
Piyush Goyal meets J-K traders, discuss strategies to sustain industrial development in cold chain, agro-processing sectors
The meeting focused on strategies to sustain industrial development in the cold chain and agro-processing sectors, crucial for strengthening J-K's agricultural economy and boosting exports.
'Today, I met with representatives of the Jammu-Kashmir Fruits and Vegetable Processing and Integrated Cold Chain Association (JKPICCA) in Srinagar. During this, discussions were held on strategies to sustain industrial development in the cold chain and agro-processing sectors, which are extremely important for strengthening J&K's agricultural economy and boosting exports,' Minister Goyal wrote in a post on X.https://x.com/PiyushGoyal/status/1941775489296719913
Earlier today, Goyal addressed the FTII: Traders Conclave - 2025 in Srinagar and promised to work for the a reduction in the Goods and Services Tax imposed on handicrafts and handloom products to help promote the sector.
'The issue of GST levied on handicrafts and handlooms was brought to my attention by two or three system delegations. I have suggested that they submit an application regarding this matter to the Finance Ministry as well as to me so that we can explore what relief can be provided. We will try to reduce the GST rate from 12 per cent to 5 per cent on these items, which would help promote the handloom and handicraft sectors -- especially in Jammu & Kashmir. We will make efforts to find a way forward in this regard,' he said.
The Union Minister said that Jammu and Kashmir will soon get a Centre of Excellence for Packaging and Design.
'I have directed officials to explore possibilities in collaboration with the Indian Institute of Packaging to initiate a project focused on quality packaging and design. They have been requested to identify a suitable location where this initiative can be launched at the earliest,' he said.
Further, the Union Minister said that representatives have discussed setting up a Centre of Excellence (CoE) focused on storage technology, cold chain infrastructure, and encouraging startups and new talent.
Goyal also assured that he will discuss with the NTPC and Solar Energy Corporation to establish a solar lighting or power generation facility in the area to help producers to export their products as a green product to get a greater prices.
He had also held detailed discussions with the MSME Development Forum, Jammu-Kashmir, regarding various suggestions to promote local enterprises. (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Revanth says Banakacherla project not discussed, will visit Delhi twice a month to protect Telangana's interests
Telangana Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy clarified that the Jal Shakti Ministry itself confirmed there was no discussion on the Banakacherla project during the inter-State meeting on Wednesday (July 16, 2025) where both the Telangana and Andhra Pradesh Chief Ministers participated in the presence of Union Jal Shakthi Minister C.R. Patil. 'How can problems be solved without discussions with the Centre?' questioned Mr. Revanth. 'Even India and Pakistan hold talks on water distribution. What's wrong if I speak to the neighbouring State's CM? This is about the people's interests, not political showmanship,' he said in an informal interaction with reporters in New Delhi on Thursday (July 17, 2025). Taking a swipe at the Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS), he said, 'I am not an engineer. Decisions will come after technical studies. People gave me the authority to work with the Central government. Should I go to farmhouse or New Delhi to get the issues resolved?' he asked, taking a jibe at former Chief Minister K. Chandrashekar Rao. He also announced his intent to visit New Delhi twice a month to work in coordination with various Union Ministries, as continuous dialogue with the Centre was essential to protect Telangana's interests, particularly on crucial issues like water sharing. Telangana CM plans to meet Maharashtra CM Mr. Reddy also confirmed plans to meet the Maharashtra Chief Minister on the Tummidihatti project soon. 'When KCR met with Chandrababu and Jaganmohan Reddy, he claimed it as a victory. Now they say it's wrong if I meet them [A.P. leaders]. If I don't attend these meetings, who will present Telangana's case before the Centre?,' he asked. Continuing his attack on the BRS leadership, Mr. Reddy alleged that BRS working president K.T. Rama Rao's close circles were involved in drug abuse. 'KTR's friend Kedar died of a drug overdose in Dubai, and we secured the forensic report to Telangana,' he claimed. The Chief Minister further attacked KTR saying that his sister K. Kavitha was not willing to accept her brother's leadership and has exposed the internal bickering. 'KTR ran away when I challenged him for a debate in the past.' The Chief Minister also questioned the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) inaction, despite evidence, in cases like the sheep distribution scam, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) irregularities, and the Formula E race. 'The ED has taken the evidence we gathered, yet there is no arrest of KCR, KTR or Harish Rao,' he said, accusing the Union Minister G. Kishan Reddy of not following up with the concerned Ministry. On the ongoing investigations in Telangana, he said investigations against KCR, KTR, and Harish Rao will continue. 'The High Court is looking into the phone-tapping issue,' he said.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
Is India mulling a change to the MRP formula? Why?
India is mulling overhauling the existing Maximum Retail Price (MRP) regime. The Union consumer affairs department is reportedly looking to work out a formula that ensures both consumer affordability and manufacturer profitability read more Have you heard of that friend or family member who has fought with a storekeeper for charging more than the MRP (Maximum Retail Price) printed on it? Chances are you have; after all, most Indians have been taught to never pay a rupee more than what's printed on the pack. But have you ever given MRP a second thought — how is it decided? Who decides it? Now, as the government considers a major overhaul of the maximum retail price (MRP) pricing, we take a closer look at everything MRP-related. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What is MRP? Maximum Retail Price (MRP) was introduced in 1990 by the Ministry of Civil Supplies, Department of Legal Metrology. According to the Indian Consumer Goods Act, 2006, a MRP refers to the price at which the packed product shall be sold in the retail market, and this price shall include all taxes levied on the product. The MRP for a product is decided by its manufacturer or seller of the product, taking into account various factors such as production costs, marketing expenses, and profit margin. As the name suggests, it is the maximum that a customer will have to pay for the product. It is important to note that MRP is different from the Suggested Retail Price (SRP), which is a price that is recommended by the manufacturer or seller as a fair price for the product. The SRP is not necessarily the price at which the product is actually sold, and retailers may choose to sell the product at a lower or higher price depending on various factors such as competition and market demand. MRP in India is only levied on packed commodities and not services. Moreover, many commodities in India aren't packed — take for instance, your fruits, vegetables, rice, pulses, which are sold 'loose'. Many experts note that the purpose of introducing MRP was to prevent tax evasion and protect consumers from profiteering by retailers. Before the amendment, manufacturers could print either the maximum retail price (inclusive of all taxes) or the retail price (local taxes extra). How is MRP calculated in India? In India, the MRP is decided by the manufacturer or retailer. To decide upon a figure, the retailer takes various factors into consideration: product's actual cost+ profit margin+ cost and freight margin+ distributor margin+ retailer margin + GST+ transportation+ advertisement expense+ other expenses. In some cases, MRP may be regulated by law and may be determined by the government or other regulatory bodies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why is the government now looking to overhaul MRP? A report in the Mint states that the government is now looking to re-evaluate MRP. The report states that the Union consumer affairs department held a meeting with industry associations, consumer bodies and tax officials about the plan. But why, you ask? The move to overhaul MRP, as officials state, is to prevent manufacturers marking up retail prices steeply. The officials told Mint that the consumer affairs department is looking into whether there should be guidelines on linking MRP to the cost of making and marketing items including essential commodities, packaged goods, and daily use consumer products. An Indian woman fills her trolley with retail products as she shops at a department store in Mumbai. The law mandates that all packaged goods must have a MRP label. Representational image/Reuters Many note that the MRP formula in India is archaic and needs an overhaul. Critics point to the fact that often times products are irrationally priced. For instance, a packet of juice costs Rs 50. But, there's another juice right next to in the store that costs Rs 150, despite the fact that the two juices weigh the same and taste the same. Officials argue that there's no clear formula or benchmark to check if the MRP stated is reasonable. There's also the issue of inflated pricing. There are several instances when retailers price a product at Rs 1000 so they can offer huge discounts later. As one official was quoted telling the Mint, 'If a product has an MRP of Rs 5,000 but is sold at Rs 2,500 after a 50 per cent discount, the question arises — why was such a high price printed on the tag in the first place? If the retailer is earning a profit by selling it at Rs 2,500, the original MRP appears inflated. Does that mean the 50 per cent discount was merely a tactic to attract consumers? We are exploring all such cases in consultation with the industry, especially since the retailer is legally allowed to sell the product at its declared MRP.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD One official told the Mint that the objective wasn't pricing control but to ensure that pricing is reasonable. Some argue that the maximum retail price is an archaic mechanism and should be replaced with Suggested Retail Price (SRP) or Recommended Retail Price. Representational image/Pixabay Will an MRP overhaul be possible? But while the government has shown keenness to change MRP, not everyone is on board. Many manufacturers and retailers saw no need to change the existing system. They argued that India is a highly price-sensitive market and MRP helps people know exactly how much they should pay. Some also argued that linking retail price to costs will prompt some businesses to discontinue certain products, which will affect their availability to the consumer. Many also noted that rather than overhauling MRP, certain interventions needed to be made to make it more transparent and customer-friendly. In a report, Finshots noted that could switch from MRP to a Suggested Retail Price (SRP) or Recommended Retail Price (RRP) system like in the US and Europe. This way, retailers have some flexibility to adjust prices based on their own costs. So if a shop in a remote village has higher transport costs, they can charge a bit more and be upfront about it. Meanwhile, shoppers still know the baseline price set by the government, so they're not in the dark. Overhauling MRP could also be problematic from a tax point of view. Whatever alternative is chosen would have to align with Goods and Services Tax (GST) structure. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It's left to be seen what happens next — but for now, keep ensuring that you aren't paying more than the MRP. With inputs from agencies


News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
‘Securing Energy Needs Is Our Priority': India On NATO Chief's Warning For Buying Russian Oil
Last Updated: India responded to NATO's warning of sanctions for buying Russian oil, stressing India's priority to secure energy needs and warning against double standards. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Thursday responded to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's stark warning that India could face 'severe secondary sanctions" for buying Russian oil, saying that securing energy needs is an overriding priority for New Delhi. The ministry further said that New Delhi is guided by what is on offer in the markets, and by the prevailing global circumstances. It further said that India will particularly caution against any double standards on the matter. 'We have seen reports on the subject and are closely following the developments. Let me reiterate that securing energy needs of our people is understandably an overriding priority for us. In this endeavor, we are guided by what is on offer in the markets, and by the prevailing global circumstances. We would particularly caution against any double standards on the matter," MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said while addressing the press briefing. #WATCH | Delhi | On Nato chief Mark Rutte's comment that countries buying Russian oil could face secondary sanctions, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal says, 'We have seen reports on the subject and are closely following the developments. Let me reiterate that securing the energy… — ANI (@ANI) July 17, 2025 The MEA's response came a day after NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte warned India along with Brazil and China about buying Russian oil, cautioning that they could face severe secondary sanctions and penalties if they continue doing business with Moscow. While speaking to reporters after meeting US senators on Wednesday, Rutte urged leaders in Delhi, Beijing and Brasilia to press Russian President Vladimir Putin to take peace negotiations seriously. His remarks came a day after US President Donald Trump unveiled a new weapons package for Ukraine and threatened 'biting" secondary tariffs of 100% on buyers of Russian exports unless a peace agreement is reached within 50 days. 'My encouragement to these three countries, particularly is, if you live now in Beijing, or in Delhi, or you are the president of Brazil, you might want to take a look into this, because this might hit you very hard," Rutte told reporters. He had met with Trump on Monday and endorsed the new measures. 'So please make the phone call to Vladimir Putin and tell him that he has to get serious about peace talks, because otherwise this will slam back on Brazil, on India and on China in a massive way," he added. Since the Russia-Ukraine war in February 2022, India has ramped up the purchase of discounted Russian oil. As Russian energy exports are central to the country's economy, and Putin's war-waging capabilities, many Western leaders and commentators have frequently criticised India. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.