Trump's becoming the Basil Fawlty of American tourism
Fat chance. As the world's witnessed with international sport over the decades, the notion that it and world events can be separated has proved historically risible, and now we witness overseas travel becoming markedly more politicised.
Nowhere is it more starkly illustrated than what appears to be the weaponisation of tourism for political purposes by the US Trump administration and its facilitators, who appear to be Googling overtime in search of any criticism of the president and his policies.
This article, and others I've written critical of US treatment of tourists under the Trump administration in my role as travel editor of the Herald and the Age, will likely render any visit by me to the States a risky proposition.
I'm not complaining. For me it's no loss, as it's still a wide, wonderful and mostly welcoming world out there, and word has it that our far more rational Canadian friends could do with a little antipodean love in the form of a holiday there.
Loading
So forget about yours truly and consider the recent case of a reader of the Traveller title of the above publications.
Only a few hours before the departure of his flight earlier this month to visit his daughter in the States, Australian Bruce Hyland received notice from US immigration authorities that he would not be permitted to enter the country. This news came after earlier having been approved to visit.
'No reason for a cancellation was provided [for the decision to refuse entry],' Hyland writes in his Traveller letter, 'so one is in the Kafkaesque situation of having breached some official procedure, while having no way to appeal the decision or determine what that procedure could be.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
29 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Congress seeks Morrison's advice on China. Just don't mention tariffs
Washington | There was a contradiction at the heart of a bunch of US politicians seeking help on how to stand up to China's economic coercion, but it took an hour and a half before someone finally nailed it. 'Is the current tariffs policy that we are seeing from the Trump administration, quite frankly, playing into China's hands?' Democrat representative Jill Tokuda asked former Australian prime minister Scott Morrison.
The Advertiser
29 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
US beef unlikely to flood Australia as ban lifted
Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally.
The Advertiser
29 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Overseas travellers are paying an extra $80 when they don't have to
Picture: Shutterstock Use a card with no international fees Set up your PIN before you leave for your holiday Don't withdraw money at airport currency exchange kiosks Pay in the local currency Foreign transaction fees are surely the bane of every overseas traveller's existence. You often forget about them until you have to pay for something - or worse, until you get home and see your credit card bill. Subscribe now for unlimited access. or signup to continue reading All articles from our website The digital version of Today's Paper All other in your area I experienced this on a recent trip to Europe, but more on that later. New research from shows almost 60 per cent of Australian travellers paid foreign transaction fees on their most recent overseas holiday, costing them $80 on average. A third of those were slugged with charges of $100 or more. says foreign transaction fees - charges banks apply when you use your card overseas or make a purchase in a foreign currency - typically range from 1 per cent to 3 per cent of the transaction amount. These charges can quickly add up. If you spend $5000 overseas, a 3 per cent foreign transaction fee adds up to $150 in unnecessary charges. Saving on international fees puts more money in your pocket for seeing the sights. Picture: Shutterstock finance expert, Sean Callery, says these fees are one of the most overlooked travel expenses and one of the easiest to avoid if you're willing to shop around. "Most people look for savings on flights, accommodation and travel insurance - but forget about international transaction fees," he says. There are plenty of credit cards and debit cards on the market that don't charge international transaction fees. Some allow you to see your balance and spending in both local currency and AUD, as well as the conversion rate, so you can control your spending. But there are other ways you can avoid hefty bank fees, too. Here are Explore and top tips to avoid those pesky fees. Use a card with no international fees Australians can pick from more than 30 debit and credit cards that charge no foreign transaction fees, Mr Callery said. Switch before you travel and save up to 3 per cent on every purchase or ATM withdrawal you make overseas or online in a foreign currency. Don't forget to set up your PIN Before my Europe trip, I obtained a travel money card. But once overseas, I realised I could only tap and pay up to a maximum of AU$100 and once over this cap, I had to punch in my PIN. The problem was, I hadn't set up my PIN before leaving Australia, so I used my other card for larger payments and ended up being slugged with the very fees I was trying to avoid. Make sure you set up your PIN before you travel. Avoid overseas ATMs with extra fees Mr Callery advises sticking to partner banks or major networks when withdrawing cash abroad. Some ATMs also charge their own fees on top of what your bank may add, so it's a good idea to check with your bank about fee-free global ATM partners or daily withdrawal charges. "Avoid withdrawing cash using a credit card as high cash advance rates and fees typically apply," he says Always pay in the local currency There are instances overseas when you might be asked whether you want to pay in Australian dollars or the local currency. Always choose the local currency, Mr Callery says. Picture: Shutterstock If you pick AUD, the merchant's payment system handles the conversion using its own exchange rate, which will trigger dynamic currency conversion, and this often adds hidden fees, he says. Avoid currency exchange kiosks at airports "Airport currency counters have some of the worst exchange rates and fees," Mr Callery says. "If you need cash, withdraw a small amount from a reputable ATM abroad using a debit card or use a prepaid travel card." Words by Sarah Falson Sarah is ACM's travel producer. She believes regional travel is just as fun (if not better) than staying in the big cities and loves any travel experience to do with nature, animals and food!.My all-time favourite destination is ... Cornwall. From the giant seagulls to the blustery beaches, Cornish pasties and fishing villages, it stirs something romantic and seafaring in me. Next on my bucket list is … Mongolia. I want to go somewhere really unique that feels totally foreign and challenges my way of life. My top travel tip is … Don't plan too much. Walk the streets and let it happen. And make sure you check out what's within a few blocks of your hotel - sometimes the best local food is found that way.
