than women, even in instances where they had less professional experience or objectively inferior qualifications.
Like many pseudo-diagnostic terms, concept creep means that 'impostor syndrome' is now used beyond its original definition. Psychological discomfort in a work or social setting is not necessarily impostor syndrome; most people feel nervous in situations such as starting a new job, going on a first date, speaking in public, or attending a social event where they are expecting to know few other guests.
Rather, impostor syndrome is defined by thoughts and feelings about one's intellectual parity and deservedness of success or achievement. The comparison to an individual or group of people must also be unfair or unrealistic. An amateur footballer is not expected to play at the same level as a professional; feelings of inferiority or envy that arise from this comparison are a reflection of reality, rather than indicative of impostor syndrome.
Understandably, we often seek to push away or suppress psychological discomfort or distress associated with impostor syndrome. Many people convinced they are impostors seek consolation from others about their skills or the unfairness of a situation (such as a colleague being promoted). This provides temporary reassurance but does little to ameliorate the underlying causes of impostor syndrome.
As impostor syndrome is not a clinical diagnosis, no recognised or standardised treatment exists. Instead, therapeutic work can focus on specific aspects of impostor syndrome, such as self-esteem, identity and anxiety. Assertiveness training can also be helpful. Exploring these underpinning characteristics can be effective in shifting mindset and behaviour around deservedness.
For Julie, valuable insight was gained by viewing impostor syndrome as a defence mechanism: in never seeking a promotion, Julie never risked rejection, thus defending herself against disappointment or failure.
Understanding the origins of Julie's impostor syndrome was an important step, but a practical element was also needed. Together, we devised a whimsical approach. Rather than 'fake it until you make it', we termed the approach 'making it, not faking it'.
In moments of self-doubt, Julie adopted the internal voice of a well known male politician. How would he answer questions about qualifications and work experience? What would he say in a job interview or meeting with colleagues? What would be the tone of his voice, the cadence of his speech? This challenged Julie's thinking and temporarily quelled thoughts of being an impostor.
Julie's personality and temperament would never transform into that of the politician being channelled, nor would we wish her to become someone or something she is not. But gaining a glimpse into that alternate persona allowed Julie to stop apologising for her success – and move towards celebrating it.
* Julie is a fictitious amalgam to exemplify similar cases
Dr Bianca Denny is a clinical psychologist based in Melbourne. She is the author of Talk To Me: Lessons from Patients and their Therapist

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
12 hours ago
- Times
My father abused me — should I still care for him now he's elderly?
Q. I've found myself unexpectedly taking care of my father, who is now elderly, alone and physically unwell, but who was violently homophobic and emotionally abusive to me when I was younger. When I came out in my teens he beat me, called me disgusting and told me I was no longer his son. We didn't speak for over 15 years. It was only when his health began deteriorating that he made contact again — not to apologise, but to ask for help. Since then I've been paying some of his bills, helping him with appointments and organising a cleaner. No one else in the family will take responsibility, and now everyone's calling me 'so kind' and 'the better person'. But I don't feel kind; I feel overwhelmingly angry. There's still a teenage part of me that wants him to say sorry and another part that resents having to do anything at all. Some days I want to walk away; other days I feel guilty if I don't call him. I don't know whether I'm doing this because I genuinely want to help, or because I still need to prove I'm a good son. Am I betraying myself by caring for the person who showed me so little care? Or is this what forgiveness looks like? I'm stuck between who he was, who he is now, and who I'm supposed to be in response. Graeme A. You're facing one of the most painful dilemmas: what do we do when the person who hurt us becomes dependent on us? My starting point may feel blunt, but it's essential to state it — you do not owe your father care, compassion or contact. Families can be profoundly unsafe, and you were harmed and rejected by the person meant to love you unconditionally, and the absence of an apology or acknowledgment shows he has never taken responsibility for his cruelty. Nevertheless, you are supporting him now and you raise two crucial questions: why are you doing this? And can you continue without betraying yourself? Age and vulnerability don't create an automatic right to care from those who were once abused. This statement challenges deep cultural myths about unconditional familial love and the virtue of forgiveness — often celebrated as morally superior, particularly after trauma, but that doesn't mean it's required or healthy for everyone. Your decision to help may have earned you praise as 'the better person', yet this implies moral superiority for providing care and moral failing for withdrawing. In reality, you're managing complex, unresolved trauma that others may prefer to smooth over by keeping you in this role. You are not better for doing it, and you would not be worse for stepping back; I make these statements not to diminish what you are doing but to remove the pressure that is implicit in you being told you're 'the better person'. • Read more advice from Professor Tanya Byron You ask whether you are stepping in to care for your father because you 'still need to prove that I'm the good son'. You have nothing to prove. However, attachment theory, built on research evidence, could help to explain this feeling because childhood rejection can hardwire a drive to win back the abusive caregiver's approval, even when logic says it's futile or unsafe. This need is understandable — he's your father — but acting on it can trap you in the same trauma loop. The alternative is to shift from seeking approval to acting in line with your values. You help, therefore, because it reflects who you are now — autonomous, boundaried and self-respecting. This is profoundly different from helping in the hope of rewriting the past. From here, you have choices. Withdrawing completely is a valid option, especially if it protects your wellbeing. You can step back while ensuring other care arrangements are in place — perhaps involving another relative, referring him to adult social services, or engaging a community support worker (see This is not cruelty; it's clarity. You can hold the boundary with compassion, wishing him no harm but refusing to retraumatise (and therefore harm) yourself. If you choose to remain involved, define the terms in advance. How much time, money, administrative support or emotional contact are you prepared to give? Be explicit about what you will not do, whether that's daily visits, intimate care, or revisiting the past. Identify the signs that you've reached your emotional limits and enlist someone you trust to help you recognise them. This shifts the decision-making lens from 'what does he need?' to 'what reflects the person I choose to be?' However, being human does not require being a martyr. You're also allowed to give transactional support without re-entering a full relationship — to be limited, clear-eyed and kind at the same time. And if your father's refusal to acknowledge the past makes your care feel like collusion, name the truth to yourself. Whether you write it down, speak it to a trusted person or keep it in your own mind, your version of events deserves to be heard and validated, even if he never accepts it. • I've discovered my cold, uncaring father was abused — can I forgive him? Whether you step back or stay involved, you deserve support. Seek a trauma-aware therapist or connect with others who have faced similar conflicts. You are not alone in having been forced into the role of rescuer when once you needed rescue yourself. And as for forgiveness — it's yours to define. You can forgive without reuniting, forgive without receiving an apology, or choose not to forgive at all. Forgiveness is not a performance to prove healing. It is essential that you ground your decision in more than guilt, obligation or outside pressure. Psychology gives us several lenses for making such a choice. Ethical decision-making models encourage you to weigh four key principles: your right to autonomy (making a choice that honours your own needs and boundaries); beneficence (doing good or preventing harm to him); non-maleficence (avoiding harm to yourself); and justice (considering fairness and responsibility). A trauma-informed perspective adds further checks: would stepping in put you at risk of re-traumatisation, reignite unsafe dynamics, or compromise the emotional safety you've built? Family and relationship models also help to untangle longstanding patterns. The Karpman drama triangle describes three repeating roles — victim, rescuer and persecutor — that can trap families in unhealthy cycles. Stepping into a caring role can pull you back into the rescuer position, which, without clear boundaries, could negatively impact your wellbeing. Bowen's family systems theory sees family as an interconnected emotional system and encourages differentiation: staying connected while maintaining your individuality, or making a clear cut-off if that's healthier. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) focuses on living in line with your personal values rather than avoiding discomfort, and so the question becomes whether caring for him fits with who you want to be, even if it's difficult. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) adds a practical, problem-solving layer by helping you to map out the situation, identify unhelpful thinking patterns, and make decisions based on realistic appraisal rather than automatic emotional responses. One CBT tool, the cost-benefit analysis, involves listing the emotional, physical and practical demands of caring alongside any potential rewards. This can reduce the pull of guilt-driven or fear-driven decision-making, and make clear whether the role would be sustainable without causing you harm. Compassion-focused therapy reminds us that compassion for others is healthiest when it coexists with compassion for ourselves. Preserving your wellbeing is not selfish, it's protective. In the end, the 'right' decision is the one that honours both your humanity and your hard-earned boundaries. • My elderly parents are getting frail but they refuse any help Ultimately, these models make one thing clear: there is no 'should' here, no moral scoreboard that makes you a better or worse person for choosing one path over another. Caring for someone who once harmed you is not a litmus test of character, and stepping back is not a moral failure. What matters is that your decision is conscious, values-led, and grounded in both compassion and self-preservation rather than from obligation, guilt or pressure. I wish you well.


Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Jaw-dropping sum mothers pay to sorority rush guru... who guarantees their daughters a place with these tricks
Sorority recruitment is a minefield for wide-eyed college freshman desperate to get into the perfect house – and with social media, it is only more daunting. But some moms are willing to shell out thousands of dollars to guarantee their daughters acceptance into a sorority house – and to make sure they don't say the wrong thing during rush.


Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Working mom sparks debate as she cries over missing child's milestone due to her job
A working mom's emotional reaction to witnessing her baby's milestone from afar has struck a chord online. Brooke Lipps, from Austin, Texas, recently went viral after she took to TikTok to open up about a heart wrenching moment that she endured at work. The 25-year-old posted a video of herself in tears as she watched her baby sit up for the first time via a baby monitor at her desk. 'Being a working mom is so much harder than I could've imagined. Missing the milestones just breaks me,' she wrote in her caption. Her video resonated widely, sparking a broader conversation about the challenges of working motherhood and the issues with parental leave policies in the United States. 'One year of paid federal maternity leave NEEDS to be the standard. I'm glad women are getting louder about this, it's a huge issue,' one user urged in the comment section. 'It's OK, hun. If you stayed home, you'd feel guilty for not earning money. There's no winning as a mom, do the best you can,' another comforted. 'Mothers deserve a pay raise and greater maternity leave,' someone else declared. Another wrote: 'We need longer maternity leave in the US, period!!!' 'The US needs to figure something out [because] being a parent in this country is so unfair,' a different user stated. Other comments read: 'This makes me so angry,' 'You shouldn't be working,' 'The 9-5 does not work and never has,' and, 'We were NOT supposed to live like this.' One user came to her defense after some people urged the working mom to 'just quit her job.' 'People saying just to quit, hilarious. Apparently, half the moms in this comment section have zero financial comprehension. Not everyone can afford this at all,' one said. However, others urged women to find 'provider husbands' so they can be stay-at-home moms. 'Choose your husbands wisely,' someone advised. 'Not having kids unless I can stay home and have a provider husband,' another user affirmed. 'This is why it's so important who you marry and what it looks like when you have kids!' someone else wrote. A different comment read: 'Proof that marrying a good provider man is a flex. Being a girl boss isn't.' One person chimed in, arguing that finding a 'provider husband' isn't the answer: '"Marry a provider," y'all think that men also don't wanna see their kids?' The United States does not offer national paid maternity leave for mothers, per Paycor. However, some moms are in luck, as the laws vary by state and industry. States that offer paid maternity leave include: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and the District of Columbia. The Family and Medical Leave Act offers parents 12 weeks of unpaid leave with job protections.