Billionaire Warren Buffett Has a $348 Billion Dilemma -- and His Decision Is Only Getting Tougher
There isn't a money manager on Wall Street who garners more attention from professional and everyday investors than Berkshire Hathaway 's (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) billionaire CEO Warren Buffett. When you deliver an aggregate return for your company's Class A shares (BRK.A) of better than 5,910,000% over six decades (as of the closing bell on June 11), you're going to draw a crowd.
But the aptly dubbed "Oracle of Omaha" is also 94 years old and readying to hang up his proverbial work coat. During Berkshire's annual shareholder meeting in early May, Buffett announced his plan to step down as the company's CEO by the end of the year and hand over the reins to predetermined successor Greg Abel.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Though Warren Buffett's time at the helm is limited, it doesn't change the fact that he's facing a $348 billion dilemma, which is seemingly getting tougher by the day.
Warren Buffett has been a net seller of stocks since October 2022
Most investors follow Buffett to get a bead on which stocks he's been buying and selling -- with far more interest in the former than the latter. Riding his coattails has been a profitable investing strategy for decades.
While Buffett has, indeed, been purchasing shares of select companies on a quarterly basis, the theme of the last two and a half years is that of Berkshire's chief being a net seller of equities.
Berkshire Hathaway's quarterly operating results contain a detailed consolidated cash flow statement that specifically lists "purchases of equity securities" and "sales of equity securities." Some simple arithmetic can allow anyone to decipher whether or not the Oracle of Omaha and his top investment advisors were net buyers or sellers of stocks in the latest quarter.
During the March-ended quarter, Warren Buffett sold $1.494 billion more in stocks than was purchased. This marked the 10th consecutive quarter -- a stretch spanning from Oct. 1, 2022 to March 31, 2025 -- where Buffett was a net seller of stocks. On a cumulative basis, Berkshire's head honcho has disposed of $174.4 billion more in stocks than was purchased over this 30-month timeline.
All the while, the roughly five dozen businesses Berkshire owns have remained sustainably profitable and continue to generate positive cash from operations. Put this net cash generation together with Buffett's persistent net-selling activity and you get Berkshire Hathaway's cash pile (which includes U.S. Treasuries) ballooning to $347.7 billion.
For most companies, an exorbitant cash pile would be a luxury. But for Berkshire Hathaway's lead investor, it's indicative of a dilemma that shows no signs of resolution anytime soon.
Buffett is an unwavering value investor who's navigating a historically pricey stock market
In an ideal world, the Oracle of Omaha would prefer to put most of his company's capital to work via large investments or acquisitions that would move the needle. Keep in mind that at least $30 billion in combined cash, cash equivalents, and U.S. Treasuries needs to remain on Berkshire's balance sheet to conduct share buybacks, so Buffett won't be dipping below (or generally close to) this level.
However, Berkshire's top investor is also unwavering in his desire to get a good deal. Regardless of a company's competitive advantages or rich history, Warren Buffett won't chase pricey stocks higher. He'll patiently sit on his hands and wait for price dislocations to crop up before diving in.
Despite Berkshire's cash pile growing to a record $348 billion, Buffett has little-to-no incentive to put this capital to work amid the historic priciness of the stock market.
Nearly a quarter of a century ago, in an interview with Fortune magazine, Buffett referred to the market cap-to-GDP ratio as "probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment." This valuation tool, which aggregates the value of all publicly traded stocks and divides it by U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), has come to be known as the " Buffett Indicator."
Warren Buffett Indicator jumps to 200% and is now just 2 percentage points away from the most expensive stock market valuation in history 🚨🚨 pic.twitter.com/Qajxn2B2JM
-- Barchart (@Barchart) June 10, 2025
When back-tested to 1970, the Buffett Indicator has averaged a reading of approximately 85%, which means the total value of all publicly traded stocks has equated to 85% of U.S. GDP. However, as of the closing bell on June 10, the Buffett Indicator was a few hundredths shy of 202%! It's also within a stone's throw of its all-time high of 205.55%, which was set in mid-February.
Another broad-stroke valuation tool that demonstrates what little value can be found on Wall Street at the moment is the S&P 500 's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) Shiller price-to-earnings (P/E) Ratio, which may also be referred to as the cyclically adjusted P/E Ratio (CAPE Ratio). The Shiller P/E is based on average inflation-adjusted earnings over the prior 10 years.
When back-tested to January 1871, the average Shiller P/E multiple is a touch over 17. As of the closing bell on June 11, the Shiller P/E sported a multiple of more than 37. Although this is down from a peak reading of 38.89 during the current bull market cycle, it marks the third-priciest multiple spanning 154 years.
While the Shiller P/E offers no guidance on when stock market corrections will commence, it does have a flawless track record of foreshadowing eventual downside of 20% or more in Wall Street's major stock indexes, including the S&P 500, when surpassing a multiple of 30.
Patience is a virtue and a path to profits for the Oracle of Omaha
Historically, putting Berkshire Hathaway's capital to work has helped the company grow its sales and/or profits. But until valuation multiples stop going up, it's unlikely that Warren Buffett will be doing much of anything on the investment front, which suggests Berkshire's cash pile is going to continue to expand.
However, this isn't necessarily a bad thing -- even if investors are growing weary of the Oracle of Omaha's net-selling activity.
To use a baseball analogy, Buffett's outsized investment returns aren't a function of swinging at a lot of pitches. Even though Berkshire Hathaway has more than enough capital that Buffett could, in theory, swing for the fences on a daily basis, his success has been based on waiting for the right pitch to enter his wheelhouse.
Regardless of how long it takes, Buffett and his successor Greg Abel have demonstrated a willingness to remain on the sidelines until valuations make sense.
For example, Buffett has been purchasing shares of satellite-radio operator Sirius XM Holdings (NASDAQ: SIRI), whose forward P/E ratio of a little over 7 is just shy of its all-time low as a publicly traded company of 31 years. Though Buffett's investment in Sirius XM isn't needle-moving, it's representative of the principles to which Buffett has aligned his investment philosophy. Sirius XM's legal monopoly status ensures its moat, and the company's ultra-low forward P/E presents as a price dislocation amid a historically expensive market.
As I've pointed out before, patience paid off handsomely in August 2011 for Berkshire Hathaway and its shareholders when Buffett orchestrated a deal to infuse Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) with $5 billion to shore up its balance sheet. In return, Buffett's company netted $5 billion in BofA preferred stock yielding 6% annually, as well as warrants to purchase up to 700 million shares of Bank of America common stock at $7.14 per share. These warrants were executed in the summer of 2017, leading to an instant (unrealized) profit of $12 billion for Berkshire.
Eventually, the lion's share of Berkshire Hathaway's $348 billion in cash will be put to work -- but this won't happen until price dislocations or unique, needle-moving situations present themselves.
Should you invest $1,000 in Berkshire Hathaway right now?
Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
7 minutes ago
- CTV News
Tariff ‘stacking' adds another headache for U.S. importers
John Hamer, president of Rodgers Wade Manufacturing in Paris, Texas, makes store fixtures for big retailers like Ross Dress for Less and Ulta Beauty. He sources many of the goods from China, which until recently meant he paid 70% in tariffs on metal fixtures. 'The media was saying it was 30%, but that was never true,' he said, referring to the tariff rate for China announced in May as part of a truce between the Trump administration and Beijing as it negotiated a broader deal. That's because Hamer's 30% tariff was stacked on top of existing tariffs, including a tariff on Chinese steel products that varies depending on the amount of steel used in a fixture. When U.S. President Donald Trump adds a new tariff the old ones don't go away. Some companies will pay far more because of a phenomenon called tariff stacking, the latest complication for U.S. importers trying to navigate Trump's on-again, off-again trade war. The reality for many U.S. businesses is that their tariff bills are often far higher than the headline number touted in trade talks. Tariff stacking applies to any country exporting to the U.S., but the most extreme cases tend to be with China, where the U.S. has accumulated a long list of sometimes hefty existing tariffs, implemented under different provisions of U.S. trade law. The latest twist is an announcement that the two sides have agreed to a 55% tariff, but that's in part only an estimate of what the average pre-existing tariffs were. Hamer isn't sure what his tariff total will be now, but he figures it couldn't get much worse. 'Hopefully this will bring the (tariff) number down - and some of the clients who've been sitting on the sidelines will go ahead and place orders,' he said, 'because it's been all over the map.' 'Here's the tariff bill' Hamer is searching for suppliers outside China to avoid his stacked tariffs. He's checked Mexico and is planning a trip to India next month as part of the effort. In the meantime, he is passing through all the tariffs. 'The customers pay the tariff,' said Hamer. 'When it comes in, we say, 'Here's the tariff bill.'' Many businesses are still hoping for a reprieve from President Donald Trump's trade war. Federal courts, including the U.S. Court of International Trade, have ruled that Trump's imposition of tariffs exceeded his authority. A federal appeals court is considering the administration's appeal to that ruling, and the tariffs remain in effect while that plays out, a process expected to take months. Some are counting on tariff exemptions, a popular tool used by companies during the first Trump administration to get goods imported without the taxes. Michael Weidner, president of Lalo Baby Products in Brooklyn, is one of them. 'We believe there should be an exemption for baby products,' he said. 'Same with toys.' The Trump administration has said it will resist creating such carve-outs. And even during the last trade war, it was a complex process. For instance, Lalo imports a 'play table' from China that happens to be classified under a customs category that was subject to a 25% tariff under a part of trade law that aims to fight unfair trade practices. So Weidner has been paying 55% tariffs on those, thanks to stacking. Trump campaigned on a vow to use tariffs to pull manufacturing back to U.S. shores and collect revenue to help fund a major tax cut. His battle with China quickly spiraled into a conflagration with the U.S. imposing a 145% across-the-board tariff that shut down much of the trade between the world's two largest economies. The agreement to curb the tariffs is part of a larger effort to negotiate individual deals with most of the U.S.'s trading partners. Passing costs through On Wednesday, a White House official said the 55% figure represents a sum of a baseline 10% 'reciprocal' tariff Trump has imposed on goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the U.S.; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term. 'It sounds like that's the way he's thinking of the baseline - 55% - at least for some products,' said Greta Peisch, a trade lawyer at Wiley Rein in Washington. Ramon van Meer's business selling filtered shower heads from China may yet survive the trade war, though he's not certain. That depends entirely on whether he can can manage the multiple tariffs placed on his $159 shower heads, which became a viral sensation on Instagram. When the Trump administration trimmed tariffs on China to 30% in May, van Meer's tariff bill was actually 43%. That's because the 30% tariff was stacked on top of an existing 13% tariff. It's an improvement over the 145% tariffs slapped on Chinese imports in April, when he halted shipments entirely. 'At least I can afford to pay it,' said van Meer, chief executive of Afina, based in Austin, Texas, referring to his latest calculations. 'And I don't have to raise the price by that much.' (Reporting by Timothy Aeppel in New York with additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington. Editing by Dan Burns and Michael Learmonth)
Globe and Mail
25 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Tenable Recognized for AI Leadership with Globee Award for AI-Powered Security
COLUMBIA, Md., June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Tenable®, the exposure management company, today announced that Tenable Vulnerability Management has been recognized with a prestigious 2025 Globee® Award for AI-Powered Vulnerability Management. This latest accolade underscores Tenable's market leadership, delivering advanced exposure management solutions that revolutionize the way organizations identify, prioritize and remediate cyber risk. 'This achievement is a testament to Tenable's commitment to innovation and to helping customers secure modern and emerging attack surfaces,' said Eric Doerr, chief product officer, Tenable. 'We're arming cyber defenders with innovative AI-powered exposure management solutions to get ahead of the risks before they can be exploited.' Tenable Vulnerability Management uses AI and the power of Nessus technology to analyze threat intelligence, asset criticality and vulnerability data. The enhanced visibility, predictive insights, and intelligent prioritization from Tenable enable organizations to rapidly identify emerging threats and effectively reduce risk. Tenable Vulnerability Management was also recently awarded the AI-powered vulnerability management category of the 2025 Cybersecurity Excellence Awards, further validating Tenable's AI-powered approach to proactive security. In addition to using AI to power its exposure management solutions, Tenable is also accelerating its ability to help customers safely innovate by securing the AI they use and the AI they build. This month, Tenable acquired Apex Security, a breakthrough innovator in securing the rapidly expanding AI attack surface. Building on the foundation set with Tenable AI Aware and embedded AI security posture management (AI-SPM) capabilities, the acquisition will strengthen the Tenable One exposure management platform by providing deeper visibility and control, and the ability to govern usage, enforce policy and control exposure across all AI initiatives. About Tenable Tenable® is the exposure management company, exposing and closing the cybersecurity gaps that erode business value, reputation and trust. The company's AI-powered exposure management platform radically unifies security visibility, insight and action across the attack surface, equipping modern organizations to protect against attacks from IT infrastructure to cloud environments to critical infrastructure and everywhere in between. By protecting enterprises from security exposure, Tenable reduces business risk for approximately 44,000 customers around the globe. Learn more at
Globe and Mail
25 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Forget Palantir and Buy These 2 Tech Stocks Instead?
Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) has emerged as a leading artificial intelligence company, offering AI data analytics to the U.S. government and businesses. And the company is growing quickly, with sales rising 39% to $884 million and adjusted earnings increasing 63% to $0.13 per share in the first quarter. That second figure is especially notable because many AI start-ups aren't profitable, making Palantir an exception among many of its peers. Its success has helped propel the company's share price to dizzying heights, gaining nearly 500% over the past year. But this rapid rise means that its stock is now extremely expensive, trading at a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 574. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Paying such a high premium typically isn't a wise decision. So, here are two other AI companies that are leaders as well, at a much lower premium. 1. Nvidia Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) doesn't need an introduction for anyone who follows the tech sector closely, but it's worth highlighting some of the strengths of the company to show just how dominant it is in AI. Here are a few highlights: Its AI accelerators are in an estimated 70% to 95% of the world's AI data centers. The company's data center revenue spiked 73% in the first quarter to $39 billion and adjusted earnings rose 33% to $0.81 per share in the first quarter. Even with all of its growth, CEO Jensen Huang said that "Global demand for Nvidia's AI infrastructure is incredibly strong." Its financial performance remains very strong, and the company has little competition in AI data center processors. While there have been some rumblings of tech companies backing away from spending in this category, a slowdown has yet to happen. Data center spending will reach $1.1 trillion in 2029, double what companies were spending last year, according to the analysis website Network World. It's worth noting that Nvidia's stock has a P/E of 46, which means it's not necessarily cheap. Still, it's far less pricey than Palantir, and the company arguably has a much bigger competitive moat in AI than Palantir does. 2. Microsoft It's easy to overlook Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) because it has seemingly been around forever. But while younger AI companies may attract a lot of attention, Microsoft is already benefiting from AI and continues to be a leading player in cloud computing. Its Azure cloud computing service now has a 21% market share in its market, making gains against Amazon, which holds 30% of the market. Cloud services sales spiked 35% in its fiscal third quarter (which ended March 31), showing that the company continues to find new ways to increase demand in this area. And management wisely invested in OpenAI early, giving the company access to ChatGPT when it debuted. Since then, Microsoft has integrated the chatbot into many of its services, giving it an edge over other tech giants that are still trying to catch the AI wave (I'm looking at you, Apple). That's one of the reasons why the stock has jumped 42% over the past two years, while Apple's has gained just 12%. With its early moves into AI coupled with the company's strong cloud business, Microsoft is poised to continue benefiting as artificial intelligence expands. And with the stock having a P/E of just 36, it's far less expensive than Palantir. Palantir has a good product that is profiting from AI, but I think buying the company's stock when it's so expensive could be a mistake. There are plenty of other tech companies benefiting from AI with share prices that are far less frothy, with Nvidia and Microsoft being two of the best right now. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Chris Neiger has positions in Apple. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
